pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.10903 · v1 · submitted 2026-02-11 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Weak Annihilation Contribution to Angular Observables in B_{c}^+to D^{ast+}ell⁺ell⁻ Decays

Zohaib Aarfi , Qazi Maaz Us Salam , Ishtiaq Ahmed , Faisal Munir Bhutta , M.Ali Paracha
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords B_c decaysrare semileptonic decaysweak annihilationangular observablesforward-backward asymmetryform factorsb to d transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Weak annihilation contributions significantly alter angular observables in B_c^+ to D^{*+} lepton pair decays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates rare semileptonic decays of the B_c meson to a D* vector meson plus lepton pair, focusing on how weak annihilation diagrams combine with penguin, box, and resonance effects. It uses the effective Hamiltonian for b to d transitions and form factors from the covariant confined quark model to find differential branching ratios, forward-backward asymmetry, and normalized angular coefficients. A sympathetic reader would care because these decays offer a window on possible new physics, but only if all Standard Model pieces including weak annihilation are accounted for accurately. The results show weak annihilation is sizable at low q squared and shifts zero crossings of several observables. Resonance effects dominate at high q squared and limit the clean analysis region.

Core claim

Using the effective Hamiltonian for b to d ℓ^+ ℓ^- transitions and B_c to D* form factors from the covariant confined quark model, weak annihilation contributions prove sizable at low q^2, modifying differential branching ratios, forward-backward asymmetry, longitudinal helicity fraction, and angular coefficients while shifting zero crossings in B_c^+ → D^{*+} ℓ^+ ℓ^- decays.

What carries the argument

Weak annihilation contributions within the effective Hamiltonian for b → d ℓ^+ ℓ^- transitions, together with B_c → D* transition form factors obtained from the covariant confined quark model.

If this is right

  • Weak annihilation effects are sizable particularly at low q^2.
  • Several observables including branching ratios and asymmetries are significantly modified with shifted zero crossings.
  • Resonance effects dominate at high q^2 and restrict reliable analysis windows.
  • Inclusion of weak annihilation is required for precise Standard Model predictions and to isolate possible new physics signals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Omitting weak annihilation would produce incomplete predictions that could be misread as new physics signals at low q^2.
  • The same weak annihilation treatment could be applied to related rare decays such as B to K* ℓℓ for cross-checks.
  • Updated form factor calculations from lattice QCD would allow direct comparison to test the size of the weak annihilation shift.

Load-bearing premise

The form factors from the covariant confined quark model accurately capture the B_c to D* transition matrix elements while the effective Hamiltonian and resonance modeling account for all relevant long-distance contributions.

What would settle it

Experimental measurements of angular observables such as the forward-backward asymmetry or helicity fraction at low q^2 that match calculations without weak annihilation but deviate from those including it would show the contribution is not essential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.10903 by Faisal Munir Bhutta, Ishtiaq Ahmed, M.Ali Paracha, Qazi Maaz Us Salam, Zohaib Aarfi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Feynman diagrams contributing to the process. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Kinematics of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Branching ratios of the two channels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The first and the second columns show (from top to bottom) the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Angular observables of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Angular observables of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: A comparison of the binned average values of the branching ratio, forward backward asymmetry and helicity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The real (left panel) and the imaginary (right panel) parts of the WA form factors. The uncertainties are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyze the rare semileptonic decays $B_{c}^+ \to D^{\ast+}(\to P_1 P_2)\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$, with $P_1 P_2 = D^+ \pi^0$ or $D^0 \pi^+$, and $\ell=\mu, \tau$. We focus on the impact of weak annihilation contributions alongside penguin, box, and long-distance effects. Using the effective Hamiltonian for $b \to d \ell^+ \ell^-$ transitions and $B_c \to D^{*}$ form factors from covariant confined quark model inputs, we compute the differential branching ratios, forward-backward asymmetry, longitudinal helicity fraction of the $D^{\ast}$, and various normalized angular coefficients. The results of the observables show that weak annihilation effects are sizable, particularly at low $q^2$, significantly modifying several observables and shifting zero-crossings. Resonance effects dominate at high $q^2$, restricting reliable analysis windows. We conclude that the inclusion of weak annihilation is essential for precise Standard Model predictions and for isolating possible New Physics effects in $B_c^+ \to D^{*+} \ell^+ \ell^-$ decays.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the rare semileptonic decays B_c^+ → D^{*+} ℓ^+ ℓ^- (ℓ=μ,τ), emphasizing the role of weak annihilation (WA) alongside penguin, box, and resonance contributions. Employing the standard effective Hamiltonian for b→d ℓℓ transitions and B_c→D^* form factors from the covariant confined quark model, the authors compute differential branching fractions, forward-backward asymmetry A_FB, longitudinal helicity fraction F_L, and normalized angular coefficients. They report that WA effects are sizable at low q², shifting zero-crossings and altering several observables, while resonances dominate at high q²; the conclusion is that WA inclusion is required for accurate SM predictions and NP isolation.

Significance. If the results hold after addressing form-factor validation, the work would establish that weak annihilation provides non-negligible corrections to angular observables in B_c→D^* ℓℓ decays at low dilepton mass, improving the precision of SM benchmarks and sharpening the sensitivity to possible New Physics in these channels.

major comments (1)
  1. [Form-factor inputs and WA amplitude construction] The central claim that WA contributions are sizable enough to modify observables and shift zero-crossings rests on B_c→D^* transition matrix elements supplied by the covariant confined quark model. No comparison of these form factors to lattice QCD results or light-cone sum-rule parametrizations is presented, and no model uncertainties are propagated into the final angular coefficients or branching ratios. This directly affects the relative weight of WA versus penguin/box terms and therefore the assertion that WA inclusion is essential.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Resonance modeling] The abstract notes that resonance effects dominate at high q² and restrict reliable windows, but the main text should explicitly define the resonance modeling (e.g., which charmonium states are included and with what widths) and the precise q² intervals retained for analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the discussion of form-factor inputs and their impact.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Form-factor inputs and WA amplitude construction] The central claim that WA contributions are sizable enough to modify observables and shift zero-crossings rests on B_c→D^* transition matrix elements supplied by the covariant confined quark model. No comparison of these form factors to lattice QCD results or light-cone sum-rule parametrizations is presented, and no model uncertainties are propagated into the final angular coefficients or branching ratios. This directly affects the relative weight of WA versus penguin/box terms and therefore the assertion that WA inclusion is essential.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit validation and uncertainty analysis would improve the manuscript. The covariant confined quark model (CCQM) is a well-established approach that has been applied consistently to B_c decays in the literature, with parameters fixed from meson spectroscopy and decay constants. Direct lattice QCD results for the full set of B_c → D^* form factors across the relevant q² range are not currently available. In the revised version we will add a new subsection that (i) compares the CCQM form factors to other available quark-model and sum-rule parametrizations where they exist, (ii) estimates the model-parameter uncertainties and propagates them to the differential branching ratios and angular observables, and (iii) quantifies how these uncertainties affect the relative size of the weak-annihilation contribution versus the penguin/box terms. These additions will make the robustness of our conclusions clearer while preserving the central finding that WA effects are sizable at low q². revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; observables computed from external form factors and standard Hamiltonian

full rationale

The derivation combines the standard effective Hamiltonian for b→dℓ⁺ℓ⁻ transitions with B_c→D* form factors taken as external inputs from the covariant confined quark model. No equation reduces the computed branching ratios, forward-backward asymmetry, helicity fractions or angular coefficients to a fitted parameter or self-defined quantity; the weak-annihilation terms are obtained by direct substitution of those independent matrix elements. Resonance modeling at high q² is likewise external. The conclusion that weak annihilation is essential follows from the numerical output rather than by construction, rendering the chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two standard domain assumptions: the validity of the effective Hamiltonian for b to d ll transitions and the reliability of form factors from the covariant confined quark model. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Effective Hamiltonian for b → d ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ transitions captures all short-distance physics
    Standard framework invoked for the decay amplitude
  • domain assumption Covariant confined quark model form factors for B_c → D* are sufficiently accurate
    Used as input for all matrix elements

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1330 out tokens · 47670 ms · 2026-05-16T02:49:56.411697+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Real and Complex Singlet-Scalar Benchmarks with a Vector-Like Down Quark for $B\to X_s\gamma$ and $B_s-\bar B_s$ Mixing

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In minimal benchmarks with a vector-like down quark D and singlet scalar, the new-physics contribution to B to X_s gamma is only 0.4 percent of the Standard Model value at TeV scales, while B_s mixing imposes stronger...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 52 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Forward-backward asymmetry and Helicity fraction 11

    work page

  2. [2]

    Weak Annihilation Contribution to Angular Observables in $B_{c}^+\to D^{\ast+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ Decays

    Phenomenological analysis of Angular coefficients in Bc → D∗ℓ+ℓ− Decays 12 IV. Conclusion 15 Acknowledgments 16 A. W A Form Factors 16 B. Wilson Coefficients Expressions 16 C. Kinematics 17 References 18 ∗ zohaib.phdphy22sns@student.nust.edu.pk † qazimaaz92@gmail.com ‡ ishtiaq.ahmed@ncp.edu.pk § faisal.munir@sns.nust.edu.pk ¶ aliparacha@sns.nust.edu.pk (cor...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    3 present the differential branching ratios for the decay channels Bc → D∗(→ D+π0)µ+µ− and Bc → D∗(→ D0π+)µ+µ−, respectively, at low q2 bin

    Branching Ratio The upper and lower plots in first column in FIG. 3 present the differential branching ratios for the decay channels Bc → D∗(→ D+π0)µ+µ− and Bc → D∗(→ D0π+)µ+µ−, respectively, at low q2 bin. Although light vector resonances such as ρ, ω, and ϕ manifest as a small structure in the low- q2 region, their overall impact on the decay spectrum i...

    work page

  4. [4]

    4 depicts the behavior of the forward-backward asymmetry AF B (1st row) and the longitudinal helicity fraction fL (2nd row) as a function of q2

    Forward-backward asymmetry and Helicity fraction FIG. 4 depicts the behavior of the forward-backward asymmetry AF B (1st row) and the longitudinal helicity fraction fL (2nd row) as a function of q2. The first two columns in FIG. 4 show the behavior of the said observables for the decay Bc → D∗µ+µ− in low and high q2 bin, while the same observables are pre...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Numerical values of the SM predictions of the average angular coefficients with uncertainties due to the form factors in different q2 are presented in Table- III

    Phenomenological analysis of Angular coefficients in Bc → D∗ℓ+ℓ− Decays In this section, we present the W A effects in the individual angular coefficients ⟨I1s⟩, ⟨I1c⟩, ⟨I2s⟩, ⟨I2c⟩, ⟨I3⟩, ⟨I4⟩, ⟨I5⟩ and ⟨I6s⟩. Numerical values of the SM predictions of the average angular coefficients with uncertainties due to the form factors in different q2 are presented i...

    work page

  6. [6]

    S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Weak Interactions with Lepton-Hadron Symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1285–1292

    work page 1970

  7. [7]

    The Study of Rare $B_c\rightarrow D^{(*)}_{s,d}l\bar{l}$ Decays

    W.-L. Ju, G.-L. Wang, H.-F. Fu, T.-H. Wang, and Y. Jiang, The Study of Rare Bc → D(∗) s,dl¯l Decays, JHEP 04 (2014) 065, [ arXiv:1307.5492]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Aaij et al., Search for B+ c → π+µ+µ− decays and measurement of the branching fraction ratio B(B+ c → ψ(2S)π+)/B(B+ c → J/ ψπ+), Eur

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for B+ c → π+µ+µ− decays and measurement of the branching fraction ratio B(B+ c → ψ(2S)π+)/B(B+ c → J/ ψπ+), Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 5 468, [ arXiv:2312.12228]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    First observation of the decay Bc+ to J/psi pi+pi-pi+

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., First observation of the decay B+ c → J/ψπ +π−π+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 251802, [ arXiv:1204.0079]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    First observation of the decay $B^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., First observation of the decay B+ → π+µ+µ−, JHEP 12 (2012) 125, [arXiv:1210.2645]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Evidence for the decay $B_{s}^0 \rightarrow \overline{K}{}^{*0}\mu^+\mu^-$

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Evidence for the decay B0 S → K ∗0 µ+µ−, JHEP 07 (2018) 020, [ arXiv:1804.07167]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Artuso, G

    M. Artuso, G. Isidori, and S. Stone, New Physics in B Decays . World Scientific, Singapore, 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    London and J

    D. London and J. Matias, B Flavour Anomalies: 2021 Theoretical Status Report , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72 (2022) 37–68, [ arXiv:2110.13270]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Aaij et al., A search for rare B → D µ+µ− decays, JHEP 02 (2024) 032, [ arXiv:2308.06162]

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., A search for rare B → D µ+µ− decays, JHEP 02 (2024) 032, [ arXiv:2308.06162]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    C. Q. Geng, C.-W. Hwang, and C. C. Liu, Study of rare B+ c → Dd,s + lepton anti-lepton decays , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 094037, [ hep-ph/0110376]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  16. [16]

    Analysis of the Rare $B_c \to D_{s,d}^{*} l^+ l^-$ Decays in QCD

    K. Azizi, F. Falahati, V. Bashiry, and S. M. Zebarjad, Analysis of the Rare Bc → D∗ s,d ℓ+ℓ− Decays in QCD , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 114024, [ arXiv:0806.0583]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  17. [17]

    Analysis of the rare semileptonic $B_c \rar P(D,D_s) l^{+}l^{-}/\nu\bar{\nu}$ decays within QCD sum rules

    K. Azizi and R. Khosravi, Analysis of the rare semileptonic Bc → P (D, Ds)ℓ+ℓ−/ν ¯ν decays within QCD sum rules , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 036005, [ arXiv:0806.0590]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    The exclusive rare decays B -> K l(bar) l and B_c -> D(D*) l(bar) l in a relativistic quark model

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, The Exclusive rare decays B → K(K*) ¯ℓℓ and Bc → D(D*) ¯ℓℓ in a relativistic quark model , Eur. Phys. J. direct 4 (2002), no. 1 18, [ hep-ph/0205287]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  19. [19]

    Light-front quark model analysis of the exclusive rare $B_c\to D_{(s)}(\ell^+\ell^-,\nu_{\ell}\bar{\nu}_{\ell})$ decays

    H.-M. Choi, Light-front quark model analysis of the exclusive rare Bc → D(s)(ℓ+ℓ−, νℓ ¯νℓ) decays, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 054003, [ arXiv:1001.3432]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    W.-F. Wang, X. Yu, C.-D. Lü, and Z.-J. Xiao, Semileptonic decays B+ c → D(∗) (s) (l+νl, l+l−, ν¯ν) in the perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 9 094018, [ arXiv:1401.0391]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    U. O. Yilmaz, Study of Bc → D∗ s ℓ+ℓ− in Single Universal Extra Dimension , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115026, [arXiv:1204.1261]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    Rare semileptonic decays of B and B_c mesons in the relativistic quark model

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Rare Semileptonic Decays of B and Bc Mesons in the Relativistic Quark Model, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 034032, [ arXiv:1006.4231]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    P. Maji, S. Mahata, P. Nayek, S. Biswas, and S. Sahoo, Investigation of rare semileptonic Bc → (D(∗) s,d)µ+µ− decays with non-universal Z ′ effect, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020), no. 7 073106, [ arXiv:2003.12272]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    P. Maji, S. Biswas, P. Nayek, and S. Sahoo, Charged Higgs contribution on Bc → (Ds, D∗ s )l+l−, PTEP 2020 (2020), no. 5 053B07, [ arXiv:2003.07041]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Dutta, Model independent analysis of new physics effects on Bc → (Ds, D ∗ s ) µ+µ− decay observables, Phys

    R. Dutta, Model independent analysis of new physics effects on Bc → (Ds, D ∗ s ) µ+µ− decay observables, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 7 075025, [ arXiv:1906.02412]

    work page arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    M. K. Mohapatra, N. Rajeev, and R. Dutta, Combined analysis of Bc → D(∗) s µ+µ− and Bc → D(∗) s ν ¯ν decays within Z ′ and leptoquark new physics models , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 11 115022, [ arXiv:2108.10106]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    M. Zaki, M. A. Paracha, and F. M. Bhutta, Footprints of New Physics in the angular distribution of Bc → D∗ s (→ Dsγ, (Dsπ)) ℓ+ℓ− decays, Nucl. Phys. B 992 (2023) 116236, [ arXiv:2303.01145]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Q. M. U. Salam, I. Ahmed, R. Khalid, and I. U. Rehman, Exploring new physics in transition b → sℓ+ℓ− through different Bc → D(∗) s ℓ+ℓ− observables, J. Phys. G 52 (2025), no. 4 045003, [ arXiv:2411.00912]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Investigating New Physics through the Observables of Semileptonic $B_{s}\to K^{\ast}(\to K \pi)\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ Decay

    Z. Aarfi, Q. M. U. Salam, I. Ahmed, F. M. Bhutta, R. Khalid, and M. A. Paracha, Investigating New Physics through the Observables of Semileptonic Bs → K ∗(→ Kπ ) µ+µ− Decay, PTEP 2025 (6, 2025) 123, [ arXiv:2506.20446]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Search for the Flavor-Changing Neutral Current Decays B^+ -> mu^+ mu^- K^+ and B^0 -> mu^+ mu^-K^{*0}

    CDF Collaboration, T. Affolder et al., Search for the flavor-changing neutral current decays B+ → µ+µ−K + and B0 → µ+µ−K ∗0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3378–3383, [ hep-ex/9905004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  31. [31]

    Search for B^+ --> K^+l^+l^- and B^0 --> K^(*0)l^+l^-

    BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Search for B+ → K + ℓ+ℓ− and B0 → K ∗0 ℓ+ℓ−, in 30th International Conference on High-Energy Physics , 7, 2000. hep-ex/0008059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  32. [32]

    Observation of the Decay $B \to K \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$

    Belle Collaboration, K. Abe et al., Observation of the decay B → Kℓ +ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 021801, [hep-ex/0109026]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  33. [33]

    Evidence for the Rare Decay B -> K*ll and Measurement of the B -> Kll Branching Fraction

    BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Evidence for the rare decay B → K ∗ℓ+ℓ− and measurement of the B → Kℓ +ℓ− branching fraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 221802, [ hep-ex/0308042]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  34. [34]

    Direct CP, Lepton Flavor and Isospin Asymmetries in the Decays B->K(*)l+l-

    BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Direct CP, Lepton Flavor and Isospin Asymmetries in the Decays B → K (∗)ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 091803, [ arXiv:0807.4119]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    Observation of $B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-$

    Belle Collaboration, A. Ishikawa et al., Observation of B → K ∗ ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 261601, [hep-ex/0308044]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  36. [36]

    Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of $B\to K^\ast \ell^+\ell^-$

    Belle Collaboration, S. Wehle et al., Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of B → K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 11 111801, [ arXiv:1612.05014]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Choudhury et al., Test of lepton flavor universality and search for lepton flavor violation in B → Kℓℓ decays, JHEP 03 (2021) 105, [ arXiv:1908.01848]

    BELLE Collaboration, S. Choudhury et al., Test of lepton flavor universality and search for lepton flavor violation in B → Kℓℓ decays, JHEP 03 (2021) 105, [ arXiv:1908.01848]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Belle Collaboration, T. V. Dong et al., Search for the decay B0 → K ∗0 τ +τ − at the Belle experiment , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 1 L011102, [ arXiv:2110.03871]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Belle Collaboration, J. T. Wei et al., Measurement of the Differential Branching Fraction and Forward-Backward Asymmetry for B → K (∗)ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 171801, [ arXiv:0904.0770]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  40. [40]

    Abdesselam et al., Test of Lepton-Flavor Universality in B → K ∗ℓ+ℓ− Decays at Belle , Phys

    Belle Collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., Test of Lepton-Flavor Universality in B → K ∗ℓ+ℓ− Decays at Belle , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021), no. 16 161801, [ arXiv:1904.02440]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Measurement of Branching Fractions and Rate Asymmetries in the Rare Decays B → K (∗)l+l−, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 032012, [ arXiv:1204.3933]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    Observation of the Baryonic Flavor-Changing Neutral Current Decay Lambda_b -> Lambda mu+ mu-

    CDF Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Observation of the Baryonic Flavor-Changing Neutral Current Decay Λb → Λµ+µ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 201802, [ arXiv:1107.3753]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    Angular analysis of the decay B0 to K*0 mu mu from pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Angular analysis of the decay B0 → K ∗0µ+µ− from pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 424–448, [ arXiv:1507.08126]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Test of lepton universality using $B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality using B+ → K +ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 151601, [ arXiv:1406.6482]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    Measurements of the S-wave fraction in $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{+}\pi^{-}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decays and the $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{\ast}(892)^{0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ differential branching fraction

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurements of the S-wave fraction in B0 → K +π−µ+µ− decays and the B0 → K ∗(892)0µ+µ− differential branching fraction , JHEP 11 (2016) 047, [ arXiv:1606.04731]. [Erratum: JHEP 04, 142 (2017)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Test of lepton universality with $B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality with B0 → K ∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays, JHEP 08 (2017) 055, [arXiv:1705.05802]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Measurement of form-factor independent observables in the decay $B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^+ \mu^-$

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of Form-Factor-Independent Observables in the Decay B0 → K ∗0µ+µ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 191801, [ arXiv:1308.1707]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the $B^{+} \rightarrow K^{+}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the B+ → K +µ+µ− decay, JHEP 02 (2013) 105, [ arXiv:1209.4284]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    Comparative Study of B_{c} --> D_{s}^{*}l^{+}l^{-} Decays in Standard Model and Supersymmetric Models

    A. Ahmed, I. Ahmed, M. A. Paracha, M. Junaid, A. Rehman, and M. J. Aslam, Comparative Study of Bc → D∗ s ℓ+ℓ− Decays in Standard Model and Supersymmetric Models , 8, 2011. arXiv:1108.1058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    Analysis of B_{C} --> D_{s}^{*}l^{+}l^{-} in the Standard Model Beyond Third Generation

    I. Ahmed, M. A. Paracha, M. Junaid, A. Ahmed, A. Rehman, and M. J. Aslam, Analysis of Bc → D∗ s ℓ+ℓ− in the Standard Model Beyond Third Generation , [ arXiv:1107.5694]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    B_c meson rare decays in the light-cone quark model

    T. Wang, D.-X. Zhang, B.-Q. Ma, and T. Liu, Bc Meson Rare Decays in the Light-cone Quark Model , Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1758, [ arXiv:1004.4274]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  52. [52]

    Isidori, Z

    G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, and A. Tinari, Explicit estimate of charm rescattering in B0 → K 0 ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 9 093007, [ arXiv:2405.17551]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Aaij et al., Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the B 0→ K ∗0µ+µ− decay, JHEP 09 (2024) 026, [ arXiv:2405.17347]

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the B 0→ K ∗0µ+µ− decay, JHEP 09 (2024) 026, [ arXiv:2405.17347]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Bordone, G

    M. Bordone, G. Isidori, S. Mächler, and A. Tinari, Short- vs. long-distance physics in B → K (∗)ℓ+ℓ−: a data-driven analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 5 547, [ arXiv:2401.18007]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Mahmoudi and Y

    F. Mahmoudi and Y. Monceaux, Overview of B→K (∗)ℓℓ Theoretical Calculations and Uncertainties , Symmetry 16 (2024), no. 8 1006, [ arXiv:2408.03235]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Hadronic uncertainties in $B\to K^*\mu^+\mu^-$: a state-of-the-art analysis

    B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, and J. Matias, Hadronic uncertainties in B → K ∗µ+µ−: a state-of-the-art analysis, JHEP 04 (2017) 016, [ arXiv:1701.08672]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms

    G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak Decays beyond Leading Logarithms , Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 1125–1144, [ hep-ph/9512380]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  58. [58]

    Three-loop matching of the dipole operators for b -> s gamma and b -> s g

    M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser, Three loop matching of the dipole operators for b → sγ and b → sg, Nucl. Phys. B 683 (2004) 277–305, [ hep-ph/0401041]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  59. [59]

    Wu, G.-L

    B. Wu, G.-L. Yu, Z.-G. Wang, Z. Zhou, and J. Lu, Analysis of the form factors of Bc → D(∗), D(∗) s and their nonleptonic decays, 11, 2024

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Hazra, T

    A. Hazra, T. M. S., N. Sharma, and R. Dhir, Bc to A transition form factors and semileptonic decays in self-consistent covariant light-front approach , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 9 944, [ arXiv:2309.03655]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    The two-body B_c {\to} D^{(*)}_{(s)}P, D^{(*)}_{(s)}V decays in the Perturbative QCD Approach

    Z. Rui, Z.-T. Zou, and C.-D. Lu, The Two-Body Bc→D(∗) (s) P , D(∗) (s) V Decays in the Perturbative QCD Approach , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 074008, [ arXiv:1112.1257]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  62. [62]

    Semileptonic $D_{q}\to K_{1}\ell \nu$ and nonleptonic $D\to K_1 \pi$ decays in three--point QCD sum rules and factorization approach

    R. Khosravi, K. Azizi, and N. Ghahramany, Semileptonic Dq → K1 ℓν and nonleptonic D → K1π decays in three-point QCD sum rules and factorization approach , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 036004, [ arXiv:0812.1352]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    M. A. Ivanov, J. N. Pandya, P. Santorelli, and N. R. Soni, Decay B+ c → D(∗)+ (s) ℓ+ℓ− within covariant confined quark model, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 096003, [ arXiv:2404.15085]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, and C.-T. Tran, Analyzing new physics in the decays ¯B0 → D(∗)τ − ¯ντ with form factors obtained from the covariant quark model , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 9 094028, [ arXiv:1607.02932]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    On the meson mass spectrum in the covariant confined quark model

    G. Ganbold, T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, On the meson mass spectrum in the covariant confined 20 quark model , J. Phys. G 42 (2015), no. 7 075002, [ arXiv:1410.3741]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Issadykov, M

    A. Issadykov, M. A. Ivanov, and G. Nurbakova, Semileptonic decays of B c mesons into charmonium states , EPJ Web Conf. 158 (2017) 03002, [ arXiv:1907.13210]

    work page arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    Heavy-to-light semileptonic decays of Lambda_b and Lambda_c baryons in the covariant confined quark model

    T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and P. Santorelli, Heavy-to-light semileptonic decays of Λb and Λc baryons in the covariant confined quark model , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 11 114033, [ arXiv:1410.6043]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 059902 (2016)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Study of Form Factors and Observables in $B_c^- \rightarrow \bar{D}^{(*)0}\ell^-\bar{\nu}_{\ell}$ and $B_c^- \rightarrow D^{(*)-}\ell^+\ell^-$ decays

    U. Dey and S. Nandi, Study of Form Factors and Observables in B− c → ¯D(∗)0ℓ− ¯νℓ and B− c → D(∗)−ℓ+ℓ− decays, [arXiv:2509.19445]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Bause, H

    R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, Model-independent analysis of b → d processes, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 5 419, [ arXiv:2209.04457]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Photonic penguins at two loops and m_t-dependence of BR[ B -> X_s l^+ l^-]

    C. Bobeth, M. Misiak, and J. Urban, Photonic penguins at two loops and mt dependence of BR[B → Xsl+l−], Nucl. Phys. B 574 (2000) 291–330, [ hep-ph/9910220]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  71. [71]

    Systematic approach to exclusive B ->V l^+l^-, V gamma decays

    M. Beneke, T. Feldmann, and D. Seidel, Systematic approach to exclusive B → V l+l−, V γ decays, Nucl. Phys. B612 (2001) 25–58, [ hep-ph/0106067]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  72. [72]

    H. H. Asatrian, H. M. Asatrian, C. Greub, and M. Walker, Two loop virtual corrections to B → Xsl+l− in the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 507 (2001) 162–172, [ hep-ph/0103087]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  73. [73]

    H. H. Asatryan, H. M. Asatrian, C. Greub, and M. Walker, Calculation of two loop virtual corrections to b → sl+l− in the standard model , Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 074004, [ hep-ph/0109140]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  74. [74]

    Analytic calculation of two-loop QCD corrections to b\to s\ell^+\ell^- in the high q^2 region

    C. Greub, V. Pilipp, and C. Schupbach, Analytic calculation of two-loop QCD corrections to b → sl+l− in the high q2 region, JHEP 12 (2008) 040, [ arXiv:0810.4077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    D. Du, A. X. El-Khadra, S. Gottlieb, A. S. Kronfeld, J. Laiho, E. Lunghi, R. S. Van de Water, and R. Zhou, Phenomenology of semileptonic B-meson decays with form factors from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 3 034005, [ arXiv:1510.02349]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    Angular moments of the decay $\Lambda_b^0 \rightarrow \Lambda \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ at low hadronic recoil

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Angular moments of the decay Λ0 b → Λµ+µ− at low hadronic recoil , JHEP 09 (2018) 146, [ arXiv:1808.00264]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Gratrex, M

    J. Gratrex, M. Hopfer, and R. Zwicky, Generalised helicity formalism, higher moments and the B → KJK (→ Kπ )¯ℓ1ℓ2 angular distributions , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 5 054008, [ arXiv:1506.03970]

    work page arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    James, Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics

    F. James, Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics . World Scientific, Singapore, 2nd ed., 2006

    work page 2006

  79. [79]

    Extracting Angular Observables without a Likelihood and Applications to Rare Decays

    F. Beaujean, M. Chrzaszcz, N. Serra, and D. van Dyk, Extracting Angular Observables without a Likelihood and Applications to Rare Decays , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 11 114012, [ arXiv:1503.04100]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    Angular analysis of the $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{*0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay using $3\,\mbox{fb}^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Angular analysis of the B0 → K ∗0µ+µ− decay using 3 fb −1 of integrated luminosity , JHEP 02 (2016) 104, [ arXiv:1512.04442]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.