pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.07104 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE· physics.plasm-ph· physics.space-ph

Cosmic Rays on Galaxy Scales: Progress and Pitfalls for CR-MHD Dynamical Models

Philip F. Hopkins This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph
keywords cosmic raysCR-MHDgalaxy formationcircumgalactic mediumcosmic ray transportmagnetohydrodynamicsinterstellar mediumgalaxy scales
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cosmic ray modeling on galaxy scales requires moving beyond older assumptions to rigorously derived CR-MHD equations and global simulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how cosmic rays influence galactic and circumgalactic physics but shows that many current models rely on outdated assumptions that introduce systematic errors. It stresses the fundamental dependence of macro-scale behavior on micro-scale gyro orbits and meso-scale mean free paths. By critiquing approaches such as simple Fokker-Planck equations, leaky boxes, and classical streaming models, the work highlights recent advances including rigorously derived equations, full-spectrum dynamics, and global 3D galaxy-plus-halo simulations. Compiling extragalactic and local interstellar medium observations constrains GeV cosmic ray transport in the circumgalactic medium and supplies phenomenological models for future use. Readers would care because accurate transport modeling changes predictions for star formation and galaxy evolution.

Core claim

Recent arguments indicate cosmic rays play an important role in galactic and circumgalactic medium physics, yet older assumptions such as ad-hoc two-moment formalisms, leaky-box or plane-parallel boundaries, and classical advection or self-confinement models produce systematic errors; these are addressed by rigorously derived CR-MHD equations, global three-dimensional galaxy and halo models, full-spectrum treatments, and novel intermittent scattering models, while compiled observations constrain GeV cosmic ray transport in the circumgalactic medium.

What carries the argument

Rigorously-derived CR-MHD equations whose behavior depends on micro-scale CR gyro orbits and meso-scale mean-free-paths of cosmic ray scattering.

If this is right

  • Global 3D galaxy and halo models will permit direct, quantitative comparisons to local interstellar medium spectra.
  • Phenomenological transport models based on the compiled observations can be inserted into future simulations.
  • Methods for full-spectrum dynamics and intermittent scattering will replace older spectrally integrated approximations.
  • Open questions at micro, meso, and macro scales will guide the next generation of CR-MHD simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Better CR transport prescriptions could alter the efficiency of cosmic ray feedback in regulating star formation across different galaxy masses.
  • Linking local interstellar medium constraints with extragalactic observables may expose scale-dependent scattering regimes not yet included in models.
  • The same framework could be extended to test whether revised transport changes predictions for circumgalactic medium ionization and gas dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The compiled extragalactic and LISM observations sufficiently constrain GeV CR transport in the CGM to guide phenomenological models for future simulations.

What would settle it

If global 3D simulations using the new CR-MHD equations fail to reproduce observed GeV cosmic ray spectra in the circumgalactic medium or local interstellar medium when compared directly to the compiled data, the claimed progress in reducing systematic errors would be undermined.

read the original abstract

Recent years have seen many arguments for cosmic rays (CRs) as an important influence on galactic and circumgalactic (CGM) physics, star and galaxy formation. We present a pedagogical overview of state-of-the-art modeling of CR-magnetohydrodynamics (CR-MHD) on macro scales (~kpc), highlighting their fundamental dependence on the micro (< au) scales of CR gyro orbits and meso (~pc) scales of CR mean-free-paths, intended to connect the extragalactic, Galactic, and plasma CR transport modeling communities. We note the pitfalls and systematic errors that arise from older assumptions in CR modeling, including: use of a simple Fokker-Planck equation or ad-hoc two-moment formalisms for transport; assumption of leaky boxes or plane-parallel or shear-periodic boundaries for comparison to local interstellar medium (LISM) observations; ignoring detailed LISM constraints on CR spectra (e.g. focusing only on extragalactic observables or spectrally integrated models); assuming CR transport is mediated by classical models of advection, streaming from self-confinement (super-Alfvenic or Alfvenic), or extrinsic turbulence. We emphasize recent progress addressing these: development of rigorously-derived CR-MHD equations; use of global, 3D galaxy+halo models for LISM comparisons; new methods for full-spectrum dynamics; novel models for intermittent scattering and/or new drivers. We compile extragalactic+LISM observations to show how ~GeV CR transport is being rapidly constrained in the CGM, and present phenomenological models which can be used in future simulations. We conclude by highlighting critical open questions for micro, meso, and macro-scale CR-MHD simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper provides a pedagogical overview of cosmic ray (CR) magnetohydrodynamics (CR-MHD) modeling on galactic and circumgalactic scales (~kpc), emphasizing the dependence on micro- and meso-scale physics. It identifies pitfalls in older approaches such as simple Fokker-Planck or ad-hoc two-moment transport, leaky-box or plane-parallel boundaries, neglect of LISM spectral constraints, and classical assumptions for advection/streaming/turbulence. It highlights progress via rigorously derived CR-MHD equations, global 3D galaxy+halo models, full-spectrum dynamics, and intermittent scattering models. The manuscript compiles extragalactic and LISM observations to argue that ~GeV CR transport in the CGM is being rapidly constrained and presents phenomenological models for future simulations, while listing critical open questions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the review would usefully bridge extragalactic, Galactic, and plasma communities by cataloging systematic errors from legacy assumptions and directing attention to newer global 3D frameworks. The compilation of observations and presentation of phenomenological models could provide practical guidance for simulation setups, and the explicit listing of open micro/meso/macro questions is a constructive contribution. The paper does not ship machine-checked proofs or new falsifiable predictions but does synthesize cross-scale constraints in a manner that could reduce ad-hoc choices in future CR-MHD work.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 4] Section 4 (phenomenological models) and the observation compilation: the claim that extragalactic+LISM data now sufficiently constrain ~GeV CR transport coefficients (diffusion tensor, streaming speed) in the CGM is not supported by a degeneracy analysis. Multiple combinations of advection, intermittent scattering, and extrinsic turbulence can reproduce the same integrated gamma-ray, synchrotron, or secondary-ratio observables when halo B-field geometry and n_gas profiles remain free parameters; without sensitivity tests or posterior width quantification, the guidance for future simulations is less secure than stated in the abstract and conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly distinguish which older assumptions are still used in current global 3D runs versus which have already been superseded in the literature cited.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for transport coefficients (e.g., diffusion tensor components) should be standardized across sections to avoid ambiguity when comparing LISM versus CGM constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments, which have helped us to refine the presentation of our review. We respond to the major comment as follows.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (phenomenological models) and the observation compilation: the claim that extragalactic+LISM data now sufficiently constrain ~GeV CR transport coefficients (diffusion tensor, streaming speed) in the CGM is not supported by a degeneracy analysis. Multiple combinations of advection, intermittent scattering, and extrinsic turbulence can reproduce the same integrated gamma-ray, synchrotron, or secondary-ratio observables when halo B-field geometry and n_gas profiles remain free parameters; without sensitivity tests or posterior width quantification, the guidance for future simulations is less secure than stated in the abstract and conclusion.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the lack of explicit degeneracy analysis in our discussion of observational constraints. The manuscript compiles observations to demonstrate that ~GeV CR transport in the CGM is being rapidly constrained by the combination of extragalactic and LISM data, as opposed to claiming that the coefficients are now fully and uniquely determined. We acknowledge that degeneracies with halo B-field geometry and gas density profiles do exist, and that different combinations of advection, intermittent scattering, and turbulence can fit the data. To address this, we have revised Section 4 to include a discussion of these degeneracies and their implications for simulation guidance. We have also adjusted the language in the abstract and conclusion to more accurately reflect that the constraints are improving but not yet complete, and we suggest that future work should include sensitivity analyses. This revision makes the guidance more secure as requested. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in review compiling external observations

full rationale

The paper is a pedagogical review that compiles independent extragalactic and LISM observations to discuss constraints on ~GeV CR transport in the CGM and highlights pitfalls in older modeling assumptions versus progress in new CR-MHD equations and global 3D simulations. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction, uniqueness result, or phenomenological model to the paper's own fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or self-citation chains by construction; all central claims draw from external data sources and prior literature that remain falsifiable outside the present work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper discusses assumptions in the broader CR-MHD field but introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or entities itself; the ledger reflects domain assumptions it highlights as problematic in older work.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption CR-MHD models on kpc scales fundamentally depend on micro (<au) gyro orbits and meso (~pc) mean-free-path scales
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the basis for connecting modeling communities and identifying pitfalls.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5848 in / 1271 out tokens · 32653 ms · 2026-05-18T17:36:15.757620+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Distribution of Cosmic Ray Electrons in Star-Forming Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Explicit algebraic expressions for cosmic ray electron number density as a function of position and energy are derived for axisymmetric source distributions in galaxies.

  2. Clumps in a Cocoon: Geometry and Mixing Set the Universal X-ray to H$\alpha$ Surface Brightness Ratio

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    3D wind-tunnel simulations in the χ~10^3 regime show clump-cocoon geometry sets SB_X/SB_Hα~3, with Hα fraction fixed by atomic physics and X-ray fraction set by residence time in the X-ray band that scales inversely w...

  3. Beyond the Diffusion Coefficient: Propagators and Memory in Cosmic Ray Transport

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Cosmic ray transport requires a propagator P(k,s) that encodes memory and non-diffusive behaviors rather than being reduced to a single diffusion coefficient.

  4. Effects of Varied Cosmic Ray Feedback from AGN on Massive Galaxy Properties

    astro-ph.GA 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Varied cosmic ray feedback models from AGN in FIRE-3 simulations all quench massive galaxies consistently with observations but produce vastly different circumgalactic medium properties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 '...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

    work page

  3. [3]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Abdo A. A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...710..133A 710, 133

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/710/1/133 2010

  4. [4]

    Acero F., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/223/2/26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..223...26A 223, 26

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/223/2/26 2016

  5. [5]

    Ackermann M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/81 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...726...81A 726, 81

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/726/2/81 2011

  6. [6]

    Ackermann M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750....3A 750, 3

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/3 2012

  7. [7]

    Ackermann M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6cab , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...840...43A 840, 43

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6cab 2017

  8. [8]

    Albert A., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad738e , 974, 246

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad738e 2024

  9. [9]

    Amato E., Blasi P., 2018, @doi [Advances in Space Research] 10.1016/j.asr.2017.04.019 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AdSpR..62.2731A 62, 2731

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2017.04.019 2018

  10. [10]

    arXiv:2503.14651

    Ambrosone A., Evoli C., Schroer B., Blasi P., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250314651A p. arXiv:2503.14651

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14651 2025

  11. [11]

    arXiv , author =:2108.09356 , journal =

    Armillotta L., Ostriker E. C., Jiang Y.-F., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1db2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922...11A 922, 11

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1db2 2021

  12. [12]

    Bai X.-N., Caprioli D., Sironi L., Spitkovsky A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809...55B 809, 55

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/55 2015

  13. [13]

    C., Plotnikov I., Stone J

    Bai X.-N., Ostriker E. C., Plotnikov I., Stone J. M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876...60B 876, 60

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1648 2019

  14. [14]

    W., Girichidis P., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.15614 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250515614B p

    Baldacchino-Jordan A., Hanasz M., Ogrodnik M., W \'o lta \'n ski D., Gawryszczak A., Strong A. W., Girichidis P., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.15614 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250515614B p. arXiv:2505.15614

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15614 2025

  15. [15]

    J., Bai X.-N., Ostriker E

    Bambic C. J., Bai X.-N., Ostriker E. C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ce7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920..141B 920, 141

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ce7 2021

  16. [16]

    M., Xu , S., & Lazarian , A

    Barreto-Mota L., de Gouveia Dal Pino E. M., Xu S., Lazarian A., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2405.12146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240512146B p. arXiv:2405.12146

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.12146 2024

  17. [17]

    Basu A., Beck R., Schmidt P., Roy S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv510 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.3879B 449, 3879

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv510 2015

  18. [18]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1195, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02551-5

    Beattie J. R., Federrath C., Klessen R. S., Cielo S., Bhattacharjee A., 2025, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-025-02551-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NatAs.tmp..114B

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02551-5 2025

  19. [19]

    Beck R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&ARv..24....4B 24, 4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4 2015

  20. [20]

    C., Beck A

    Beck M. C., Beck A. M., Beck R., Dolag K., Strong A. W., Nielaba P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/056 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016JCAP...05..056B 2016, 056

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/056 2016

  21. [21]

    R., 2013, @doi [Astroparticle Physics] 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.022 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013APh....43...56B 43, 56

    Bell A. R., 2013, @doi [Astroparticle Physics] 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.022 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013APh....43...56B 43, 56

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.022 2013

  22. [22]

    Bialy S., Belli S., Padovani M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658L..13B 658, L13

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142619 2022

  23. [23]

    M., Hooper D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JCAP...10..081B 2022, 081

    Bitter O. M., Hooper D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JCAP...10..081B 2022, 081

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/081 2022

  24. [24]

    Boldyrev S., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/431649 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...626L..37B 626, L37

    work page doi:10.1086/431649 2005

  25. [25]

    Boldyrev S., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.115002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PhRvL..96k5002B 96, 115002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.115002 2006

  26. [26]

    M., Agertz O., Kravtsov A

    Booth C. M., Agertz O., Kravtsov A. V., Gnedin N. Y., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/777/1/L16 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777L..16B 777, L16

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/777/1/l16 2013

  27. [27]

    Bovino S., Ferrada-Chamorro S., Lupi A., Schleicher D. R. G., Caselli P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa048 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495L...7B 495, L7

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa048 2020

  28. [28]

    F., Voelk H

    Breitschwerdt D., McKenzie J. F., Voelk H. J., 1991, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A

    work page 1991

  29. [29]

    arXiv:2410.19087

    Brugaletta V., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.19087 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241019087B p. arXiv:2410.19087

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.19087 2024

  30. [30]

    Buck T., Pfrommer C., Pakmor R., Grand R. J. J., Springel V., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.1712B 497, 1712

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1960 2020

  31. [31]

    arXiv , author =:2301.04156 , journal =

    Bustard C., Oh S. P., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aceef9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955...64B 955, 64

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aceef9 2023

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Bustard C., Zweibel E. G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abf64c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...913..106B 913, 106

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf64c 2021

  33. [33]

    S., Quinn T

    Butsky I. S., Quinn T. R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeac2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...868..108B 868, 108

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaeac2 2018

  34. [34]

    Butsky, Drummond B

    Butsky I. S., Fielding D. B., Hayward C. C., Hummels C. B., Quinn T. R., Werk J. K., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbad2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903...77B 903, 77

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbad2 2020

  35. [35]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad671 , eprint =

    Butsky I. S., Nakum S., Ponnada S. B., Hummels C. B., Ji S., Hopkins P. F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad671 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.2477B 521, 2477

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad671 2023

  36. [36]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae276 , eprint =

    Butsky I. S., Hopkins P. F., Kempski P., Ponnada S. B., Quataert E., Squire J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.4245B 528, 4245

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae276 2024

  37. [37]

    arXiv:2310.16086

    Byrne L., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.16086 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231016086B p. arXiv:2310.16086

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.16086 2023

  38. [38]

    Calore F., Cholis I., McCabe C., Weniger C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.063003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvD..91f3003C 91, 063003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.063003 2015

  39. [39]

    J., 1971, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society

    Cesarsky C. J., 1971, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. p. 480

    work page 1971

  40. [40]

    J., Kulsrud R

    Cesarsky C. J., Kulsrud R. M., 1981, in Setti G., Spada G., Wolfendale A. W., eds, IAU Symposium No. 94 Vol. 94, Origin of Cosmic Rays. D. Reidel Publishing Co, Dordrecht, Dordrecht, p. 251

    work page 1981

  41. [41]

    K., Kere s D., Hopkins P

    Chan T. K., Kere s D., Hopkins P. F., Quataert E., Su K. Y., Hayward C. C., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.3716C 488, 3716

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1895 2019

  42. [42]

    K., Kereˇ s, D., Gurvich, A

    Chan T. K., Kere s D., Gurvich A. B., Hopkins P. F., Trapp C., Ji S., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517..597C 517, 597

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2236 2022

  43. [43]

    Chandran B. D. G., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4656 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000PhRvL..85.4656C 85, 4656

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.4656 2000

  44. [44]

    L., Salem M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1197 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.3335C 460, 3335

    Chen J., Bryan G. L., Salem M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1197 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.3335C 460, 3335

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1197 2016

  45. [45]

    Cho J., Lazarian A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06941.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345..325C 345, 325

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06941.x 2003

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Cochrane R. K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.2409C 523, 2409

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1528 2023

  47. [47]

    The Misleading Nature of the Leaky Box Models in Cosmic Ray Physics

    Codino A., Plouin F., 2008, in International Cosmic Ray Conference. pp 191--194 ( @eprint arXiv 0806.1346 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0806.1346

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0806.1346 2008

  48. [48]

    M., Lazio T

    Cordes J. M., Lazio T. J. W., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319442 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...549..997C 549, 997

    work page doi:10.1086/319442 2001

  49. [49]

    Cosmic ray pressures and calorimetry

    Crocker R. M., Krumholz M. R., Thompson T. A., 2021a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.1312C 502, 1312

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab148

  50. [50]

    Stability limits and the onset of cosmic ray-driven outflows

    Crocker R. M., Krumholz M. R., Thompson T. A., 2021b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab502 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.2651C 503, 2651

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab502

  51. [51]

    E., Lopez-Rodriguez E., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.08437 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240908437D p

    Dacunha T., Martin-Alvarez S., Clark S. E., Lopez-Rodriguez E., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.08437 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240908437D p. arXiv:2409.08437

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.08437 2024

  52. [52]

    De La Torre Luque P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JCAP...11..018D 2021, 018

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/018 2021

  53. [53]

    arXiv:2408.05179

    De La Torre Luque P., Linden T., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.05179 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240805179D p. arXiv:2408.05179

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.05179 2024

  54. [54]

    2021, jcap, 2021, 099, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/099

    De La Torre Luque P., Mazziotta M. N., Loparco F., Gargano F., Serini D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JCAP...03..099D 2021, 099

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/099 2021

  55. [55]

    Delhaize J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629430 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...602A...4D 602, A4

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629430 2017

  56. [56]

    Derome L., Maurin D., Salati P., Boudaud M., G \'e nolini Y., Kunz \'e P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...627A.158D 627, A158

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935717 2019

  57. [57]

    Di Mauro M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063029 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PhRvD.103f3029D 103, 063029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.063029 2021

  58. [58]

    Di Mauro M., Korsmeier M., Cuoco A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvD.109l3003D 109, 123003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.123003 2024

  59. [59]

    Do A., Duong M., McDaniel A., O'Connor C., Profumo S., Rafael J., Sweeney C., Vera W., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PhRvD.104l3016D 104, 123016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123016 2021

  60. [60]

    Dome T., Martin-Alvarez S., Tacchella S., Yuan Y., Sijacki D., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.tmp...15D

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf006 2025

  61. [61]

    Dong C., Wang L., Huang Y.-M., Comisso L., Bhattacharjee A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.165101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvL.121p5101D 121, 165101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.165101 2018

  62. [62]

    2022, Science Advances, 8, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7627

    Dong C., Wang L., Huang Y.-M., Comisso L., Sandstrom T. A., Bhattacharjee A., 2022, @doi [Science Advances] 10.1126/sciadv.abn7627 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022SciA....8N7627D 8, eabn7627

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn7627 2022

  63. [63]

    A., & Breitschwerdt, D

    Dorfi E. A., Breitschwerdt D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118082 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118082 2012

  64. [64]

    T., 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    Draine B. T., 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    Elsasser K., Schamel H., 1974, @doi [Physics Letters A] 10.1016/0375-9601(74)90155-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974PhLA...47..419E 47, 419

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(74)90155-8 1974

  66. [66]

    Els \"a sser K., Schamel H., 1976, @doi [Zeitschrift fur Physik B Condensed Matter] 10.1007/BF01322265 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ZPhyB..23...89E 23, 89

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01322265 1976

  67. [67]

    En lin T., Pfrommer C., Miniati F., Subramanian K., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015652 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015652 2011

  68. [68]

    Y., Kreiss H

    Erlebacher G., Hussaini M. Y., Kreiss H. O., Sarkar S., 1990, @doi [Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics] 10.1007/BF00272136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ThCFD...2...73E 2, 73

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00272136 1990

  69. [69]

    E., Zweibel E

    Everett J. E., Zweibel E. G., Benjamin R. A., McCammon D., Rocks L., Gallagher III J. S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524766 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...674..258E 674, 258

    work page doi:10.1086/524766 2008

  70. [70]

    Evoli C., Morlino G., Blasi P., Aloisio R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.023013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhRvD.101b3013E 101, 023013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.023013 2020

  71. [71]

    Evoli C., Amato E., Blasi P., Aloisio R., 2021a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PhRvD.103h3010E 103, 083010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083010

  72. [72]

    Evoli C., Amato E., Blasi P., Aloisio R., 2021b, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123029 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PhRvD.104l3029E 104, 123029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123029

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Ewart R. J., Reichherzer P., Bott A. F. A., Kunz M. W., Schekochihin A. A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1578 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.2098E 532, 2098

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1578 2024

  74. [74]

    K., Zweibel E

    Farber R., Ruszkowski M., Yang H.-Y. K., Zweibel E. G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab26d , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856..112F 856, 112

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab26d 2018

  75. [75]

    arXiv:2501.17239

    Farcy M., Rosdahl J., Dubois Y., Blaizot J., Martin-Alvarez S., Haehnelt M., Kimm T., Teyssier R., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250117239F p. arXiv:2501.17239

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    J., Goldreich P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/382040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...604..671F 604, 671

    Farmer A. J., Goldreich P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/382040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...604..671F 604, 671

    work page doi:10.1086/382040 2004

  77. [77]

    Fielding D., Quataert E., Martizzi D., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slx072 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470L..39F 470, L39

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx072 2017

  78. [78]

    B., Ripperda B., Philippov A

    Fielding D. B., Ripperda B., Philippov A. A., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221106434F p. arXiv:2211.06434

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    F., Krumholz M

    Fitz Axen M., Offner S., Hopkins P. F., Krumholz M. R., Grudi \'c M. Y., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad675a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973...16F 973, 16

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad675a 2024

  80. [80]

    A., Kulsrud R

    Foote E. A., Kulsrud R. M., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157391 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...233..302F 233, 302

    work page doi:10.1086/157391 1979

Showing first 80 references.