pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.20970 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-24 · ✦ hep-lat · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Spatial confinement-deconfinement transition in accelerated gluodynamics within lattice simulation

Victor V. Braguta , Vladimir A. Goy , Jayanta Dey , Artem A. Roenko
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 19:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat gr-qchep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords gluodynamicsRindler spacetimeconfinement-deconfinement transitionTolman-Ehrenfest lawlattice simulationacceleration effectsspatial crossoverblack hole horizon
0
0 comments X

The pith

In Rindler spacetime the confinement-deconfinement transition in gluodynamics becomes a spatial crossover rather than a uniform phase change.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper performs lattice simulations of gluodynamics in the Rindler coordinates that describe an accelerated observer. It establishes that the familiar finite-temperature phase transition turns into a spatial crossover, so that confined and deconfined regions can sit next to each other at the same temperature. The location of the dividing surface follows the Tolman-Ehrenfest law that links local temperature to acceleration, with only small deviations. In the weak-acceleration limit the critical temperature remains exactly the same as in ordinary homogeneous gluodynamics. The work therefore indicates that a similar spatial separation of phases could appear near the horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole.

Core claim

The finite temperature confinement-deconfinement phase transition turns into spatial crossover in the Rindler spacetime. In other words, spatially separated confinement and deconfinement phases can coexist in the Rindler spacetime within certain intervals of temperature and acceleration. The position of the boundary between the phases can be described by the Tolman-Ehrenfest law with rather good accuracy although a minor deviation takes place. The critical temperature of the system in the weak acceleration regime is found to remain unchanged as that of the standard homogeneous gluodynamics.

What carries the argument

Lattice gauge theory simulations formulated directly in Rindler coordinates, with the Polyakov loop used as the order parameter to locate the spatial boundary between confined and deconfined regions.

If this is right

  • The boundary between confined and deconfined regions follows the Tolman-Ehrenfest law for several values of acceleration and temperature.
  • The critical temperature stays identical to that of homogeneous gluodynamics when acceleration is weak.
  • Confined and deconfined phases coexist spatially inside finite intervals of temperature and acceleration.
  • An analogous spatial confinement-deconfinement transition can occur near the horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same spatial-phase structure may appear in other accelerated or curved backgrounds beyond Rindler geometry.
  • The small observed deviation from the Tolman-Ehrenfest law could be studied further to separate lattice artifacts from genuine physical corrections.
  • Analog gravity experiments in condensed-matter systems might be able to realize a comparable spatial crossover.
  • The result supplies a concrete lattice-based model for how strong gravity can organize quark-gluon matter near compact objects.

Load-bearing premise

Lattice discretization and Polyakov-loop measurements remain reliable when written in Rindler coordinates and are not qualitatively altered by finite-volume or discretization artifacts.

What would settle it

A simulation performed at significantly finer lattice spacing or larger spatial volume that finds either no spatial crossover or a boundary position that deviates strongly from the Tolman-Ehrenfest prediction would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.20970 by Artem A. Roenko, Jayanta Dey, Victor V. Braguta, Vladimir A. Goy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison of characteristic values of gravitational acceleration near various astrophysical objects and in heavy-ion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The coordinate system of a uniformly accelerated observer in Minkowski spacetime (see formulas ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The renormalized local Polyakov loop (left) and its susceptibility (right) as a function of coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The critical distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (left) The critical distance normalized by acceleration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The best fit parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The renormalized local Polyakov loop (left) and its susceptibility (right) as a function of coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The renormalized local Polyakov loop (left) and its susceptibility (right) as a function of coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The bare (left panel) and renormalized (right panel) local Polyakov loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. (left) The ratio of bare Polyakov loop of accelerated system to that of the standard homogeneous system for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. (left) The difference between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. (left) The difference between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. (left) The critical distances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work we investigate the influence of weak acceleration on the confinement-deconfinement phase transition in gluodynamics. Our study is carried out within lattice simulation in the comoving reference frame of accelerated observer which is parameterized by the Rindler coordinates. We find that finite temperature confinement-deconfinement phase transition turns into spatial crossover in the Rindler spacetime. In other words, spatially separated confinement and deconfinement phases can coexist in the Rindler spacetime within certain intervals of temperature and acceleration. We determine the position of the boundary between the phases as a function of temperature for several accelerations and find that it can be described by the Tolman-Ehrenfest law with rather good accuracy although a minor deviation takes place. Moreover, the critical temperature of the system in the weak acceleration regime is found to remain unchanged as that of the standard homogeneous gluodynamics. Our results imply that the spatial confinement-deconfinement transition might take place in the vicinity of the Schwarzschild black hole horizon.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents lattice simulations of SU(3) gluodynamics formulated in Rindler coordinates to study the effect of weak acceleration on the confinement-deconfinement transition. It claims that the usual finite-temperature phase transition is replaced by a spatial crossover separating confined and deconfined regions, that the location of this boundary follows the Tolman-Ehrenfest law to good accuracy (with a small deviation), and that the critical temperature remains unchanged from the homogeneous case in the weak-acceleration regime.

Significance. If the central numerical results survive systematic checks, the work supplies direct lattice evidence that a position-dependent local temperature can induce coexisting confined and deconfined phases in a non-Abelian gauge theory. This constitutes a non-trivial test of the Tolman-Ehrenfest relation outside equilibrium thermodynamics and carries implications for the vicinity of black-hole horizons. The use of an order parameter measured on the lattice is a concrete strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lattice formulation] Lattice formulation (presumably §2–3): the Wilson action is discretized on a uniform coordinate grid without explicit inclusion of the Rindler metric factor sqrt(-g) = 1 + a x in the plaquette weights or local rescaling of the Polyakov-loop temporal extent by sqrt(g_tt(x)). Because the observed spatial crossover tracks the Tolman-Ehrenfest prediction, this omission is load-bearing; an artificial gradient in the effective coupling or temperature could reproduce the reported behavior by construction rather than by dynamics.
  2. [Results] Results section (presumably §4): no information is given on the number of independent configurations, autocorrelation times, statistical uncertainties on the crossover location, finite-volume scaling, or any continuum extrapolation. Without these controls the quantitative agreement with the Tolman-Ehrenfest law and the claim of an unchanged critical temperature cannot be evaluated at the level required for the central conclusions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the critical temperature 'remains unchanged' but does not specify the acceleration range over which this statement holds or quote a numerical value for the deviation from the homogeneous T_c.
  2. [Figures and text] Figure captions and text should explicitly define the precise definition of the Polyakov loop used (e.g., whether it is normalized by the local proper time) and the criterion adopted to locate the crossover position.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation of our lattice formulation and statistical analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Lattice formulation] Lattice formulation (presumably §2–3): the Wilson action is discretized on a uniform coordinate grid without explicit inclusion of the Rindler metric factor sqrt(-g) = 1 + a x in the plaquette weights or local rescaling of the Polyakov-loop temporal extent by sqrt(g_tt(x)). Because the observed spatial crossover tracks the Tolman-Ehrenfest prediction, this omission is load-bearing; an artificial gradient in the effective coupling or temperature could reproduce the reported behavior by construction rather than by dynamics.

    Authors: We appreciate this important observation. In our lattice setup, the Rindler metric is incorporated through the local definition of the temperature via the Tolman-Ehrenfest relation, where the effective temperature varies with position. The Wilson action is discretized on the coordinate lattice, and for weak accelerations, the metric factor introduces only higher-order corrections. To address the concern rigorously, we will revise the manuscript to include an explicit derivation of the discretized action including the volume factor and demonstrate that it does not induce an artificial crossover. We will also add a numerical check by comparing with and without the factor in the weak limit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (presumably §4): no information is given on the number of independent configurations, autocorrelation times, statistical uncertainties on the crossover location, finite-volume scaling, or any continuum extrapolation. Without these controls the quantitative agreement with the Tolman-Ehrenfest law and the claim of an unchanged critical temperature cannot be evaluated at the level required for the central conclusions.

    Authors: We agree that these statistical and systematic details are essential for assessing the reliability of our results. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the results section to include the number of independent Monte Carlo configurations, estimates of autocorrelation times, bootstrap errors on the crossover positions, a discussion of finite-volume effects, and justification for the lattice spacing used. These additions will allow better evaluation of the agreement with the Tolman-Ehrenfest law and the unchanged critical temperature. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Lattice simulation results are independent of Tolman-Ehrenfest comparison

full rationale

The paper obtains its central claims through direct lattice Monte Carlo measurements of the Polyakov loop on a discretized Rindler grid. The location of the spatial crossover is extracted from these measurements as a function of the acceleration coordinate. The subsequent comparison to the Tolman-Ehrenfest law is performed after the data are generated and functions only as an external consistency check; the law is not used to define the action, the order parameter, or the fitting procedure. No self-citations, ansatzes, or fitted parameters are invoked to force the observed spatial structure or the reported invariance of the critical temperature. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the lattice data and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of lattice regularization of gluodynamics when expressed in Rindler coordinates and on the assumption that standard order parameters continue to diagnose confinement in this frame. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • acceleration parameter a
    Several discrete values of acceleration are chosen to explore the weak-acceleration regime.
  • lattice spacing and volume
    Standard lattice parameters that must be taken to the continuum and infinite-volume limits.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Rindler coordinates provide a faithful description of the comoving frame of a uniformly accelerated observer in flat spacetime.
    Invoked to set up the lattice simulation.
  • domain assumption The Polyakov loop or equivalent order parameter remains a valid diagnostic of confinement when the theory is discretized on a Rindler lattice.
    Required to identify the spatial boundary between phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1506 out tokens · 32680 ms · 2026-05-15T19:42:01.629710+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spatially inhomogeneous confinement-deconfinement phase transition in rotating QGP

    hep-lat 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    First-principles lattice simulations identify a spatially inhomogeneous confinement-deconfinement transition in rotating gluon plasma, with confinement localizing at the periphery for real angular velocities.

  2. Spatially inhomogeneous confinement-deconfinement phase transition in accelerated gluodynamics

    hep-lat 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Lattice simulations find spatially inhomogeneous confinement-deconfinement transition in weakly accelerated SU(3) gluodynamics, with phase boundary following TE prediction and unchanged critical temperature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The observer in this reference frame is at rest in the spatial coordinate originη 1 =0

    work page

  2. [2]

    The temporal coordinate for the observer coincides with the proper timeη 0 =τ

    work page

  3. [3]

    Kurchatov Institute

    The coordinates(η 0, η1)determine the conformally flat metric ds2 =Ω 2(η0, η1)((dη0)2−(dη1)2) ,(10) where Ω(η 0, η1)is a function of the coordinates, which will be specified below. Similarly to the previous section, instead of the(η 0, η1)coordinates it is convenient to use lightcone coordinates ˜u=η0−η1 ,˜v=η 0+η 1 .(11) Evidently, at the observer’s worl...

    work page

  4. [4]

    G. Y. Prokhorov, D. A. Shohonov, O. V. Teryaev, N. S. Tsegelnik, and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. C112, 064907 (2025), arXiv:2502.10146 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    From Color Glass Condensate to Quark Gluon Plasma through the event horizon

    D. Kharzeev and K. Tuchin, Nucl. Phys. A753, 316 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0501234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and G. E. A. Matsas, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 787 (2008), arXiv:0710.5373 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Mukhanov and S

    V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki,Introduction to quantum effects in gravity(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Rindler, Am

    W. Rindler, Am. J. Phys.34, 1174 (1966)

    work page 1966

  9. [9]

    W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    work page 1976

  10. [10]

    Quantum corrections to the stress-energy tensor in thermodynamic equilibrium with acceleration

    F. Becattini and E. Grossi, Phys. Rev. D92, 045037 (2015), arXiv:1505.07760 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    G. Y. Prokhorov, O. V. Teryaev, and V. I. Zakharov, Particles3, 1 (2020), arXiv:1911.04563 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    G. Y. Prokhorov, O. V. Teryaev, and V. I. Zakharov, (2023), arXiv:2304.13151 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    R. V. Khakimov, G. Y. Prokhorov, O. V. Teryaev, and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. D108, L121701 (2023), arXiv:2308.08647 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    V. E. Ambru¸ s and M. N. Chernodub, Phys. Lett. B855, 138757 (2024), arXiv:2308.03225 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    M. N. Chernodub, V. A. Goy, A. V. Molochkov, D. V. Stepanov, and A. S. Pochinok, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 111904 (2025), arXiv:2409.01847 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    E. T. Akhmedov, K. V. Bazarov, and D. V. Diakonov, Phys. Rev. D104, 085008 (2021), arXiv:2106.01791 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    D. V. Diakonov and K. V. Bazarov, Theor. Math. Phys.223, 839 (2025), arXiv:2301.07478 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    E. T. Akhmedov and K. Gubarev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, 2445004 (2024), arXiv:2310.02866 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Selch, R

    M. Selch, R. A. Abramchuk, and M. A. Zubkov, Phys. Rev. D109, 016003 (2024), arXiv:2310.02098 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    The Static Heavy Quark-Antiquark Potential within String Theory in Arbitrary Stationary Backgrounds

    N. Tsegelnik, (2026), arXiv:2601.10668 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Bordag and D

    M. Bordag and D. N. Voskresensky, (2025), arXiv:2510.07438 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Thermodynamic equilibrium with acceleration and the Unruh effect

    F. Becattini, Phys. Rev. D97, 085013 (2018), arXiv:1712.08031 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, and A. Palermo, JHEP02, 101, arXiv:2007.08249 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Palermo, M

    A. Palermo, M. Buzzegoli, and F. Becattini, JHEP10, 077, arXiv:2106.08340 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking and its Restoration for an Accelerated Observer

    T. Ohsaku, Phys. Lett. B599, 102 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0407067

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Restoration of Dynamically Broken Chiral and Color Symmetries for an Accelerated Observer

    D. Ebert and V. C. Zhukovsky, Phys. Lett. B645, 267 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0612009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Symmetry Restoration By Acceleration

    P. Castorina and M. Finocchiaro, J. Mod. Phys.3, 1703 (2012), arXiv:1207.3677 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    Takeuchi, Phys

    S. Takeuchi, Phys. Lett. B750, 209 (2015), arXiv:1501.07471 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Unruh effect and condensate in and out of an accelerated vacuum

    S. Benic and K. Fukushima, (2015), arXiv:1503.05790 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism for accelerating observers

    A. Dobado, Phys. Rev. D96, 085009 (2017), arXiv:1710.01564 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Triggering the QCD phase transition through the Unruh effect: chiral symmetry restoration for uniformly accelerated observers

    A. Casado-Turri´ on and A. Dobado, Phys. Rev. D99, 125018 (2019), arXiv:1905.11179 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Kou and X

    W. Kou and X. Chen, Phys. Lett. B856, 138942 (2024), arXiv:2405.18697 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    M. N. Chernodub, (2025), arXiv:2501.16129 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Zhu, H.-L

    Z.-B. Zhu, H.-L. Chen, and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. D113, 034005 (2026), arXiv:2511.03230 [hep-ph]. 24

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    W. G. Unruh and N. Weiss, Phys. Rev. D29, 1656 (1984)

    work page 1984

  36. [36]

    D. G. Salluce, M. Pasini, A. Flachi, A. Pittelli, and S. Ansoldi, JHEP05, 218, arXiv:2401.16483 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD

    M. L¨ uscher, JHEP08, 071, [Erratum: JHEP 03, 092 (2014)], arXiv:1006.4518 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  38. [38]

    Tolman and P

    R. Tolman and P. Ehrenfest, Phys. Rev.36, 1791 (1930)

    work page 1930

  39. [39]

    Lattice QCD in rotating frames

    A. Yamamoto and Y. Hirono, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 081601 (2013), arXiv:1303.6292 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    V. V. Braguta, A. Y. Kotov, D. D. Kuznedelev, and A. A. Roenko, JETP Lett.112, 6 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    V. V. Braguta, A. Y. Kotov, D. D. Kuznedelev, and A. A. Roenko, Phys. Rev. D103, 094515 (2021), arXiv:2102.05084 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    V. V. Braguta, A. Kotov, A. Roenko, and D. Sychev, PoSLATTICE2022, 190 (2023), arXiv:2212.03224 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Yang and X.-G

    J.-C. Yang and X.-G. Huang, (2023), arXiv:2307.05755 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    V. V. Braguta, I. E. Kudrov, A. A. Roenko, D. A. Sychev, and M. N. Chernodub, JETP Lett.117, 639 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    V. V. Braguta, M. N. Chernodub, and A. A. Roenko, Phys. Lett. B855, 138783 (2024), arXiv:2312.13994 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    V. V. Braguta, M. N. Chernodub, Y. A. Gershtein, and A. A. Roenko, JHEP09, 079, arXiv:2411.15085 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Quantum Monte Carlo simulation with a black hole

    S. Beni´ c and A. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D93, 094505 (2016), arXiv:1603.00716 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Curci, P

    G. Curci, P. Menotti, and G. Paffuti, Phys. Lett. B130, 205 (1983), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 135, 516 (1984)]

    work page 1983

  49. [49]

    Luscher and P

    M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Phys. Lett. B158, 250 (1985)

    work page 1985

  50. [50]

    String Tension and Thermodynamics with Tree Level and Tadpole Improved Actions

    B. Beinlich, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and A. Peikert, Eur. Phys. J. C6, 133 (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9707023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  51. [51]

    Borsanyi, R

    S. Borsanyi, R. Kara, Z. Fodor, D. A. Godzieba, P. Parotto, and D. Sexty, Phys. Rev. D105, 074513 (2022), arXiv:2202.05234 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Heavy Quark Anti-Quark Free Energy and the Renormalized Polyakov Loop

    O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky, and F. Zantow, Phys. Lett. B543, 41 (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0207002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  53. [53]

    Renormalized Polyakov loops in many representations

    S. Gupta, K. Huebner, and O. Kaczmarek, Phys. Rev. D77, 034503 (2008), arXiv:0711.2251 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    Fukugita, M

    M. Fukugita, M. Okawa, and A. Ukawa, Nucl. Phys. B337, 181 (1990)

    work page 1990

  55. [55]

    Binder and D

    K. Binder and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B30, 1477 (1984)

    work page 1984

  56. [56]

    Svetitsky and L

    B. Svetitsky and L. G. Yaffe, Nucl. Phys. B210, 423 (1982)

    work page 1982

  57. [57]

    Critical behaviour of SU(2) lattice gauge theory. A complete analysis with the $\chi^2$-method

    J. Engels, S. Mashkevich, T. Scheideler, and G. Zinovev, Phys. Lett. B365, 219 (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9509091

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  58. [58]

    Yang, W.-W

    J.-C. Yang, W.-W. Li, and C.-X. Yue, Phys. Rev. D110, 054509 (2024), arXiv:2401.03826 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.80, 421 (1981)

    work page 1981

  60. [60]

    Anikina, D

    A. Anikina, D. Belyakov, T. Bezhanyan, M. Kirakosyan, A. Kokorev, M. Lyubimova, M. Matveev, D. Podgainy, A. Rah- monova, S. Shadmehri, O. Streltsova, S. Torosyan, M. Vala, and M. Zuev, inDistributed Computer and Communication Networks, edited by V. M. Vishnevsky, K. E. Samouylov, and D. V. Kozyrev (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2025) pp. 444–457

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev.135, A1505 (1964)

    work page 1964

  62. [62]

    P. M. Lo, B. Friman, O. Kaczmarek, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D88, 074502 (2013), arXiv:1307.5958 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013