pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.07129 · v4 · submitted 2025-04-03 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph · math.AP· physics.flu-dyn

Near-Inertial Pollard Waves Modeling the Arctic Halocline

Christian Puntini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 21:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph math.APphysics.flu-dyn
keywords arctic haloclinenear-inertial wavespollard wavesstratified oceanthree-layer modelvertical structureconstant density layersnonhydrostatic waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

An exact solution models the Arctic Ocean vertical structure with three constant-density layers and near-inertial waves in the halocline.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents an explicit and exact solution to the governing equations for the vertical structure of the Arctic Ocean near the North Pole. It represents the water column as three regions of constant density, with a motionless bottom layer, a middle halocline layer containing nonhydrostatic near-inertial Pollard waves, and an upper layer that includes a mean current together with wave motion tied to the halocline. A reader would care because the solution supplies an analytical description of the halocline without requiring numerical integration or continuous density variation. The construction isolates the halocline as the layer that carries the wave dynamics while the other layers follow directly from matching conditions.

Core claim

We present an explicit and exact solution to the governing equations describing the vertical structure of the Arctic Ocean region centred around the North Pole. The solution describes a stratified water column with three constant-density regions: a motionless bottom layer, a middle layer -- the halocline -- described by nonhydrostatic, near-inertial Pollard waves, and an upper layer presenting a mean current and a wave motion associated with the one in the halocline layer.

What carries the argument

Three-layer constant-density model with nonhydrostatic near-inertial Pollard waves confined to the middle halocline layer.

If this is right

  • The bottom layer remains at rest while the upper layer carries both a steady current and waves whose motion matches the halocline waves.
  • No internal forcing or density variation inside layers is required to satisfy the governing equations.
  • The solution is exact once the three-layer geometry and constant densities are fixed.
  • Wave motion is transmitted directly from the halocline into the upper layer through the interface conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The analytical form could be inserted into larger-scale ocean models to supply an explicit halocline component without sub-grid parameterization.
  • It suggests a direct way to relate observed near-inertial energy in the Arctic to the thickness and density jump of the halocline layer.
  • Time-dependent extensions of the same layer structure might be used to track how changing surface stress alters the mean current in the upper layer.

Load-bearing premise

The ocean can be represented accurately by three layers of strictly constant density in which the middle halocline supports nonhydrostatic near-inertial Pollard waves without additional forcing or density changes inside any layer.

What would settle it

Vertical density profiles from the Arctic halocline that show continuous gradients instead of constant density, or observed wave periods that deviate from the predicted near-inertial band, would show the three-layer construction does not apply.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.07129 by Christian Puntini.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: Map of the Arctic Ocean. Adapted from the IBCAO map https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/bathymetry/arctic/currentmap.html. Credit [33] As a matter of fact, one of the main features of the Arctic Ocean is that it is predominantly stratified by salinity (hence it is defined as a β-ocean) rather than by temperature (the so called α-oceans) (see [2] or [3]). Moreover, the central region of Arctic Ocean - centred a… view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Figure 1.2: A depiction of the model we are considering More precisely, we assume the following water characteristics (we refer to [52]): • Surface Mixed Layer: water density ρ0, T = −1.5 ◦ C, S = 34.0 psu; • Halocline: water density ρ1, T = 0◦ C, S = 34.2 psu; • Atlantic Water: water density ρ2, T = 2◦ C, S = 34.9 psu; and density variations can be modeled by (see [2] or [55]) dρ ρ = −α dT + β dS, (1.1) where T is … view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Left: classical spherical coordinates. Right: rotated spherical coordinate. Images from [14]. CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) 2.2. Equations of motion. Away from the boundary layers, the friction/viscous effects are negligi￾ble, so the fluid can be considered ideal [13]. The governing equations for a rotating incompressible ideal fluid are, in vectorial coordinate-free form, writte… view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: Depiction of the basis at the North Pole. In reality, the angle γ is bigger than the one depicted here (close to 90◦). However, for graphical clarity reasons, we did it smaller (70◦). Finally, observe that, as Ω × (Ω × r) = 1 2∇(Ω2 ℓ 2 ) where ℓ is the distance from the axis of rotation e3, this will not change when adopting this new basis, hence there is no need to modify the expression for the pressure… view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Schematic depiction of the flow pattern, at a fixed coordinate y 3.6. The dispersion relation. The last two equations in (3.42) and (3.52), namely (ρ1 − ρ0) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an explicit and exact solution to the governing equations describing the vertical structure of the Arctic Ocean region centred around the North Pole. The solution describes a stratified water column with three constant-density regions: a motionless bottom layer, a middle layer -- the halocline -- described by nonhydrostatic, near-inertial Pollard waves, and an upper layer presenting a mean current and a wave motion associated with the one in the halocline layer.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to present an explicit and exact solution to the governing equations for the vertical structure of the Arctic Ocean near the North Pole. It describes a three-layer constant-density water column consisting of a motionless bottom layer, a middle halocline layer supporting nonhydrostatic near-inertial Pollard waves, and an upper layer with a mean current plus associated wave motion.

Significance. If the claimed exact solution is internally consistent and satisfies the full Euler equations plus density conservation while maintaining strictly uniform density in the wave-bearing layer, the result would provide a simple analytical idealization for near-inertial dynamics in the Arctic halocline. The explicit nature of the solution would be a strength if it avoids fitted parameters.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of an exact solution for nonhydrostatic near-inertial Pollard waves in a strictly constant-density halocline layer requires explicit demonstration that the velocity field satisfies both the Euler equations and the density conservation equation without inducing any density perturbations. Nonhydrostatic terms permit vertical acceleration; in a wave context this normally produces isopycnal displacements, which would violate the constant-density assumption unless vertical velocity is identically zero. The associated wave motion described in the upper layer appears to contradict this requirement, making the interface-matching conditions load-bearing for the entire construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and for highlighting the need to confirm consistency of the claimed exact solution with the full set of governing equations. We address the major comment below and will strengthen the presentation accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of an exact solution for nonhydrostatic near-inertial Pollard waves in a strictly constant-density halocline layer requires explicit demonstration that the velocity field satisfies both the Euler equations and the density conservation equation without inducing any density perturbations. Nonhydrostatic terms permit vertical acceleration; in a wave context this normally produces isopycnal displacements, which would violate the constant-density assumption unless vertical velocity is identically zero. The associated wave motion described in the upper layer appears to contradict this requirement, making the interface-matching conditions load-bearing for the entire construction.

    Authors: The velocity and pressure fields in each layer are obtained by direct substitution into the nonhydrostatic Euler equations under the assumption of piecewise-constant density. In the halocline layer the density is uniform, so the density conservation equation is satisfied identically (the material derivative of a constant vanishes). Nonzero vertical velocity is an intrinsic part of the wave solution, but because the layer contains no internal density gradient, vertical motion produces no density perturbations and the layer remains homogeneous. The vertical momentum equation is satisfied by balancing the nonhydrostatic acceleration with the vertical pressure gradient. In the upper layer the associated wave is a matched evanescent mode whose amplitude is fixed by the interface conditions; its own constant density is likewise preserved. The kinematic and dynamic interface conditions (normal-velocity continuity and pressure continuity adjusted for the density jump) are imposed exactly, ensuring global consistency. We will add a dedicated verification subsection that substitutes the explicit fields into each equation and confirms satisfaction layer by layer. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; exact solution presented as independent construction from governing equations.

full rationale

The abstract and available text present the work as an explicit exact solution to the Euler equations under a three-layer constant-density ansatz with Pollard waves confined to the middle layer. No quoted equations, self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-definitional reductions appear. The constant-density layers and wave form are stated inputs/assumptions, not outputs that loop back to themselves. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5588 in / 1058 out tokens · 25609 ms · 2026-05-22T21:41:00.231155+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Instability of the halocline at the North Pole

    physics.geo-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Near-inertial Pollard waves modeling the Arctic halocline are linearly unstable above a steepness threshold derived via short-wavelength analysis of fluid trajectories.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. A. Abrashkin, E. N. Pelinovsky, Gerstner waves and their generalizations in hydrodynamics and geophysics, Phys. Usp., Vol. 65 (2022), 453–467

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Bertosio, On the evolution of the halocline in the upper Arctic Ocean since 2007, PhD Thesis in Oceanography, Sorbonne Universit´ e, 2021

    C. Bertosio, On the evolution of the halocline in the upper Arctic Ocean since 2007, PhD Thesis in Oceanography, Sorbonne Universit´ e, 2021

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    E. C. Carmack, The alpha/beta ocean distinction: A perspective on freshwater fluxes, convection, nutrients and productivity in high-latitude seas, Deep-Sea Res. II, Vol. 54 (2007), 2578–2598

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    First Concepts of Topology

    W. Chinn, and N. Steenrod “First Concepts of Topology”, Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC, 1966

    work page 1966

  5. [5]

    J. Chu, D. Ionescu-Kruse, and Y. Yang, Exact Solutions and Instability for Geophysical Waves with Centripetal Forces and at Arbitrary Latitude, J. Math. Fluid Mech., Vol. 21 (2019), 19

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Constantin, On the deep water wave motion, J

    A. Constantin, On the deep water wave motion, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., Vol. 34 (2001), 1405-1417

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Constantin, Edge waves along a sloping beach, J

    A. Constantin, Edge waves along a sloping beach, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., Vol. 34 (2001), 9723-9731

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Nonlinear water waves with applications to wave-current interactions and tsunamis

    A. Constantin, “Nonlinear water waves with applications to wave-current interactions and tsunamis”, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2011

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Constantin, On the modelling of equatorial waves, Geophys

    A. Constantin, On the modelling of equatorial waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., Vol. 39 (2012), L05602

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Constantin, An exact solution for equatorially trapped waves, J

    A. Constantin, An exact solution for equatorially trapped waves, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, Vol. 117 (2012), C05029

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Constantin, Some Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Equatorial Flows, J

    A. Constantin, Some Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Equatorial Flows, J. Phys. Oceanogr., Vol. 43 (2013), 165–175

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Constantin, Some Nonlinear, Equatorially Trapped, Nonhydrostatic Internal Geophysical Waves, J

    A. Constantin, Some Nonlinear, Equatorially Trapped, Nonhydrostatic Internal Geophysical Waves, J. Phys. Oceanogr., Vol. 44 (2014), 781–789

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Constantin, and R

    A. Constantin, and R. S. Johnson, On the role of nonlinearity in geostrophic ocean flows on a sphere, In: N. Euler (Ed.), Nonlinear Systems and Their Remarkable Mathematical Structures: Volume I (pp 500-519 ). CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2019

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Constantin, and R

    A. Constantin, and R. S. Johnson, On the dynamics of the near-surface currents in the Arctic Ocean, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., Vol. 73 (2023), 103894

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Constantin, and R

    A. Constantin, and R. S. Johnson, Spherical Coordinates for Arctic Ocean Flows, In: D. Henry (Ed.), Nonlinear Dispersive Waves. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics (pp 239-282). Birkh¨ auser, Cham, 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Constantin, and P

    A. Constantin, and P. Germain, Instability of some equatorially trapped waves, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, Vol. 118 (2013), 2802–2810

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Constantin, and S

    A. Constantin, and S. G. Monismith, Gerstner waves in the presence of mean currents and rotation, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 820 (2017), 511-528

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Constantin and W

    A. Constantin and W. A. Strauss, Trochoidal Solutions to the Incompressible Two-Dimensional Euler Equations, J. Math. Fluid Mech., Vol. 12 (2010), 181-201

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    C. J. Garrett, and W. H. Munk, Space-time scales of internal waves, Geophys. Fluid Dyn., Vol. 2 (1972), 225–264

    work page 1972

  20. [20]

    C. J. Garrett, and W. H. Munk, Space-time scales of internal waves: A progress report, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 80 (1975), 291–297

    work page 1975

  21. [21]

    Gerstner, Theorie der Wellen, Ann

    F. Gerstner, Theorie der Wellen, Ann. Phys., Vol. 32 (1809), 412-445

    work page

  22. [22]

    J. D. Guthrie, J. H. Morison, and I. Fer, Revisiting internal waves and mixing in the Arctic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, Vol. 118 (2013), 3966–3977

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Henry, On Gerstner’s Water Wave, J

    D. Henry, On Gerstner’s Water Wave, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., Vol. 15 (2008), 87-95

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Henry, Exact equatorial water waves in the f-plane, Nonlinear Anal

    D. Henry, Exact equatorial water waves in the f-plane, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., Vol. 28 (2016), 284-289

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Henry, and H.-C

    D. Henry, and H.-C. Hsu, Instability of internal equatorial water waves, J. Differ. Equ., Vol. 258 (2015), 1015-1024

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Henry, and H.-C

    D. Henry, and H.-C. Hsu, Instability of equatorial water waves in the f-plane, DCDS-A, Vol. 35 (2015), 909-916

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Hsu, An Exact Solution for Nonlinear Internal Equatorial Waves in the f-Plane Approximation, J

    H.-C. Hsu, An Exact Solution for Nonlinear Internal Equatorial Waves in the f-Plane Approximation, J. Math. Fluid Mech., Vol. 16 (2014), 463-471

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Hsu, Exact Nonlinear Internal Equatorial Waves in the f-plane, J

    H.-C. Hsu, Exact Nonlinear Internal Equatorial Waves in the f-plane, J. Math. Fluid Mech., Vol. 19 (2017), 367-374

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Ionescu-Kruse, On Pollard’s wave solution at the Equator, J

    D. Ionescu-Kruse, On Pollard’s wave solution at the Equator, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., Vol. 22 (2015), 523-530

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Ionescu-Kruse, An exact solution for geophysical edge waves in the f-plane approximation, Nonlinear Anal

    D. Ionescu-Kruse, An exact solution for geophysical edge waves in the f-plane approximation, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., Vol. 24 (2015), 190-195

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Ionescu-Kruse, Instability of Pollard’s exact solution for geophysical ocean flows, Phys

    D. Ionescu-Kruse, Instability of Pollard’s exact solution for geophysical ocean flows, Phys. Fluids, Vol. 28 (2016), 086601

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Ionescu-Kruse, On the short-wavelength stabilities of some geophysical flows., Phil

    D. Ionescu-Kruse, On the short-wavelength stabilities of some geophysical flows., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, Vol. 376 (2017), 20170090

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Jakobsson, et al., The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) Version 3.0, Geophys

    M. Jakobsson, et al., The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) Version 3.0, Geophys. Res. Lett., Vol. 39 (2012), L12609

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    R. S. Johnson,An introduction to the mathematical fluid dynamics of oceanic and atmospheric flows, EMS Press, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Kluczek, Exact and Explicit Internal Equatorial Water Waves with Underlying Currents, J

    M. Kluczek, Exact and Explicit Internal Equatorial Water Waves with Underlying Currents, J. Math. Fluid Mech., Vol. 19 (2017), 305-314. POLLARD WAVES MODELING THE HALOCLINE 25

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Kluczek, Physical flow properties for Pollard-like internal water waves, J

    M. Kluczek, Physical flow properties for Pollard-like internal water waves, J. Math. Phys. Vol. 59 (2018), 123102

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Kluczek, Nonhydrostatic Pollard-like internal geophysical waves, Discrete Continuous Dyn

    M. Kluczek, Nonhydrostatic Pollard-like internal geophysical waves, Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst., Vol. 39 (2019), 5171-5183

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Kluczek, Exact Pollard-like internal water waves, J

    M. Kluczek, Exact Pollard-like internal water waves, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., Vol. 26 (2019), 133-146

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Kluczek, and R

    M. Kluczek, and R. Stuhlmeier, Mass transport for Pollard waves, Appl. Anal., Vol. 101 (2020), 984–993

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Atmosphere, Ocean and Climate Dynamics. An Introductory Text

    J. Marshall, and R. A. Plumb, “Atmosphere, Ocean and Climate Dynamics. An Introductory Text”, Academic Press, Burlington, 2008

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    E. P. Metzner, and M. Salzmann, Technical note: Determining Arctic Ocean halocline and cold halostad depths based on vertical stability, Ocean Sci., Vol. 19 (2023), 1453–1464

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    McCarney, Exact internal waves in the presence of mean currents and rotation, J

    J. McCarney, Exact internal waves in the presence of mean currents and rotation, J. Math. Phys., Vol. 64 (2023), 073101

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    McCarney, Nonhydrostatic internal waves in the presence of mean currents and rotation, J

    J. McCarney, Nonhydrostatic internal waves in the presence of mean currents and rotation, J. Math. Phys., Vol. 65 (2024), 043101

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    F. Miao, M. Feˇ ckan, and J. Wang, Exact solution and instability for geophysical edge waves, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., Vol. 21 (2022), 2447-2461

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Morita,Classical Mechanics in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, CRC Press, 2023

    O. Morita,Classical Mechanics in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, CRC Press, 2023

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Peralta-Ferriz, and R

    C. Peralta-Ferriz, and R. A. Woodgate, Seasonal and interannual variability of pan-Arctic surface mixed layer properties from 1979 to 2012 from hydrographic data, and the dominance of stratification for multiyear mixed layer depth shoaling, Progress in Oceanography, Vol. 134 (2015), 19–53

    work page 1979

  47. [47]

    Models of Random Seas Based on the Lagrangian Equations of Motion

    W. J. Pierson Jr., “Models of Random Seas Based on the Lagrangian Equations of Motion”, College of Eng., Res. Div., New York University, New York, 1961

    work page 1961

  48. [48]

    R. T. Pollard, Surface waves with rotation: an exact solution, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 75 (1970), 5895-5898

    work page 1970

  49. [49]

    I. V. Polyakov, A. V. Pnyushkov, and E. C. Carmack, Stability of the arctic halocline: a new indicator of arctic climate change, Environ. Res. Lett., Vol. 13 (2018), 125008

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Puntini, On the modeling of nonlinear wind-induced ice-drift ocean currents at the North Pole, J

    C. Puntini, On the modeling of nonlinear wind-induced ice-drift ocean currents at the North Pole, J. Math. Fluid Mech., Vol. 27 (2025), 71

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Rodr´ ıguez-Sanjurjo, Internal equatorial water waves and wave-current interactions in the f-plane, Monatsh

    A. Rodr´ ıguez-Sanjurjo, Internal equatorial water waves and wave-current interactions in the f-plane, Monatsh. Math., Vol. 186 (2018), 685-701

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Rudels, and E

    B. Rudels, and E. Carmack, Arctic Ocean Water Mass Structure and Circulation, Oceanography, Vol. 35 (2022), 52-65

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics

    R. Salmon, “Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics”, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998

    work page 1998

  54. [54]

    G. G. Stokes, On the Theory of Oscillatory Waves, Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc., Vol. 8 (1847), 441-455

    work page

  55. [55]

    Descriptive Physical Oceanography: An Introduction

    L. D. Talley, G. L. Pickard, W. J. Emery, and J. H. Swift, “Descriptive Physical Oceanography: An Introduction”, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    Timmermans, and J

    M.-L. Timmermans, and J. Marshall, Understanding Arctic Ocean circulation: A review of ocean dynamics in a changing climate, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, Vol. 125 (2020), e2018JC014378

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation

    G. K. Vallis, “Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    J. E. H. Weber, A note on trapped Gerstner waves, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 117 (2012), C03048

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    W. B. White, and R. G. Peterson, An Antarctic circumpolar wave in surface pressure, temperature and sea-ice extent, Nature, Vol. 380 (1996), 699-702

    work page 1996