pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2501.10551 · v4 · submitted 2025-01-17 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: unknown

An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essays

Alice Jang, Andrew Jelson, Daniel Dunlap, Daniel Manesh, Sang Won Lee, Young-Ho Kim

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords studentschatgptusagewritingtoolsdifferentessayfound
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

As large language models (LLMs) advance and become widespread, students increasingly turn to systems like ChatGPT for assistance with writing tasks. Educators are concerned with students' usage of ChatGPT beyond cheating; using ChatGPT may reduce their critical engagement with writing, hindering students' learning processes. The negative or positive impact of using LLM-powered tools for writing will depend on how students use them; however, how students use ChatGPT remains largely unknown, resulting in a limited understanding of its impact on learning. To better understand how students use these tools, we conducted an online study $(n=70)$ where students were given an essay-writing task using a custom platform we developed to capture the queries they made to ChatGPT. To characterize their ChatGPT usage, we categorized each of the queries students made to ChatGPT. We then analyzed the relationship between ChatGPT usage and a variety of other metrics, including students' self-perception, attitudes towards AI, and the resulting essay itself. We found that factors such as gender, race, and perceived self-efficacy can help predict different AI usage patterns. Additionally, we found that different usage patterns were associated with varying levels of enjoyment and perceived ownership over the essay. The results of this study contribute to discussions about how writing education should incorporate generative AI-powered tools in the classroom.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NIRVANA: A Comprehensive Dataset for Reproducing How Students Use Generative AI for Essay Writing

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NIRVANA supplies keystroke-level logs, complete ChatGPT dialogues, and copied content from 77 students to reconstruct AI-assisted essay writing and classify students into four behavioral profiles: Lead Authors, Collab...

  2. Characterizing Students' LLM Usage Behaviors and Their Association with Learning in Critical Thinking Tasks

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Refined bottom-up categories of LLM usage in critical thinking homework, labeled by student initiative, are examined for associations with midterm performance across two course offerings.

  3. The Crutch or the Ceiling? How Different Generations of LLMs Shape EFL Student Writings

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Advanced LLMs improve EFL writing scores and diversity for lower-proficiency students but correlate with lower expert ratings on deep coherence, acting more as crutches than scaffolds.