pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.02958 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-03 · ✦ hep-ex

Combined effective field theory interpretation of Higgs boson, electroweak vector boson, top quark, and multi-jet measurements

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 21:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords SMEFTWilson coefficientsHiggs bosontop quarkelectroweak vector bosonsmultijet productionCMS experimentLHC
0
0 comments X

The pith

A simultaneous fit to seven CMS measurements and electroweak precision data constrains 64 Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT framework.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a combined analysis of multiple LHC measurements to extract limits on possible new physics effects parameterized by dimension-six operators in the standard model effective field theory. By fitting differential cross sections from Higgs, electroweak boson, top quark, and multijet production together with precision observables, it obtains constraints on individual Wilson coefficients and their combinations. This approach allows for a more comprehensive test of the standard model by exploiting correlations across different production processes. A sympathetic reader would care because it provides model-independent bounds that can guide searches for physics beyond the standard model.

Core claim

Constraints on Wilson coefficients corresponding to dimension-six operators of the SMEFT are determined from a simultaneous fit to seven sets of CMS measurements probing Higgs boson, electroweak vector boson, top quark, and multijet production, along with electroweak precision observables. Individual constraints on 64 WCs, and constraints on 43 linear combinations of WCs, are obtained from the fit to data at 13 TeV with luminosities of 36.3 or 138 fb^{-1}.

What carries the argument

The simultaneous fit to differential cross sections parameterized as functions of the Wilson coefficients, with SMEFT effects modeled at the detector level for ttbar X production.

If this is right

  • Individual bounds are placed on 64 Wilson coefficients.
  • Constraints are derived on 43 linear combinations of those coefficients.
  • The inclusion of electroweak precision observables provides complementary constraints to the CMS measurements.
  • The analysis covers a broad set of operators for which consistent SMEFT predictions exist.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future measurements could further tighten these constraints by adding more differential distributions sensitive to the same operators.
  • Discrepancies in any single channel could be cross-checked against the global fit to identify the source of tension.
  • These bounds can be used to predict allowed ranges for observables not included in the current fit.

Load-bearing premise

That consistent SMEFT predictions can be derived for the selected measurements and that SMEFT effects are correctly modelled at the detector level for ttbar X production.

What would settle it

A new differential cross section measurement in one of the fitted channels that lies outside the range allowed by the obtained Wilson coefficient constraints would falsify the derived bounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.02958 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example Feynman diagrams of modifications of SM processes by the SMEFT operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Relative effect of the linear SMEFT terms for the WCs that affect the Higgs STXS cross sections and the H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relative effect of the linear SMEFT terms for the WCs that affect the W [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relative effect of the linear SMEFT terms for the WCs that affect the t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relative effect of the linear SMEFT terms for the WCs that affect the inclusive jet differential cross sections in the rapidity bins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative effect of the linear SMEFT terms for the WCs that affect the inclusive jet differential cross sections in the rapidity bins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative effect of the linear SMEFT terms for the WCs that affect the EWPO [37–39]. The parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Diagonal entries Hα jj of the Hessian matrix evaluated for each input channel. These indicate which of the input channels are expected to be the most sensitive to any given operator. Larger values of Hα jj correspond to higher sensitivity. In the combined measurement it is not possible to simultaneously constrain all the WCs that affect the processes of interest, because some of the WCs have (nearly) degen… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Constraints on linear combinations of WCs, for the hybrid fit including the full set of measurements. The shaded areas correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The 95% CL lower limits on the scales Λj for the indicated values of the WCs cj . combination of the Wγ and H → γγ data yields an improved constraint on cW with respect to any single-analysis result. For example, the linear-only sensitivity is approximately 45% higher with respect to the Wγ result of Ref. [34]. For several operators, the inclusion of the EWPO measurements provides significantly stronger c… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Constraints on Wilson coefficients (WCs) corresponding to dimension-six operators of the standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) are determined from a simultaneous fit to seven sets of CMS measurements probing Higgs boson, electroweak vector boson, top quark, and multijet production. Masurements of electroweak precision observables are also included and provide complementary constraints to those from CMS experiment. The CMS measurements, using LHC proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 36.3 or 138 fb$^{-1}$, are chosen to provide sensitivity to a broad set of operators, for which consistent SMEFT predictions can be derived. These are primarily measurements of differential cross sections which are parameterized as functions of the WCs. In measurements targeting $\text{t}(\bar{\text{t}})\text{X}$ production, SMEFT effects are modelled at the detector level. Individual constraints on 64 WCs, and constraints on 43 linear combinations of WCs, are obtained.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports a simultaneous SMEFT fit to seven CMS measurements (Higgs, electroweak vector boson, top quark, and multijet production) at 13 TeV with 36.3 or 138 fb^{-1}, supplemented by electroweak precision observables. Differential cross sections are parameterized in terms of Wilson coefficients (WCs) for dimension-six operators; SMEFT effects in t(tbar)X are modeled at detector level. The fit yields individual constraints on 64 WCs and constraints on 43 linear combinations of WCs.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies one of the broadest simultaneous SMEFT interpretations from CMS data, combining multiple production sectors with complementary EWPO constraints. The extraction of both individual WC bounds and 43 linear combinations provides a concrete, falsifiable input for global fits and BSM model building.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: 'Masurements' is a typographical error and should be corrected to 'Measurements'.
  2. Abstract, paragraph on measurement selection: the statement that 'consistent SMEFT predictions can be derived' is central to the combination; a brief explicit reference to the validation procedure (e.g., a table or section number) would improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and positive recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the significance of combining multiple CMS measurements with EWPO constraints in a broad SMEFT fit is recognized, and that the provision of both individual WC bounds and linear combinations is viewed as useful for global fits.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper reports constraints on 64 Wilson coefficients and 43 linear combinations obtained via a simultaneous fit to seven CMS datasets plus electroweak precision observables. All results are direct statistical outputs from experimental data; the abstract explicitly selects measurements for which consistent SMEFT predictions exist, which is a standard prerequisite rather than a derived claim. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the provided material. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the validity of the SMEFT as an effective description at LHC energies and on the assumption that the chosen observables admit consistent SMEFT predictions.

free parameters (1)
  • Wilson coefficients
    The 64 WCs are the parameters determined by the fit to data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption SMEFT provides a consistent parameterization for the selected measurements at the probed energies.
    Invoked to justify deriving predictions for the observables from the operators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5710 in / 1236 out tokens · 43556 ms · 2026-05-22T21:26:08.777375+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Effective field theory interpretation of ATLAS measurements involving the Higgs boson, electroweak bosons and the top quark

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    A simultaneous fit to multiple ATLAS datasets constrains 48 SMEFT Wilson coefficients and matches subsets to 2HDM and heavy-vector models, finding consistency with the Standard Model.

  2. Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions using the $\gamma\gamma$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Updated constraints from the full Run 2 dataset show no evidence for anomalous Higgs couplings in gluon fusion, vector boson fusion, and associated production modes decaying to two photons.

  3. Impact of Higgs-boson measurements on SMEFT fits

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Higgs precision data now meaningfully tightens SMEFT constraints and increases the lower bound on new physics scales across different flavor assumptions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 122 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 55 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020,arXiv:1207.7214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  2. [2]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021,arXiv:1207.7235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  3. [3]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV”,JHEP06(2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081,arXiv:1303.4571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  4. [4]

    Searches for Higgs boson production through decays of heavy resonances

    CMS Collaboration, “Searches for Higgs boson production through decays of heavy resonances”,Phys. Rep.1115(2025) 368,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.004, arXiv:2403.16926

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.004 2025

  5. [5]

    The quest to discover supersymmetry at the ATLAS experiment

    ATLAS Collaboration, “The quest to discover supersymmetry at the ATLAS experiment”,Phys. Rep.1116(2025) 261,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.010, arXiv:2403.02455

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.010 2025

  6. [6]

    Exploration at the high-energy frontier: ATLAS Run 2 searches investigating the exotic jungle beyond the standard model

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Exploration at the high-energy frontier: ATLAS Run 2 searches investigating the exotic jungle beyond the standard model”,Phys. Rep.1116(2025) 301, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.10.001,arXiv:2403.09292. References 31

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.10.001 2025

  7. [7]

    The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory

    I. Brivio and M. Trott, “The standard model as an effective field theory”,Phys. Rep.793 (2019) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002,arXiv:1706.08945

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002 2019

  8. [8]

    Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzy ´nski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, “Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian”,JHEP10(2010) 085, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)085,arXiv:1008.4884

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2010)085 2010

  9. [9]

    The SMEFTsim package, theory and tools

    I. Brivio, Y. Jiang, and M. Trott, “The SMEFTsim package, theory and tools”,JHEP12 (2017) 070,doi:10.1007/jhep12(2017)070,arXiv:1709.06492

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2017)070 2017

  10. [10]

    SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide

    I. Brivio, “SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide”,JHEP04(2021) 073, doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)073,arXiv:2012.11343

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)073 2021

  11. [11]

    Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions from the production of Higgs bosons using theτ τfinal state

    CMS Collaboration, “Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions from the production of Higgs bosons using theτ τfinal state”,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 032013,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.032013,arXiv:2205.05120

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.032013 2023

  12. [12]

    Measurements of WH and ZH production in the H→b b decay channel in pp collisions at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurements of WH and ZH production in the H→b b decay channel in pp collisions at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 178,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08677-2,arXiv:2007.02873

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08677-2 2021

  13. [13]

    Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4ℓdecay channel at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4ℓdecay channel at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 957,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9, arXiv:2004.03447. [Errata:doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6; doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08644-x]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9 2020

  14. [14]

    Measurement of the inclusive and differential t tγcross sections in the single-lepton channel and EFT interpretation at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive and differential t tγcross sections in the single-lepton channel and EFT interpretation at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP12(2021) 180, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)180,arXiv:2107.01508

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)180 2021

  15. [15]

    Search for new physics using effective field theory in 13 TeV pp collision events that contain a top quark pair and a boosted Z or Higgs boson

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for new physics using effective field theory in 13 TeV pp collision events that contain a top quark pair and a boosted Z or Higgs boson”,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 032008,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.032008, arXiv:2208.12837

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.032008 2023

  16. [16]

    Probing effective field theory operators in the associated production of top quarks with a Z boson in multilepton final states at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Probing effective field theory operators in the associated production of top quarks with a Z boson in multilepton final states at √s=13 TeV”, JHEP12(2021) 083,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)083,arXiv:2107.13896

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)083 2021

  17. [17]

    Measurements of inclusive and differential cross-sections of t tγ production in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurements of inclusive and differential cross-sections of t tγ production in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP10(2024) 191,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)191,arXiv:2403.09452

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)191 2024

  18. [18]

    Evidence for the charge asymmetry in pp→t t production at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Evidence for the charge asymmetry in pp→t t production at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP08(2023) 077, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)077,arXiv:2208.12095

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)077 2023

  19. [19]

    Measurements of pp→ZZ production cross sections and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of pp→ZZ production cross sections and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at √s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 200,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08817-8,arXiv:2009.01186. 32

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08817-8 2021

  20. [20]

    Measurement of the inclusive and differential WZ production cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive and differential WZ production cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP07(2022) 032,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)032, arXiv:2110.11231

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)032 2022

  21. [21]

    Measurement and interpretation of same-sign W boson pair production in association with two jets in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement and interpretation of same-sign W boson pair production in association with two jets in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP04(2024) 026,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)026, arXiv:2312.00420

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2024)026 2024

  22. [22]

    Differential cross-section measurements of the production of four charged leptons in association with two jets using the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Differential cross-section measurements of the production of four charged leptons in association with two jets using the ATLAS detector”,JHEP01 (2024) 004,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)004,arXiv:2308.12324

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2024)004 2024

  23. [23]

    CMS Collaboration, “Constraints on standard model effective field theory for a Higgs boson produced in association with W or Z bosons in the H→b b decay channel in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP03(2025) 114, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2025)114,arXiv:2411.16907

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2025)114 2025

  24. [24]

    Experimental measurements and observables

    N. Castro et al., “Experimental measurements and observables”, LHC EFT WG Note CERN-LHCEFTWG-2022-001, CERN-LPCC-2022-05, 2022.arXiv:2211.08353

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Top, Higgs, diboson and electroweak fit to the standard model effective field theory

    J. Ellis et al., “Top, Higgs, diboson and electroweak fit to the standard model effective field theory”,JHEP04(2021) 279,doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)279, arXiv:2012.02779

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)279 2021

  26. [26]

    A global analysis of the SMEFT under the minimal MFV assumption

    R. Bartocci, A. Biek ¨otter, and T. Hurth, “A global analysis of the SMEFT under the minimal MFV assumption”,JHEP05(2024) 074,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)074, arXiv:2311.04963

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)074 2024

  27. [27]

    From models to SMEFT and back?

    I. Brivio et al., “From models to SMEFT and back?”,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 036, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.1.036,arXiv:2108.01094

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.1.036 2022

  28. [28]

    Mapping the SMEFT at high-energy colliders: From LEP and the (HL-)LHC to the FCC-ee

    E. Celada et al., “Mapping the SMEFT at high-energy colliders: From LEP and the (HL-)LHC to the FCC-ee”,JHEP09(2024) 091,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)091, arXiv:2404.12809

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)091 2024

  29. [29]

    Search for physics beyond the standard model in top quark production with additional leptons in the context of effective field theory

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for physics beyond the standard model in top quark production with additional leptons in the context of effective field theory”,JHEP12 (2023) 068,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)068,arXiv:2307.15761

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)068 2023

  30. [30]

    Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP11(2024) 097,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)097, arXiv:2402.05742

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)097 2024

  31. [31]

    Measurements of Higgs boson production cross sections and couplings in the diphoton decay channel at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of Higgs boson production cross sections and couplings in the diphoton decay channel at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP07(2021) 027, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)027,arXiv:2103.06956

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)027 2021

  32. [32]

    Measurement of differential t t production cross sections in the full kinematic range using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of differential t t production cross sections in the full kinematic range using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 092013,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.092013, arXiv:2108.02803. References 33

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.092013 2021

  33. [33]

    W +W− boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “W +W− boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 092001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.092001,arXiv:2009.00119

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.092001 2020

  34. [34]

    Measurement of W ±γdifferential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV and effective field theory constraints

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of W ±γdifferential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV and effective field theory constraints”,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 052003,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.052003,arXiv:2111.13948

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.052003 2022

  35. [35]

    Measurement of the Z boson differential production cross section using its invisible decay mode (Z→ν ¯ν) in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Z boson differential production cross section using its invisible decay mode (Z→ν ¯ν) in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”, JHEP05(2021) 205,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)205,arXiv:2012.09254

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)205 2021

  36. [36]

    Measurement and QCD analysis of double-differential inclusive jet cross sections in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement and QCD analysis of double-differential inclusive jet cross sections in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP02(2022) 142, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)142,arXiv:2111.10431. [Addendum: doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)035]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)142 2022

  37. [37]

    Precision Electroweak Measurements on the Z Resonance

    ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD electroweak group, SLD heavy flavour group, “Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance”,Phys. Rep.427(2006) 257,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.006, arXiv:hep-ex/0509008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.006 2006

  38. [38]

    Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP

    ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group, “Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP”,Phys. Rep.532(2013) 119,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.07.004,arXiv:1302.3415

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.07.004 2013

  39. [39]

    An EWPD SMEFT likelihood for the LHC -- and how to improve it with measurements of W and Z boson properties

    H. Mildner, “An EWPD SMEFT likelihood for the LHC – and how to improve it with measurements of W and Z boson properties”,JHEP07(2025) 089, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)089,arXiv:2412.07651

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2025)089 2025

  40. [40]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2025.doi:10.17182/hepdata.157866

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.157866 2025

  41. [41]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  42. [42]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  43. [43]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  44. [44]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  45. [45]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024

  46. [46]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888. 34

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021

  47. [47]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  48. [48]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  49. [49]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  50. [50]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008

  51. [51]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,arXiv:1111.6097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 2012

  52. [52]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011,arXiv:1712.07158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/p05011 2018

  53. [53]

    Jet flavour classification using DeepJet

    E. Bols et al., “Jet flavour classification using DeepJet”,JINST15(2020) P12012, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012,arXiv:2008.10519

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/p12012 2020

  54. [54]

    Performance of the DeepJet b tagging algorithm using 41.9/fb of data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase 1 CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the DeepJet b tagging algorithm using 41.9/fb of data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase 1 CMS detector”, CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2018-058, 2018

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004 2019

  56. [56]

    Simplified template cross sections - stage 1.1

    N. Berger et al., “Simplified template cross sections - stage 1.1”, LHCHXSWG note LHCHXSWG-2019-003, DESY-19-070, 2019.arXiv:1906.02754

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  58. [58]

    NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production

    K. Hamilton, P . Nason, E. Re, and G. Zanderighi, “NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production”,JHEP10(2013) 222,doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)222, arXiv:1309.0017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)222 2013

  59. [59]

    Parton distributions for the LHC Run II

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”,JHEP04(2015) 040, doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040,arXiv:1410.8849

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015

  60. [60]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5 2017

  61. [61]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comp. Phys. Comm.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012. References 35

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  62. [62]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”,doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002, arXiv:1610.07922

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-002 2017

  63. [63]

    Diboson interference resurrection

    G. Panico, F. Riva, and A. Wulzer, “Diboson interference resurrection”,Phys. Lett. B776 (2018) 473,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.068,arXiv:1708.07823

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.068 2018

  64. [64]

    Novel measurements of anomalous triple gauge couplings for the LHC

    A. Azatov, J. Elias-Mir ´o, Y. Reyimuaji, and E. Venturini, “Novel measurements of anomalous triple gauge couplings for the LHC”,JHEP10(2017) 027, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)027,arXiv:1707.08060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)027 2017

  65. [65]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  66. [66]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  67. [67]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010

  68. [68]

    W+W-, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX

    T. Melia, P . Nason, R. Rontsch, and G. Zanderighi, “W+W-, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP11(2011) 078,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2011)078, arXiv:1107.5051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2011)078 2011

  69. [69]

    W+W-, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX V2

    P . Nason and G. Zanderighi, “W+W− ,WZandZZproduction in the POWHEG-BOX-V2”,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2702, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2702-5,arXiv:1311.1365

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2702-5 2014

  70. [70]

    MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC

    J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, “MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC”,Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.205(2010) 10,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011, arXiv:1007.3492

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011 2010

  71. [71]

    $W^+W^-$ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD

    T. Gehrmann et al., “W +W− production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD”,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 212001,doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.212001, arXiv:1408.5243

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.212001 2014

  72. [72]

    Parton distributions with LHC data

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions with LHC data”,Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.10.003,arXiv:1207.1303

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.10.003 2013

  73. [73]

    A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and G. Ridolfi, “A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction”,JHEP09(2007) 126, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126,arXiv:0707.3088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126 2007

  74. [74]

    Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, “Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders”,Comp. Phys. Comm.185(2014) 2930, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021,arXiv:1112.5675

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021 2014

  75. [75]

    Top-quark pair production at the LHC: Fully differential QCD predictions at NNLO

    S. Catani et al., “Top-quark pair production at the LHC: Fully differential QCD predictions at NNLO”,JHEP07(2019) 100,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)100, arXiv:1906.06535. 36

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2019)100 2019

  76. [76]

    Search for new physics in top quark production with additional leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using effective field theory

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for new physics in top quark production with additional leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using effective field theory”,JHEP 03(2021) 095,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)095,arXiv:2012.04120

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)095 2021

  77. [77]

    On improving NLO merging for t tW production

    R. Frederix and I. Tsinikos, “On improving NLO merging for t tW production”,JHEP 11(2021) 029,doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)029,arXiv:2108.07826

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)029 2021

  78. [78]

    Threshold resummation for the production of four top quarks at the LHC

    M. van Beekveld, A. Kulesza, and L. Moreno Valero, “Threshold resummation for the production of four top quarks at the LHC”, 2022.arXiv:2212.03259

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Combination of CDF and D0 Results on the Width of the W boson

    Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, “Combination of CDF and D0 results on the width of the W boson”, technical report, 2010.doi:10.48550/arXiv.1003.2826, arXiv:1003.2826

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1003.2826 2010

  80. [80]

    A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(m2 Z)

    M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, “A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(m2 Z)”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 241,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7792-2, arXiv:1908.00921

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7792-2 2020

Showing first 80 references.