Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Successive Interference Cancellation-aided Diffusion Models for Joint Channel Estimation and Data Detection in Low Rank Channel Scenarios

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A SIC-aided diffusion receiver jointly estimates channels and detects data in low-rank MIMO systems where users outnumber antennas.

desk verdict Promising SIC-plus-diffusion idea for overloaded MIMO that is undermined by an internally inconsistent MAP derivation in Section 3. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11229 v1 pith:B337KBKP submitted 2025-01-20 cs.CV cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT

Sagnik Bhattacharya , Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin , Kamyar Rajabalifardi , John M. Cioffi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.ITeess.SPmath.IT
keywords successiveinterferencecancellationscore-baseddiffusionmodelsjointchannelestimationdatadetectionlow-rankMIMOmassiveLangevindynamicsMAP
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that joint channel estimation and data detection in MIMO uplinks remains feasible when the number of users meets or exceeds the number of receive antennas, a low-rank regime where prior diffusion-based receivers fail. Its proposed receiver splits the channel into near-square submatrices, learns the prior of each submatrix with a score-based diffusion (Langevin) model, and cancels interference between submatrices through successive interference cancellation with a decoding order updated from current channel gains. Simulations with a 3GPP channel model and a 64-user, 32-antenna configuration show lower normalized mean squared error and symbol error rate than learned D-AMP, joint Langevin diffusion, and linear MMSE baselines across all tested SNRs, with the largest advantage concentrated in the low-rank scenarios.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the SIC-aided score-based diffusion update over partial channel submatrices. The full channel matrix $H$ is split into $k = \lceil N_u/N_r \rceil$ blocks $H^{(i)}$ of size $N_r \times N_r$ each, and a diffusion network $s_\theta(H^{(i)}, \sigma_{i,H})$ is trained to estimate the score (gradient of the log-prior) of each block. The MAP objective is written as a sum over SIC stages, with later-stage users folded into a Gaussian noise covariance $\Sigma_i$, and the algorithm alternates between reordering users by current channel gain and updating each $H^{(i)}$ and data block $X_D^{(i)}$ with the gradients in Eqs. (4)-(5). The split is what makes the per-stage subproblem nearly full-rank, so the same diffusion machinery that works for massive MIMO can be applied in the overloaded regime.

What would settle it

Re-derive the gradient of the MAP objective in Eq. (2) with respect to a fixed $H^{(i)}$ for a two-stage system and compare term by term with Eq. (4); if any stage whose $H^{(j)}$ and $X^{(j)}$ do not appear in that objective's likelihood factor still contributes to the gradient sum, then the algorithm is maximizing a different objective than the one stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the failure of prior diffusion-based receivers in low-rank channels is not fundamental. By estimating the score of each $N_r \times N_r$ channel submatrix separately rather than the full channel, and by cancelling the contributions of already-decoded submatrices through successive interference cancellation, the remaining per-stage estimation problem is close to full rank and can be handled by the same Langevin-diffusion machinery that already works in massive MIMO. The paper derives a MAP objective that factorizes over SIC stages and an iterative update that alternates channel-submatrix estimation, data-symbol detection, and a decoding order based on current channel gains. The reported simulations show this receiver matching or beating learned D-AMP, joint Langevin diffusion, and LMMSE baselines in NMSE and SER for both rank-sufficient and rank-deficient channels, with the clearest advantage at low SNR and in the low-rank case.

Load-bearing premise

The whole iterative loop depends on treating users decoded later as Gaussian noise with a known covariance, and on the gradient formulas in Eqs. (4)-(5) really describing the stated MAP objective; if either is off, the loop may not solve the problem it claims to solve.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In overloaded uplink systems where users outnumber receive antennas, a receiver can estimate the channel and detect data with lower NMSE and SER than learned denoising, joint Langevin diffusion, or LMMSE baselines at every tested SNR.
  • The largest gains appear in low-rank channels and at low SNR, exactly where the baselines degrade most, so the method widens the operating range of diffusion-based receivers.
  • The dynamic SIC order, re-derived from current channel strengths, gives a practical rule for deciding which partial channels to estimate first as the channel estimates improve.
  • For a fixed pilot length, increasing the number of data symbols changes the SER, so the method remains usable as block length grows without requiring more pilots.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The submatrix-splitting trick is independent of the generative model, so the same SIC ordering and likelihood factorization could be combined with other learned priors, such as GANs or normalizing flows, rather than only score-based diffusion; the paper does not test this.
  • The channel-gain-based ordering is a heuristic; a decoding order optimized for post-cancellation signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio would likely improve the low-SNR gains further, but the paper does not explore it.
  • The reported gains come from simulations with one antenna ratio (64 users, 32 antennas) and perfect SIC assumptions, so how the gains degrade with imperfect cancellation or with more extreme ratios, such as eight users per antenna, remains an open question.
  • Because diffusion sampling is iterative, the improvement over L-MMSE and L-DAMP may come with a substantially higher computational cost; the paper does not report runtime or complexity comparisons, so practical deployment would need to trade the error gains against latency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a successive interference cancellation (SIC)-aided score-based diffusion algorithm for joint channel estimation and data detection in uplink MIMO systems where the number of users exceeds the number of access-point antennas. The channel matrix is split into full-rank submatrices, a score network is trained on the partial-channel priors, and the algorithm alternates between estimating channel submatrices, detecting symbol blocks, and updating a channel-gain-based SIC decoding order. Simulations on QuaDRiGa 3GPP channels compare normalized mean squared error and symbol error rate against LMMSE, L-DAMP, and Joint Langevin baselines in both full-rank and low-rank scenarios, reporting improvements across SNR.

Significance. If the reported results are correct, the paper addresses a genuine and understudied problem: standard massive MIMO receivers degrade when the number of users exceeds the number of antennas, and the proposed decomposition into approximately full-rank channel submatrices is a plausible way to adapt diffusion-based priors to this regime. The experimental setup uses a realistic 3GPP channel model and compares against several relevant baselines. However, the central algorithm is not well defined in the manuscript: the stated MAP objective is not a valid factorization of the joint posterior, the gradient updates do not follow from that objective, and the implementation details needed to reproduce the experiments are largely absent. The potential significance is therefore clear, but the current text does not establish a correct or reproducible method.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (2)-(3)] The MAP objective in Eqs. (2)-(3) is not a correct factorization of the joint posterior p(XD,H|Y,XP). For an SIC decoder, after decoding stages 1 through i-1, the residual is R_i = Y - sum_{l<i} H(l)X(l), and the stage-i likelihood should be a density for this residual, such as N(H(i)X(i), Sigma_i) with later users treated as noise. Equation (3) instead places the cumulative previous-signal sum H(i-1)X(i-1)+...+H(1)X(1) in the mean of a Gaussian for Y, which is inconsistent with the observation model Y=HX+Z and with the stated SIC residual. As a result, the objective being maximized is not the MAP objective for the system in Eq. (1).
  2. [Section 3, Eqs. (4)-(5)] Equations (4)-(5) are not the derivatives of the objective in Eq. (3). Differentiating the first term of Eq. (3) with respect to H(i) yields contributions only from stages j>i, since H(i) does not appear in the stage-i mean, and the residual that appears should be Y - sum_{l<j} H(l)X(l), not Y - H(j)X(j). The sums in Eqs. (4)-(5) start at j=i and use Y - H(j)X(j), so they solve a different optimization problem. Consequently, the iterative update rule that is claimed to maximize Eq. (3) is not correctly specified, and the algorithm that generated the simulation results is not uniquely defined by the manuscript.
  3. [Sections 3 and 4] The manuscript does not contain a complete algorithm specification. There is no pseudocode, no score-network architecture or training loss, no noise schedule, no Langevin step size or iteration count, and no convergence criterion for the SIC loop. Section 4 also does not state whether the 10,000 QuaDRiGa channel instances were split into training and test sets. Because the central claim is an empirical performance comparison, these omissions prevent reproduction and make it impossible to map the curves in Fig. 1 to a unique implementation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (3)] The covariance Sigma_i is written as "Sigma_i = Z + PU_{i+1} H(i)X(i)", which is not a valid covariance expression and P U is never defined. It should presumably be something like sigma_0^2 I + sum_{l>i} H(l)X(l)X(l)^H H(l)^H if later users are treated as noise.
  2. [Section 3] The notation for the SIC ordering is confusing: pi(i) is called the decoding order for user i, while pi^{-1}(i) is called the user index decoded at the ith stage, and later H(i) is defined using pi^{-1}(iNr:...). Please define the ordering and the grouping consistently.
  3. [Section 4] The first paragraph lists baselines [18, 13, 19], but the experimental description also cites [20]; please reconcile the reference list and clearly identify which baseline is used in each experiment.
  4. [Figure 1] The figure shows no markers, error bars, or confidence intervals on the NMSE and SER curves. Please specify the number of Monte Carlo runs and report the statistical spread of the results.
  5. [Section 4] The sentence "we observe that as XD increases, the SER efficacy increases" should be rephrased, since the SER should decrease as the number of data symbols grows under the stated comparison; please clarify the intended claim.
  6. [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract claims the method "outperforms the baseline methods" generally, but only three specific baselines are evaluated; please qualify the claim as applying to the evaluated baselines.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the empirical claims rest on external baselines and a standard learned prior; the Section 3 gradient inconsistency is a correctness issue, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims are empirical (NMSE/SER against LMMSE, L-DAMP, and Joint Langevin), and the proposed method is specified by an iterative SIC-aided diffusion algorithm whose score network is trained as a generative prior on QuaDRiGa channel samples. Training and evaluating on the same channel model is a standard empirical-Bayes setup, not a circular reduction: the score network is not fitted to the reported NMSE/SER values, and the baselines are external implementations. There are no self-citations used to justify the algorithm or to forbid alternatives; the annealing approximation is adopted from an external paper. The notable defect is in Section 3: Eq. (4) is not the derivative of the MAP objective in Eq. (3), and the residual and summation ranges are internally inconsistent; however, that is a derivation-validity and correctness problem, not a case where a prediction reduces by construction to its inputs. Accordingly, no circular step is identified, and the paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the circularity sense.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method rests on a learned generative prior from the same channel model used in evaluation, an unproven MAP factorization, and several unspecified hyperparameters. There are no invented physical entities.

free parameters (3)
  • Diffusion model hyperparameters (noise schedule, Langevin iterations, step size) = not reported
    The paper does not specify values or a tuning procedure; the reported NMSE/SER gains depend on these undisclosed choices, so they are free parameters for the central claim.
  • SIC iteration count and convergence criterion = not reported
    The iterative algorithm's stopping rule is unspecified, so the results depend on an unstated convergence choice.
  • Score network architecture and training details = not reported
    No architecture, loss function, or training procedure is given, so the learned prior is not reproducible.
assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The MAP objective in Eqs. (2)-(3) is a valid factorization of the joint posterior under SIC decoding.
    The paper asserts this decomposition without proof; the first term is a Gaussian centered on previously decoded signals, which does not follow from standard SIC likelihood factorization. This is an assumption introduced for this paper.
  • domain assumption Each Nr x Nr channel submatrix H(i) is approximately full-rank, enabling diffusion models trained for full-rank channels to be applied per submatrix.
    Section 3 states this explicitly ('We do this to make each of the individual submatrices close to full-rank'); it depends on the propagation environment and the SIC ordering.
  • domain assumption The score network s_theta(H(i)) accurately estimates the gradient of the true channel prior distribution.
    The method relies on a trained diffusion model to provide prior gradients, but no training details, architecture, or verification of the score estimate is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Successive Interference Cancellation-aided Diffusion Models for Joint Channel Estimation and Data Detection in Low Rank Channel Scenarios." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B337KBKP

@misc{pith2026250111229,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Successive Interference Cancellation-aided Diffusion Models for Joint Channel Estimation and Data Detection in Low Rank Channel Scenarios},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B337KBKP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11229}
}
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a novel joint channel-estimation and source-detection algorithm using successive interference cancellation (SIC)-aided generative score-based diffusion models. Prior work in this area focuses on massive MIMO scenarios, which are typically characterized by full-rank channels, and fail in low-rank channel scenarios. The proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in joint source-channel estimation, especially in low-rank scenarios where the number of users exceeds the number of antennas at the access point (AP). The proposed score-based iterative diffusion process estimates the gradient of the prior distribution on partial channels, and recursively updates the estimated channel parts as well as the source. Extensive simulation results show that the proposed method outperforms the baseline methods in terms of normalized mean squared error (NMSE) and symbol error rate (SER) in both full-rank and low-rank channel scenarios, while having a more dominant effect in the latter, at various signal-to-noise ratios (SNR).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Censored Sampling for Topology Design: Guiding Diffusion with Human Preferences

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Guiding a pretrained topology-diffusion generator with human-preference reward classifiers is claimed to suppress floating-material and boundary-violation failure modes without retraining the generator.

  2. Continual Learning for Wireless Channel Prediction

    eess.SP 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Applying replay and regularization-based continual learning to channel prediction reduces cross-configuration NMSE by up to roughly 2 dB in simulated 5G urban micro scenarios.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [13]

    Reduc- ing pilot overhead: channel estimation with symbol rep- etition in mimo-fbmc systems,

    Dejin Kong, Jian Li, Kai Luo, and Tao Jiang, “Reduc- ing pilot overhead: channel estimation with symbol rep- etition in mimo-fbmc systems,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 7634–7646, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    These systems use numerous base station antennas for beam- forming, enabling high-gain, narrow beams for multi-user communication [2]

    INTRODUCTION Massive multiple-input multiple-output (mMIMO) systems are vital for next-generation wireless networks, especially in environments demanding better spatial resolution [1]. These systems use numerous base station antennas for beam- forming, enabling high-gain, narrow beams for multi-user communication [2]. However, massive MIMO assumes a full-...

    work page

  3. [2]

    A novel SIC-aided joint channel estimation and data detec- tion algorithm using score-based diffusion models for partial channel prior distribution estimation

    work page

  4. [3]

    A channel gain-based SIC decoding order which is iter- atively updated, and determines the partial channels to be estimated

    work page

  5. [4]

    arXiv:2501.11229v1 [cs.CV] 20 Jan 2025

    Extensive simulation evaluation demonstrating the pro- posed algorithm outperforming baseline algorithms across low-rank and full-rank channels, for different hyperparameter settings. arXiv:2501.11229v1 [cs.CV] 20 Jan 2025

    arXiv 2025

  6. [5]

    Our fo- cus is on the low-rank channel scenario where the number of users exceeds the number of antennas at AP, i.e

    PROBLEM FORMULA TION We examine an uplink multiple access channel (MAC) where Nu single-antenna transmitters send pilot and data symbols to an access point (AP) equipped with Nr antennas. Our fo- cus is on the low-rank channel scenario where the number of users exceeds the number of antennas at AP, i.e. Nu ≥ Nr. In this system, specific time slots are all...

    work page

  7. [6]

    The proposed algorithm uses SIC-aided scoring diffusion for channel prior estimation, based on Langevin dynamics [17]

    SIC-AIDED LANGEVIN DIFFUSION FOR LOW-RANK CHANNEL In our framework, we jointly estimate the channel and de- tect symbols in low-rank uplink channel scenarios, i.e., when the number of users exceeds the number of AP/BS antennas. The proposed algorithm uses SIC-aided scoring diffusion for channel prior estimation, based on Langevin dynamics [17]. For symbol...

    work page

  8. [7]

    PERFORMANCE EV ALUA TION In this section, we evaluate the efficacy of the proposed al- gorithm in Section 3 against baseline algorithms [18, 13, 19]

    work page

Show all 30 references
  1. [8]

    Mixed-integer quadratic programming is in np,

    Alberto Del Pia, Santanu S. Dey, and Marco Molinaro, “Mixed-integer quadratic programming is in np,” 2014

    2014

  2. [9]

    Our proposed methodology is based on channel gain based dynamic decoding order for SIC using diffusion model

    CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK In this paper, we present a novel SIC-aided scoring diffusion- based joint channel estimation and data detection pipeline for low-rank channel scenarios. Our proposed methodology is based on channel gain based dynamic decoding order for SIC using dif...

  3. [10]

    Mobile cell-free massive mimo: Challenges, solutions, and future directions,

    Jiakang Zheng, Jiayi Zhang, Hongyang Du, Dusit Niy- ato, Bo Ai, M ´erouane Debbah, and Khaled B. Letaief, “Mobile cell-free massive mimo: Challenges, solutions, and future directions,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 140–147, 2024

    2024

  4. [11]

    Benchmarking and interpreting end-to-end learning of mimo and multi-user communication,

    Jinxiang Song, Christian H ¨ager, Jochen Schr¨oder, Tim- othy J O’Shea, Erik Agrell, and Henk Wymeersch, “Benchmarking and interpreting end-to-end learning of mimo and multi-user communication,” IEEE Transac- tions on Wireless Communications , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7287–7298, 2022

    2022

  5. [12]

    Joint channel es- timation and symbol detection in mimo-ofdm systems: A deep learning approach using bi-lstm,

    Aswathy K Nair and Vivek Menon, “Joint channel es- timation and symbol detection in mimo-ofdm systems: A deep learning approach using bi-lstm,” in 2022 14th international conference on communication systems & networks (COMSNETS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 406–411

    2022

  6. [14]

    A novel joint channel es- timation and symbol detection receiver for orthogonal time frequency space in vehicular networks,

    Xiaoqi Zhang, Haifeng Wen, Ziyu Yan, Weijie Yuan, Jun Wu, and Zhongjie Li, “A novel joint channel es- timation and symbol detection receiver for orthogonal time frequency space in vehicular networks,” Entropy, vol. 25, no. 9, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    High dimensional channel estimation using deep generative networks,

    Eren Balevi, Akash Doshi, Ajil Jalal, Alexandros Di- makis, and Jeffrey G. Andrews, “High dimensional channel estimation using deep generative networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Wireless communications and applications above 100 ghz: Opportunities and challenges for 6g and beyond,

    Theodore S. Rappaport, Yunchou Xing, Ojas Kan- here, Shihao Ju, Arjuna Madanayake, Soumyajit Man- dal, Ahmed Alkhateeb, and Georgios C. Trichopoulos, “Wireless communications and applications above 100 ghz: Opportunities and challenges for 6g and beyond,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, ...

    2019

  9. [17]

    Stochastic processes and appli- cations,

    Grigorios A Pavliotis, “Stochastic processes and appli- cations,” Texts in applied mathematics, vol. 60, 2014

    2014

  10. [18]

    uses an iterative method that integrates a learned denois- ing neural network (DnCNN) into the Approximate Message Passing framework to efficiently recover signals from noisy measurements. [13] uses the Langevin diffusion-based joint channel estimation and data detection; howe...

  11. [19]

    Vlsi designs for joint channel estimation and data de- tection in large simo wireless systems,

    Oscar Casta ˜neda, Tom Goldstein, and Christoph Studer, “Vlsi designs for joint channel estimation and data de- tection in large simo wireless systems,” 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Interference cancellation information geometry approach for massive mimo channel estimation,

    An-An Lu, Bingyan Liu, and Xiqi Gao, “Interference cancellation information geometry approach for massive mimo channel estimation,” 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Cddm: Chan- nel denoising diffusion models for wireless communi- cations,

    Tong Wu, Zhiyong Chen, Dazhi He, Liang Qian, Yin Xu, Meixia Tao, and Wenjun Zhang, “Cddm: Chan- nel denoising diffusion models for wireless communi- cations,” 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Diffusion-based gen- erative prior for low-complexity mimo channel estima- tion,

    Benedikt Fesl, Michael Baur, Florian Strasser, Michael Joham, and Wolfgang Utschick, “Diffusion-based gen- erative prior for low-complexity mimo channel estima- tion,” 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Joint channel estimation and data detection in massive mimo systems based on diffusion models,

    Nicolas Zilberstein, Ananthram Swami, and Santiago Segarra, “Joint channel estimation and data detection in massive mimo systems based on diffusion models,” in ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , 2024, pp. 13291–13295

    2024

  16. [24]

    Non-orthogonal multiple access (noma) for cellular fu- ture radio access,

    Yuya Saito, Yoshihisa Kishiyama, Anass Benjebbour, Takehiro Nakamura, Anxin Li, and Kenichi Higuchi, “Non-orthogonal multiple access (noma) for cellular fu- ture radio access,” in 2013 IEEE 77th vehicular tech- nology conference (VTC Spring). IEEE, 2013, pp. 1–5

    2013

  17. [25]

    Power-domain non-orthogonal multiple access (noma) in 5g systems: Potentials and challenges,

    SM Riazul Islam, Nurilla Avazov, Octavia A Dobre, and Kyung-Sup Kwak, “Power-domain non-orthogonal multiple access (noma) in 5g systems: Potentials and challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutori- als, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 721–742, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    Fairness- aware energy-efficient power allocation for uplink noma systems with imperfect sic,

    Kaijie Wang, Ting Zhou, Tianheng Xu, Yongming Huang, Honglin Hu, and Xiaoming Tao, “Fairness- aware energy-efficient power allocation for uplink noma systems with imperfect sic,” IEEE Wireless Communi- cations Letters, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Learned d-amp: Principled neural network based compressive image recovery,

    Christopher A. Metzler, Ali Mousavi, and Richard G. Baraniuk, “Learned d-amp: Principled neural network based compressive image recovery,” 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    Semi-blind channel estimation for multiuser massive mimo systems,

    Elina Nayebi and Bhaskar D. Rao, “Semi-blind channel estimation for multiuser massive mimo systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 540–553, 2018

    2018

  21. [29]

    On the robustness of mimo lmmse channel estimation,

    Antonio Assalini, Emiliano Dall’Anese, and Silvano Pupolin, “On the robustness of mimo lmmse channel estimation,” IEEE transactions on wireless communica- tions, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 3313–3319, 2010

    2010

  22. [30]

    Quadriga: A 3-d multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,

    Stephan Jaeckel, Leszek Raschkowski, Kai B ¨orner, and Lars Thiele, “Quadriga: A 3-d multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,” IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3242–3256, 2014

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.