REVIEW 5 cited by
Evaluating Scenario-based Decision-making for Interactive Autonomous Driving Using Rational Criteria: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Evaluating Scenario-based Decision-making for Interactive Autonomous Driving Using Rational Criteria: A Survey
read the original abstract
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) can significantly promote the advances in road transport mobility in terms of safety, reliability, and decarbonization. However, ensuring safety and efficiency in interactive during within dynamic and diverse environments is still a primary barrier to large-scale AV adoption. In recent years, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has emerged as an advanced AI-based approach, enabling AVs to learn decision-making strategies adaptively from data and interactions. DRL strategies are better suited than traditional rule-based methods for handling complex, dynamic, and unpredictable driving environments due to their adaptivity. However, varying driving scenarios present distinct challenges, such as avoiding obstacles on highways and reaching specific exits at intersections, requiring different scenario-specific decision-making algorithms. Many DRL algorithms have been proposed in interactive decision-making. However, a rationale review of these DRL algorithms across various scenarios is lacking. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation is essential to assess these algorithms from multiple perspectives, including those of vehicle users and vehicle manufacturers. This survey reviews the application of DRL algorithms in autonomous driving across typical scenarios, summarizing road features and recent advancements. The scenarios include highways, on-ramp merging, roundabouts, and unsignalized intersections. Furthermore, DRL-based algorithms are evaluated based on five rationale criteria: driving safety, driving efficiency, training efficiency, unselfishness, and interpretability (DDTUI). Each criterion of DDTUI is specifically analyzed in relation to the reviewed algorithms. Finally, the challenges for future DRL-based decision-making algorithms are summarized.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Enhanced Mean Field Game for Interactive Decision-Making with Varied Stylish Multi-Vehicles
A mean-field-game lane-change planner with six hand-set driving styles claims collision-free simulation results, but its promised NGSIM calibration and baseline comparisons do not appear in the body.
-
Adaptive Evolution Factor Risk Ellipse Framework for Reliable and Safe Autonomous Driving
An adaptive risk-field-plus-MPC controller with a sigmoid evolution factor and TTC/TWH-based risk ellipses is claimed to achieve collision-free overtaking and lane changes in simulation.
-
Safe and Efficient Lane-Changing for Autonomous Vehicles: An Improved Double Quintic Polynomial Approach with Time-to-Collision Evaluation
An optimization-based double quintic lane-change planner that penalizes low time-to-collision is proposed and tested in simulation.
-
Context-Aware Multi-Turn Visual-Textual Reasoning in LVLMs via Dynamic Memory and Adaptive Visual Guidance
The proposed CAMVR framework is not supported by verifiable evidence, and the manuscript itself labels its experimental results as fabricated.
-
Scenario-based Decision-making Using Game Theory for Interactive Autonomous Driving: A Survey
A scenario-based survey of game-theoretic autonomous driving decision-making that claims comprehensiveness but is undermined by a non-systematic methodology and numerous internal errors.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.