pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.01238 · v1 · pith:QL7SAMHNnew · submitted 2025-05-02 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

EvalxNLP: A Framework for Benchmarking Post-Hoc Explainability Methods on NLP Models

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords evalxnlpexplainabilityexplanationsframeworkmethodsbenchmarkingmodelsuser
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

As Natural Language Processing (NLP) models continue to evolve and become integral to high-stakes applications, ensuring their interpretability remains a critical challenge. Given the growing variety of explainability methods and diverse stakeholder requirements, frameworks that help stakeholders select appropriate explanations tailored to their specific use cases are increasingly important. To address this need, we introduce EvalxNLP, a Python framework for benchmarking state-of-the-art feature attribution methods for transformer-based NLP models. EvalxNLP integrates eight widely recognized explainability techniques from the Explainable AI (XAI) literature, enabling users to generate and evaluate explanations based on key properties such as faithfulness, plausibility, and complexity. Our framework also provides interactive, LLM-based textual explanations, facilitating user understanding of the generated explanations and evaluation outcomes. Human evaluation results indicate high user satisfaction with EvalxNLP, suggesting it is a promising framework for benchmarking explanation methods across diverse user groups. By offering a user-friendly and extensible platform, EvalxNLP aims at democratizing explainability tools and supporting the systematic comparison and advancement of XAI techniques in NLP.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Disagreeing Rationales: Rethinking Classification and Explainability Evaluation in Hate Speech Detection

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Softer label and rationale representations outperform hard ones on predictive, distributional, plausibility, faithfulness, and complexity metrics when models are re-implemented across representation spaces in hate spe...