Recognition: unknown
KnowMe-Bench: Benchmarking Person Understanding for Lifelong Digital Companions
read the original abstract
Existing long-horizon memory benchmarks mostly use multi-turn dialogues or synthetic user histories, which makes retrieval performance an imperfect proxy for person understanding. We present \BenchName, a publicly releasable benchmark built from long-form autobiographical narratives, where actions, context, and inner thoughts provide dense evidence for inferring stable motivations and decision principles. \BenchName~reconstructs each narrative into a flashback-aware, time-anchored stream and evaluates models with evidence-linked questions spanning factual recall, subjective state attribution, and principle-level reasoning. Across diverse narrative sources, retrieval-augmented systems mainly improve factual accuracy, while errors persist on temporally grounded explanations and higher-level inferences, highlighting the need for memory mechanisms beyond retrieval. Our data is in \href{KnowMeBench}{https://github.com/QuantaAlpha/KnowMeBench}.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MedMemoryBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Personalized Healthcare
MedMemoryBench supplies a 2,000-session synthetic medical trajectory dataset and an evaluate-while-constructing streaming protocol to expose memory saturation and reasoning failures in current agent architectures for ...
-
MMEB-V3: Measuring the Performance Gaps of Omni-Modality Embedding Models
MMEB-V3 benchmark shows omni-modality embedding models fail to enforce instruction-specified modality constraints and exhibit asymmetric, query-biased retrieval.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.