pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12020 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Beyond the Standard Model of Cosmology: Testing new paradigms with a Multiprobe Exploration of the Dark Universe

Juan Garcia-Bellido
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-th
keywords primordial black holesdark matterdark energyentropic accelerationprimordial spectrumcosmologygravitational waveslarge scale structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

The paper proposes extending the primordial fluctuation spectrum for primordial black hole dark matter and adding general relativistic entropic acceleration for dark energy, using only known physics to address multiple cosmological puzzles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that recent observations from JWST, LIGO-Virgo, and galaxy surveys challenge the standard Lambda Cold Dark Matter model, including early massive galaxies, unexpected black holes, and possible variation in dark energy. It suggests two revisions based on existing physics: extending the primordial spectrum of fluctuations to small scales with new statistical properties so primordial black holes can serve as dark matter, and incorporating non-equilibrium thermodynamics in the expanding universe through general relativistic entropic acceleration to explain dark energy acceleration. If successful, these changes would unify explanations for multi-scale observations across gravitational wave detectors, large scale structure surveys, and cosmic microwave background experiments without introducing new particles or degrees of freedom. A sympathetic reader would care because this keeps the framework within general relativity and standard cosmology while offering concrete ways to test the ideas against upcoming data.

Core claim

The central claim is that dark matter can be accounted for by primordial black holes generated through an extension of the primordial spectrum of fluctuations to small scales with new statistical properties, while dark energy arises from non-equilibrium thermodynamics implemented as general relativistic entropic acceleration in the expanding universe. These two paradigms, based on known physics, aim to provide a unified explanation for a wide range of interrelated observations from gravitational wave detectors, large scale structure observatories, and cosmic microwave background experiments without new particles or degrees of freedom.

What carries the argument

The two central mechanisms are an extended primordial spectrum of fluctuations carrying new statistical properties at small scales to produce viable primordial black holes as dark matter, and general relativistic entropic acceleration arising from non-equilibrium thermodynamics to drive the observed dark energy behavior.

If this is right

  • Primordial black holes formed from the extended spectrum would naturally explain the black hole properties detected by LIGO-Virgo and the early massive galaxies observed by JWST.
  • The entropic acceleration mechanism would reproduce the accelerating expansion while allowing for the non-constant dark energy behavior suggested by galaxy surveys.
  • Small-scale enhancements in the fluctuation spectrum would boost early structure formation, aligning with high-redshift observations.
  • Multi-probe data from gravitational waves, large scale structure, and the cosmic microwave background would become interconnected tests of the same underlying extensions.
  • Theoretical development of these ideas must proceed in parallel with observations to refine understanding of the early and late universe.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Specifying the new statistical properties in the primordial spectrum could generate distinctive non-Gaussian signatures in the cosmic microwave background that differ from standard predictions and could be targeted by next-generation experiments.
  • The entropic acceleration model might shift the predicted expansion history in ways that address the current Hubble tension between early and late universe measurements.
  • Future high-redshift gravitational wave detections could reveal merger rates or mass distributions that distinguish primordial black holes from those formed by stellar evolution.
  • Similar non-equilibrium thermodynamic treatments might be explored in other gravitational settings, such as near black hole horizons, to check for consistent behavior.

Load-bearing premise

That unspecified new statistical properties added to the primordial spectrum will produce a viable and consistent primordial black hole dark matter scenario, and that non-equilibrium thermodynamics can be consistently incorporated into general relativity to match the observed dark energy.

What would settle it

A precise measurement confirming that the dark energy equation of state remains exactly constant at minus one at all redshifts, or small-scale primordial power spectrum data from future CMB or galaxy surveys showing neither excess power nor the specific statistical features needed for primordial black holes, would falsify the proposals.

read the original abstract

Cosmology is living through fascinating times, where new observations from ground and space telescopes are questioning the established paradigm, the so-called Lambda Cold Dark Matter model. The particle nature of Dark Matter is severely constrained by underground experiments, while recent observations by galaxy surveys indicate that the cosmological constant (Lambda) may not be constant after all. Furthermore, observations at high redshift of fully-formed galaxies with massive black holes at their centers by the James Webb Space Telescope, as well as black holes with unexpected properties observed by gravitational wave detectors LIGO-Virgo, are driving an in-depth revision of our assumptions in models of structure formation and the evolution of the universe. I propose to explore two new paradigms to account for Dark Matter and Dark Energy, based on known physics without the need for new particles nor new degrees of freedom. I will extend the primordial spectrum of fluctuations to small scales with new statistical properties to provide a viable Primordial Black Hole scenario for Dark Matter, and will include non-equilibrium thermodynamics in the expanding universe, in the form of General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration, to explain Dark Energy. My proposal could provide a unified explanation for a plethora of interrelated multi-epoch, multi-scale and multi-probe observations from present and future Gravitational Wave detectors, Large Scale Structure observatories and Cosmic Microwave Background experiments. It emphasizes the need to develop new theoretical ideas hand-in-hand with observations to acquire a deeper understanding of our universe. If these ideas are correct, they will open a new window into the early universe and a new fundamental understanding of gravity in the late universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a forward-looking proposal to address tensions in the LambdaCDM model by introducing two new paradigms without new particles or degrees of freedom. It advocates extending the primordial fluctuation spectrum to small scales with unspecified new statistical properties to realize a viable primordial black hole (PBH) dark matter scenario, and incorporating non-equilibrium thermodynamics via a mechanism termed 'General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration' to account for late-time cosmic acceleration. The author claims these ideas could unify multi-epoch, multi-scale observations from gravitational-wave detectors, large-scale structure surveys, and CMB experiments, while stressing the value of developing theory in tandem with data.

Significance. If the proposed mechanisms were developed into explicit, falsifiable models with quantitative predictions that survive observational tests, the work could contribute to alternative explanations for dark matter and dark energy, potentially alleviating issues such as the particle nature of DM, possible evolution of the cosmological constant, and early galaxy formation. The multi-probe emphasis aligns with current observational strategies. However, the manuscript contains no derivations, explicit functional forms, calculations, or comparisons to data, so its significance remains prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract and proposal statement: The claim that extending the primordial spectrum with 'new statistical properties' will yield a viable PBH dark matter scenario matching the observed density while evading microlensing, GW, and CMB constraints is asserted without any explicit modification to the power spectrum, PBH mass-function calculation, or abundance estimate. This is load-bearing for the central DM paradigm and leaves the viability untested.
  2. Abstract and proposal statement: The 'General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration' mechanism is introduced as a non-equilibrium thermodynamic effect in GR to explain dark energy, yet no modified Friedmann or acceleration equations, thermodynamic implementation details, or demonstration that it reproduces the observed expansion history are provided. This is load-bearing for the DE paradigm.
  3. Abstract: The assertion of a 'unified explanation' for observations from GW detectors, LSS observatories, and CMB experiments is not supported by any quantitative predictions, parameter constraints, or consistency checks against existing data sets, rendering the multi-probe unification claim speculative rather than substantiated.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from explicit references to prior literature on PBH formation from modified primordial spectra and on entropic or thermodynamic approaches to gravity and cosmology to better contextualize the novelty of the proposed ideas.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The manuscript is a forward-looking proposal outlining two new paradigms rather than a completed model with explicit calculations. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and proposal statement: The claim that extending the primordial spectrum with 'new statistical properties' will yield a viable PBH dark matter scenario matching the observed density while evading microlensing, GW, and CMB constraints is asserted without any explicit modification to the power spectrum, PBH mass-function calculation, or abundance estimate. This is load-bearing for the central DM paradigm and leaves the viability untested.

    Authors: We agree that no explicit modification to the primordial power spectrum, PBH mass function, or abundance calculation is provided. The manuscript is framed as a conceptual proposal to explore extending the fluctuation spectrum with new statistical properties as a route to viable PBH dark matter, without claiming to have performed those calculations here. The viability of the scenario is indeed untested in the present work and would require dedicated follow-up studies. No revision is made, as adding such details would change the paper from a high-level proposal to a technical model paper. revision: no

  2. Referee: Abstract and proposal statement: The 'General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration' mechanism is introduced as a non-equilibrium thermodynamic effect in GR to explain dark energy, yet no modified Friedmann or acceleration equations, thermodynamic implementation details, or demonstration that it reproduces the observed expansion history are provided. This is load-bearing for the DE paradigm.

    Authors: We agree that no modified Friedmann equations, explicit thermodynamic implementation, or comparison to the observed expansion history are derived. The manuscript introduces General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration as a proposed non-equilibrium thermodynamic effect within GR to account for late-time acceleration, without providing the detailed formalism. This remains a paradigm to be developed quantitatively in future work. No revision is made to include these elements, consistent with the prospective scope of the paper. revision: no

  3. Referee: Abstract: The assertion of a 'unified explanation' for observations from GW detectors, LSS observatories, and CMB experiments is not supported by any quantitative predictions, parameter constraints, or consistency checks against existing data sets, rendering the multi-probe unification claim speculative rather than substantiated.

    Authors: The manuscript states that the proposed paradigms 'could provide a unified explanation' for multi-probe observations, not that such unification is already demonstrated with quantitative predictions or data constraints. The emphasis is on the value of developing theory alongside observations from GW, LSS, and CMB experiments. We acknowledge that no specific predictions or consistency checks are performed in this work. No revision is made. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: forward-looking proposal with no derivations or equations presented.

full rationale

The document is a research proposal that outlines two new paradigms without presenting any derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or closed calculations. The central ideas—extending the primordial spectrum with unspecified statistical properties for PBH DM and implementing non-equilibrium thermodynamics via General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration for DE—are stated as proposals to be explored and tested with future observations, not as results derived from prior inputs within the paper. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definitions, fitted inputs, or self-citations by construction. This matches the reader's assessment of score 0.0 and qualifies as a normal non-finding for a non-calculational proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on extensions of the primordial spectrum and a new thermodynamic interpretation in GR whose parameters and consistency conditions are not specified in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • statistical properties of the extended primordial spectrum
    New statistics at small scales are invoked to produce viable PBH dark matter but no functional form or parameter values are given.
  • implementation details of General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration
    The non-equilibrium thermodynamic term is introduced without explicit equations or free parameters listed.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard general relativity remains valid when non-equilibrium thermodynamics is added to the expanding universe
    Invoked to justify the entropic acceleration mechanism.
  • domain assumption The primordial fluctuation spectrum can be extended to small scales while preserving large-scale consistency with CMB data
    Required for the PBH dark matter scenario.
invented entities (1)
  • General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration no independent evidence
    purpose: To generate the observed dark energy behavior from non-equilibrium thermodynamics
    New concept introduced in the proposal; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5586 in / 1549 out tokens · 80451 ms · 2026-05-10T15:37:01.587874+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Primordial Black Hole contribution to the stochastic background of Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A PBH fraction of about 0.1 as dark matter, with 1% in stellar-mass range, produces the observed SGWB amplitude via dynamical friction and hierarchical mergers while explaining JWST early SMBHs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Astrophys. J. Lett.263, L1 (1982)

    1982

  2. [2]

    Amendola and S

    L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Cambridge U.P., UK (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Scott, Proc

    D. Scott, Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. Fermi200, 133 (2020), arXiv:1804.01318 [astro-ph.CO]. [4]https://royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2024/04/cosmological-model/,

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Verde, T

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, Nature Astronomy3, 891 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena,et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity38, 153001 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Bullet al., Physics of the Dark Universe12, 56 (2016)

    P. Bullet al., Physics of the Dark Universe12, 56 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Carnianiet al., Nature633, 318 (2024), arXiv:2405.18485

    S. Carnianiet al., Nature633, 318 (2024), arXiv:2405.18485

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP02, 021 (2025), arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), Astrophys. J. Lett.973, L14 (2024), arXiv:2401.02929 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), Phys. Rev. D113, 063530 (2026), arXiv:2503.06712 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, M. Hawkins, and F. K¨ uhnel, Phys. Rept.1054, 1 (2024), arXiv:2306.03903 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Dark Univ.45, 101533 (2024), arXiv:2405.02895 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and E. Ruiz Morales, Phys. Lett. B776, 345 (2018), arXiv:1705.04861 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and V. Vennin, JCAP03, 029 (2020), arXiv:1912.05399 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and F. K¨ uhnel, Phys. Dark Univ.31, 100755 (2021), arXiv:1906.08217 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Matthee et al.,Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z∼ 5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys,Astrophys

    J. Mattheeet al., Astrophys. J.963, 129 (2024), arXiv:2306.05448 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Rinaldiet al., Astrophys

    P. Rinaldiet al., Astrophys. J.992, 71 (2025), arXiv:2411.14383 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    J. F. N. Siles and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido Capdevila, Phys. Dark Univ.47, 101789 (2025), arXiv:2405.06391 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Espinosa-Portal´ es and J

    L. Espinosa-Portal´ es and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Dark Univ.34, 100893 (2021), arXiv:2106.16012 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Jacobson, Physical Review Letters75, 1260 (1995)

    T. Jacobson, Physical Review Letters75, 1260 (1995)

    1995

  23. [23]

    Padmanabhan, Reports on Progress in Physics73, 046901 (2010)

    T. Padmanabhan, Reports on Progress in Physics73, 046901 (2010)

    2010

  24. [24]

    Verlinde, Journal of High Energy Physics2011, 29 (2011)

    E. Verlinde, Journal of High Energy Physics2011, 29 (2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    Bousso, Reviews of Modern Physics74, 825 (2002)

    R. Bousso, Reviews of Modern Physics74, 825 (2002)

    2002

  26. [26]

    Fischler and L

    W. Fischler and L. Susskind, hep-th/9806039 (1998)

    work page arXiv 1998

  27. [27]

    Zhaoet al., Nature Astronomy1, 627 (2017)

    G.-B. Zhaoet al., Nature Astronomy1, 627 (2017)

    2017

  28. [28]

    Collaboration, Astronomy & Astrophysics641, A6 (2020)

    P. Collaboration, Astronomy & Astrophysics641, A6 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Garc´ ıa-Bellido and L

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido and L. Espinosa-Portal´ es, Phys. Dark Univ.34, 100892 (2021), arXiv:2106.16014 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 063001 (2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    Young and C

    S. Young and C. T. Byrnes, JCAP10, 034 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    Kawasaki, A

    M. Kawasaki, A. Kusenko,et al., Physical Review D94, 083523 (2016)

    2016

  33. [33]

    C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole, and S. P. Patil, JCAP06, 028 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Dalianiset al., JCAP01, 043 (2021)

    I. Dalianiset al., JCAP01, 043 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Physical Review D50, 6357 (1994)

    1994

  36. [36]

    Winitzki, Physical Review D62, 043501 (2000)

    S. Winitzki, Physical Review D62, 043501 (2000)

    2000

  37. [37]

    Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Rev. D92, 023524 (2015), arXiv:1501.07565 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Animali and V

    C. Animali and V. Vennin, JCAP08, 026 (2024), arXiv:2402.08642 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and V. Vennin, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 121003 (2023), arXiv:2207.06317 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Trashorras, J

    M. Trashorras, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and S. Nesseris, Universe7, 18 (2021), arXiv:2006.15018 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    L. Wang, M. Iwasawa, K. Nitadori, and J. Makino, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497, 536 (2020), arXiv:2006.16560

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Bagui et al., Living Reviews in Relativity28, 1 (2025), 2310.19857

    E. Baguiet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), Living Rev. Rel.28, 1 (2025), arXiv:2310.19857 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    A. G. Adame, S. Avila, V. Gonzalez-Perez, G. Yepes, M. Pellejero, M. S. Wang, C.-H. Chuang, Y. Feng, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and A. Knebe, Astron. Astrophys.689, A69 (2024), arXiv:2312.12405 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Zevinet al., Astrophysical Journal910, 152 (2021)

    M. Zevinet al., Astrophysical Journal910, 152 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Belczynskiet al., Astronomy & Astrophysics636, A104 (2020)

    K. Belczynskiet al., Astronomy & Astrophysics636, A104 (2020)

    2020

  46. [46]

    Mageeet al., Physical Review D106(2022), 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043009

    R. Mageeet al., Physical Review D106(2022), 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.043009 2022

  47. [47]

    E. D. Hall and A. D. Gow, Physical Review D102(2020), 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123516

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123516 2020

  48. [48]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Physical Review D97, 123532 (2018)

    2018

  49. [49]

    Dom` enech, International Journal of Modern Physics D29, 2050058 (2021)

    G. Dom` enech, International Journal of Modern Physics D29, 2050058 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    Abbottet al.(LVK), Mon

    R. Abbottet al.(LVK), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524, 5984 (2023), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 526, 6234 (2023)], arXiv:2212.01477 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Morraset al., Phys

    G. Morraset al., Phys. Dark Univ.42, 101285 (2023), arXiv:2301.11619 [gr-qc]. 8

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Prunier, G

    M. Prunier, G. Morr´ as, J. F. N. Siles, S. Clesse, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and E. Ruiz Morales, Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101582 (2024), arXiv:2311.16085 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Morras, J

    G. Morras, J. F. N. Siles, and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Rev. D108, 123025 (2023), arXiv:2307.16610 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), Astrophys. J. Lett.970, L34 (2024), arXiv:2404.04248 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.900, L13 (2020), arXiv:2009.01190 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    C. A. ´Alvarez, H. W. Y. Wong, A. Liu, and J. Calder´ on Bustillo, Astrophys. J.977, 220 (2024), arXiv:2404.00720 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    GW190425, GW190521 and GW190814: Three candidate mergers of primordial black holes from the QCD epoch,

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Dark Univ.38, 101111 (2022), arXiv:2007.06481 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravitational waves,

    N. Bartoloet al., JCAP12, 026 (2016), arXiv:1610.06481 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Im- ager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MASTER, J...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW-E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Observatory, VINROUGE, MASTER), Nature551, 85 (2017), arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Palmeseet al., Astrophysical Journal Letters900, L33 (2020)

    A. Palmeseet al., Astrophysical Journal Letters900, L33 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    Mukherjee and B

    S. Mukherjee and B. Wandelt, Physical Review D98, 083016 (2018)

    2018

  65. [65]

    B. F. Schutz, Nature323, 310 (1986)

    1986

  66. [66]

    First measurement of the Hubble constant from a dark standard siren using the Dark Energy Survey galaxies and the LIGO/Virgo binary-black-hole merger GW170814

    M. Soares-Santoset al.(DES, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.876, L7 (2019), arXiv:1901.01540 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Libanore, M

    S. Libanore, M. Liguori, and A. Raccanelli, JCAP08, 055 (2023), arXiv:2306.03087 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, and J. B. Mu˜ noz, Physical Review Letters116, 201301 (2016)

    2016

  69. [69]

    H¨ utsi, M

    G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal,et al., JCAP03, 068 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    Wyrzykowskiet al., Astron

    L. Wyrzykowskiet al., Astron. Astrophys.674, A23 (2023), arXiv:2206.06121 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Ou, A.-C

    X. Ou, A.-C. Eilers, L. Necib, and A. Frebel, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528, 693 (2024), arXiv:2303.12838 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Garc´ ıa-Bellido and M

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido and M. Hawkins, Universe10, 449 (2024), arXiv:2402.00212 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    M. R. S. Hawkins and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.544, 1950 (2025), arXiv:2509.05400 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 1950

  74. [74]

    N. S. Abramset al., Astrophys. J. Suppl.276, 10 (2025), arXiv:2309.15310 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    As- trometric microlensing by primordial black holes with the roman space telescope,

    J. Fardeen, P. McGill, S. E. Perkins, W. A. Dawson, N. S. Abrams, J. R. Lu, M.-F. Ho, and S. Bird, Astrophys. J.965, 138 (2024), arXiv:2312.13249 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview

    J. Lesgourgues, (2011), arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  77. [77]

    MontePython 3: boosted MCMC sampler and other features

    T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, Phys. Dark Univ.24, 100260 (2019), arXiv:1804.07261 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Calderonet al., (2025), arXiv:2509.21491 [astro-ph.CO]

    R. Calderonet al., (2025), arXiv:2509.21491 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Dark Univ.44, 101491 (2024), arXiv:2306.10593 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Kov´ acs and J

    A. Kov´ acs and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.462, 1882 (2016), arXiv:1511.09008 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.