Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.24377 v1 pith:VP5UU75G submitted 2025-03-31 cs.CL cs.AI

Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords reasoningeconomysystemllmsanalysiscomputationalcostsefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks, transitioning from fast and intuitive thinking (System 1) to slow and deep reasoning (System 2). While System 2 reasoning improves task accuracy, it often incurs substantial computational costs due to its slow thinking nature and inefficient or unnecessary reasoning behaviors. In contrast, System 1 reasoning is computationally efficient but leads to suboptimal performance. Consequently, it is critical to balance the trade-off between performance (benefits) and computational costs (budgets), giving rise to the concept of reasoning economy. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive analysis of reasoning economy in both the post-training and test-time inference stages of LLMs, encompassing i) the cause of reasoning inefficiency, ii) behavior analysis of different reasoning patterns, and iii) potential solutions to achieve reasoning economy. By offering actionable insights and highlighting open challenges, we aim to shed light on strategies for improving the reasoning economy of LLMs, thereby serving as a valuable resource for advancing research in this evolving area. We also provide a public repository to continually track developments in this fast-evolving field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dynamic Rollout Editing for Reducing Overthinking in RL-Trained Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dynamic Rollout Editing reduces overthinking in RL-trained LLMs by editing post-answer continuations in successful rollouts and preferring the edited versions within GRPO groups.

  2. The Vision Wormhole: Latent-Space Communication in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Reasoning messages between heterogeneous VLMs can be routed through the image-token span: a distilled universal codec plus affine alignment transmits latent traces across model families, cutting wall-clock time in sma...

  3. Is Your Model Thinking or Just Stagnating? PUMA: Diagnosing Reasoning Pathology via Phase-Momentum Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    PUMA detects when a reasoning model's entropy drop aligns with hidden-state momentum, truncates at that point, and reports improved accuracy-efficiency on 1.5B-32B reasoning models.

  4. BV-Blend: Uncertainty-Weighted Historical Baselines for Stable Critic-Free RL with Verifiable Rewards

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    BV-Blend blends prompt-local and semantic-cluster historical reward statistics via SEM-derived weights to stabilize critic-free RL advantage estimation.