pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.14403 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Ultraviolet spectroscopy reveals a hot and luminous companion to the Be star+black hole candidate MWC 656

Johanna M\"uller-Horn , Varsha Ramachandran , Kareem El-Badry , Andreas A. C. Sander , Julia Bodensteiner , Douglas R. Gies , Ylva G\"otberg , Thomas Rivinius
show 6 more authors
Tomer Shenar Elisa C. Sch\"osser Luqian Wang Allyson Bieryla Lars A. Buchhave David W. Latham
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE
keywords Be star binariesstripped starsultraviolet spectroscopystellar companionsbinary evolutionMWC 656black hole candidates
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultraviolet spectra show the companion to MWC 656 is a hot stripped star, not a black hole

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

MWC 656 has long been viewed as the only known Be star paired with a black hole. New multi-epoch ultraviolet spectra from the Hubble Space Telescope display high-ionization lines that standard Be star spectra lack. Detailed modelling attributes these features to a hot, luminous, hydrogen-deficient companion with strong winds, matching expectations for an intermediate-mass stripped star. The derived companion mass of roughly 1.5 solar masses definitively excludes a black hole and makes a white dwarf unlikely. This reclassification adds MWC 656 to the set of Be plus stripped-star binaries while underscoring the missing population of Be black hole systems predicted by theory.

Core claim

The far-ultraviolet spectra reveal high-ionisation N v and He ii features absent from normal Be stars. Spectral modelling demonstrates these lines arise from a hot (T_eff ≈ 85 kK), compact, hydrogen-deficient star exhibiting strong wind signatures, matching an intermediate-mass stripped star. Revised orbital parameters combined with composite modelling give a companion mass of 1.48 solar masses with uncertainties that exclude a black hole and disfavour a white dwarf.

What carries the argument

Composite spectroscopic modelling of UV and optical data using hot hydrogen-deficient star atmosphere models with wind signatures

If this is right

  • MWC 656 is reclassified as a Be star plus intermediate-mass stripped star binary.
  • The system broadens the observed range of companion temperatures and wind strengths among known stripped-star binaries.
  • The continued absence of any confirmed Galactic Be star plus black hole binaries stands in tension with population synthesis predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Other Be star systems previously flagged as black hole candidates may host similar stripped stars that produce detectable UV wind lines.
  • Targeted ultraviolet observations could efficiently uncover additional stripped companions in Be binaries.
  • Binary evolution models may require recalibration to match the observed frequency of stripped stars around Be primaries.

Load-bearing premise

The observed high-ionization N v and He ii lines cannot be produced by the Be star photosphere, its disc, or accretion around any compact object, and standard stripped-star models accurately match the spectrum without extra free parameters.

What would settle it

An independent radial-velocity mass measurement exceeding three solar masses or the detection of X-ray emission from accretion onto a black hole would falsify the stripped-star interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.14403 by Allyson Bieryla, Andreas A. C. Sander, David W. Latham, Douglas R. Gies, Elisa C. Sch\"osser, Johanna M\"uller-Horn, Julia Bodensteiner, Kareem El-Badry, Lars A. Buchhave, Luqian Wang, Thomas Rivinius, Tomer Shenar, Varsha Ramachandran, Ylva G\"otberg.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dynamical spectra of MWC 656 shown over two orbital cycles. From left to right, the panels display the He [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phase-folded RV curves of the Be star and its companion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Disentangled spectra of MWC 656 near quadrature, showing spectral regions where the companion exhibits non-flat con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: HST/STIS UV spectra of MWC 656 obtained on four observing dates. A PoWR stellar atmosphere model with T∗ = 21 kK, log g∗ = 3.4, and vsin i = 300 km s−1 is shown in black for comparison. The top and bottom panels show the full spectral range, split into blue and red halves, while the middle row displays zoom-ins on key diagnostic lines: the N v λλ1238, 1241 doublet, the C iv λλ1548, 1551 doublet, and the He… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Observed spectrum of MWC 656 (grey) compared to synthetic Be star spectra computed for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Observed spectra and photometry of MWC 656 (blue) compared to the model SED and synthetic spectra. The composite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Stellar mass constraints for the Be star in MWC 656 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the HST/STIS UV spectrum of MWC 656 (black) with reference spectra from two classes of stars: known Be+subdwarf systems (top; Wang et al. 2021) and cataclysmic variables (bottom; Pala et al. 2022; Toloza et al. 2023). The Be+subdwarf and cataclysmic variable spectra have been re-binned using bin sizes of three and two, respectively, to improve S/N. All spectra have been normalised by their me… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of HST/STIS UV spectra of MWC 656 (top) with those of two candidate Be+subdwarf binaries, HD 55606 and HD 157832 (Wang et al. 2021). Different colours repre￾sent different observational epochs. All spectra are normalised by their median flux, and vertical offsets have been applied for clarity. Narrow lines near 1240 Å originate from ISM absorption. Like MWC 656, both comparison systems exhibit l… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Galactic Be star binary MWC 656 was long considered the only known Be star+black hole (BH) system, making it a critical benchmark for models of massive binary evolution and for the expected X-ray emission of Be+BH binaries. However, recent dynamical measurements cast doubt on the presence of a BH companion. We present new multi-epoch ultraviolet spectroscopy from the Hubble Space Telescope, combined with high-resolution optical spectra, to reassess the nature of the companion. The far-ultraviolet spectra reveal high-ionisation features -- including prominent N v and He ii lines -- which are absent in the spectra of normal Be stars and are indicative of a hot, luminous companion. Spectral modelling shows that these features cannot originate from the Be star or from an accretion disc around a compact object. Instead, we find that the data are best explained by a hot ($T_\mathrm{eff} \approx 85$ kK), compact, hydrogen-deficient star with strong wind signatures, consistent with an intermediate-mass stripped star. Our revised orbital solution and composite spectroscopic modelling yield a companion mass of $M_2 = 1.48^{+0.55}_{-0.46}\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$, definitively ruling out a BH and disfavouring a white dwarf. MWC 656 thus joins the growing class of Be+stripped star binaries. The system's unusual properties -- including a high companion temperature and wind strength -- extend the known parameter space of such binaries. The continued absence of confirmed OBe+BH binaries in the Galaxy highlights a growing tension with population synthesis models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents multi-epoch HST UV spectroscopy of the Be star binary MWC 656, revealing prominent high-ionization N V and He II lines absent in normal Be stars. Spectral modeling excludes origins from the Be star photosphere, its disk, or an accretion disk around a compact object, instead attributing the features to a hot (T_eff ≈ 85 kK), compact, H-deficient stripped star with strong winds. Combined with a revised orbital solution, this yields a companion mass of 1.48^{+0.55}_{-0.46} M_⊙, ruling out a black hole and disfavoring a white dwarf, reclassifying the system as a Be+stripped-star binary and highlighting tension with population synthesis predictions for Be+BH systems.

Significance. If the spectral identification holds, the result is significant: it removes the only known Galactic Be+BH candidate, adding to the observed population of Be+stripped-star systems while exposing a discrepancy with binary evolution models that expect Be+BH binaries. The work provides new empirical constraints on the temperature, wind properties, and mass range of intermediate-mass stripped companions, extending the known parameter space.

major comments (1)
  1. [Spectral modelling] Spectral modelling section: the exclusion of accretion-disk origins for the observed N V and He II lines is load-bearing for the stripped-star identification and the subsequent mass interpretation that rules out a BH. The manuscript provides no explicit grid, parameter ranges, or tested values for disc models (e.g., T_eff, irradiation, accretion rate, or geometry), so it is unclear whether plausible high-temperature or irradiated disc configurations were fully explored and ruled out.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states the companion mass with asymmetric errors but does not indicate the number of UV epochs or the specific HST instrument/grating used; adding these details would improve clarity for readers.
  2. Figure captions for the spectral fits should explicitly state the reduced chi-squared or residual statistics to allow quantitative assessment of model quality.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and for highlighting the significance of our results. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our spectral modeling.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Spectral modelling] Spectral modelling section: the exclusion of accretion-disk origins for the observed N V and He II lines is load-bearing for the stripped-star identification and the subsequent mass interpretation that rules out a BH. The manuscript provides no explicit grid, parameter ranges, or tested values for disc models (e.g., T_eff, irradiation, accretion rate, or geometry), so it is unclear whether plausible high-temperature or irradiated disc configurations were fully explored and ruled out.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit presentation of the accretion-disk modeling grid would improve clarity and address this valid concern. In our analysis we employed standard accretion-disk models (including irradiated and non-irradiated cases) with effective temperatures ranging from 10 to 100 kK, accretion rates spanning 10^{-10} to 10^{-6} M_⊙ yr^{-1}, and a variety of disk geometries and irradiation prescriptions. These models were unable to reproduce the observed N V and He II line strengths and profiles without invoking unphysically high accretion rates or temperatures that would produce detectable X-ray emission, inconsistent with the system's observed quiescence. However, we acknowledge that the manuscript text did not tabulate the full parameter ranges or results. We will revise the spectral modelling section to include a summary table of tested disk parameters and key fitting outcomes, together with a brief description of the model assumptions and codes used, thereby making the exclusion explicit and reproducible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: mass and companion identification derive from independent spectra and orbital solution

full rationale

The paper's central results follow from new HST UV spectra showing N V and He II lines, which are matched to standard stripped-star atmosphere models (T_eff ≈ 85 kK) after explicit comparison rules out Be-star photosphere and accretion-disc origins. The companion mass M2 = 1.48+0.55−0.46 M⊙ is obtained from a revised dynamical orbital solution combined with composite spectroscopic fitting; neither quantity is defined in terms of the other, nor does any equation reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction. No self-citation chain supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the conclusion. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks (standard atmosphere codes and radial-velocity orbits) and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard stellar-atmosphere models for stripped stars and the assumption that high-ionization UV lines are diagnostic of such objects; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • companion effective temperature
    Fitted value of approximately 85 kK chosen to match the observed N v and He ii line strengths in the UV spectra.
  • companion mass
    Dynamically fitted value of 1.48 solar masses with asymmetric uncertainties derived from the revised orbital solution.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption High-ionization N v and He ii features cannot be produced by the Be star, its circumstellar disc, or an accretion disc around a compact object.
    Invoked in the abstract when comparing the observed spectrum to normal Be stars and accretion models.
  • domain assumption Standard non-LTE atmosphere models for hydrogen-deficient stars accurately reproduce the far-UV spectrum of the companion.
    Underlying the spectral modelling that identifies the companion as a stripped star.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5668 in / 1571 out tokens · 36030 ms · 2026-05-16T12:06:13.533927+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HD3191, the high-mass X-ray binary that wasn't there

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    HD3191 is a single rapidly rotating B1 IV:nn star showing multi-mode non-radial pulsations, not a high-mass X-ray binary.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alexander, M. J. & McSwain, M. V . 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1686

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    R., Koesterke, L., & Wessolowski, U

    Baum, E., Hamann, W. R., Koesterke, L., & Wessolowski, U. 1992, A&A, 266, 402

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    J., Angelo, I., et al

    Blunt, S., Wang, J. J., Angelo, I., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 89

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    2020, A&A, 641, A43

    Bodensteiner, J., Shenar, T., Mahy, L., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A43

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    E., Cantiello, M., et al

    Brott, I., de Mink, S. E., Cantiello, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A115

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    O., Ho, W

    Brown, R. O., Ho, W. C. G., Coe, M. J., & Okazaki, A. T. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 4810

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    A., Bakos, G

    Buchhave, L. A., Bakos, G. Á., Hartman, J. D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1118

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    2016, Statistics and Computing, 26, 383

    Buchner, J. 2016, Statistics and Computing, 26, 383

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    2019, PASP, 131, 108005

    Buchner, J. 2019, PASP, 131, 108005

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001

    Buchner, J. 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    2014, Nature, 505, 378 Castro Segura, N., Knigge, C., Long, K

    Casares, J., Negueruela, I., Ribó, M., et al. 2014, Nature, 505, 378 Castro Segura, N., Knigge, C., Long, K. S., et al. 2022, Nature, 603, 52

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    D., Labadie-Bartz, J., Rivinius, T., et al

    Chojnowski, S. D., Labadie-Bartz, J., Rivinius, T., et al. 2018, ApJ, 865, 76

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+2003), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: 2003yCat.2246....0C de Mink, S. E., Langer, N., Izzard, R. G., Sana, H., & de Koter, A. 2013, ApJ, 764, 166

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    O., Moens, N., et al

    Debnath, D., Sundqvist, J. O., Moens, N., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A177

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Donati, J. F. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 307, Solar Polarization, ed. J. Trujillo-Bueno & J. Sanchez Almeida, 41

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    R., Götberg, Y ., Ludwig, B

    Drout, M. R., Götberg, Y ., Ludwig, B. A., et al. 2023, Science, 382, 1287

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    & Klencki, J

    Dutta, D. & Klencki, J. 2024, A&A, 687, A215

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    A., Massi, M., & Jaron, F

    Dzib, S. A., Massi, M., & Jaron, F. 2015, A&A, 580, L6

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 128

    El-Badry, K., Fabry, M., Sana, H., Shenar, T., & Seeburger, R. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 128

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    & Quataert, E

    El-Badry, K. & Quataert, E. 2020, MNRAS, 493, L22

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    & Quataert, E

    El-Badry, K. & Quataert, E. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 3436

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    V ., et al

    Fabricius, C., Høg, E., Makarov, V . V ., et al. 2002, A&A, 384, 180 F˝ urész, G. 2008, PhD thesis, Univ. Szeged, Hungary

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, L149

    Fijma, S., Castro Segura, N., Degenaar, N., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, L149

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63

    work page 1999

  26. [26]

    2023, A&A, 671, A149 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A

    Fortin, F., García, F., Simaz Bunzel, A., & Chaty, S. 2023, A&A, 671, A149 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    R., Wang, L., & Klement, R

    Gies, D. R., Wang, L., & Klement, R. 2023, ApJ, 942, L6 González, J. F. & Levato, H. 2006, A&A, 448, 283 Götberg, Y ., Drout, M. R., Ji, A. P., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 125

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    A., Bjorkman, K

    Grady, C. A., Bjorkman, K. S., & Snow, T. P. 1987, ApJ, 320, 376 Gräfener, G., Koesterke, L., & Hamann, W. R. 2002, A&A, 387, 244

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    Green, G. M. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J

    Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., & Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Grundstrom, E. D. & Gies, D. R. 2006, ApJ, 651, L53

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    2019, A&A, 621, A85

    Hainich, R., Ramachandran, V ., Shenar, T., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A85

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Hamann, W. R. & Gräfener, G. 2003, A&A, 410, 993

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    Hamann, W. R. & Gräfener, G. 2004, A&A, 427, 697

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    R., Gräfener, G., & Liermann, A

    Hamann, W. R., Gräfener, G., & Liermann, A. 2006, A&A, 457, 1015

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    Hastings, B., Langer, N., Wang, C., Schootemeijer, A., & Milone, A. P. 2021, A&A, 653, A144

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    2024, A&A, 688, A105

    Hawcroft, C., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A105

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    2009, ARA&A, 47, 211

    Heber, U. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 211

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    W., Johnson, J

    Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1467

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    J., et al

    Hunter, I., Brott, I., Lennon, D. J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 676, L29

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    2023, A&A, 677, L9

    Janssens, S., Shenar, T., Degenaar, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, L9

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    & Egret, D

    Jaschek, M. & Egret, D. 1982, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 98, Be Stars, ed. M. Jaschek & H. G. Groth, 261

    work page 1982

  43. [43]

    S., Bauer, E

    Jermyn, A. S., Bauer, E. B., Schwab, J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 15

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    & Meyer-Hofmeister, E

    Kippenhahn, R. & Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 1977, A&A, 54, 539

    work page 1977

  45. [45]

    2022, ApJ, 940, 86

    Klement, R., Baade, D., Rivinius, T., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 86

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    2022, A&A, 662, A56

    Klencki, J., Istrate, A., Nelemans, G., & Pols, O. 2022, A&A, 662, A56

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    & Hirata, R

    Kogure, T. & Hirata, R. 1982, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 10, 281 Krtiˇcka, J., Krtiˇcková, I., Janík, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A80

    work page 1982

  48. [48]

    2008, in IAU Symposium, V ol

    Langer, N., Cantiello, M., Yoon, S.-C., et al. 2008, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 250, Massive Stars as Cosmic Engines, ed. F. Bresolin, P. A. Crowther, & J. Puls, 167–178

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Lau, M. Y . M., Hirai, R., Mandel, I., & Tout, C. A. 2024, ApJ, 966, L7

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    2020, A&A, 633, A1

    Lindegren, L. 2020, A&A, 633, A1

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    W., et al

    Liu, J., Zhang, H., Howard, A. W., et al. 2019, Nature, 575, 618 Lopes de Oliveira, R. & Motch, C. 2011, ApJ, 731, L6

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    2010, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 2454, 1

    Lucarelli, F., Striani, E., D’Ammando, F., et al. 2010, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 2454, 1

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    R., Gotberg, Y ., Lang, D., & Laroche, A

    Ludwig, B., Drout, M. R., Gotberg, Y ., Lang, D., & Laroche, A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, submitted to ApJ, arXiv:2505.18632

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    & Meynet, G

    Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 143

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    2022, A&A, 664, A159

    Mahy, L., Sana, H., Shenar, T., et al. 2022, A&A, 664, A159

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    2021, in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy, ed

    Mapelli, M. 2021, in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy, ed. C. Bambi, S. Katsanevas, & K. D. Kokkotas, 16

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    & Bodensteiner, J

    Marchant, P. & Bodensteiner, J. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 21

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    V ., Moffat, A

    Marchenko, S. V ., Moffat, A. F. J., & Eenens, P. R. J. 1998, PASP, 110, 1416

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    G., Hennicker, L., et al

    Moens, N., Poniatowski, L. G., Hennicker, L., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, A42

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    A., Charles, P

    Morales-Rueda, L., Carter, D., Steele, I. A., Charles, P. A., & Worswick, S. 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 215

    work page 2004

  61. [61]

    D., Meilland, A., et al

    Mourard, D., Monnier, J. D., Meilland, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A51 Müller-Horn, J., El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A9

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    A., McClintock, J

    Orosz, J. A., McClintock, J. E., Narayan, R., et al. 2007, Nature, 449, 872

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    A., Steeghs, D., McClintock, J

    Orosz, J. A., Steeghs, D., McClintock, J. E., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 573

    work page 2009

  64. [64]

    F., Gänsicke, B

    Pala, A. F., Gänsicke, B. T., Belloni, D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 6110

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    C., Vieira, R

    Panoglou, D., Carciofi, A. C., Vieira, R. G., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 2616

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    work page 2013

  68. [68]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    B., et al

    Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 10 Article number, page 15 of 21 A&A proofs:manuscript no

    Paxton, B., Smolec, R., Schwab, J., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 10 Article number, page 15 of 21 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa57960-25corr

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    J., Pewett, T

    Peters, G. J., Pewett, T. D., Gies, D. R., Touhami, Y . N., & Grundstrom, E. D. 2013, ApJ, 765, 2

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Peters, G. J. & Polidan, R. S. 1984, ApJ, 283, 745

    work page 1984

  73. [73]

    J., Wang, L., Gies, D

    Peters, G. J., Wang, L., Gies, D. R., & Grundstrom, E. D. 2016, ApJ, 828, 47

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    2024, A&A, 681, A31

    Picco, A., Marchant, P., Sana, H., & Nelemans, G. 2024, A&A, 681, A31

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    1981, PASP, 93, 297

    Poeckert, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 297

    work page 1981

  76. [76]

    R., Cote, J., Waters, L

    Pols, O. R., Cote, J., Waters, L. B. F. M., & Heise, J. 1991, A&A, 241, 419

    work page 1991

  77. [77]

    Prinja, R. K. 1989, MNRAS, 241, 721

    work page 1989

  78. [78]

    S., & Najarro, F

    Puls, J., Vink, J. S., & Najarro, F. 2008, A&A Rev., 16, 209

    work page 2008

  79. [79]

    Ramachandran, V ., Klencki, J., Sander, A. A. C., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, L12

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    M., Hamann, W

    Ramachandran, V ., Oskinova, L. M., Hamann, W. R., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A77

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.