pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2506.16453 · v4 · submitted 2025-06-19 · 💻 cs.SE

Recognition: unknown

Understanding the Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI Apps: An Empirical Study

Buthayna AlMulla , Maram Assi , Safwat Hassan

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.SE
keywords appsgen-aireviewsanalysischallengescreativegenerativeopportunities
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The release of ChatGPT in 2022 triggered a rapid surge in generative artificial intelligence mobile apps (Gen-AI apps). Despite widespread adoption, little is known about how end users perceive and evaluate these Gen-AI functionalities. We conduct a user-centered analysis of 1,035,342 reviews from 171 Gen-AI apps from the Google Play Store. We propose SARA (Selection, Acquisition, Refinement, and Analysis), a four-phase framework that leverages prompt-based LLMs for large-scale review analysis. We validate the reliability of LLM-based topic extraction and assignment using 4,353 manually evaluated reviews, achieving 91% accuracy with five-shot prompting and filtering of non-informative reviews. We identify the top ten topics (e.g., AI Performance and Emotional Connection) and perform a cross-platform comparison with Apple App Store reviews. Through qualitative analysis of 762 reviews, we uncover three opportunities (AI for Accessibility and Wellbeing, AI as a Collaborative Creative Tool, and AI Versatility) and three challenges (Managing User Expectations and AI Limitations, Balancing Content Moderation and Creative Freedom, and Strategic Integration of Gen-AI Features). Finally, we analyze temporal trends, revealing how user concerns shift as users mature. Our findings enable researchers and developers to better leverage the capabilities of Gen-AI apps and address potential challenges.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AI coding agents are classified along a Collaborator-Assistant spectrum using an Initiator x Approver taxonomy on 29,585 PR lifecycles, revealing agent initiation in collaborator tools but near-universal human merge g...

  2. Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AI coding tools divide into collaborators that initiate most PRs and assistants that support human-led ones, yet humans retain merge authority across all five tools examined.

  3. From Assistance to Agency: Rethinking Autonomy and Control in CI/CD Pipelines

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The central challenge in AI-augmented CI/CD is designing authority transfer from humans to agents under constraints, as current systems remain limited to bounded data-plane autonomy backed by external governance.

  4. A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 accept novelty 4.0

    The survey organizes Context Engineering into retrieval, processing, management, and integrated systems like RAG and multi-agent setups while identifying an asymmetry where LLMs handle complex inputs well but struggle...