pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.23634 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-24 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Testing Dark Energy with Black Hole Ringdown

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords black hole ringdownquasi-normal modesdynamical dark energycubic Galileoncosmological hairgravitational wavesLVK constraintsLISA forecasts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dynamical dark energy imprints order-one shifts on black hole ringdown quasi-normal modes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Dynamical dark energy develops a time-dependent scalar profile around black holes that alters the gravitational-wave ringdown after mergers. The paper uses the cubic Galileon as the concrete example that admits a stable solution, parametrically links the cosmological background to the local black-hole spacetime, and computes the resulting changes to the quasi-normal mode frequencies and damping rates. These changes are large enough to be detectable. Current and future gravitational-wave observatories can therefore place direct limits on the dark energy field profile itself.

Core claim

Dynamical dark energy theories imprint O(1) modifications on the quasi-normal mode spectrum that characterises black hole ringdown. Taking the cubic Galileon as the only known stable solution of this kind, the cosmological and black-hole regimes are parametrically connected, the induced QNM shifts are derived, and the resulting dark energy constraints are forecast at the level of 10^{-2} for LVK and 10^{-4} for LISA.

What carries the argument

Cosmological hair from the time-dependent dark energy scalar field in the cubic Galileon, which modifies the effective potential for metric perturbations and thereby shifts the quasi-normal mode spectrum.

If this is right

  • The quasi-normal mode spectrum becomes a direct observational probe of the time evolution of dark energy.
  • LVK detections can constrain the dark energy field profile to roughly one-percent accuracy.
  • LISA observations can tighten the same constraint by two orders of magnitude.
  • Black-hole ringdowns supply an independent test of scalar-tensor gravity that complements cosmological surveys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar ringdown shifts are likely to appear in other scalar-tensor models that give dark energy a time-dependent vacuum expectation value.
  • Absence of the predicted shifts in future high-precision data would disfavour the entire class of Galileon-like theories with stable cosmological hair.
  • Combining ringdown constraints with late-time cosmological observables could break degeneracies between the dark energy profile and modified gravity parameters.
  • The method may eventually yield an independent measurement of the present-day Hubble rate from individual merger events.

Load-bearing premise

The cubic Galileon supplies the only stable solution that can be connected parametrically from cosmology to the black-hole regime without extra assumptions that would invalidate the quasi-normal mode calculation.

What would settle it

A high-signal-to-noise ringdown measurement from a binary black hole merger whose fundamental quasi-normal mode frequency and decay time agree with general-relativity predictions to better than the forecasted precision, even though the universe contains dynamical dark energy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.23634 by Johannes Noller, Laurens Smulders, Sergi Sirera.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Values for the hair parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The quasi-normal mode (QNM) frequencies for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Forecasted constraints on the dark energy-induced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fisher ellipses in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that dynamical dark energy theories can imprint $O(1)$ modifications on the quasi-normal mode (QNM) spectrum characterising black hole ringdown. The time dependence of dynamical dark energy naturally gives rise to cosmological 'hair' around a black hole. Taking the cubic Galileon as a concrete example, which admits the only known stable solution of this kind, we parametrically connect the cosmological and black hole regimes, derive the induced QNM shifts and forecast the resulting dark energy constraints. We find that the dark energy field profile can be constrained with an accuracy of up to $10^{-2}$ for LVK and $10^{-4}$ for LISA.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that dynamical dark energy theories imprint O(1) modifications on black hole quasi-normal mode (QNM) spectra via cosmological hair. Using the cubic Galileon as the sole known stable example, the authors parametrically connect the cosmological solution to a black-hole background, derive the induced QNM shifts from the Galileon action, and forecast constraints on the dark energy field profile at the level of 10^{-2} (LVK) and 10^{-4} (LISA).

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result would establish a new, falsifiable link between time-dependent dark energy and strong-field gravitational-wave observables. It supplies concrete, detector-specific forecasts that could be tested with existing LVK data and upcoming LISA observations, thereby extending dark-energy tests into the ringdown regime.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section describing the parametric connection and the linearised wave equation] The parametric connection between the cosmological Galileon solution and the black-hole background (the step that fixes the scalar hair profile entering the QNM calculation) is load-bearing for the O(1) shift claim. The manuscript must show explicitly that time-dependent corrections and near-horizon adjustments remain sub-dominant at the order needed to produce the reported shifts; otherwise the forecasted 10^{-2} and 10^{-4} constraints do not follow.
  2. [Introduction and the Galileon solution subsection] The assertion that the cubic Galileon is the only known stable solution of this kind requires a concise but explicit justification (including the stability criterion used) so that readers can assess whether the QNM derivation is tied to a unique or representative case.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Forecasting section] Clarify the precise definition of the 'field profile' parameter that is being constrained (e.g., its relation to the Galileon coupling coefficients) in the forecasting section.
  2. [QNM derivation subsection] Add a brief statement on the range of validity of the linearised perturbation analysis around the matched background.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and explicit derivations.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The parametric connection between the cosmological Galileon solution and the black-hole background (the step that fixes the scalar hair profile entering the QNM calculation) is load-bearing for the O(1) shift claim. The manuscript must show explicitly that time-dependent corrections and near-horizon adjustments remain sub-dominant at the order needed to produce the reported shifts; otherwise the forecasted 10^{-2} and 10^{-4} constraints do not follow.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the sub-dominance is necessary to support the O(1) shifts. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection (now Section 3.2) that linearizes the wave equation around the matched background and shows that time-dependent corrections enter suppressed by the dark-energy slow-roll parameter (of order 10^{-2} or smaller), while near-horizon adjustments contribute only at O(ε) where ε parametrizes deviations from the cosmological solution. These terms do not alter the leading-order QNM shifts at the precision required for the LVK and LISA forecasts, which therefore remain valid. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The assertion that the cubic Galileon is the only known stable solution of this kind requires a concise but explicit justification (including the stability criterion used) so that readers can assess whether the QNM derivation is tied to a unique or representative case.

    Authors: We accept the need for an explicit justification. The revised introduction and Galileon subsection now include a short paragraph stating the stability criterion: the background must be free of ghost and gradient instabilities, verified by requiring positive kinetic terms and sound speed squared in the quadratic action for scalar perturbations. We note that the cubic Galileon is the only known example satisfying this criterion without additional fine-tuning or higher-order operators, making it a representative case for the class of theories that can support stable cosmological hair around black holes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation of QNM shifts from Galileon action

full rationale

The paper presents the QNM modifications as derived from the cubic Galileon action via parametric connection of cosmological and black-hole regimes, followed by direct computation of shifts and subsequent forecasting of observational constraints. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation whose content is unverified within the paper. The statement identifying the Galileon as the only known stable solution is descriptive background rather than a uniqueness theorem imported to force the result. The forecasting step uses the independently derived shifts to project sensitivities and does not retroactively define those shifts. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim rests on the existence of a stable black-hole solution with cosmological hair in the cubic Galileon and on the validity of a parametric matching between cosmological and near-horizon regimes.

free parameters (1)
  • Galileon coupling coefficients
    Specific values of the cubic Galileon parameters are required to obtain the stable hair solution and are not derived from first principles within the paper.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Cubic Galileon admits a unique stable black-hole solution with cosmological hair
    Invoked to justify the concrete example used for the QNM calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper Parametric connection between cosmological and black-hole regimes preserves the leading QNM shifts
    Required to translate the cosmological field profile into a local perturbation problem.
invented entities (1)
  • cosmological hair no independent evidence
    purpose: Time-dependent scalar profile sourced by dynamical dark energy around the black hole
    Introduced to explain how the cosmological evolution imprints on the local geometry; no independent falsifiable signature outside the QNM shift is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5408 in / 1487 out tokens · 33434 ms · 2026-05-15T00:26:00.724654+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Master Equation for Screening in Luminal Horndeski Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A master screening equation is derived for luminal Horndeski gravity that recovers Vainshtein and Chameleon mechanisms and introduces Phaedrus screening with screening radius scaling linearly with source mass.

  2. Stable black hole solutions with cosmological hair

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Stable black hole solutions with cosmological scalar hair are explicitly derived in the cubic Galileon theory, recovering cosmological behavior at large distances and regular short-range dynamics.

  3. A cosmology-to-ringdown EFT consistency map for scalar-tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An EFT consistency map transports cosmology-conditioned posteriors from scalar-tensor FLRW backgrounds to black-hole quasinormal-mode kernels, showing tensor-speed effects fall below ringdown detectability while other...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 51 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    a screening mechanism on smaller scales [27, 55, 56], 3) their shift symmetry resulting in analytically tractable cos- mological attractor solutions [54]. The action for the cubic Galileon, the simplest such example, is given by S= Z d4x√−g M2 Pl 2 R+ 1 2 (∂ ϕ)2 − c3 Λ3 3 □ϕ(∂ ϕ)2 ,(1) where in addition to the scalarϕ, we have included the standard kineti...

  2. [2]

    Note that, when computing inspiral/merger constraints for the solutions considered here, we (optimistically) assume that mass uncertainties will eventually be obtainable with similar precision as the GR values quoted here. It is worth highlight- ing, that dark-energy motivated models with an interaction scaleΛ 3 3 =M PlH2 0 (as discussed here) have a naiv...

  3. [3]

    The precision of Mc andηmeasurements depends on survey characteristics, as discussed in detail below

    the measurement precision forM c andη, and 2) the ac- curacy with whichf NR can be computed. The precision of Mc andηmeasurements depends on survey characteristics, as discussed in detail below. Thef NR mapping, on the other hand, can e.g. be obtained from theSURFINBH/NRSURfam- ily of surrogate remnant models [112–116] resulting in an es- timate ofM(for a...

  4. [4]

    Note that reaching both accuracies with a single event can be challenging (and would require e.g

    (CE) – ‘golden events’ can reach a ringdown SNR of ρ∼O(10 2), while the measurement precision forM c and ηcan reach levels ofO(10 −5)– see [87]. Note that reaching both accuracies with a single event can be challenging (and would require e.g. a golden GW250114-like observation with ET/CE), since events that are optimal in terms of constraints onM c andηar...

  5. [5]

    Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,

    W. Israel, “Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,” Phys. Rev.164(1967) 1776–1779

  6. [6]

    Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,

    B. Carter, “Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,”Phys. Rev. Lett.26(1971) 331–333

  7. [7]

    Nonexistence of baryon number for static black holes,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Nonexistence of baryon number for static black holes,”Phys. Rev. D5(1972) 1239–1246

  8. [8]

    Introducing the black hole,

    R. Ruffini and J. A. Wheeler, “Introducing the black hole,” Phys. Today24(1971) no. 1, 30

  9. [9]

    Nonexistence of baryon number for black holes. ii,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Nonexistence of baryon number for black holes. ii,”Phys. Rev. D5(1972) 2403–2412

  10. [10]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    D. C. Robinson, “Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole,”Phys. Rev. Lett.34(1975) 905–906. [7]DESICollaboration, A. G. Adameet al., “DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,”JCAP02(2025) 021, arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]. [8]DESCollaboration, B. Popovicet al., “The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A R...

  11. [11]

    Dynamics of dark energy

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15(2006) 1753–1936, arXiv:hep-th/0603057

  12. [12]

    Modified Gravity and Cosmology

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, “Modified Gravity and Cosmology,”Phys. Rept.513(2012) 1–189,arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [13]

    Black holes in the presence of dark energy

    E. O. Babichev, V . I. Dokuchaev, and Y . N. Eroshenko, “Black holes in the presence of dark energy,”Phys. Usp.56 (2013) 1155–1175,arXiv:1406.0841 [gr-qc]

  14. [14]

    Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, “Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model,”Phys. Rept.568(2015) 1–98, arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO]

  15. [15]

    Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity

    K. Koyama, “Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity,”Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) no. 4, 046902,arXiv:1504.04623 [astro-ph.CO]

  16. [16]

    Horndeski theory and beyond: a review

    T. Kobayashi, “Horndeski theory and beyond: a review,” Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019) no. 8, 086901, arXiv:1901.07183 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    Primordial black hole evolution in tensor-scalar cosmology

    T. Jacobson, “Primordial black hole evolution in tensor scalar 14 Note that for SMBHB both the inspiral and ringdown phases can simulta- neously reach 103 SNRs in the LISA band [89]. cosmology,”Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 2699–2702, arXiv:astro-ph/9905303

  18. [18]

    Dressing a black hole with a time-dependent Galileon

    E. Babichev and C. Charmousis, “Dressing a black hole with a time-dependent Galileon,”JHEP08(2014) 106, arXiv:1312.3204 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Exact black hole solutions in shift symmetric scalar-tensor theories

    T. Kobayashi and N. Tanahashi, “Exact black hole solutions in shift symmetric scalar–tensor theories,”PTEP2014(2014) 073E02,arXiv:1403.4364 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Cosmological self-tuning and local solutions in generalized Horndeski theories

    E. Babichev and G. Esposito-Farese, “Cosmological self-tuning and local solutions in generalized Horndeski theories,”Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no. 2, 024020, arXiv:1609.09798 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Hairy Schwarzschild-(A)dS black hole solutions in DHOST theories beyond shift symmetry

    J. Ben Achour and H. Liu, “Hairy Schwarzschild-(A)dS black hole solutions in degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond shift symmetry,”Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no. 6, 064042,arXiv:1811.05369 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Exact black hole solutions in shift-symmetric quadratic degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories

    H. Motohashi and M. Minamitsuji, “Exact black hole solutions in shift-symmetric quadratic degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories,”Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no. 6, 064040,arXiv:1901.04658 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    Rotating Black Holes in Higher Order Gravity,

    C. Charmousis, M. Crisostomi, R. Gregory, and N. Stergioulas, “Rotating Black Holes in Higher Order Gravity,”Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no. 8, 084020, arXiv:1903.05519 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    Perturbations of stealth black holes in degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories,

    C. de Rham and J. Zhang, “Perturbations of stealth black holes in degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories,”Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no. 12, 124023,arXiv:1907.00699 [hep-th]

  25. [25]

    General Relativity solutions with stealth scalar hair in quadratic higher-order scalar-tensor theories,

    K. Takahashi and H. Motohashi, “General Relativity solutions with stealth scalar hair in quadratic higher-order scalar-tensor theories,”JCAP06(2020) 034, arXiv:2004.03883 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Existence and instability of hairy black holes in shift-symmetric Horndeski theories,

    J. Khoury, M. Trodden, and S. S. C. Wong, “Existence and instability of hairy black holes in shift-symmetric Horndeski theories,”JCAP11(2020) 044,arXiv:2007.01320 [astro-ph.CO]

  27. [27]

    Black hole perturbations in DHOST theories: master variables, gradient instability, and strong coupling,

    K. Takahashi and H. Motohashi, “Black hole perturbations in DHOST theories: master variables, gradient instability, and strong coupling,”JCAP08(2021) 013, arXiv:2106.07128 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    Stable black hole solutions with cosmological hair

    L. Smulders and J. Noller, “Stable black hole solutions with cosmological hair,”arXiv:2603.22398 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    The galileon as a local modification of gravity

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, and E. Trincherini, “The Galileon as a local modification of gravity,”Phys. Rev.D79(2009) 064036, arXiv:0811.2197 [hep-th]. 11

  30. [30]

    Avoidance of Strong Coupling in General Relativity Solutions with a Timelike Scalar Profile in a Class of Ghost-Free Scalar-Tensor Theories,

    A. De Felice, S. Mukohyama, and K. Takahashi, “Avoidance of Strong Coupling in General Relativity Solutions with a Timelike Scalar Profile in a Class of Ghost-Free Scalar-Tensor Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) no. 3, 031103,arXiv:2204.02032 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    Weakly-coupled stealth solution in scordatura degenerate theory,

    H. Motohashi and S. Mukohyama, “Weakly-coupled stealth solution in scordatura degenerate theory,”JCAP01(2020) 030,arXiv:1912.00378 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    Approximately stealth black hole in higher-order scalar-tensor theories,

    A. De Felice, S. Mukohyama, and K. Takahashi, “Approximately stealth black hole in higher-order scalar-tensor theories,”JCAP03(2023) 050, arXiv:2212.13031 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    Effective Field Theory of Black Hole Quasinormal Modes in Scalar-Tensor Theories

    G. Franciolini, L. Hui, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and E. Trincherini, “Effective Field Theory of Black Hole Quasinormal Modes in Scalar-Tensor Theories,”JHEP02 (2019) 127,arXiv:1810.07706 [hep-th]

  34. [34]

    Black Hole Ringdown as a Probe for Dark Energy,

    J. Noller, L. Santoni, E. Trincherini, and L. G. Trombetta, “Black Hole Ringdown as a Probe for Dark Energy,”Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 084049,arXiv:1911.11671 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    Effective Field Theory for the perturbations of a slowly rotating black hole,

    L. Hui, A. Podo, L. Santoni, and E. Trincherini, “Effective Field Theory for the perturbations of a slowly rotating black hole,”JHEP12(2021) 183,arXiv:2111.02072 [hep-th]

  36. [36]

    Effective field theory of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile: formulation,

    S. Mukohyama and V . Yingcharoenrat, “Effective field theory of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile: formulation,”JCAP09(2022) 010,arXiv:2204.00228 [hep-th]

  37. [37]

    Stability of hairy black holes in shift-symmetric scalar-tensor theories via the effective field theory approach,

    J. Khoury, T. Noumi, M. Trodden, and S. S. C. Wong, “Stability of hairy black holes in shift-symmetric scalar-tensor theories via the effective field theory approach,” JCAP04(2023) 035,arXiv:2208.02823 [hep-th]

  38. [38]

    Generalized Regge-Wheeler equation from Effective Field Theory of black hole perturbations with a timelike scalar profile,

    S. Mukohyama, K. Takahashi, and V . Yingcharoenrat, “Generalized Regge-Wheeler equation from Effective Field Theory of black hole perturbations with a timelike scalar profile,”JCAP10(2022) 050,arXiv:2208.02943 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    Quasinormal modes from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile,

    S. Mukohyama, K. Takahashi, K. Tomikawa, and V . Yingcharoenrat, “Quasinormal modes from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile,”JCAP07 (2023) 050,arXiv:2304.14304 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Bridging dark energy and black holes with EFT: frame transformation and gravitational wave speed,

    S. Mukohyama, E. Seraille, K. Takahashi, and V . Yingcharoenrat, “Bridging dark energy and black holes with EFT: frame transformation and gravitational wave speed,”JCAP01(2025) 085,arXiv:2407.15123 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Tidal Love Numbers from EFT of Black Hole Perturbations with Timelike Scalar Profile,

    C. G. A. Barura, H. Kobayashi, S. Mukohyama, N. Oshita, K. Takahashi, and V . Yingcharoenrat, “Tidal Love Numbers from EFT of Black Hole Perturbations with Timelike Scalar Profile,”arXiv:2405.10813 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Effective field theory of perturbations on arbitrary black hole backgrounds with spacelike scalar profile,

    S. Mukohyama, E. Seraille, K. Takahashi, and V . Yingcharoenrat, “Effective field theory of perturbations on arbitrary black hole backgrounds with spacelike scalar profile,”JHEP10(2025) 128,arXiv:2507.02066 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    Spherical black hole perturbations in EFT of scalar-tensor gravity with timelike scalar profile,

    S. Mukohyama, K. Takahashi, K. Tomikawa, and V . Yingcharoenrat, “Spherical black hole perturbations in EFT of scalar-tensor gravity with timelike scalar profile,” JCAP05(2025) 084,arXiv:2503.00520 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    Black Holes in the Ghost Condensate

    S. Mukohyama, “Black holes in the ghost condensate,”Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 104019,arXiv:hep-th/0502189

  45. [45]

    Linear perturbation analysis of hairy black holes in shift-symmetric Horndeski theories: Odd-parity perturbations

    K. Takahashi and T. Suyama, “Linear perturbation analysis of hairy black holes in shift-symmetric Horndeski theories: Odd-parity perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no. 2, 024034,arXiv:1610.00432 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    Linear stability analysis of hairy black holes in quadratic degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories: Odd-parity perturbations

    K. Takahashi, H. Motohashi, and M. Minamitsuji, “Linear stability analysis of hairy black holes in quadratic degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories: Odd-parity perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no. 2, 024041, arXiv:1904.03554 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Time-dependent spherically symmetric covariant Galileons

    E. Babichev and G. Esposito-Farèse, “Time-Dependent Spherically Symmetric Covariant Galileons,”Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 044032,arXiv:1212.1394 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Black holes in a cubic Galileon universe

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, A. Lehébel, and T. Moskalets, “Black holes in a cubic Galileon universe,”JCAP09(2016) 011,arXiv:1605.07438 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    Large black-hole scalar charges in- duced by cosmology in Horndeski theories,

    E. Babichev, G. Esposito-Farèse, I. Sawicki, and L. G. Trombetta, “Large black-hole scalar charges induced by cosmology in Horndeski theories,”Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no. 2, 024043,arXiv:2504.07882 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Black holes with primary scalar hair,

    A. Bakopoulos, C. Charmousis, P. Kanti, N. Lecoeur, and T. Nakas, “Black holes with primary scalar hair,” arXiv:2310.11919 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    Stability and quasinormal modes for black holes with time-dependent scalar hair,

    S. Sirera and J. Noller, “Stability and quasinormal modes for black holes with time-dependent scalar hair,”Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) no. 4, 044067,arXiv:2408.01720 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    Inverting no-hair theorems: How requiring General Relativity solutions restricts scalar-tensor theories

    H. Kobayashi, S. Mukohyama, J. Noller, S. Sirera, K. Takahashi, and V . Yingcharoenrat, “Inverting no-hair theorems: How requiring general relativity solutions restricts scalar-tensor theories,”Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no. 12, 124022,arXiv:2503.05651 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    Axial perturbations of black holes with primary scalar hair,

    C. Charmousis, S. Iteanu, D. Langlois, and K. Noui, “Axial perturbations of black holes with primary scalar hair,”JCAP 05(2025) 102,arXiv:2503.22348 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    Primary black-hole scalar charges and kinetic screening in K-essence-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    G. Lara, G. Trenkler, and L. G. Trombetta, “Primary black-hole scalar charges and kinetic screening in K-essence-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,”arXiv:2512.23683 [gr-qc]

  55. [55]

    Self-Accelerating Universe in Galileon Cosmology

    F. P. Silva and K. Koyama, “Self-Accelerating Universe in Galileon Cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 121301, arXiv:0909.4538 [astro-ph.CO]

  56. [56]

    Cosmology of a covariant Galileon field

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, “Cosmology of a covariant Galileon field,”Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 111301, arXiv:1007.2700 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [57]

    Revisiting fifth forces in the Galileon model

    C. Burrage and D. Seery, “Revisiting fifth forces in the Galileon model,”JCAP08(2010) 011, arXiv:1005.1927 [astro-ph.CO]

  58. [58]

    An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism

    E. Babichev and C. Deffayet, “An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism,”Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 184001,arXiv:1304.7240 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    Conditions for the cosmological viability of the most general scalar-tensor theories and their applications to extended Galileon dark energy models

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, “Conditions for the cosmological viability of the most general scalar-tensor theories and their applications to extended Galileon dark energy models,”JCAP1202(2012) 007, arXiv:1110.3878 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    The parameter space in Galileon gravity models

    A. Barreira, B. Li, A. Sanchez, C. M. Baugh, and S. Pascoli, “Parameter space in Galileon gravity models,”Phys. Rev. D 87(2013) 103511,arXiv:1302.6241 [astro-ph.CO]

  61. [61]

    Positivity bounds from multiple vacua and their cosmological consequences,

    S. Melville and J. Noller, “Positivity bounds from multiple vacua and their cosmological consequences,”JCAP06(2022) no. 06, 031,arXiv:2202.01222 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    Evolution of linear cosmological perturbations and its observational implications in Galileon-type modified gravity

    T. Kobayashi, H. Tashiro, and D. Suzuki, “Evolution of linear cosmological perturbations and its observational implications in Galileon-type modified gravity,”Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 063513,arXiv:0912.4641 [astro-ph.CO]

  63. [63]

    Black holes in self-tuning cubic Horndeski cosmology,

    W. T. Emond, A. Lehébel, and P. M. Saffin, “Black holes in 12 self-tuning cubic Horndeski cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) no. 8, 084008,arXiv:1912.09199 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, “Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,”Phys. Rev.108(1957) 1063–1069

  65. [65]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 3, 2018

  66. [66]

    BLACK HOLE NORMAL MODES: A SEMIANALYTIC APPROACH,

    B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, “BLACK HOLE NORMAL MODES: A SEMIANALYTIC APPROACH,”Astrophys. J. Lett.291(1985) L33–L36

  67. [67]

    Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, “Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations,”Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 155002,arXiv:1904.10333 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    General theories of linear gravitational perturbations to a Schwarzschild Black Hole

    O. J. Tattersall, P. G. Ferreira, and M. Lagos, “General theories of linear gravitational perturbations to a Schwarzschild Black Hole,”Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no. 4, 044021,arXiv:1711.01992 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole,

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, “The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A344(1975) 441–452

  70. [70]

    Vainshtein Mechanism in Binary Pulsars

    C. de Rham, A. J. Tolley, and D. H. Wesley, “Vainshtein Mechanism in Binary Pulsars,”Phys. Rev. D87(2013) no. 4, 044025,arXiv:1208.0580 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    Scalar Gravitational Radiation from Binaries: Vainshtein Mechanism in Time-dependent Systems

    F. Dar, C. De Rham, J. T. Deskins, J. T. Giblin, and A. J. Tolley, “Scalar Gravitational Radiation from Binaries: Vainshtein Mechanism in Time-dependent Systems,”Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) no. 2, 025008, arXiv:1808.02165 [hep-th]

  72. [72]

    Unveiling the Galileon in a three-body system : scalar and gravitational wave production,

    P. Brax, L. Heisenberg, and A. Kuntz, “Unveiling the Galileon in a three-body system : scalar and gravitational wave production,”JCAP05(2020) 012, arXiv:2002.12590 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    Black hole binaries in cubic Horndeski theories,

    P. Figueras and T. França, “Black hole binaries in cubic Horndeski theories,”Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no. 12, 124004, arXiv:2112.15529 [gr-qc]

  74. [74]

    On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA

    E. Berti, V . Cardoso, and C. M. Will, “On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 064030, arXiv:gr-qc/0512160

  75. [75]

    Quasi-Normal Modes of Hairy Scalar Tensor Black Holes: Odd Parity,

    O. J. Tattersall, “Quasi-Normal Modes of Hairy Scalar Tensor Black Holes: Odd Parity,”Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) no. 11, 115007,arXiv:1911.07593 [gr-qc]

  76. [77]

    Testing the speed of gravity with black hole ringdowns,

    S. Sirera and J. Noller, “Testing the speed of gravity with black hole ringdowns,”Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no. 12, 124054,arXiv:2301.10272 [gr-qc]

  77. [78]

    Modeling Ringdown: Beyond the Fundamental Quasi-Normal Modes

    L. London, D. Shoemaker, and J. Healy, “Modeling ringdown: Beyond the fundamental quasinormal modes,” Phys. Rev. D90(2014) no. 12, 124032, arXiv:1404.3197 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 069902 (2016)]

  78. [79]

    Inspiral, merger and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: a multipolar analysis

    E. Berti, V . Cardoso, J. A. Gonzalez, U. Sperhake, M. Hannam, S. Husa, and B. Bruegmann, “Inspiral, merger and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A Multipolar analysis,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 064034, arXiv:gr-qc/0703053

  79. [80]

    Matched-filtering and parameter estimation of ringdown waveforms

    E. Berti, J. Cardoso, V . Cardoso, and M. Cavaglia, “Matched-filtering and parameter estimation of ringdown waveforms,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 104044, arXiv:0707.1202 [gr-qc]

  80. [81]

    Bhagwat, M

    S. Bhagwat, M. Cabero, C. D. Capano, B. Krishnan, and D. A. Brown, “Detectability of the subdominant mode in a binary black hole ringdown,”Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no. 2, 024023,arXiv:1910.13203 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.