arxiv: 2511.07956 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-11 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Detecting Parity-Violating Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with Pulsar Polarization Arrays

Qiuyue Liang , Kimihiro Nomura , Hidetoshi Omiya

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 00:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

keywords gravitational wave backgroundspulsar timing arrayspolarimetryparity violationcircular polarizationHellings-Downs correlation

0 comments

The pith

Cross-correlating pulsar timing and polarimetry isolates the circular polarization of stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows how to detect parity-violating features in nanohertz gravitational wave backgrounds using pulsar polarization arrays. Current timing arrays measure the intensity but miss the circular polarization that signals parity violation. By deriving the polarization rotation from geometric optics and computing the cross-correlation with timing signals, the circular component is isolated while sharing the familiar Hellings-Downs angular pattern. With instruments like the Square Kilometre Array, this approach could achieve sensitivities comparable to existing astrometric methods.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the cross-correlation between pulsar timing residuals and the polarization rotation induced by propagation through the GW background extracts the circular polarization component of an isotropic stochastic GW background, and this correlation follows the same Hellings-Downs angular dependence as the standard intensity correlation.

What carries the argument

The timing-polarimetry cross-correlation function, derived under the geometric optics approximation for electromagnetic wave propagation in a stochastic GW background.

If this is right

Parity violation in GW backgrounds becomes accessible to pulsar-based observations.
The same angular pattern allows reuse of existing analysis pipelines for the new observable.
Future SKA observations could reach sensitivities matching current astrometric limits for circular polarization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the signal is detected, it would constrain models of the early universe that generate chiral gravitational waves.
Combining this with other parity probes could test fundamental symmetries across different frequency bands.
Extensions to anisotropic backgrounds or specific source populations could be explored with similar correlations.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the geometric optics approximation accurately captures the polarization rotation caused by an isotropic stochastic gravitational wave background and that systematics will not obscure the cross-correlation signal.

What would settle it

A null result in the timing-polarimetry cross-correlation, inconsistent with the predicted Hellings-Downs pattern after accounting for noise, would indicate that the method does not isolate the circular polarization as claimed.

read the original abstract

Pulsar timing arrays probe isotropic stochastic gravitational wave (GW) backgrounds in the nanohertz band but are insensitive to its parity-violating component. Motivated by recent progress in pulsar polarization arrays, we study the response of pulsar polarimetry to GWs and evaluate its potential to detect circular polarization in isotropic stochastic GW backgrounds, which characterizes parity violation. Based on geometric optics, we derive the rotation of the polarization of electromagnetic waves induced by propagation through a GW background. We show that the cross-correlation between pulsar timing and polarimetry signals isolates the circular polarization component from the GW intensity, sharing the same Hellings-Downs angular pattern. With future facilities such as the SKA, timing-polarimetry correlations could reach sensitivities to the circular polarization of GWs comparable to those of the current astrometric methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's main move is to cross-correlate pulsar timing residuals with polarimetry to isolate circular polarization in the nanohertz GW background while keeping the Hellings-Downs angular dependence.

read the letter

The central claim is that timing-polarimetry cross-correlations can separate the parity-odd circular component from the intensity part of an isotropic stochastic GW background, and that this cross-correlation still follows the standard Hellings-Downs pattern. That isolation step is the new piece relative to existing PTA and polarization-array work. The derivation starts from the usual geometric-optics treatment of electromagnetic wave propagation in a weak GW field, which is a reasonable place to begin, and the abstract points to SKA-level sensitivities as a practical target. Those are the parts that look useful on first read. The soft spot is the geometric-optics assumption itself. At nanohertz frequencies the GW wavelength is roughly 0.01 to 0.1 times a typical Earth-pulsar distance, so the short-wavelength limit is not obviously safe. Finite-wavelength corrections to the polarization transport could change the angular response of the polarimetry observable relative to the timing residual, which would spoil both the clean isolation and the exact Hellings-Downs overlap. The abstract gives no error estimate or comparison against a full-wave calculation, so it is hard to judge how large the effect is. The paper is aimed at people already working on PTA extensions and early-universe parity tests. A reader who wants a concrete proposal for extracting circular polarization from future data will find something to think about, even if the details need tightening. It is worth sending to a serious referee who can check the validity of the approximation and ask for explicit response functions or simulations.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using cross-correlations between pulsar timing residuals and polarization measurements from pulsar polarization arrays to detect the circularly polarized (parity-violating) component of an isotropic stochastic gravitational wave background in the nanohertz band. Based on a geometric-optics derivation of the GW-induced polarization rotation, the authors show that the timing-polarimetry cross-correlation isolates the circular polarization while sharing the Hellings-Downs angular pattern; they further estimate that future facilities such as the SKA could reach sensitivities comparable to existing astrometric methods.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the work supplies a new, parity-sensitive observable that augments standard pulsar timing array analyses without requiring a separate instrument class. By reusing the Hellings-Downs overlap reduction function, it offers a concrete path to constrain parity violation in the stochastic GW background with near-term data.

major comments (1)

[Derivation section (geometric optics)] §2 (or whichever section presents the geometric-optics derivation of the polarization rotation angle): the central claim that the timing-polarimetry cross-correlation isolates the circular polarization and reproduces the exact Hellings-Downs pattern rests on the eikonal transport of the electromagnetic polarization vector. For nHz GWs the wavelength is ~3×10^17 m while typical pulsar distances are 10^19–10^20 m, so λ/D ~ 0.01–0.1. The manuscript provides no error estimate for finite-wavelength corrections to the geometric-optics approximation. If these corrections modify the angular response of the polarimetry observable differently from the timing residual, the cross-correlation will neither cleanly project out the parity-odd component nor preserve the Hellings-Downs function. This issue is load-bearing for the isolation claim and requires either an analytic bound or a numerical check.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and §2] The abstract states that a derivation was performed and that the cross-correlation isolates the desired component, yet the main text should display the explicit expression for the rotation angle and the resulting overlap reduction function so that the isolation step can be verified directly.
[Sensitivity estimates] Sensitivity projections for SKA would be strengthened by a brief discussion of how instrumental polarization leakage or timing noise would enter the cross-correlation, even at a qualitative level.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying a point that strengthens the rigor of the derivation. We respond to the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate an explicit error estimate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Derivation section (geometric optics)] §2 (or whichever section presents the geometric-optics derivation of the polarization rotation angle): the central claim that the timing-polarimetry cross-correlation isolates the circular polarization and reproduces the exact Hellings-Downs pattern rests on the eikonal transport of the electromagnetic polarization vector. For nHz GWs the wavelength is ~3×10^17 m while typical pulsar distances are 10^19–10^20 m, so λ/D ~ 0.01–0.1. The manuscript provides no error estimate for finite-wavelength corrections to the geometric-optics approximation. If these corrections modify the angular response of the polarimetry observable differently from the timing residual, the cross-correlation will neither cleanly project out the parity-odd component nor preserve the Hellings-Downs function. This issue is load-bearing for the isolation claim and requires either

Authors: We agree that an explicit bound on finite-wavelength corrections is necessary to support the isolation claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph to the derivation section that performs a next-to-leading-order WKB analysis of the electromagnetic wave equation in the presence of a slowly varying GW background. The leading correction to the polarization rotation angle is suppressed by an extra factor of λ/D relative to the geometric-optics term. For the quoted range this yields a relative error ≲ 0.1. Because the correction is essentially isotropic (direction-independent to this order), it multiplies the entire overlap reduction function by a nearly constant factor close to unity and does not introduce angular structure capable of mixing parity-even and parity-odd components. Consequently the timing-polarimetry cross-correlation continues to isolate the circular polarization while preserving the Hellings-Downs angular dependence up to a small overall rescaling. We have also performed a brief numerical check by integrating the exact transport equation for representative pulsar distances and GW frequencies, confirming that the deviation from the Hellings-Downs form remains below 5 %. These additions are now included in the revised §2 and referenced in the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained from standard geometric optics with no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper begins from the established geometric-optics treatment of EM wave propagation in a weak gravitational field and derives the polarization rotation angle induced by an isotropic stochastic GW background. It then computes the cross-correlation between timing residuals and polarimetry signals, showing that this isolates the circular-polarization (parity-odd) component while inheriting the standard Hellings-Downs angular dependence. No equation or step defines the target observable in terms of itself, fits a parameter to a subset of the target data and renames it a prediction, or relies on a self-citation chain whose only justification is prior work by the same authors. The Hellings-Downs pattern is imported as an external, independently verified result rather than being re-derived from the present ansatz. The derivation therefore remains independent of the final claim and does not collapse to tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the geometric optics limit for light propagation and the assumption that the GW background is isotropic and stochastic; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Geometric optics approximation holds for electromagnetic wave propagation through a weak gravitational wave background
Invoked to derive the polarization rotation induced by the GWs.
domain assumption The stochastic GW background is isotropic
Required for the Hellings-Downs pattern to apply to the cross-correlation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5446 in / 1289 out tokens · 42067 ms · 2026-05-18T00:06:14.803219+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Black Hole Ringdown Seen in Photon Polarization Swings
astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Polarization angle swings in photons near a Kerr black hole during ringdown lock in time to quasi-normal modes with amplitudes up to about 10 degrees.
Prospects for multi-messenger discovery of the gravitational-wave background anisotropies via cross-correlation with galaxies
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

New simulations show that cross-correlating gravitational wave background anisotropies with galaxy distributions can enable discovery at angular scales of 4-6 degrees with next-generation observatories.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 36 internal anchors

[1]

In this regime, the summation over pulsar pairsP A<B ΓHD(ξAB)2 can be approximated by an integral, which leads to the factor 1/24 in Eq. (97). If the specturm is flat, Ω V GW(f) is independent off, the SNR roughly reads SNR∼5 ΩV GW 0.012 Tobs 20 yr 4 Np 200 σt 30 ns −1 × σp 0.1 deg −1 δt 2 week −1 ,(98) where we have usedH0 = 70 km/s/Mpc. Thus, the PTA- P...

work page
[2]

Gravitational Wave Experiments and Early Universe Cosmology

M. Maggiore, Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology, Phys. Rept.331, 283 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9909001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[3]

Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds

N. Christensen, Stochastic Gravitational Wave Back- grounds, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016903 (2019), arXiv:1811.08797 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[4]

The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[5]

The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[6]

D. J. Reardonet al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pul- sar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[7]

Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

H. Xuet al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[8]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Upper Limits on the Isotropic Gravitational-Wave Back- ground from the first part of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA’s fourth Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.20721 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[9]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

Hu and Y.-L

W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017)

work page 2017
[11]

Meiet al.(TianQin), The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology, PTEP2021, 05A107 (2021), arXiv:2008.10332 [gr-qc]

J. Meiet al.(TianQin), The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology, PTEP2021, 05A107 (2021), arXiv:2008.10332 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[12]

Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO

S. Kawamuraet al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[13]

Y. A. El-Neajet al.(AEDGE), AEDGE: Atomic Experi- ment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space, EPJ Quant. Technol.7, 6 (2020), arXiv:1908.00802 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[14]

L. G. Book and E. E. Flanagan, Astrometric Effects of a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background, Phys. Rev. D83, 024024 (2011), arXiv:1009.4192 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[15]

Y. Wang, K. Pardo, T.-C. Chang, and O. Dor´ e, Gravita- tional Wave Detection with Photometric Surveys, Phys. Rev. D103, 084007 (2021), arXiv:2010.02218 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

M. A. Fedderke, P. W. Graham, and S. Rajendran, As- teroids forµHz gravitational-wave detection, Phys. Rev. D105, 103018 (2022), arXiv:2112.11431 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

Zheng, C

Q. Zheng, C. M. F. Mingarelli, W. DeRocco, J. Nay, K. K. Boddy, and J. A. Dror, Probing Picohertz Grav- itational Waves with Pulsars, (2025), arXiv:2508.21582 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Allyset al.(LiteBIRD), Probing Cosmic Infla- tion with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Back- ground Polarization Survey, PTEP2023, 042F01 (2023), arXiv:2202.02773 [astro-ph.IM]

E. Allyset al.(LiteBIRD), Probing Cosmic Infla- tion with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Back- ground Polarization Survey, PTEP2023, 042F01 (2023), arXiv:2202.02773 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

Abazajianet al.(CMB-S4), CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves, Astro- 11 phys

K. Abazajianet al.(CMB-S4), CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves, Astro- 11 phys. J.926, 54 (2022), arXiv:2008.12619 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[20]

Okumura and M

T. Okumura and M. Sasaki, Extracting parity-violating gravitational waves from projected tidal force tensor in three dimensions, JCAP10, 060, arXiv:2405.04210 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv
[21]

Mentasti and C

G. Mentasti and C. R. Contaldi, Cosmic shimmering: the gravitational wave signal of time-resolved cosmic shear observations, JCAP06, 013, arXiv:2410.16274 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv
[22]

Cosmological Signature of New Parity-Violating Interactions

A. Lue, L.-M. Wang, and M. Kamionkowski, Cosmolog- ical signature of new parity violating interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1506 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812088

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[23]

S. H.-S. Alexander, M. E. Peskin, and M. M. Sheikh- Jabbari, Leptogenesis from gravity waves in models of inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 081301 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0403069

work page arXiv 2006
[24]

Circular Polarization of Primordial Gravitational Waves in String-inspired Inflationary Cosmology

M. Satoh, S. Kanno, and J. Soda, Circular Polarization of Primordial Gravitational Waves in String-inspired In- flationary Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D77, 023526 (2008), arXiv:0706.3585 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[25]

Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity

S. Alexander and N. Yunes, Chern-Simons Modi- fied General Relativity, Phys. Rept.480, 1 (2009), arXiv:0907.2562 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[26]

Kanno, J

S. Kanno, J. Soda, and A. Taniguchi, Circularly polarized gravitational waves in Chern-Simons gravity originating from an axion domain wall, Phys. Rev. D108, 083525 (2023), arXiv:2304.03944 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

Chiral Primordial Gravitational Waves from a Lifshitz Point

T. Takahashi and J. Soda, Chiral Primordial Gravita- tional Waves from a Lifshitz Point, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 231301 (2009), arXiv:0904.0554 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[28]

A. Wang, Q. Wu, W. Zhao, and T. Zhu, Polariz- ing primordial gravitational waves by parity violation, Phys. Rev. D87, 103512 (2013), arXiv:1208.5490 [astro- ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[29]

T. Zhu, W. Zhao, Y. Huang, A. Wang, and Q. Wu, Ef- fects of parity violation on non-gaussianity of primordial gravitational waves in Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Rev. D88, 063508 (2013), arXiv:1305.0600 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[30]

Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton

L. Sorbo, Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Back- ground from a pseudoscalar inflaton, JCAP06, 003, arXiv:1101.1525 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[31]

J. L. Cook and L. Sorbo, Particle production during infla- tion and gravitational waves detectable by ground-based interferometers, Phys. Rev. D85, 023534 (2012), [Er- ratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 069901 (2012)], arXiv:1109.0022 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[32]

Stability analysis of chromo-natural inflation and possible evasion of Lyth's bound

E. Dimastrogiovanni and M. Peloso, Stability analysis of chromo-natural inflation and possible evasion of Lyth’s bound, Phys. Rev. D87, 103501 (2013), arXiv:1212.5184 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[33]

Perturbations in Chromo-Natural Inflation

P. Adshead, E. Martinec, and M. Wyman, Pertur- bations in Chromo-Natural Inflation, JHEP09, 087, arXiv:1305.2930 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[34]

Primordial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics

E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, and T. Fujita, Primor- dial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dy- namics, JCAP01, 019, arXiv:1608.04216 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[35]

Chiral Primordial Gravitational Waves from Dilaton Induced Delayed Chromo-natural Inflation

I. Obata and J. Soda, Chiral primordial Chiral pri- mordial gravitational waves from dilaton induced de- layed chromonatural inflation, Phys. Rev. D93, 123502 (2016), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 109903 (2017)], arXiv:1602.06024 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[36]

Adshead, J

P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, and Z. J. Weiner, Gravitational waves from gauge preheating, Phys. Rev. D98, 4 (2018), arXiv:1805.04550 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2018
[37]

Bastero-Gil and A

M. Bastero-Gil and A. T. Manso, Parity violating grav- itational waves at the end of inflation, JCAP08, 001, arXiv:2209.15572 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[38]

K. Aoki, T. Fujita, R. Kawaguchi, and K. Yanagihara, Effective Field Theory of Chiral Gravitational Waves, (2025), arXiv:2504.19059 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

Okano and T

S. Okano and T. Fujita, Chiral Gravitational Waves Pro- duced in a Helical Magnetogenesis Model, JCAP03, 026, arXiv:2005.13833 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2005
[40]

Chiba, R

W. Chiba, R. Jinno, and K. Nomura, Graviton-photon conversion in stochastic magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083539 (2025), arXiv:2505.10926 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Polarized Cosmological Gravitational Waves from Primordial Helical Turbulence

T. Kahniashvili, G. Gogoberidze, and B. Ratra, Polar- ized cosmological gravitational waves from primordial helical turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 151301 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505628

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[42]

Valbusa Dall’Armi, A

L. Valbusa Dall’Armi, A. Nishizawa, A. Ricciardone, and S. Matarrese, Circular Polarization of the Astrophysical Gravitational Wave Background, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041401 (2023), arXiv:2301.08205 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

Polarization analysis of gravitational-wave backgrounds from the correlation signals of ground-based interferometers: measuring a circular-polarization mode

N. Seto and A. Taruya, Polarization analysis of gravitational-wave backgrounds from the correlation sig- nals of ground-based interferometers: Measuring a circular-polarization mode, Phys. Rev. D77, 103001 (2008), arXiv:0801.4185 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[44]

Seto, Measuring Parity Asymmetry of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with a Heliocentric Detector Network in the mHz Band, Phys

N. Seto, Measuring Parity Asymmetry of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with a Heliocentric Detector Network in the mHz Band, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 251101 (2020), arXiv:2009.02928 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[45]

Orlando, M

G. Orlando, M. Pieroni, and A. Ricciardone, Measuring Parity Violation in the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the LISA-Taiji network, JCAP03, 069, arXiv:2011.07059 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2011
[46]

Omiya and N

H. Omiya and N. Seto, Correlation analysis for isotropic stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds with maxi- mally allowed polarization degrees, Phys. Rev. D104, 064021 (2021), arXiv:2107.12001 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[47]

J. Chen, C. Liu, Y.-L. Zhang, and G. Wang, Alternative LISA-TAIJI networks: Detectability of parity violation in stochastic gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D111, 084026 (2025), arXiv:2412.18420 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Mikura, T

Y. Mikura, T. Okumura, and M. Sasaki, Imprints of gravitational-wave polarizations on projected tidal ten- sor in three dimensions, (2025), arXiv:2507.23302 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Probing circular polarization in stochastic gravitational wave background with pulsar timing arrays

R. Kato and J. Soda, Probing circular polarization in stochastic gravitational wave background with pul- sar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D93, 062003 (2016), arXiv:1512.09139 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[50]

T. L. Smith and R. Caldwell, Sensitivity to a Frequency- Dependent Circular Polarization in an Isotropic Stochas- tic Gravitational Wave Background, Phys. Rev. D95, 044036 (2017), arXiv:1609.05901 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[51]

Belgacem and M

E. Belgacem and M. Kamionkowski, Chirality of the gravitational-wave background and pulsar-timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D102, 023004 (2020), arXiv:2004.05480 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2020
[52]

Sato-Polito and M

G. Sato-Polito and M. Kamionkowski, Pulsar-timing measurement of the circular polarization of the stochas- tic gravitational-wave background, Phys. Rev. D106, 023004 (2022), arXiv:2111.05867 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

N. M. J. Cruz, A. Malhotra, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Measuring the circular polarization of gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D110, 103505 12 (2024), arXiv:2406.04957 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[54]

Liang, M.-X

Q. Liang, M.-X. Lin, M. Trodden, and S. S. C. Wong, Probing parity violation in the stochastic gravitational wave background with astrometry, Phys. Rev. D109, 083028 (2024), arXiv:2309.16666 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

C ¸ alı¸ skan, Y

M. C ¸ alı¸ skan, Y. Chen, L. Dai, N. Anil Kumar, I. Stomberg, and X. Xue, Dissecting the stochastic grav- itational wave background with astrometry, JCAP05, 030, arXiv:2312.03069 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[56]

W. Qin, K. K. Boddy, M. Kamionkowski, and L. Dai, Pulsar-timing arrays, astrometry, and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D99, 063002 (2019), arXiv:1810.02369 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[57]

First astrometric constraints on parity-violation in the gravitational wave background

S. Jaraba, S. Kuroyanagi, Q. Liang, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, First astrometric constraints on parity- violation in the gravitational wave background, JCAP 08, 057, arXiv:2505.18085 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[58]

A. G. Lyne and F. G. Smith, Linear Polarization in Pul- sating Radio Sources, Nature218, 124 (1968)

work page 1968
[59]

Polarization observations of 20 millisecond pulsars

W. Yanet al., Polarization observations of 20 millisecond pulsars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.414, 2087 (2011), arXiv:1102.2274 [astro-ph.SR]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2087
[60]

A Study of Multi-frequency Polarization Pulse Profiles of Millisecond Pulsars

S. Daiet al., A study of multifrequency polarization pulse profiles of millisecond pulsars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.449, 3223 (2015), arXiv:1503.01841 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[61]

Guillemot, I

L. Guillemot, I. Cognard, W. van Straten, G. Theureau, and E. G´ erard, Improving pulsar polarization and timing measurements with the Nan¸ cay Radio Telescope, Astron. Astrophys.678, A79 (2023), arXiv:2308.01599 [astro- ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[62]

Radhakrishnan and D

V. Radhakrishnan and D. J. Cooke, Magnetic Poles and the Polarization Structure of Pulsar Radiation, Astro- physics Letters3, 225 (1969)

work page 1969
[63]

M. A. Ruderman and P. G. Sutherland, Theory of pul- sars: Polar caps, sparks, and coherent microwave radia- tion, Astrophys. J.196, 51 (1975)

work page 1975
[64]

Iacopini, E

E. Iacopini, E. Picasso, F. Pegoraro, and L. A. Radi- cati, Birefringence Induced by Gravitational Waves: A Suggestion for a New Detector, Phys. Lett. A73, 140 (1979)

work page 1979
[65]

A. M. Cruise, An electromagnetic detector for very-high- frequency gravitational waves, Class. Quant. Grav.17, 2525 (2000)

work page 2000
[66]

A. R. Prasanna and S. Mohanty, Gravitational wave in- duced rotation of the plane of polarization of pulsar sig- nals, EPL57, 651 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0110606

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[67]

The rotation of polarization by gravitational waves

V. Faraoni, The rotation of polarization by gravitational waves, New Astron.13, 178 (2008), arXiv:0709.0386 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[68]

Park and D.-H

C. Park and D.-H. Kim, Observation of gravitational waves by light polarization, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 95 (2021), arXiv:2012.04243 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[69]

A. A. Shoom, Faraday effect of light caused by plane gravitational wave, Gen. Rel. Grav.56, 97 (2024), arXiv:2206.08867 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[70]

Garc´ ıa-Cely, L

C. Garc´ ıa-Cely, L. Marsili, A. Ringwald, and A. D. Spec- tor, Polarimetric searches for axion dark matter and high-frequency gravitational waves using optical cavities, Phys. Rev. D112, 023031 (2025), arXiv:2501.08382 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[71]

G. C. Surpi and D. D. Harari, Weak lensing by large scale structure and the polarization properties of distant radio sources, Astrophys. J.515, 455 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9709087

work page arXiv 1999
[72]

Di Dio, R

E. Di Dio, R. Durrer, G. Fanizza, and G. Marozzi, Rotation of the CMB polarisation by foreground lens- ing, Phys. Rev. D100, 043508 (2019), arXiv:1905.12573 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2019
[73]

L. T. Santana, J. C. Lobato, I. S. Matos, M. O. Calv˜ ao, and R. R. R. Reis, Evolution of the electric field along null rays for arbitrary observers and spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D101, 081501 (2020), arXiv:2004.03496 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[74]

Dehnen, Gravitational faraday-effect, Int

H. Dehnen, Gravitational faraday-effect, Int. J. Theor. Phys.7, 467 (1973)

work page 1973
[75]

P. A. Connors, T. Piran, and R. F. Stark, Polarization features of X-ray radiation emitted near black holes., As- trophysical Journal235, 224 (1980)

work page 1980
[76]

Ishihara, M

H. Ishihara, M. Takahashi, and A. Tomimatsu, GRAV- ITATIONAL FARADAY ROTATION INDUCED BY KERR BLACK HOLE, Phys. Rev. D38, 472 (1988)

work page 1988
[77]

T. Liu, X. Lou, and J. Ren, Pulsar Polarization Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 121401 (2023), arXiv:2111.10615 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[78]

N. K. Poraykoet al.(EPTA), Searches for signatures of ultralight axion dark matter in polarimetry data of the European Pulsar Timing Array, Phys. Rev. D111, 062005 (2025), arXiv:2412.02232 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[79]

Liet al., Probing Ultralight Axion-like Dark Matter− A PTA-PPA Synergy, (2025), arXiv:2506.04871 [astro- ph.CO]

X. Liet al., Probing Ultralight Axion-like Dark Matter− A PTA-PPA Synergy, (2025), arXiv:2506.04871 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[80]

C. F. Gammie and P. K. Leung, A Formalism for Co- variant Polarized Radiative Transport by Ray Tracing, Astrophysical Journal752, 123 (2012)

work page 2012

Showing first 80 references.