pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.16369 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-18 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph· nucl-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Rapidity dependence of mean transverse momentum fluctuation and decorrelation in baryon-dense medium

Tribhuban Parida
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 21:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-phnucl-ex
keywords mean transverse momentumrapidity decorrelationbaryon density fluctuationsequation of stateheavy-ion collisionshydrodynamic modelproton antiproton splittingbaryon diffusion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mean transverse momentum fluctuations in baryon-rich collisions arise from combined energy and net-baryon density variations, yielding a robust equation-of-state probe.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the mean transverse momentum fluctuates event by event and decorrelates with rapidity inside a baryon-dense medium created in heavy-ion collisions. It shows that these fluctuations are produced by the joint action of energy-density and net-baryon-density variations, so the rapidity pattern directly encodes the three-dimensional shape of both profiles. Baryon diffusion turns out to have almost no effect on the decorrelation, in contrast to shear and bulk viscosity. This insensitivity makes the observable a clean test of the equation of state at finite baryon density. Calculations for identified particles reveal a clear splitting between the rapidity decorrelation seen in protons and in antiprotons.

Core claim

In a baryon-rich medium the event-by-event fluctuation of the mean transverse momentum is driven by the combined effects of energy-density and net-baryon-density fluctuations. Consequently the rapidity dependence of this observable provides a promising handle to probe the three-dimensional structure of both energy and baryon density profiles. Baryon diffusion has a negligible impact, establishing the observable as a robust probe of the equation of state. Predictions for identified hadrons show a pronounced splitting in the rapidity decorrelation of mean transverse momentum between protons and antiprotons.

What carries the argument

The rapidity dependence of mean transverse momentum fluctuation and decorrelation, generated by the joint energy-density and net-baryon-density fluctuations inside a hydrodynamic description of baryon-dense matter.

If this is right

  • The rapidity pattern of the fluctuations can map the three-dimensional energy and baryon density profiles created in the collision.
  • The observable remains a reliable probe of the equation of state even when baryon diffusion is present.
  • A splitting between protons and antiprotons signals distinct transverse flow dynamics for baryons and antibaryons.
  • Measurements of identified hadrons can separate baryon from antibaryon collective behavior in dense matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Data on the proton-antiproton splitting could constrain models of initial baryon stopping and transport.
  • The same rapidity dependence might be combined with other flow observables to reduce uncertainties in the initial-state density profiles.
  • Repeating the analysis at different beam energies could trace how the three-dimensional density structures evolve across the QCD phase diagram.

Load-bearing premise

That energy-density and net-baryon-density fluctuations fully account for the observed mean transverse momentum fluctuations inside the hydrodynamic framework without significant contributions from other unmodeled dynamics.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the rapidity decorrelation of mean transverse momentum changes substantially when the baryon diffusion coefficient is varied in hydrodynamic simulations compared with experimental data from baryon-rich collisions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.16369 by Tribhuban Parida.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Space–time rapidity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Pseudo-rapidity dependence of the mean- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Pseudorapidity dependence of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color Online) Rapidity dependence of observables related to mean transverse momentum correlations and fluctuations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color Online) Rapidity dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

I study the event-by-event fluctuation and rapidity decorrelation of the mean transverse momentum $\spt$, which has recently been proposed as a sensitive probe of the equation of state at finite baryon density. The investigation reveals that, in a baryon-rich medium, the event-by-event fluctuation of the mean transverse momentum is driven by the combined effects of energy-density and net-baryon-density fluctuations. Consequently, the rapidity dependence of this observable provides a promising handle to probe the three-dimensional structure of both energy and baryon density profiles. Previous studies have shown that $\spt$ decorrelation along rapidity is largely insensitive to shear and bulk viscosity; however, its dependence on baryon diffusion, another key transport coefficient in baryonic matter, has not been explored. I find that baryon diffusion has a negligible impact, establishing this observable as a robust probe of the equation of state. Furthermore, I present predictions for identified hadrons and observe a pronounced splitting in the rapidity decorrelation of mean transverse momentum between protons and antiprotons, indicating different transverse flow dynamics for baryons and antibaryons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates event-by-event fluctuations and rapidity decorrelation of mean transverse momentum <pT> in baryon-rich heavy-ion collisions within a hydrodynamic framework. It claims that <pT> fluctuations are driven by the combined effects of energy-density and net-baryon-density fluctuations, that the rapidity dependence serves as a probe of the three-dimensional initial-state profiles, that baryon diffusion has negligible impact (rendering the observable robust against this transport coefficient), and that predictions for identified hadrons show a pronounced splitting in <pT> decorrelation between protons and antiprotons due to distinct transverse flow dynamics for baryons versus antibaryons.

Significance. If the central findings hold, the work would establish <pT> rapidity decorrelation as a robust, viscosity-insensitive probe of the equation of state and initial-state structure in the baryon-dense regime, with new predictions for identified-particle observables that could distinguish baryon versus antibaryon dynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Predictions for identified hadrons] In the section presenting predictions for identified hadrons, the pronounced splitting in rapidity decorrelation of mean transverse momentum between protons and antiprotons is attributed to different transverse flow dynamics for baryons and antibaryons. This interpretation assumes that hydrodynamic evolution plus Cooper-Frye freeze-out maps initial baryon-density fluctuations directly into the final-state observables without significant contamination from resonance decays; however, protons typically receive substantial feed-down from Delta and Lambda resonances (with different space-time emission points) while antiprotons receive less, and the calculation does not vary or disable resonance contributions to test this.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract provides no quantitative details on the magnitude of the reported fluctuations, the specific values of transport coefficients tested, or the model parameters (e.g., initial-state profiles or freeze-out conditions), which would strengthen the presentation of the claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment on the identified-hadron predictions. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the section presenting predictions for identified hadrons, the pronounced splitting in rapidity decorrelation of mean transverse momentum between protons and antiprotons is attributed to different transverse flow dynamics for baryons and antibaryons. This interpretation assumes that hydrodynamic evolution plus Cooper-Frye freeze-out maps initial baryon-density fluctuations directly into the final-state observables without significant contamination from resonance decays; however, protons typically receive substantial feed-down from Delta and Lambda resonances (with different space-time emission points) while antiprotons receive less, and the calculation does not vary or disable resonance contributions to test this.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation. Our hydrodynamic evolution with Cooper-Frye freeze-out includes resonance production according to the local thermodynamic conditions, followed by standard resonance decays. The splitting in rapidity decorrelation of <pT> between protons and antiprotons originates from the distinct coupling of net-baryon and net-antibaryon distributions to the transverse flow field in the baryon-rich regime; this difference is already present at chemical freeze-out. While resonance feed-down modifies the final yields and slightly shifts the effective emission points, it does not erase the rapidity-dependent correlation structure imprinted by the initial-state profiles. We did not perform an explicit calculation with resonances disabled, but the robustness of the splitting follows from the fact that both direct and decay contributions inherit the same underlying flow velocities. In the revised manuscript we will add a clarifying paragraph on this point and note that the main conclusions are insensitive to the precise treatment of resonance decays. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from hydrodynamic simulations

full rationale

The paper reports numerical results from event-by-event hydrodynamic evolution of energy and baryon density fluctuations, followed by Cooper-Frye freeze-out to compute mean-pT fluctuations and rapidity decorrelations. No analytical derivation reduces a claimed prediction to its own fitted inputs by construction. Baryon-diffusion insensitivity and proton-antiproton splitting are presented as simulation outputs, not as self-definitional identities or renamed fits. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, new entities, or detailed axioms; relies on standard assumptions of hydrodynamic modeling in nuclear collisions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Hydrodynamic evolution accurately captures event-by-event fluctuations of energy and baryon density in baryon-rich matter
    Invoked to link mean transverse momentum fluctuations to density profiles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5492 in / 1208 out tokens · 38694 ms · 2026-05-15T21:21:07.986375+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Thermal and geometric normal modes of spectral fluctuations in heavy-ion collisions

    nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Principal component analysis of spectral fluctuations in heavy-ion collisions yields thermal and geometric normal modes that explain 99.5% of variance and account for measured flow observables v0(pT) and v02(pT).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 57 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    a baseline case with the same normalization of en- ergy density and net-baryon density as in the fluc- tuating initial condition scenario

    work page

  2. [2]

    an increased energy density (ϵ) normalization by a factor of 1.1 while keeping the net-baryon density unchanged

    work page

  3. [3]

    an increased net-baryon density (ρB) normalization by a factor of 1.1 while keeping the energy density unchanged

    work page

  4. [4]

    1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.2 0.5 1 2 v0( ) v0( = 0) = pT/ pT ( pT/ pT )| = 0 Smooth IC Fluctuating IC varying varying B varying both FIG

    a simultaneous increase of both energy density (ϵ) and net-baryon density (ρ B) normalizations by a factor of 1.1. 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.2 0.5 1 2 v0( ) v0( = 0) = pT/ pT ( pT/ pT )| = 0 Smooth IC Fluctuating IC varying varying B varying both FIG. 2. Pseudo-rapidity dependence of the mean-p T fluc- tuationv 0(η)/v0(η= 0), scaled by its respective ...

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    J. Y. Ollitrault, Eur. J. Phys.29(2008), 275- 302 doi:10.1088/0143-0807/29/2/010 [arXiv:0708.2433 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0143-0807/29/2/010 2008

  6. [6]

    J. Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. D46(1992), 229-245 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.229

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.229 1992

  7. [7]

    Alpha clusters and collective flow in ultra-relativistic carbon - heavy nucleus collisions

    P. Bozek, W. Broniowski, E. Ruiz Arriola and M. Ry- bczynski, Phys. Rev. C90(2014) no.6, 064902 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.064902 [arXiv:1410.7434 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.90.064902 2014

  8. [8]

    H. Song, S. A. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011), 192301 [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012), 139904] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.192301 [arXiv:1011.2783 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.192301 2011

  9. [9]

    Bulk and shear viscosities of matter created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    P. Bozek, Phys. Rev. C81(2010), 034909 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.034909 [arXiv:0911.2397 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.034909 2010

  10. [10]

    Flow and interferometry in 3+1 dimensional viscous hydrodynamics

    P. Bozek, Phys. Rev. C85(2012), 034901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034901 [arXiv:1110.6742 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.85.034901 2012

  11. [11]

    I. A. Karpenko, P. Huovinen, H. Petersen and M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C91(2015) no.6, 064901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.064901 [arXiv:1502.01978 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.064901 2015

  12. [12]

    Shen and U

    C. Shen and U. Heinz, Nucl. Phys. News25 (2015) no.2, 6-11 doi:10.1080/10619127.2015.1006502 [arXiv:1507.01558 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1080/10619127.2015.1006502 2015

  13. [13]

    S. Ryu, J. F. Paquet, C. Shen, G. S. Denicol, B. Schenke, S. Jeon and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) no.13, 132301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.132301 [arXiv:1502.01675 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.132301 2015

  14. [14]

    Shen and S

    C. Shen and S. Alzhrani, Phys. Rev. C102 (2020) no.1, 014909 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014909 [arXiv:2003.05852 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.014909 2020

  15. [15]

    Omana Kuttan, J

    M. Omana Kuttan, J. Steinheimer, K. Zhou and H. Stoecker, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) no.20, 202303 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.202303 [arXiv:2211.11670 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.202303 2023

  16. [16]

    J. Gong, H. Roch and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C111 (2025) no.4, 044912 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.111.044912 [arXiv:2410.22160 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.111.044912 2025

  17. [17]

    K. H. Ackermannet al.[STAR], Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(2001), 402-407 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.402 [arXiv:nucl-ex/0009011 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.402 2001

  18. [18]

    Higher harmonic anisotropic flow measurements of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV

    K. Aamodtet al.[ALICE], Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011), 032301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.032301 [arXiv:1105.3865 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.032301 2011

  19. [19]

    Centrality dependence of identified particle elliptic flow in relativistic heavy ion collisions at sqrt(s)= 7.7--62.4 GeV

    L. Adamczyket al.[STAR], Phys. Rev. C93 (2016) no.1, 014907 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.014907 [arXiv:1509.08397 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.014907 2016

  20. [20]

    S. S. Adleret al.[PHENIX], Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(2003), 182301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.182301 [arXiv:nucl-ex/0305013 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.182301 2003

  21. [21]

    J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland, S. A. Bass, J. Liu and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C94(2016) no.2, 024907 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024907 [arXiv:1605.03954 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.024907 2016

  22. [22]

    J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland and S. A. Bass, Nature Phys.15(2019) no.11, 1113-1117 doi:10.1038/s41567- 019-0611-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567- 2019

  23. [23]

    G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. G¨ ursoy and R. Snellings, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no.20, 202301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.202301 [arXiv:2010.15130 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.202301 2021

  24. [24]

    Everettet al.[JETSCAPE], Phys

    D. Everettet al.[JETSCAPE], Phys. Rev. C103 (2021) no.5, 054904 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054904 [arXiv:2011.01430 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.054904 2021

  25. [25]

    S. A. Jahan, H. Roch and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C110 (2024) no.5, 054905 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.054905 [arXiv:2408.00537 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.054905 2024

  26. [26]

    Schenke, C

    B. Schenke, C. Shen and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C102 (2020) no.3, 034905 [arXiv:2004.00690 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Samanta and T

    R. Samanta and T. Parida, J. Subatomic Part. Cos- mol.4(2025), 100100 doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100100 [arXiv:2505.02706 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100100 2025

  28. [29]

    Samanta, S

    R. Samanta, S. Bhatta, J. Jia, M. Luzum and J. Y. Ol- litrault, Phys. Rev. C109(2024) no.5, L051902 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.L051902 [arXiv:2303.15323 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.l051902 2024

  29. [30]

    Jia, [arXiv:2507.14399 [nucl-th]]

    J. Jia, [arXiv:2507.14399 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv

  30. [31]

    The shape of differential radial flow $v_0(p_T)$, not its zero-crossing, carries physical information

    S. Bhatta, A. Dimri and J. Jia, [arXiv:2504.20008 [nucl- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [32]

    F. Zhou, G. Giacalone and J. Y. Ollitrault, [arXiv:2511.04605 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [33]

    Giacalone, F

    G. Giacalone, F. G. Gardim, J. Noronha-Hostler and J. Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. C103(2021) no.2, 024910 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024910 [arXiv:2004.09799 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.024910 2021

  33. [35]

    S. Saha, R. Singh and B. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. C112(2025) no.2, 024902 doi:10.1103/83zq-kdjg [arXiv:2505.19697 [nucl-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1103/83zq-kdjg 2025

  34. [36]

    Size fluctuations of the initial source and the event-by-event transverse momentum fluctuations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    W. Broniowski, M. Chojnacki and L. Obara, Phys. Rev. C80(2009), 051902 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.051902 [arXiv:0907.3216 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.80.051902 2009

  35. [37]

    Transverse momentum fluctuations in ultrarelativistic Pb+Pb and p+Pb collisions with wounded quarks

    P. Bo˙ zek and W. Broniowski, Phys. Rev. C96 (2017) no.1, 014904 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014904 [arXiv:1701.09105 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.014904 2017

  36. [38]

    Y. S. Mu, J. A. Sun, L. Yan and X. G. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) no.16, 162301 doi:10.1103/skhj- cj9p [arXiv:2501.02777 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/skhj- 2025

  37. [39]

    F. G. Gardim, G. Giacalone, M. Luzum and J. Y. Ol- litrault, Nature Phys.16(2020) no.6, 615-619 doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0846-4 [arXiv:1908.09728 [nucl- th]]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0846-4 2020

  38. [40]

    F. G. Gardim, G. Giacalone and J. Y. Ol- litrault, Phys. Lett. B809(2020), 135749 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135749 [arXiv:1909.11609 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135749 2020

  39. [41]

    [CMS], CMS-PAS-HIN-23-003

    work page

  40. [42]

    Parida, R

    T. Parida, R. Samanta and J. Y. Olli- trault, Phys. Lett. B857(2024), 138985 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138985 [arXiv:2407.17313 [nucl-th]]. 11

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138985 2024

  41. [43]

    Acharyaet al.[ALICE], [arXiv:2504.04796 [nucl-ex]]

    S. Acharyaet al.[ALICE], [arXiv:2504.04796 [nucl-ex]]

    work page arXiv

  42. [44]

    Aadet al.[ATLAS], [arXiv:2503.24125 [nucl-ex]]

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], [arXiv:2503.24125 [nucl-ex]]

    work page arXiv

  43. [45]

    Du and P

    L. Du and P. M. Jacobs, [arXiv:2512.10265 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv

  44. [46]

    Du, [arXiv:2508.07184 [hep-ph]]

    L. Du, [arXiv:2508.07184 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  45. [47]

    Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress

    C. Ratti, Rept. Prog. Phys.81(2018) no.8, 084301 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aabb97 [arXiv:1804.07810 [hep- lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aabb97 2018

  46. [48]

    Monnai, B

    A. Monnai, B. Schenke and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C100 (2019) no.2, 024907 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024907 [arXiv:1902.05095 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.024907 2019

  47. [49]

    Monnai, G

    A. Monnai, G. Pihan, B. Schenke and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C110(2024) no.4, 044905 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044905 [arXiv:2406.11610 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.044905 2024

  48. [50]

    Noronha-Hostler, P

    J. Noronha-Hostler, P. Parotto, C. Ratti and J. M. Stafford, Phys. Rev. C100(2019) no.6, 064910 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.064910 [arXiv:1902.06723 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.064910 2019

  49. [51]

    Mondal, S

    S. Mondal, S. Mukherjee and P. Hegde, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) no.2, 022001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022001 [arXiv:2106.03165 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.022001 2022

  50. [52]

    J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D27(1983), 140-151 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.140

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.140 1983

  51. [53]

    Glasma flux tubes and the near side ridge phenomenon at RHIC

    A. Dumitru, F. Gelis, L. McLerran and R. Venu- gopalan, Nucl. Phys. A810(2008), 91-108 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.06.012 [arXiv:0804.3858 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.06.012 2008

  52. [54]

    Giacalone, [arXiv:2101.00168 [nucl-th]]

    G. Giacalone, [arXiv:2101.00168 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv

  53. [55]

    R. S. Bhalerao, G. Giacalone and J. Y. Ol- litrault, Phys. Rev. C100(2019) no.1, 014909 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014909 [arXiv:1904.10350 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.014909 2019

  54. [56]

    Primordial fluctuations in heavy-ion collisions

    F. Gelis, G. Giacalone, P. Guerrero-Rodr´ ıguez, C. Mar- quet and J. Y. Ollitrault, [arXiv:1907.10948 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  55. [57]

    Samanta, [arXiv:2505.12961 [nucl-th]]

    R. Samanta, [arXiv:2505.12961 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv

  56. [58]

    Causal Viscous Hydrodynamics for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

    H. Song, [arXiv:0908.3656 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [59]

    Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions: Viscous Hydrodynamic Simulations and Final State Interactions

    M. Luzum, [arXiv:0908.4100 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [60]

    Bulk Viscosity Effects in Event-by-Event Relativistic Hydrodynamics

    J. Noronha-Hostler, G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha, R. P. G. Andrade and F. Grassi, Phys. Rev. C88 (2013) no.4, 044916 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044916 [arXiv:1305.1981 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.044916 2013

  59. [61]

    J. E. Bernhard, [arXiv:1804.06469 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [62]

    V. Roy, A. K. Chaudhuri and B. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. C86(2012), 014902 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014902 [arXiv:1204.2347 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.86.014902 2012

  61. [63]

    H. Song, S. A. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C83(2011), 054910 [erratum: Phys. Rev. C86(2012), 059903] doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054910 [arXiv:1101.4638 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.054910 2011

  62. [64]

    L. G. Pang, G. Y. Qin, V. Roy, X. N. Wang and G. L. Ma, Phys. Rev. C91(2015) no.4, 044904 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044904 [arXiv:1410.8690 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.044904 2015

  63. [65]

    L. G. Pang, H. Petersen, G. Y. Qin, V. Roy and X. N. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. A52(2016) no.4, 97 doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16097-x [arXiv:1511.04131 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16097-x 2016

  64. [66]

    M. Nie, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, L. Yi and J. Jia, Phys. Lett. B845(2023), 138177 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138177 [arXiv:2208.05416 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138177 2023

  65. [67]

    Pseudorapidity profile of transverse momentum fluctuations in heavy ion collisions

    S. Chatterjee and P. Bozek, Phys. Rev. C96 (2017) no.1, 014906 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014906 [arXiv:1704.02777 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.014906 2017

  66. [68]

    Hydrodynamic modeling of pseudorapidity flow correlations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions and the torque effect

    P. Bo˙ zek, W. Broniowski and A. Olszewski, Phys. Rev. C91(2015), 054912 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.054912 [arXiv:1503.07425 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.054912 2015

  67. [69]

    The torque effect and fluctuations of entropy deposition in rapidity in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions

    P. Bozek and W. Broniowski, Phys. Lett. B 752(2016), 206-211 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.054 [arXiv:1506.02817 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.054 2016

  68. [70]

    Aadet al.[ATLAS], Phys

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no.12, 122301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.122301 [arXiv:2001.04201 [nucl-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.122301 2021

  69. [71]

    Measurement of longitudinal flow de-correlations in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 2.76$ and 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    M. Aaboudet al.[ATLAS], Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) no.2, 142 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5605-7 [arXiv:1709.02301 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5605-7 2018

  70. [72]

    Evidence for transverse momentum and pseudorapidity dependent event plane fluctuations in PbPb and pPb collisions

    V. Khachatryanet al.[CMS], Phys. Rev. C92 (2015) no.3, 034911 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034911 [arXiv:1503.01692 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.034911 2015

  71. [73]

    Forward-backward eccentricity and participant-plane angle fluctuations and their influences on longitudinal dynamics of collective flow

    J. Jia and P. Huo, Phys. Rev. C90(2014) no.3, 034915 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.034915 [arXiv:1403.6077 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.90.034915 2014

  72. [74]

    P. Huo, J. Jia and S. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. C90 (2014) no.2, 024910 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024910 [arXiv:1311.7091 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.90.024910 2014

  73. [75]

    K. Xiao, F. Liu and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C87 (2013) no.1, 011901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.011901 [arXiv:1208.1195 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.011901 2013

  74. [76]

    Longitudinal fluctuations of the fireball density in heavy-ion collisions

    A. Bzdak and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C87 (2013) no.2, 024906 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.024906 [arXiv:1210.1965 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.024906 2013

  75. [77]

    Torqued fireballs in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    P. Bozek, W. Broniowski and J. Moreira, Phys. Rev. C83(2011), 034911 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034911 [arXiv:1011.3354 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.034911 2011

  76. [78]

    Beam-Energy Dependence of Directed Flow of Protons, Antiprotons and Pions in Au+Au Collisions

    L. Adamczyket al.[STAR], Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) no.16, 162301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.162301 [arXiv:1401.3043 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.162301 2014

  77. [79]

    Adamet al.[STAR], Phys

    J. Adamet al.[STAR], Phys. Rev. C101(2020) no.2, 024905 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.101.024905 [arXiv:1908.03585 [nucl-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.024905 2020

  78. [80]

    Nie [STAR], Nucl

    M. Nie [STAR], Nucl. Phys. A1005(2021), 121783 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121783 [arXiv:2005.03252 [nucl-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121783 2021

  79. [81]

    Cimerman, I

    J. Cimerman, I. Karpenko, B. Tom´ aˇ sik and B. A. Trze- ciak, Phys. Rev. C104(2021) no.1, 014904 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.014904 [arXiv:2104.08022 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.014904 2021

  80. [82]

    B. B. Back, M. D. Baker, D. S. Barton, R. R. Betts, M. Ballintijn, A. A. Bickley, R. Bindel, A. Budzanowski, W. Busza and A. Carroll,et al.Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(2003), 052303 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.052303 [arXiv:nucl-ex/0210015 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.052303 2003

Showing first 80 references.