pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.02794 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-03 · 💻 cs.GR · cs.AI· cs.CV

PhysGaia: A Physics-Aware Benchmark with Multi-Body Interactions for Dynamic Novel View Synthesis

Mijeong Kim , Gunhee Kim , Jungyoon Choi , Wonjae Roh , Bohyung Han This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 12:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GR cs.AIcs.CV
keywords PhysGaiadynamic novel view synthesisphysics-aware benchmarkmulti-body interactionsparticle trajectories4D Gaussian Splattingmaterial-specific physics solvers
0
0 comments X

The pith

PhysGaia supplies ground-truth 3D particle trajectories and physical parameters for scenes with multi-body collisions and diverse materials to evaluate physics-consistent dynamic novel view synthesis.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

PhysGaia is a benchmark dataset built specifically for dynamic novel view synthesis that incorporates physical consistency rather than focusing only on visual realism. It generates complex scenes using material-specific physics solvers for objects and phenomena involving liquids, gases, textiles, and rheological substances, with realistic collisions and force exchanges between multiple bodies. The dataset includes detailed ground-truth records such as 3D particle trajectories and parameters like viscosity, which allow direct quantitative checks on whether reconstructions follow physical laws. Integration pipelines for recent 4D Gaussian Splatting models are also provided to support immediate use. This setup addresses the gap in existing datasets that lack tools to distinguish visually plausible outputs from those that are physically accurate.

Core claim

The paper introduces PhysGaia as a physics-aware benchmark for Dynamic Novel View Synthesis that encompasses both structured objects and unstructured physical phenomena through complex multi-body interactions. Scenes are generated by material-specific physics solvers that strictly follow fundamental physical laws, covering liquids, gases, textiles, and rheological substances beyond rigid-body limits. Comprehensive ground-truth information including 3D particle trajectories and physical parameters such as viscosity is supplied to enable quantitative evaluation of physical modeling in dynamic reconstructions, along with pipelines for 4D Gaussian Splatting models.

What carries the argument

The PhysGaia benchmark dataset, which supplies physics-generated scenes with multi-body interactions and ground-truth 3D particle trajectories plus physical parameters for quantitative evaluation of physical fidelity in novel view synthesis.

If this is right

  • Quantitative metrics become available to measure how well dynamic novel view synthesis methods capture physical parameters and trajectories.
  • Models can be trained and tested on interactions involving force exchanges between multiple bodies and non-rigid materials.
  • Integration with 4D Gaussian Splatting enables direct assessment of current reconstruction techniques against physics-based references.
  • Research can advance toward scene understanding that combines visual synthesis with adherence to physical laws.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The benchmark could support development of hybrid models that use view synthesis to predict future physical states rather than only interpolate observed motion.
  • It might reveal cases where high visual quality in reconstructions hides violations of conservation laws that only trajectory checks detect.
  • Future extensions could add real-world capture data to compare against the simulated ground truth for domain-gap analysis.

Load-bearing premise

Scenes produced by the chosen material-specific physics solvers accurately represent real-world physical behavior and the supplied ground-truth trajectories suffice to separate physically faithful reconstructions from those that are only visually plausible.

What would settle it

A test where a dynamic novel view synthesis model produces novel views that match visual ground truth yet its inferred particle trajectories deviate substantially from the provided 3D ground-truth paths on the same scenes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02794 by Bohyung Han, Gunhee Kim, Jungyoon Choi, Mijeong Kim, Wonjae Roh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Examples from the proposed physics-aware dataset, PhysGaia. They exhibit complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visualization of datasets most similar to our PhysGaia. While all of these datasets address [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Visualization of physics properties in PhysGaia. Alongside multi-body interactions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of diverse modalities that users can [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative results of recent DyNVS methods on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of reconstructed trajectories and its ground truth on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visualization of training camera’s traj. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Examples from the proposed physics-aware dataset, PhysGaia. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples from the proposed physics-aware dataset, PhysGaia. They exhibit complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Qualitative results of recent DyNVS methods on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce PhysGaia, a novel physics-aware benchmark for Dynamic Novel View Synthesis (DyNVS) that encompasses both structured objects and unstructured physical phenomena. While existing datasets primarily focus on photorealistic appearance, PhysGaia is specifically designed to support physics-consistent dynamic reconstruction. Our benchmark features complex scenarios with rich multi-body interactions, where objects realistically collide and exchange forces. Furthermore, it incorporates a diverse range of materials, including liquid, gas, textile, and rheological substance, moving beyond the rigid-body assumptions prevalent in prior work. To ensure physical fidelity, all scenes in PhysGaia are generated using material-specific physics solvers that strictly adhere to fundamental physical laws. We provide comprehensive ground-truth information, including 3D particle trajectories and physical parameters (e.g., viscosity), enabling the quantitative evaluation of physical modeling. To facilitate research adoption, we also provide integration pipelines for recent 4D Gaussian Splatting models along with our dataset and their results. By addressing the critical shortage of physics-aware benchmarks, PhysGaia can significantly advance research in dynamic view synthesis, physics-based scene understanding, and the integration of deep learning with physical simulation, ultimately enabling more faithful reconstruction and interpretation of complex dynamic scenes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces PhysGaia, a benchmark dataset for dynamic novel view synthesis (DyNVS) featuring multi-body interactions across structured objects and unstructured phenomena. Scenes incorporate diverse materials (liquids, gases, textiles, rheological substances) generated via material-specific physics solvers, with provided ground-truth 3D particle trajectories and physical parameters (e.g., viscosity) to support quantitative evaluation of physical modeling. Integration pipelines for 4D Gaussian Splatting models and baseline results are also supplied.

Significance. A well-validated physics-aware benchmark could meaningfully advance DyNVS research by shifting evaluation from purely visual metrics toward physical consistency in reconstructions involving collisions, force exchanges, and non-rigid dynamics. The inclusion of integration pipelines and results for recent models is a concrete practical contribution that lowers barriers to adoption.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that scenes are generated 'using material-specific physics solvers that strictly adhere to fundamental physical laws' and thereby enable 'quantitative evaluation of physical modeling' is not supported by any real-world validation. The manuscript provides no comparisons of simulated trajectories or force exchanges against independent measurements (high-speed video, motion capture, or sensor data) under matched conditions, so it remains unclear whether low reconstruction error on PhysGaia demonstrates physical fidelity or merely simulator consistency.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify in the dataset description whether the provided ground-truth trajectories include all solver-specific discretization artifacts or only idealized physical quantities.
  2. The abstract mentions 'rich multi-body interactions' but does not specify quantitative metrics (e.g., collision counts, force magnitudes) used to characterize interaction complexity; adding these would strengthen the benchmark's utility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the benchmark's potential impact. We address the major comment on the abstract's claims regarding physical validation below, with a commitment to revisions for clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that scenes are generated 'using material-specific physics solvers that strictly adhere to fundamental physical laws' and thereby enable 'quantitative evaluation of physical modeling' is not supported by any real-world validation. The manuscript provides no comparisons of simulated trajectories or force exchanges against independent measurements (high-speed video, motion capture, or sensor data) under matched conditions, so it remains unclear whether low reconstruction error on PhysGaia demonstrates physical fidelity or merely simulator consistency.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on distinguishing simulator-internal consistency from direct real-world physical fidelity. PhysGaia is explicitly a simulation-based benchmark: all scenes are generated by established material-specific solvers (e.g., MPM for fluids/rheology, cloth simulators for textiles) that enforce fundamental laws by construction, as described in Section 3. These solvers are standard tools in computational physics and have been validated against experiments in the literature; our ground-truth particle trajectories and parameters (viscosity, etc.) therefore provide a controlled, quantitative testbed for whether DyNVS methods recover physically plausible dynamics. We acknowledge that the manuscript does not include new side-by-side comparisons to real-world sensor data, which would be a separate experimental effort outside the scope of a benchmark paper. To prevent misinterpretation, we will revise the abstract to state that physical adherence is achieved through the use of validated physics simulators rather than claiming direct real-world validation. We will also add a limitations paragraph clarifying that PhysGaia evaluates consistency with physics-based simulation as a proxy for physical modeling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in benchmark dataset presentation

full rationale

The paper introduces PhysGaia as an externally generated benchmark using material-specific physics solvers to produce scenes and ground-truth trajectories. No derivation chain is claimed that reduces a prediction or first-principles result to the paper's own fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. The abstract and description position the work as a data contribution for evaluating other methods, with simulator outputs serving as direct ground truth rather than a renamed fit or self-referential loop. This is the normal case of a self-contained benchmark paper with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The benchmark rests on the domain assumption that the chosen physics solvers produce physically valid trajectories and on the availability of those solvers; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Material-specific physics solvers strictly adhere to fundamental physical laws.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify physical fidelity of all generated scenes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5764 in / 1278 out tokens · 31972 ms · 2026-05-19T12:08:13.687046+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LMMs Meet Object-Centric Vision: Understanding, Segmentation, Editing and Generation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    This review organizes literature on large multimodal models and object-centric vision into four themes—understanding, referring segmentation, editing, and generation—while summarizing paradigms, strategies, and challe...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P.P., Tancik, M., Barron, J.T., Ramamoorthi, R., Ng, R.: Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In ECCV . (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Li, T., Slavcheva, M., Zollhoefer, M., Green, S., Lassner, C., Kim, C., Schmidt, T., Lovegrove, S., Goesele, M., Newcombe, R., et al.: Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video. In CVPR. (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Pumarola, A., Corona, E., Pons-Moll, G., Moreno-Noguer, F.: D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes. In CVPR. (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Yoon, J.S., Kim, K., Gallo, O., Park, H.S., Kautz, J.: Novel view synthesis of dynamic scenes with globally coherent depths from a monocular camera. In CVPR. (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Gao, C., Saraf, A., Kopf, J., Huang, J.B.: Dynamic view synthesis from dynamic monocular video. In ICCV . (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Du, Y ., Zhang, Y ., Yu, H.X., Tenenbaum, J.B., Wu, J.: Neural radiance flow for 4d view synthesis and video processing. In ICCV . (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Park, K., Sinha, U., Barron, J.T., Bouaziz, S., Goldman, D.B., Seitz, S.M., Martin-Brualla, R.: Nerfies: Deformable neural radiance fields. In ICCV . (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Cao, A., Johnson, J.: Hexplane: A fast representation for dynamic scenes. In CVPR. (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Fridovich-Keil, S., Meanti, G., Warburg, F.R., Recht, B., Kanazawa, A.: K-planes: Explicit radiance fields in space, time, and appearance. In CVPR. (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Shao, R., Zheng, Z., Tu, H., Liu, B., Zhang, H., Liu, Y .: Tensor4d: Efficient neural 4d decomposition for high-fidelity dynamic reconstruction and rendering. In CVPR. (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    In SIGGRAPH Asia

    Fang, J., Yi, T., Wang, X., Xie, L., Zhang, X., Liu, W., Nießner, M., Tian, Q.: Fast dynamic radiance fields with time-aware neural voxels. In SIGGRAPH Asia. (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    ACM Trans

    Park, K., Sinha, U., Hedman, P., Barron, J.T., Bouaziz, S., Goldman, D.B., Martin-Brualla, R., Seitz, S.M.: Hypernerf: A higher-dimensional representation for topologically varying neural radiance fields. ACM Trans. Graph. (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    In NeurIPS

    Gao, H., Li, R., Tulsiani, S., Russell, B., Kanazawa, A.: Monocular dynamic view synthesis: A reality check. In NeurIPS. (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    In NeurIPS

    Kim, M., Lim, J., Han, B.: Ua-4dgs: 4d gaussian splatting in the wild with uncertainty-aware regularization. In NeurIPS. (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Wang, Q., Ye, V ., Gao, H., Austin, J., Li, Z., Kanazawa, A.: Shape of motion: 4d reconstruction from a single video (2024) arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13764

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Zhang, T., Gao, Q., Li, W., Liu, L., Chen, B.: Bags: Building animatable gaussian splatting from a monocular video with diffusion priors (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Huang, Y .H., Sun, Y .T., Yang, Z., Lyu, X., Cao, Y .P., Qi, X.: Sc-gs: Sparse-controlled gaussian splatting for editable dynamic scenes. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Kwak, S., Kim, J., Jeong, J.Y ., Cheong, W.S., Oh, J., Kim, M.: Modec-gs: Global-to-local motion decomposition and temporal interval adjustment for compact dynamic 3d gaussian splatting (2025) arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03714

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Kratimenos, A., Lei, J., Daniilidis, K.: Dynmf: Neural motion factorization for real-time dynamic view synthesis with 3d gaussian splatting. In ECCV . (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Cai, W., Ye, W., Ye, P., He, T., Chen, T.: Dynasurfgs: Dynamic surface reconstruction with planar-based gaussian splatting (2024) arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13972

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    In ACM ToG

    Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimkühler, T., Drettakis, G.: 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. In ACM ToG. (2023) 11

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Xie, T., Zong, Z., Qiu, Y ., Li, X., Feng, Y ., Yang, Y ., Jiang, C.: Physgaussian: Physics-integrated 3d gaussians for generative dynamics. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Zhang, T., Yu, H.X., Wu, R., Feng, B.Y ., Zheng, C., Snavely, N., Wu, J., Freeman, W.T.: Physdreamer: Physics-based interaction with 3d objects via video generation. In ECCV . (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Liu, S., Ren, Z., Gupta, S., Wang, S.: Physgen: Rigid-body physics-grounded image-to-video generation. In ECCV . (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Borycki, P., Smolak, W., Waczy´nska, J., Mazur, M., Tadeja, S., Spurek, P.: Gasp: Gaussian splatting for physic-based simulations (2024) arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05819

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Jiang, H., Hsu, H.Y ., Zhang, K., Yu, H.N., Wang, S., Li, Y .: Phystwin: Physics-informed reconstruction and simulation of deformable objects from videos (2025) arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.17973

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    In SIGGRAPH

    Jiang, Y ., Yu, C., Xie, T., Li, X., Feng, Y ., Wang, H., Li, M., Lau, H., Gao, F., Yang, Y ., et al.: Vr-gs: A physical dynamics-aware interactive gaussian splatting system in virtual reality. In SIGGRAPH. (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Lin, Y ., Lin, C., Xu, J., Mu, Y .: Omniphysgs: 3d constitutive gaussians for general physics-based dynamics generation. In ICLR. (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Huang, T., Zhang, H., Zeng, Y ., Zhang, Z., Li, H., Zuo, W., Lau, R.W.: Dreamphysics: Learning physics-based 3d dynamics with video diffusion priors. In AAAI. (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Qiu, R.Z., Yang, G., Zeng, W., Wang, X.: Feature splatting: Language-driven physics-based scene synthesis and editing. In ECCV . (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Zhong, L., Yu, H.X., Wu, J., Li, Y .: Reconstruction and simulation of elastic objects with spring-mass 3d gaussians. In ECCV . (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Chen, A., Xu, Z., Geiger, A., Yu, J., Su, H.: Tensorf: Tensorial radiance fields. In ECCV . (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Garbin, S.J., Kowalski, M., Johnson, M., Shotton, J., Valentin, J.: Fastnerf: High-fidelity neural rendering at 200fps. In ICCV . (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Wang, L., Zhang, J., Liu, X., Zhao, F., Zhang, Y ., Zhang, Y ., Wu, M., Yu, J., Xu, L.: Fourier plenoctrees for dynamic radiance field rendering in real-time. In CVPR. (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    In ACM TOG

    Müller, T., Evans, A., Schied, C., Keller, A.: Instant neural graphics primitives with a multireso- lution hash encoding. In ACM TOG. (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Yang, Z., Gao, X., Zhou, W., Jiao, S., Zhang, Y ., Jin, X.: Deformable 3d gaussians for high-fidelity monocular dynamic scene reconstruction. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Wu, G., Yi, T., Fang, J., Xie, L., Zhang, X., Wei, W., Liu, W., Tian, Q., Wang, X.: 4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Li, Z., Chen, Z., Li, Z., Xu, Y .: Spacetime gaussian feature splatting for real-time dynamic view synthesis. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Lin, Y ., Dai, Z., Zhu, S., Yao, Y .: Gaussian-flow: 4d reconstruction with dynamic 3d gaussian particle. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Lu, Z., Guo, X., Hui, L., Chen, T., Yang, M., Tang, X., Zhu, F., Dai, Y .: 3d geometry-aware deformable gaussian splatting for dynamic view synthesis. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    In TCSVT

    Guo, Z., Zhou, W., Li, L., Wang, M., Li, H.: Motion-aware 3d gaussian splatting for efficient dynamic scene reconstruction. In TCSVT. (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    In W ACV

    Liang, Y ., Khan, N., Li, Z., Nguyen-Phuoc, T., Lanman, D., Tompkin, J., Xiao, L.: Gaufre: Gaussian deformation fields for real-time dynamic novel view synthesis. In W ACV . (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Lei, J., Weng, Y ., Harley, A., Guibas, L., Daniilidis, K.: Mosca: Dynamic gaussian fusion from casual videos via 4d motion scaffolds (2024) arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17421. 12

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    In SIGGRAPH

    Duan, Y ., Wei, F., Dai, Q., He, Y ., Chen, W., Chen, B.: 4d-rotor gaussian splatting: towards efficient novel view synthesis for dynamic scenes. In SIGGRAPH. (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    In NeurIPS

    Waczynska, J., Borycki, P., Kaleta, J., Tadeja, S., Spurek, P.: D-miso: Editing dynamic 3d scenes using multi-gaussians soup. In NeurIPS. (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Liu, Q., Liu, Y ., Wang, J., Lyv, X., Wang, P., Wang, W., Hou, J.: Modgs: Dynamic gaussian splatting from casually-captured monocular videos. In ICLR. (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    In SIGGRAPH

    Stearns, C., Harley, A., Uy, M., Dubost, F., Tombari, F., Wetzstein, G., Guibas, L.: Dynamic gaussian marbles for novel view synthesis of casual monocular videos. In SIGGRAPH. (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (1994)

    Sulsky, D., Chen, Z., Schreyer, H.L.: A particle method for history-dependent materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (1994)

    work page 1994

  49. [49]

    Yan, Z., Li, C., Lee, G.H.: Nerf-ds: Neural radiance fields for dynamic specular objects. In CVPR. (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    In W ACV

    Bhattacharya, A., Madaan, R., Cladera, F., Vemprala, S., Bonatti, R., Daniilidis, K., Kapoor, A., Kumar, V ., Matni, N., Gupta, J.K.: Evdnerf: Reconstructing event data with dynamic neural radiance fields. In W ACV . (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    In Multimedia Content Analysis in Sports

    Lewin, S., Vandegar, M., Hoyoux, T., Barnich, O., Louppe, G.: Dynamic nerfs for soccer scenes. In Multimedia Content Analysis in Sports. (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Wu, G., Yi, T., Fang, J., Liu, W., Wang, X.: Fast high dynamic range radiance fields for dynamic scenes. In 3DV . (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR. (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Yang, L., Kang, B., Huang, Z., Xu, X., Feng, J., Zhao, H.: Depth anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    (2023) arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06583

    Yang, Z., Du, Y ., Sun, D., Jampani, V ., Liu, C., Freeman, W.T., Tenenbaum, J.B., Wu, J.: Cotracker: Transformers for tracking any point. (2023) arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06583

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    International Journal of Computer Vision (1992)

    Tomasi, C., Kanade, T.: Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: A factoriza- tion method. International Journal of Computer Vision (1992)

    work page 1992

  57. [57]

    TOG (2007)

    Sorkine, O., Alexa, M.: As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling. TOG (2007)

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    TOG (2021)

    Zhang, M., Wang, T.Y ., Ceylan, D., Mitra, N.J.: Dynamic neural garments. TOG (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Zou, X., Han, X., Wong, W.: Cloth4d: A dataset for clothed human reconstruction. In CVPR. (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Wang, W., Ho, H.I., Guo, C., Rong, B., Grigorev, A., Song, J., Zarate, J.J., Hilliges, O.: 4D- DRESS: A 4d dataset of real-world human clothing with semantic annotations. In CVPR. (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Rasheed, A.H., Romero, V ., Bertails-Descoubes, F., Wuhrer, S., Franco, J.S., Lazarus, A.: Learning to measure the static friction coefficient in cloth contact. In CVPR. (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Deng, Y ., Yu, H.X., Wu, J., Zhu, B.: Learning vortex dynamics for fluid inference and prediction. In ICML. (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Li, X., Qiao, Y .L., Chen, P.Y ., Jatavallabhula, K.M., Lin, M., Jiang, C., Gan, C.: Pac-nerf: Physics augmented continuum neural radiance fields for geometry-agnostic system identification. In ICLR. (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Marie-Lena Eckert, Kiwon Um, N.T.: Scalarflow: A large-scale volumetric data set of real-world scalar transport flows for computer animation and machine learning. In TOG. (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Hu, Y ., Li, T.M., Anderson, L., Ragan-Kelley, J., Durand, F.: Taichi: a language for high- performance computation on spatially sparse data structures. In TOG. (2019) 13

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    https://github.com/nvidia/warp (March 2022) NVIDIA GPU Technology Conference (GTC)

    Macklin, M.: Warp: A high-performance python framework for gpu simulation and graph- ics. https://github.com/nvidia/warp (March 2022) NVIDIA GPU Technology Conference (GTC)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Authors, G.: Genesis: A universal and generative physics engine for robotics and beyond (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Hu, Y ., Anderson, L., Li, T.M., Sun, Q., Carr, N., Ragan-Kelley, J., Durand, F.: Difftaichi: Differentiable programming for physical simulation. In ICLR. (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    Hu, Y ., Fang, Y ., Ge, Z., Qu, Z., Zhu, Y ., Pradhana, A., Jiang, C.: A moving least squares material point method with displacement discontinuity and two-way rigid body coupling. In TOG. (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Computer Physics Communications (1988)

    Brackbill, J.U., Kothe, D.B., Ruppel, H.M.: Flip: A low-dissipation, particle-in-cell method for fluid flow. Computer Physics Communications (1988)

    work page 1988

  71. [71]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1977)

    Gingold, R.A., Monaghan, J.J.: Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1977)

    work page 1977

  72. [72]

    https://www.sidefx.com/docs/houdini/pyro/ intro.html (2012)

    SideFX Software: Pyro solver. https://www.sidefx.com/docs/houdini/pyro/ intro.html (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    Journal of Computational Physics (1986)

    Brackbill, J.U.: Flip: A low-dissipation, particle-in-cell method for fluid flow. Journal of Computational Physics (1986)

    work page 1986

  74. [74]

    https://www.sidefx.com/docs/houdini/ vellum/overview.html (2017)

    SideFX Software: Vellum solver. https://www.sidefx.com/docs/houdini/ vellum/overview.html (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Motion in Games

    Macklin, M., Müller, M., Chentanez, N.: Xpbd: position-based simulation of compliant constrained dynamics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Motion in Games. (2016)

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation (2007)

    Müller, M., Heidelberger, B., Hennix, M., Ratcliff, J.: Position based dynamics. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation (2007)

    work page 2007

  77. [77]

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. In TIP. (2004)

    work page 2004

  78. [78]

    Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A.A., Shechtman, E., Wang, O.: The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In CVPR. (2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [79]

    CoRR (2018) 14 A Details of PhysGaia A.1 Scene Lists Our dataset consists of 17 scenes divided into four categories: liquid, gas, viscoelastic substances, and textile

    Peng, X., Usman, B., Saito, K., Kaushik, N., Hoffman, J., Saenko, K.: Syn2real: A new benchmark forsynthetic-to-real visual domain adaptation. CoRR (2018) 14 A Details of PhysGaia A.1 Scene Lists Our dataset consists of 17 scenes divided into four categories: liquid, gas, viscoelastic substances, and textile. Each category contains 4 to 5 scenes, and the ...

    work page 2018