pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11440 · v3 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 💻 cs.IR

Recognition: unknown

R3-VAE: Reference Vector-Guided Rating Residual Quantization VAE for Generative Recommendation

Chenwei Zhang, Dawei Yang, Jiahao Qin, Ke Wang, Qiang Wan, Siyang Liu, Wei Xu, Xin Yan, Yicong Liu, Ying Fan, Ze Yang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IR
keywords generative recommendationsemantic identifiersvector quantizationvariational autoencoderreference vectorresidual quantizationcodebook collapse
0
0 comments X

The pith

R3-VAE generates more stable and higher-quality semantic identifiers for items by anchoring features with a reference vector and rating residuals through dot products.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces R3-VAE to produce semantic identifiers that represent item meanings as discrete tokens for generative recommendation systems. Existing vector quantization approaches often fail due to unstable training from poor gradient flow and sensitivity to starting points, plus they lack cheap ways to judge identifier quality short of full system tests. The new method adds a reference vector to fix initial features in place, a dot-product rating step to keep the codebook from collapsing, and two metrics called Semantic Cohesion and Preference Discrimination that act as training regularizers. A reader would care because reliable semantic tokens could make generative recommenders work better on both familiar and new items without extra tuning.

Core claim

The authors claim that guiding residual quantization inside a VAE with a reference vector as semantic anchor, a dot-product rating mechanism to stabilize gradients and usage, and regularization by Semantic Cohesion and Preference Discrimination metrics produces semantic identifiers that outperform prior methods, shown by higher recall and NDCG on public datasets plus gains in live metrics and cold-start performance.

What carries the argument

The reference vector acting as a fixed semantic anchor together with a dot-product rating mechanism inside residual quantization VAE training, augmented by two new metrics used as regularization terms.

If this is right

  • Average gains of 14.5 percent in Recall@10 and 15.5 percent in NDCG@10 across three public datasets.
  • 1.62 percent higher MRR and 0.83 percent better StayTime per user in online A/B tests on an industrial platform.
  • 15.36 percent lift in cold-start performance when the learned identifiers replace item IDs inside a CTR model.
  • Faster SID quality checks during development because the two new metrics serve as cheap proxies for full generative training.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same anchoring and rating ideas could be tried in other discrete representation tasks such as language model tokenization or image codebooks.
  • The two evaluation metrics might transfer to measure quality of discrete codes in non-recommendation generative settings.
  • Testing the approach on much larger catalogs would reveal whether the stability holds without any extra hyperparameter search.

Load-bearing premise

The reference vector and dot-product rating mechanism plus the two regularization metrics are sufficient to remove training instability and codebook collapse across datasets without creating new biases or forcing dataset-specific retuning.

What would settle it

Training runs of R3-VAE on a fresh recommendation dataset that still exhibit codebook collapse or unstable loss curves, or controlled experiments that show no lift in recommendation metrics over strong baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11440 by Chenwei Zhang, Dawei Yang, Jiahao Qin, Ke Wang, Qiang Wan, Siyang Liu, Wei Xu, Xin Yan, Yicong Liu, Ying Fan, Ze Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The overall pipeline of R 3 -VAE. The framework takes item continuous embeddings x as input, processes them via the reference vector projection layer, hierarchical rating quantization layers, decoder, and outputs reconstructed embeddings. The reconstruction loss and proposed SC & PD loss jointly optimize the model. SC loss pulls the residual embeddings in the same cluster close, and PD loss pushes the code… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Training stability comparison: reconstruction loss [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 3D PCA visualization of embeddings before (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 2D ring projection of embeddings (colored by an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Generative Recommendation (GR) has gained traction for its merits of superior performance and cold-start capability. As the vital role in GR, Semantic Identifiers (SIDs) represent item semantics through discrete tokens. However, current techniques for SID generation based on vector quantization face two main challenges: (i) training instability, stemming from insufficient gradient propagation through the straight-through estimator and sensitivity to initialization; and (ii) inefficient SID quality assessment, where industrial practice still depends on costly GR training and A/B testing. To address these challenges, we propose Reference Vector-Guided Rating Residual Quantization VAE (R3-VAE). This framework incorporates three key innovations: (i) a reference vector that functions as a semantic anchor for the initial features, thereby mitigating sensitivity to initialization; (ii) a dot product-based rating mechanism designed to stabilize the training process and prevent codebook collapse; and (iii) two SID evaluation metrics, Semantic Cohesion and Preference Discrimination, serving as regularization terms during training. Empirical results on six benchmarks demonstrate that R3-VAE outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving an average improvement of 14.5% in Recall@10 and 15.5% in NDCG@10 across three public datasets (Beauty, Sports, and Toys). Furthermore, we perform GR training and online A/B tests on Toutiao. Our method achieves a 1.62% improvement in MRR and a 0.83% gain in StayTime/U versus baselines. Additionally, we employ R3-VAE to replace the item ID of CTR model, resulting in significant improvements in content cold start by 15.36%, corroborating the strong applicability and business value in industry-scale recommendation scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes R3-VAE, a reference vector-guided rating residual quantization VAE for generating semantic identifiers (SIDs) in generative recommendation. It targets two challenges in vector-quantized VAEs: training instability from straight-through estimators and initialization sensitivity, plus inefficient SID quality assessment. The three innovations are a reference vector as semantic anchor, a dot-product rating mechanism for stabilization and collapse prevention, and Semantic Cohesion plus Preference Discrimination metrics used as regularization terms. The central empirical claim is consistent outperformance over SOTA methods, with average gains of 14.5% Recall@10 and 15.5% NDCG@10 on three public datasets, plus positive GR training, online A/B results on Toutiao (1.62% MRR, 0.83% StayTime/U), and 15.36% cold-start CTR lift when replacing item IDs.

Significance. If the reported gains are attributable to the three proposed components rather than hyperparameter search or dataset artifacts, the work offers a concrete, deployable improvement to SID generation that directly impacts both academic GR benchmarks and industrial-scale recommendation. The inclusion of ablations, codebook utilization statistics, and real-world A/B tests strengthens the practical value; the new regularization metrics could also serve as reusable diagnostic tools for future VQ-based recommenders.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experiments] The central claim that the reference vector, dot-product rating, and two regularization terms jointly resolve instability and collapse rests on the experimental protocol. The manuscript should explicitly report (in the experimental section) the hyperparameter ranges searched for the reference vector, dot-product scale, and regularization coefficients, together with an ablation isolating each component's contribution to codebook utilization and final GR metrics; without this, it remains possible that gains arise from dataset-specific tuning rather than the architectural innovations.
  2. [Experiments] Table reporting public-dataset results: the average 14.5% Recall@10 and 15.5% NDCG@10 improvements are presented without per-dataset variance, statistical significance tests, or confirmation that all baselines were re-trained under identical data splits and negative-sampling protocols. This detail is load-bearing for the claim of consistent superiority across Beauty, Sports, and Toys.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Method] The notation for the reference vector and the exact formulation of the dot-product rating (including any scaling factor) should be introduced with a single equation block early in the method section to avoid forward references.
  2. [Experiments] The online A/B test description would benefit from a brief statement of the traffic split, duration, and any guardrail metrics monitored alongside MRR and StayTime/U.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the recommendation of minor revision. We appreciate the recognition of our work's practical contributions to generative recommendation. We address each major comment below and will update the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments] The central claim that the reference vector, dot-product rating, and two regularization terms jointly resolve instability and collapse rests on the experimental protocol. The manuscript should explicitly report (in the experimental section) the hyperparameter ranges searched for the reference vector, dot-product scale, and regularization coefficients, together with an ablation isolating each component's contribution to codebook utilization and final GR metrics; without this, it remains possible that gains arise from dataset-specific tuning rather than the architectural innovations.

    Authors: We agree that explicit hyperparameter reporting and component-isolated ablations are necessary to rule out tuning artifacts. The manuscript already includes ablations and codebook utilization statistics, but we will revise the experimental section to list the searched ranges for the reference vector, dot-product scale, and regularization coefficients. We will further expand the ablation analysis to quantify each component's individual contribution to codebook utilization and downstream GR metrics, thereby confirming that the reported gains derive from the proposed innovations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments] Table reporting public-dataset results: the average 14.5% Recall@10 and 15.5% NDCG@10 improvements are presented without per-dataset variance, statistical significance tests, or confirmation that all baselines were re-trained under identical data splits and negative-sampling protocols. This detail is load-bearing for the claim of consistent superiority across Beauty, Sports, and Toys.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of detailed statistical reporting for validating consistent superiority. In the revised manuscript we will augment the results tables with per-dataset performance figures including means and standard deviations across multiple runs, include statistical significance tests (e.g., paired t-tests), and add explicit confirmation that all baselines were re-trained under identical data splits and negative-sampling protocols. These changes will strengthen the empirical claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper defines a new VAE architecture (reference vector anchor, dot-product rating mechanism, and Semantic Cohesion + Preference Discrimination regularizers) from explicit architectural choices and loss terms, then trains it end-to-end on standard recommendation datasets. All reported gains are measured via independent downstream metrics (Recall@10, NDCG@10, MRR, StayTime, cold-start CTR) and online A/B tests rather than being forced by construction from fitted inputs or prior self-citations. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to the model's own parameters or to an unverified self-citation chain; the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The approach rests on standard VAE and vector quantization assumptions plus the novel hypothesis that a reference vector plus dot-product rating will stabilize training. Several free parameters (codebook size, reference vector, regularization coefficients) are introduced without independent verification.

free parameters (3)
  • reference vector
    Acts as semantic anchor; its initialization and possible learning constitute a new fitted component.
  • dot-product rating scale
    Weighting factor in the rating mechanism that affects quantization stability.
  • regularization coefficients for Semantic Cohesion and Preference Discrimination
    Control how strongly the new metrics influence training.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard variational autoencoder assumptions on latent distribution and evidence lower bound.
    The model is built on the VAE framework.
  • domain assumption Vector quantization can be stabilized by an external reference vector and dot-product rating without distorting the learned semantics.
    Core modeling hypothesis of R3-VAE.
invented entities (2)
  • Reference vector no independent evidence
    purpose: Semantic anchor for initial features to reduce initialization sensitivity.
    New component introduced to address training instability.
  • Dot product-based rating mechanism no independent evidence
    purpose: Stabilize quantization and prevent codebook collapse.
    New mechanism replacing or augmenting standard straight-through estimator.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5649 in / 1885 out tokens · 67245 ms · 2026-05-10T16:23:32.874897+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Long Tail POIs: Transition-Centered Generalization for Human Mobility Prediction

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RECAP improves next-POI prediction by reconstructing sparse transitions via multi-hop graph transitivity and user revisit signals, yielding gains on tail transitions across real datasets.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Constrained k-means clustering.Microsoft Research, Redmond, 2000

    Paul S Bradley, Kristin P Bennett, and Ayhan Demiriz. Constrained k-means clustering.Microsoft Research, Redmond, 2000

    2000

  2. [2]

    Unisearch: Rethinking search system with a unified generative architecture.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Jiahui Chen, Xiaoze Jiang, Zhibo Wang, Quanzhi Zhu, Junyao Zhao, Feng Hu, Kang Pan, Ao Xie, Maohua Pei, Zhiheng Qin, et al. Unisearch: Rethinking search system with a unified generative architecture.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Onerec: Unifying retrieve and rank with generative recommender and iterative preference alignment.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Jiaxin Deng, Shiyao Wang, Kuo Cai, Lejian Ren, Qigen Hu, Weifeng Ding, Qiang Luo, and Guorui Zhou. Onerec: Unifying retrieve and rank with generative recommender and iterative preference alignment.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Forge: Forming semantic identifiers for generative retrieval in industrial datasets.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Kairui Fu, Tao Zhang, Shuwen Xiao, Ziyang Wang, Xinming Zhang, Chenchi Zhang, Yuliang Yan, Junjun Zheng, Yu Li, Zhihong Chen, et al. Forge: Forming semantic identifiers for generative retrieval in industrial datasets.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Optimized product quantization

    Tiezheng Ge, Kaiming He, Qifa Ke, and Jian Sun. Optimized product quantization. InIEEE TPAMI, 2013

    2013

  6. [6]

    Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain, personalized prompt & predict paradigm (p5)

    Shijie Geng, Shuchang Liu, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain, personalized prompt & predict paradigm (p5). InRecSys, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Learning vector-quantized item representation for transferable sequential recommenders

    Yupeng Hou, Zhankui He, Julian McAuley, and Wayne Xin Zhao. Learning vector-quantized item representation for transferable sequential recommenders. InWWW, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Bridging language and items for retrieval and recommendation.arXiv preprint, 2024

    Yupeng Hou, Jiacheng Li, Zhankui He, An Yan, Xiusi Chen, and Julian McAuley. Bridging language and items for retrieval and recommendation.arXiv preprint, 2024

    2024

  9. [9]

    Generating long semantic ids in parallel for recommendation

    Yupeng Hou, Jiacheng Li, Ashley Shin, Jinsung Jeon, Abhishek Santhanam, Wei Shao, Kaveh Hassani, Ning Yao, and Julian McAuley. Generating long semantic ids in parallel for recommendation. InKDD, 2025

    2025

  10. [10]

    Generative recommendation models: Progress and directions

    Yupeng Hou, An Zhang, Leheng Sheng, Zhengyi Yang, Xiang Wang, Tat-Seng Chua, and Julian McAuley. Generative recommendation models: Progress and directions. InWWW, 2025

    2025

  11. [11]

    Product quantization for nearest neighbor search.TPAMI, 2010

    Herve Jegou, Matthijs Douze, and Cordelia Schmid. Product quantization for nearest neighbor search.TPAMI, 2010

    2010

  12. [12]

    Genrec: Large language model for generative recommendation

    Jianchao Ji, Zelong Li, Shuyuan Xu, Wenyue Hua, Yingqiang Ge, Juntao Tan, and Yongfeng Zhang. Genrec: Large language model for generative recommendation. InECIR. Springer, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Llm-aligned geographic item tokenization for local-life recommendation.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Hao Jiang, Guoquan Wang, Donglin Zhou, Sheng Yu, Yang Zeng, Wencong Zeng, Kun Gai, and Guorui Zhou. Llm-aligned geographic item tokenization for local-life recommendation.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    Generative recommendation with semantic ids: A practitioner’s handbook.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Clark Mingxuan Ju, Liam Collins, Leonardo Neves, Bhuvesh Kumar, Louis Yufeng Wang, Tong Zhao, and Neil Shah. Generative recommendation with semantic ids: A practitioner’s handbook.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Au- toregressive image generation using residual quantization

    Doyup Lee, Chiheon Kim, Saehoon Kim, Minsu Cho, and Wook-Shin Han. Au- toregressive image generation using residual quantization. InCVPR, 2022

    2022

  16. [16]

    Semantic convergence: Harmonizing recommender systems via two-stage align- ment and behavioral semantic tokenization

    Guanghan Li, Xun Zhang, Yufei Zhang, Yifan Yin, Guojun Yin, and Wei Lin. Semantic convergence: Harmonizing recommender systems via two-stage align- ment and behavioral semantic tokenization. InAAAI, 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    Order-agnostic identifier for large language model-based generative recommendation

    Xinyu Lin, Haihan Shi, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Qifan Wang, See-Kiong Ng, and Tat-Seng Chua. Order-agnostic identifier for large language model-based generative recommendation. InSIGIR, 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    Generative recommender with end-to-end learnable item tokenization

    Enze Liu, Bowen Zheng, Cheng Ling, Lantao Hu, Han Li, and Wayne Xin Zhao. Generative recommender with end-to-end learnable item tokenization. InSIGIR, 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Bridging textual- collaborative gap through semantic codes for sequential recommendation

    Enze Liu, Bowen Zheng, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. Bridging textual- collaborative gap through semantic codes for sequential recommendation. In KDD, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Discrete semantic tokenization for deep ctr prediction

    Qijiong Liu, Hengchang Hu, Jiahao Wu, Jieming Zhu, Min-Yen Kan, and Xiao- Ming Wu. Discrete semantic tokenization for deep ctr prediction. InWWW, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    Onerec-think: In-text reasoning for generative recommendation.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Zhanyu Liu, Shiyao Wang, Xingmei Wang, Rongzhou Zhang, Jiaxin Deng, Honghui Bao, Jinghao Zhang, Wuchao Li, Pengfei Zheng, Xiangyu Wu, et al. Onerec-think: In-text reasoning for generative recommendation.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Multi-behavior generative recom- mendation

    Zihan Liu, Yupeng Hou, and Julian McAuley. Multi-behavior generative recom- mendation. InCIKM, pages 1575–1585, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Qarm: Quantitative alignment multi-modal recommendation at kuaishou.arXiv preprint, 2024

    Xinchen Luo, Jiangxia Cao, Tianyu Sun, Jinkai Yu, Rui Huang, Wei Yuan, Hezheng Lin, Yichen Zheng, Shiyao Wang, Qigen Hu, et al. Qarm: Quantitative alignment multi-modal recommendation at kuaishou.arXiv preprint, 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fine-grained aspects

    Jianmo Ni, Jiacheng Li, and Julian McAuley. Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fine-grained aspects. InEMNLP, 2019

    2019

  25. [25]

    Search-based user interest modeling with lifelong sequential behavior data for click-through rate prediction

    Qi Pi, Guorui Zhou, Yujing Zhang, Zhe Wang, Lejian Ren, Ying Fan, Xiaoqiang Zhu, and Kun Gai. Search-based user interest modeling with lifelong sequential behavior data for click-through rate prediction. InCIKM, 2020

    2020

  26. [26]

    Tokenrec: Learning to tokenize id for llm-based generative recommendations

    Haohao Qu, Wenqi Fan, Zihuai Zhao, and Qing Li. Tokenrec: Learning to tokenize id for llm-based generative recommendations. InTKDE, 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    Recommender systems with generative retrieval

    Shashank Rajput, Nikhil Mehta, Anima Singh, Raghunandan Hulikal Keshavan, Trung Vu, Lukasz Heldt, Lichan Hong, Yi Tay, Vinh Tran, Jonah Samost, et al. Recommender systems with generative retrieval. InNeurIPS, 2023

    2023

  28. [28]

    Generative retrieval with semantic tree-structured identifiers and contrastive learning

    Zihua Si, Zhongxiang Sun, Jiale Chen, Guozhang Chen, Xiaoxue Zang, Kai Zheng, Yang Song, Xiao Zhang, Jun Xu, and Kun Gai. Generative retrieval with semantic tree-structured identifiers and contrastive learning. InSIGIR, 2024

    2024

  29. [29]

    Pcr-ca: Parallel codebook representations with contrastive alignment for multiple- category app recommendation.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Bin Tan, Wangyao Ge, Yidi Wang, Xin Liu, Jeff Burtoft, Hao Fan, and Hui Wang. Pcr-ca: Parallel codebook representations with contrastive alignment for multiple- category app recommendation.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  30. [30]

    Neural discrete representation learning

    Aaron Van Den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, et al. Neural discrete representation learning. InNeurIPS, 2017

    2017

  31. [31]

    Generative next poi recommendation with semantic id

    Dongsheng Wang, Yuxi Huang, Shen Gao, Yifan Wang, Chengrui Huang, and Shuo Shang. Generative next poi recommendation with semantic id. InKDD, 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    Genera- tive recommendation: Towards next-generation recommender paradigm.arXiv preprint, 2023

    Wenjie Wang, Xinyu Lin, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, and Tat-Seng Chua. Genera- tive recommendation: Towards next-generation recommender paradigm.arXiv preprint, 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    Learnable item tokenization for generative rec- ommendation

    Wenjie Wang, Honghui Bao, Xinyu Lin, Jizhi Zhang, Yongqi Li, Fuli Feng, See- Kiong Ng, and Tat-Seng Chua. Learnable item tokenization for generative rec- ommendation. InCIKM, 2024

    2024

  34. [34]

    Empowering large language model for sequen- tial recommendation via multimodal embeddings and semantic ids

    Yuhao Wang, Junwei Pan, Xinhang Li, Maolin Wang, Yuan Wang, Yue Liu, Dapeng Liu, Jie Jiang, and Xiangyu Zhao. Empowering large language model for sequen- tial recommendation via multimodal embeddings and semantic ids. InCIKM, 2025

    2025

  35. [35]

    Das: Dual-aligned semantic ids empowered industrial recommender system

    Wencai Ye, Mingjie Sun, Shaoyun Shi, Peng Wang, Wenjin Wu, and Peng Jiang. Das: Dual-aligned semantic ids empowered industrial recommender system. In CIKM, 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec

    Neil Zeghidour, Alejandro Luebs, Ahmed Omran, Jan Skoglund, and Marco Tagliasacchi. Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec. InTASLP, 2021

    2021

  37. [37]

    Actions speak louder than words: Trillion-parameter sequential transducers for generative recommendations

    Jiaqi Zhai, Lucy Liao, Xing Liu, Yueming Wang, Rui Li, Xuan Cao, Leon Gao, Zhaojie Gong, Fangda Gu, Michael He, et al. Actions speak louder than words: Trillion-parameter sequential transducers for generative recommendations. In ICML, 2024

    2024

  38. [38]

    Adapting large language models by integrating collaborative semantics for recommendation

    Bowen Zheng, Yupeng Hou, Hongyu Lu, Yu Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ming Chen, and Ji-Rong Wen. Adapting large language models by integrating collaborative semantics for recommendation. InICDE, 2024

    2024

  39. [39]

    Ega-v2: An end-to-end generative framework for industrial advertising.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Zuowu Zheng, Ze Wang, Fan Yang, Jiangke Fan, Teng Zhang, Yongkang Wang, and Xingxing Wang. Ega-v2: An end-to-end generative framework for industrial advertising.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  40. [40]

    Deep interest network for click-through rate prediction

    Guorui Zhou, Xiaoqiang Zhu, Chenru Song, Ying Fan, Han Zhu, Xiao Ma, Yanghui Yan, Junqi Jin, Han Li, and Kun Gai. Deep interest network for click-through rate prediction. InKDD, 2018

    2018

  41. [41]

    Rankmixer: Scaling up ranking models in industrial recommenders

    Jie Zhu, Zhifang Fan, Xiaoxie Zhu, Yuchen Jiang, Hangyu Wang, Xintian Han, Haoran Ding, Xinmin Wang, Wenlin Zhao, Zhen Gong, et al. Rankmixer: Scaling up ranking models in industrial recommenders. InCIKM, 2025

    2025

  42. [42]

    Cost: Contrastive quantization based semantic tokenization for generative recommendation

    Jieming Zhu, Mengqun Jin, Qijiong Liu, Zexuan Qiu, Zhenhua Dong, and Xiu Li. Cost: Contrastive quantization based semantic tokenization for generative recommendation. InRecSys, 2024

    2024