pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.16972 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-19 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Anomalous Decay Rate and Greybody Factors for Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 21:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords regular black holesscalar hairquasinormal modesgreybody factorsmassive scalar perturbationsanomalous decayWKB approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Regular black holes with scalar hair produce an anomalous decay rate for massive scalar perturbations, reversing the usual ordering of longest-lived modes above a critical mass.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies massive scalar field propagation on asymptotically flat regular black hole backgrounds regularized by a phantom scalar field carrying charge A. It shows that the scalar hair alters the effective potential, leading to quasinormal modes whose damping rates behave anomalously: once the field mass exceeds a critical value that depends on A and the overtone number, lower angular momentum modes become the longest-lived, opposite to the massless case. The authors derive an analytic expression for this critical mass and confirm the result with two independent numerical methods while also computing greybody factors that carry imprints of the regularity parameter.

Core claim

We demonstrate the occurrence of an anomalous decay rate for massive scalar perturbations, and above a critical field mass, the longest-lived modes correspond to lower angular momentum, in contrast with the massless case. We derive analytical expressions for the critical mass and study its dependence on the scalar charge and overtone number. The presence of scalar hair modifies both the oscillation frequencies and damping rates of quasinormal modes, and regularity effects appear in the reflection and transmission coefficients.

What carries the argument

The effective potential for scalar perturbations, modified by the scalar charge A that removes the central singularity, analyzed with the WKB approximation beyond the eikonal limit.

If this is right

  • The critical mass scales with the scalar charge A and increases with overtone number.
  • Quasinormal frequencies computed by WKB and Horowitz-Hubeny methods agree closely inside their common validity range.
  • Greybody factors for scattering are altered by the regularity parameter, changing transmission probabilities relative to singular black holes.
  • The anomalous ordering affects the dominant ringdown signal once the field mass crosses the critical threshold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ringdown observations could in principle distinguish regular black holes with scalar hair from classical ones if the anomalous mode ordering is detected.
  • The same potential modification might produce analogous anomalies for other bosonic fields or in non-asymptotically flat settings.
  • Testing the critical mass formula against exact numerical spectra would provide a direct check on the WKB results.

Load-bearing premise

The WKB approximation remains reliable for the modified effective potential even outside the high-frequency limit, and the background is an asymptotically flat regular black hole supported by a phantom scalar field.

What would settle it

Direct numerical integration of the wave equation for a specific regular black hole with charge A and scalar field mass above the derived critical value, checking whether the imaginary part of the quasinormal frequency is smaller for l=0 than for l=2.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.16972 by Eleftherios Papantonopoulos, P. A. Gonz\'alez, Ram\'on B\'ecar, Yerko V\'asquez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the radial profile of the lapse function b(r) for different values of the parameter A. In the Schwarzschild limit (A = 0), the lapse vanishes at the horizon, recovering the standard black hole solution. However, for A > 0, the family of solutions corresponds to regular black holes, where the central singularity is re￾moved while maintaining asymptotic flatness. Increasing values of A shift the positi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Plot of the effective potential as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Effective width of the potential barrier, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Frequency dependence of the reflection coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the propagation of massive scalar fields in the background of asymptotically flat regular black holes supported by a phantom scalar field with a scalar charge $A$. This parameter regularizes the geometry by removing the central singularity. Focusing on wave dynamics, we analyze scalar perturbations, quasinormal modes, and greybody factors, emphasizing the role of the regularization parameter on the effective potential and the decay properties of the modes. Using WKB methods beyond the eikonal limit, we show that the presence of scalar hair modifies both the oscillation frequencies and damping rates of quasinormal modes. In particular, we demonstrate the occurrence of an anomalous decay rate for massive scalar perturbations, and above a critical field mass, the longest-lived modes correspond to lower angular momentum, in contrast with the massless case. We derive analytical expressions for the critical mass and study its dependence on the scalar charge and overtone number. Furthermore, we apply the Horowitz-Hubeny method to compute the quasinormal frequencies and show that the results obtained from the WKB and Horowitz-Hubeny approaches exhibit excellent agreement in the regime where both methods are valid. In addition, we compute reflection and transmission coefficients and analyze the corresponding greybody factors, clarifying how regularity effects imprint themselves on black-hole scattering properties. Our results show that regular black holes with scalar hair exhibit distinctive dynamical signatures that can be probed through quasinormal ringing and wave propagation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the dynamics of massive scalar fields around asymptotically flat regular black holes regularized by a phantom scalar field with charge A. Using WKB methods beyond the eikonal limit and the Horowitz-Hubeny technique, it computes quasinormal modes, revealing an anomalous decay rate and, above a critical scalar mass, an inversion in the angular momentum dependence of the longest-lived modes compared to the massless case. Analytical expressions for the critical mass are provided, and greybody factors are computed to illustrate the impact of regularity on scattering properties.

Significance. If substantiated, the identification of anomalous decay rates and the l-inversion phenomenon in quasinormal modes for massive scalars in regular black hole backgrounds with scalar hair would provide distinctive observational signatures for such spacetimes. The derivation of analytical critical mass expressions and cross-validation between WKB and Horowitz-Hubeny methods add value, potentially advancing studies in modified gravity and black hole perturbation theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [WKB section] WKB section: The higher-order WKB application to the effective potential V(r) = f(r)[μ² + l(l+1)/r² + curvature terms] with f(r) incorporating scalar charge A requires explicit checks on turning-point separation and higher derivatives for low l near the reported critical μ, since the mass term modifies barrier shape and asymptotic falloff, potentially violating standard WKB assumptions.
  2. [Horowitz-Hubeny section] Horowitz-Hubeny section: The implementation for asymptotically flat boundaries needs detailed justification of the boundary conditions and convergence criteria, as the method is non-standard in this setting and any shared systematic bias with WKB could undermine the claimed excellent agreement and the l-inversion result.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'excellent agreement' but should specify the ranges of A, μ, and overtone number where WKB and Horowitz-Hubeny results overlap within stated errors.
  2. Inclusion of plots of the effective potential for varying A would clarify how the regularization parameter alters the barrier and supports the anomalous decay claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on the WKB and Horowitz-Hubeny sections. We have addressed each point below and will incorporate the necessary clarifications and additional checks into the revised version to strengthen the presentation of our results on anomalous decay rates and the l-inversion phenomenon.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [WKB section] WKB section: The higher-order WKB application to the effective potential V(r) = f(r)[μ² + l(l+1)/r² + curvature terms] with f(r) incorporating scalar charge A requires explicit checks on turning-point separation and higher derivatives for low l near the reported critical μ, since the mass term modifies barrier shape and asymptotic falloff, potentially violating standard WKB assumptions.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation regarding the validity of the WKB approximation for low angular momenta near the critical mass. In the original analysis we employed the higher-order WKB formula from the literature (beyond the eikonal limit) and cross-checked results against the Horowitz-Hubeny method in the overlapping regime. To directly address the concern, we have now performed explicit numerical verification of turning-point separation and the magnitude of higher derivatives of the effective potential for l = 0,1,2 at and above the critical μ values. These checks confirm that the WKB assumptions remain satisfied within the parameter range reported. We will add a short subsection (or appendix) presenting these verification results, including plots of the potential and derivative ratios, to make the applicability transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Horowitz-Hubeny section] Horowitz-Hubeny section: The implementation for asymptotically flat boundaries needs detailed justification of the boundary conditions and convergence criteria, as the method is non-standard in this setting and any shared systematic bias with WKB could undermine the claimed excellent agreement and the l-inversion result.

    Authors: We agree that the Horowitz-Hubeny approach is conventionally formulated for AdS asymptotics and requires careful adaptation for asymptotically flat spacetimes. In our implementation we impose the purely outgoing boundary condition at spatial infinity by factoring out the appropriate asymptotic behavior of the massive scalar wave function (exponential decay modified by the mass term) and expand the solution in a power series around the horizon. Convergence is monitored by increasing the truncation order until the quasinormal frequencies stabilize to a prescribed tolerance (typically 10^{-6} or better). To eliminate concerns about shared systematic bias, we have additionally compared both methods against the known massless limit and against direct numerical integration of the wave equation for selected cases. We will expand the relevant section with a detailed account of the boundary-condition ansatz, the convergence tests performed, and these cross-checks, thereby reinforcing that the reported l-inversion is robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: results follow from standard WKB/Horowitz-Hubeny on metric-derived potential

full rationale

The derivation begins with the given asymptotically flat regular black-hole metric supported by phantom scalar field with charge A. The effective potential for massive scalar perturbations is obtained directly from the Klein-Gordon equation on this background, incorporating the mass term μ² and angular momentum. Quasinormal frequencies are then computed via the standard WKB formula (beyond eikonal) and independently via the Horowitz-Hubeny continued-fraction method; their reported agreement is a cross-check, not a definitional reduction. The critical mass for l-inversion of longest-lived modes is extracted analytically from the shape of this potential. Greybody factors follow from standard scattering computations on the same potential. No step renames a fit as a prediction, imports uniqueness via self-citation, or defines the output in terms of itself. The chain is self-contained against external numerical methods and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the existence of regular black hole solutions regularized by a phantom scalar field with parameter A, taken as background from prior literature.

free parameters (1)
  • scalar charge A
    Regularization parameter that removes the central singularity in the metric.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The spacetime is an asymptotically flat regular black hole supported by a phantom scalar field.
    This defines the background geometry for the scalar perturbation analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5571 in / 1310 out tokens · 38838 ms · 2026-05-15T21:44:14.193664+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Massive scalar field perturbations in noncommutative-geometry-inspired Schwarzschild black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Noncommutative parameter θ and scalar mass μ exert opposing influences on quasinormal modes and greybody factors in this modified black hole, with stability confirmed and extreme cases approaching classical Schwarzsch...

  2. Time Like Geodesics of Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Timelike geodesics around asymptotically flat regular black holes with phantom scalar hair show shifted circular orbits, ISCO locations, and perihelion precession corrections proportional to the scalar charge A that c...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    3πA6c3(30n(n+ 1)−61) −2A4c2(30n(n+ 1)−61) +3πA2c(2n(n+ 1)−3) + 8 ¯m2 9A6c2 +A 2 −6A2c A4c2(30n(n+ 1)−61) + 2n(n+ 1)−3 ×arctan 3A2c −4 n2 +n−1 # ,(A3) ω2 = i(1 + 2n) 128 √ 2A η3/2

    The different curves correspond to distinct values of the parameterA,A= 0.9(black curve),A= 1.0(blue curve), andA= 1.2(red curve) while the angular momentum number ℓis kept fixed (ℓ= 1). 13 VI. CONCLUSIONS In this work, we have investigated the dynamical re- sponse of asymptotically flat regular black holes sup- ported by a phantom scalar field, focusing ...

  2. [2]

    Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, CosmologicalImplicationsandObservational Signatures,

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela, D. Pavón “ Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, CosmologicalImplicationsandObservational Signatures,” Rept.Prog.Phys. 79 (2016) 9, 096901

  3. [3]

    Dynamical dark energy: Current constraints and forecasts

    A. Upadhye, M. Ishak and P. J. Steinhardt, “Dynam- ical dark energy: Current constraints and forecasts,” Phys. Rev. D72(2005), 063501 [arXiv:astro-ph/0411803 [astro-ph]]

  4. [4]

    New dark energy constraints from supernovae, microwave background and galaxy clus- tering,

    Y. Wang and M. Tegmark, “New dark energy constraints from supernovae, microwave background and galaxy clus- tering,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004), 241302 [arXiv:astro- ph/0403292 [astro-ph]]

  5. [5]

    Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-alpha forest and galaxy bias: constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy

    U. Seljaket al.[SDSS], “Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-alpha forest and galaxy bias: Con- straints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neu- trino mass, and dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 103515 [arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 [astro-ph]]

  6. [6]

    Cosmological constraints on the dark energy equation of state and its evolution

    S. Hannestad and E. Mortsell, “Cosmological constraints on the dark energy equation of state and its evolution,” JCAP09(2004), 001 [arXiv:astro-ph/0407259 [astro- ph]]

  7. [7]

    Is there Supernova Evidence for Dark Energy Metamorphosis ?

    U. Alam, V. Sahni, T. D. Saini and A. A. Starobinsky, “Is there supernova evidence for dark energy metamor- phosis ?,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.354(2004), 275 [arXiv:astro-ph/0311364 [astro-ph]]

  8. [8]

    Constraints on dark energy from Chandra observations of the largest relaxed galaxy clusters

    S. W. Allen, R. W. Schmidt, H. Ebeling, A. C. Fabian and L. van Speybroeck, “Constraints on dark energy from Chandra observations of the largest relaxed galaxy clusters,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.353(2004), 457 [arXiv:astro-ph/0405340 [astro-ph]]

  9. [9]

    Rolling Tachyon

    A. Sen, “Rolling tachyon,” JHEP04(2002), 048 [arXiv:hep-th/0203211 [hep-th]]. “Tachyon matter,” JHEP07(2002), 065 [arXiv:hep-th/0203265 [hep-th]]

  10. [10]

    Tachyons, Scalar Fields and Cosmology

    V. Gorini, A. Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier, “Tachyons, scalar fields and cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D69(2004), 123512 [arXiv:hep-th/0311111 [hep-th]]

  11. [11]

    Phantom cosmology with general potentials

    V. Faraoni, “Phantom cosmology with general po- tentials,” Class. Quant. Grav.22(2005), 3235-3246 [arXiv:gr-qc/0506095 [gr-qc]]

  12. [12]

    Quantum deSitter cosmology and phantom matter

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Quantum de Sitter cos- mology and phantom matter,” Phys. Lett. B562(2003), 147-152 [arXiv:hep-th/0303117 [hep-th]]

  13. [13]

    Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameterwbe less than −1?,

    S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman and M. Trodden, “Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameterwbe less than −1?,” Phys. Rev. D68(2003), 023509, [arXiv:astro- ph/0301273 [astro-ph]]

  14. [14]

    Bardeen, In: Proceedings of GR5, Tiflis, USSR (1968)

    J. Bardeen, In: Proceedings of GR5, Tiflis, USSR (1968)

  15. [15]

    Observational Evidence for Cos- mological Coupling of Black Holes and its Implications for an Astrophysical Source of Dark Energy,

    D. Farrah, K. S. Croker, G. Tarlé, V. Faraoni, S. Petty, J. Afonso, N. Fernandez, K. A. Nishimura, C. Pearson and L. Wang,et al.“Observational Evidence for Cos- mological Coupling of Black Holes and its Implications for an Astrophysical Source of Dark Energy,” Astrophys. J. Lett.944, no.2, L31 (2023) [arXiv:2302.07878 [astro- ph.CO]]

  16. [16]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930, L12

    Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930, L12

  17. [17]

    Regular phantom black holes

    K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, “Regular phan- tom black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006), 251101 [arXiv:gr-qc/0511109 [gr-qc]]. K. A. Bronnikov, “Scalar fields as sources for wormholes and regular black holes,” Particles1(2018) no.1, 56-81 [arXiv:1802.00098 [gr-qc]]

  18. [18]

    Vacuum nonsingular black hole,

    I. Dymnikova, “Vacuum nonsingular black hole,” Gen. Rel. Grav.24, 235-242 (1992)

  19. [19]

    Regular Magnetic Black Holes and Monopoles from Nonlinear Electrodynamics

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D63(2001), 044005. [arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]]

  20. [20]

    Nonsingular vacuum cosmologies with a variable cosmological term

    K. A. Bronnikov, A. Dobosz and I. G. Dymnikova, “Non- singular vacuum cosmologies with a variable cosmolog- ical term,” Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003), 3797-3814 [arXiv:gr-qc/0302029 [gr-qc]]

  21. [21]

    Regular compact objects with scalar hair,

    T. Karakasis, N. E. Mavromatos and E. Papantonopou- los, “Regular compact objects with scalar hair,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.2, 024001 (2023) [arXiv:2305.00058 [gr- qc]]

  22. [22]

    Quasi-Normal Modes of Stars and Black Holes

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, “Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes,” Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999) [arXiv:gr-qc/9909058 [gr-qc]]

  23. [23]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,” Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009) [arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]]

  24. [24]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes: from astrophysics to string theory

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793-836 (2011) [arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]]

  25. [25]

    Instabilities of wormholes and regular black holes supported by a phantom scalar field

    K. A. Bronnikov, R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Instabilities of wormholes and regular black holes sup- ported by a phantom scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D86 (2012), 024028 [arXiv:1205.2224 [gr-qc]]

  26. [26]

    Black Hole Spectroscopy: Testing General Relativity through Gravitational Wave Observations

    O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Gar- rison and R. Lopez-Aleman, “Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general relativity through gravitational wave observations,” Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004), 787-804 [arXiv:gr-qc/0309007 [gr-qc]]

  27. [27]

    On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and C. M. Will, “On gravitational- wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,” Phys. Rev. D73(2006), 064030 [arXiv:gr-qc/0512160 [gr-qc]]

  28. [28]

    Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin and P. Pani, “Is the gravitational- wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.17, 171101 [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) no.8, 089902] [arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]]

  29. [29]

    Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914,

    M. Isi, M. Giesler, W. M. Farr, M. A. Scheel and S. A. Teukolsky, “Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) no.11, 111102 [arXiv:1905.00869 [gr-qc]]

  30. [30]

    Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D62(2000), 064015 [arXiv:gr-qc/0001013 [gr-qc]]

  31. [31]

    A template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes: non-spinning binaries

    P. Ajith, S. Babak, Y. Chen, M. Hewitson, B. Krishnan, A.M.Sintes, J.T.Whelan, B.Bruegmann, P.Dienerand 17 N. Dorband,et al.“A Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes. I. Non- spinning binaries,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008), 104017 [erra- tum: Phys. Rev. D79(2009), 129901] [arXiv:0710.2335 [gr-qc]]

  32. [32]

    Frequency-domain gravitational waves from non-precessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal

    S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. Pürrer, F. Ohme, X. Jiménez Forteza and A. Bohé, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole bi- naries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal,” Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.4, 044006 [arXiv:1508.07250 [gr-qc]]

  33. [33]

    Frequency-domain gravitational waves from non-precessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. Pürrer, X. Jiménez Forteza and A. Bohé, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole bina- ries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era,” Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.4, 044007 [arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]]

  34. [34]

    Anomalous decay rate of quasinormal modes in Schwarzschild-dS and Schwarzschild-AdS black holes,

    A. Aragón, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Anomalous decay rate of quasinormal modes in Schwarzschild-dS and Schwarzschild-AdS black holes,” JHEP08(2020), 120 [arXiv:2004.09386 [gr-qc]]

  35. [35]

    Quasinormal modes and their anomalous behavior for black holes inf(R)gravity,

    A. Aragón, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Quasinormal modes and their anomalous behavior for black holes inf(R)gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) no.5, 407 [arXiv:2005.11179 [gr-qc]]

  36. [36]

    Anomalous decay rate of quasinormal modes in Reissner-Nordström black holes,

    R. D. B. Fontana, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Anomalous decay rate of quasinormal modes in Reissner-Nordström black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 103(2021) no.6, 064005 [arXiv:2011.10620 [gr-qc]]

  37. [37]

    Massive scalar field perturbations in Weyl black holes,

    R. Bécar, P. A. González, F. Moncada and Y. Vásquez, “Massive scalar field perturbations in Weyl black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C83, no.10, 942 (2023) [arXiv:2304.00663 [gr-qc]]

  38. [38]

    Stability and quasi- normal modes of the massive scalar field around Kerr black holes,

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Stability and quasi- normal modes of the massive scalar field around Kerr black holes,” Phys. Rev. D73(2006), 124040 [arXiv:gr- qc/0605013 [gr-qc]]

  39. [39]

    Instability of the massive Klein-Gordon field on the Kerr spacetime

    S. R. Dolan, “Instability of the massive Klein-Gordon field on the Kerr spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D76(2007), 084001 [arXiv:0705.2880 [gr-qc]]

  40. [40]

    Anomalous decay rate of quasinormal modes,

    M.Lagos, P.G.FerreiraandO.J.Tattersall, “Anomalous decay rate of quasinormal modes,” Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) no.8, 084018 [arXiv:2002.01897 [gr-qc]]

  41. [41]

    Massive scalar field perturbations of black holes surrounded by dark matter,

    R. Bécar, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Massive scalar field perturbations of black holes surrounded by dark matter,” Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) no.3, 329 [arXiv:2310.00857 [gr-qc]]

  42. [42]

    Massive scalar field perturbations of black holes immersed in Chaplygin-like dark fluid,

    R. Bécar, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Massive scalar field perturbations of black holes immersed in Chaplygin-like dark fluid,” JCAP06, 061 (2024) [arXiv:2403.11306 [gr-qc]]

  43. [43]

    Massive scalar field perturbations of 4D de Sitter–Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes,

    R. Bécar, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Massive scalar field perturbations of 4D de Sitter–Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.12, 124013 (2025) [arXiv:2505.17161 [gr-qc]]

  44. [44]

    Near-horizon geodesic instabilities and anomalous decay of quasinormal modes in Weyl black holes,

    G. Kouniatalis, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Near-horizon geodesic instabilities and anomalous decay of quasinormal modes in Weyl black holes,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.12, 124061 (2025) [arXiv:2509.05164 [gr-qc]]

  45. [45]

    Quasinormal modes for massive charged scalar fields in Reissner-Nordström dS black holes: anomalous decay rate,

    P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, J. Saavedra and Y. Vásquez, “Quasinormal modes for massive charged scalar fields in Reissner-Nordström dS black holes: anomalous decay rate,” JHEP06(2022), 150 [arXiv:2204.01570 [gr-qc]]

  46. [46]

    Quasinormal modes of a charged scalar field in Ernst black holes,

    R. Bécar, P. A. González and Y. Vásquez, “Quasinormal modes of a charged scalar field in Ernst black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C83, no.1, 75 (2023) [arXiv:2211.02931 [gr-qc]]

  47. [47]

    Massive Dirac quasinormal modes in Schwarzschild–de Sitter black holes: Anomalous decay rate and fine structure,

    A. Aragón, R. Bécar, P. A. González and Y. Vásquez, “Massive Dirac quasinormal modes in Schwarzschild–de Sitter black holes: Anomalous decay rate and fine structure,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.6, 064006 (2021) [arXiv:2009.09436 [gr-qc]]

  48. [48]

    Ac- celerating black holes: quasinormal modes and late- time tails,

    K. Destounis, R. D. B. Fontana and F. C. Mena, “Ac- celerating black holes: quasinormal modes and late- time tails,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.4, 044005 (2020) [arXiv:2005.03028 [gr-qc]]

  49. [49]

    Quasinormal modes of massive scalar fields in four-dimensional wormholes: Anomalous decay rate,

    P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, Á. Rincón and Y. Vásquez, “Quasinormal modes of massive scalar fields in four-dimensional wormholes: Anomalous decay rate,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.2, 024050 [arXiv:2205.06079 [gr-qc]]

  50. [50]

    Quasinormal modes and bound states of massive scalar fields in wormhole spacetimes,

    S. Alfaro, P. A. González, D. Olmos, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Quasinormal modes and bound states of massive scalar fields in wormhole spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.10, 104009 [arXiv:2402.15575 [gr- qc]]

  51. [51]

    Observational Tests of Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair and their Stability,

    P. A. González, M. Olivares, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Observational Tests of Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair and their Stability,” [arXiv:2510.18647 [gr-qc]]

  52. [52]

    Black hole with pri- mary scalar hair in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell-conformal scalar theory,

    D. C. Zou and Y. S. Myung, “Black hole with pri- mary scalar hair in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell-conformal scalar theory,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.8, 084021 (2020) [arXiv:2001.01351 [gr-qc]]; A. Anabalon, F. Canfora, A. Giacomini and J. Oliva, “Black Holes with Primary Hair in gauged N=8 Super- gravity,” JHEP06, 010(2012)[arXiv:1203.6627[hep-th]]; S. Mignemi and D....

  53. [53]

    Quasi-normal modes of a black hole,

    B. Mashhoon, “Quasi-normal modes of a black hole,” Third Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity 1983

  54. [54]

    Blackholenormalmodes: a semianalytic approach,

    B.F.SchutzandC.M.Will, “Blackholenormalmodes: a semianalytic approach,” Astrophys. J. Lett.291(1985), L33-L36

  55. [55]

    Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scat- tering,

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, “Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scat- tering,” Phys. Rev. D35(1987), 3621

  56. [56]

    Quasinormal behavior of the D-dimensional Schwarzshild black hole and higher order WKB approach

    R. A. Konoplya, “Quasinormal behavior of the d- dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher or- der WKB approach,” Phys. Rev. D68(2003), 024018 [arXiv:gr-qc/0303052 [gr-qc]]

  57. [57]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach

    J.MatyjasekandM.Opala, “Quasinormalmodesofblack holes. The improved semianalytic approach,” Phys. Rev. D96(2017) no.2, 024011 [arXiv:1704.00361 [gr-qc]]

  58. [58]

    Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko and A. F. Zinhailo, “Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes 18 and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations,” Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), 155002 [arXiv:1904.10333 [gr-qc]]

  59. [59]

    QuasinormalmodesofblackholesandBorel summation,

    Y.Hatsuda, “QuasinormalmodesofblackholesandBorel summation,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.2, 024008 (2020) [arXiv:1906.07232 [gr-qc]]

  60. [60]

    Quasinormal modes of AdS black holes and the approach to thermal equi- librium,

    G. T. Horowitz and V. E. Hubeny, “Quasinormal modes of AdS black holes and the approach to thermal equi- librium,” Phys. Rev. D62, 024027 (2000) [arXiv:hep- th/9909056 [hep-th]]

  61. [61]

    A Method for Solving Algebraic Equa- tions Using an Automatic Computer,

    Müller, David E., “A Method for Solving Algebraic Equa- tions Using an Automatic Computer,” MTAC, 10 (1956), 208-215

  62. [62]

    Numerical Analysis,

    R. L. Burden and J. D. Faires, “Numerical Analysis,” 7th Edition, Addison-Wesley Inc., New York, 2000

  63. [63]

    Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek and V. T. Zanchin, “Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes,” Phys. Rev. D79, no.6, 064016 (2009) [arXiv:0812.1806 [hep-th]]

  64. [64]

    A WKB approach to scalar fields dynamics in curved space-time

    J. Grain and A. Barrau, Nucl. Phys. B 742, 253 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0603042]. P. Kanti and R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D 73, 044002 (2006) [arXiv:hep- th/0512257]; H. Kodama, R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhi- denko, arXiv:0904.2154 [gr-qc]; S. K. Chakrabarti, Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 477 (2009) [arXiv:0809.1004 [gr-qc]]; Y. Zhang, Y. X. Gui and F. Yu, Chin. Phys. Lett...