Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 1 cited by

Quantum Mixing for Schr\"odinger eigenfunctions in Benjamini-Schramm limit

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Eigenfunctions of Schrödinger operators on Benjamini-Schramm converging hyperbolic surfaces exhibit quantum mixing in large spectral windows.

desk verdict The paper proves quantum mixing for Schrödinger eigenfunctions on BS-converging hyperbolic surfaces with potentials, via Duhamel and geodesic flow mixing from the spectral gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.21582 v1 submitted 2026-04-23 math.SP math-phmath.DGmath.DSmath.MP

Kai Hippi , Félix Lequen , S{o}ren Mikkelsen , Tuomas Sahlsten , Henrik Ueberschär This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.SPmath-phmath.DGmath.DSmath.MP
keywords quantummixingSchrödingereigenfunctionsBenjamini-SchrammconvergencehyperbolicsurfacesspectralgapgeodesicflowDuhamelformulaergodicity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that eigenfunctions of the Schrödinger operator minus the Laplacian plus a potential on sequences of compact hyperbolic surfaces display quantum mixing when the surfaces Benjamini-Schramm converge to the hyperbolic plane. This holds in any sufficiently large spectral window provided the sequence has a uniform spectral gap and the geodesic flow mixes exponentially. The potential on the surfaces is induced from a fixed potential on the plane in suitable integrability classes. A reader would care because this gives a way to transfer mixing properties from the infinite hyperbolic plane to approximating finite surfaces, covering cases like arithmetic covers, random surfaces, and approximations to many-body quantum systems.

What carries the argument

The Duhamel formula applied to the hyperbolic wave equation combined with the exponential mixing property of the geodesic flow on T^1 X_n, which transfers mixing from the flow to the quantum evolution of eigenfunctions.

What would settle it

A counterexample would be a sequence of hyperbolic surfaces satisfying the Benjamini-Schramm convergence and uniform gap but where the matrix elements of the eigenfunctions in a large spectral window fail to decay according to the mixing rate predicted by the geodesic flow.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Let −Δ_H + V be the Schrödinger operator on the hyperbolic plane H where V belongs to L^p intersect L^infty for some p>0. If (X_n) is a uniformly discrete sequence of compact hyperbolic surfaces with a uniform spectral gap that Benjamini-Schramm converges to H, we prove quantum mixing for the eigenfunctions of −Δ_{X_n} + V_n in any sufficiently large spectral window I, where V_n is the induced potential on X_n. The proof relies on the Duhamel formula for the hyperbolic wave equation together with exponential mixing of the geodesic flow on the unit tangent bundle of X_n.

Load-bearing premise

The surfaces in the sequence must maintain a uniform spectral gap and their geodesic flows must mix exponentially fast.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves quantum mixing for the eigenfunctions of the Schrödinger operators −Δ_{X_n} + V_n, where (X_n) is a uniformly discrete sequence of compact hyperbolic surfaces with uniform spectral gap that Benjamini-Schramm converges to the hyperbolic plane H, and V_n is the potential induced by a fixed V ∈ L^p(H) ∩ L^∞(H) for p > 0. The result holds in any sufficiently large spectral window I. The proof combines the Duhamel formula for the hyperbolic wave equation with exponential mixing of the geodesic flow on T¹X_n. Applications are given to large-degree lifts (including congruence covers), random surfaces in the Weil-Petersson model, and Hartree operators arising from many-body Bose gases.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result supplies a modular extension of quantum ergodicity/mixing to perturbed operators on BS-converging sequences. It directly applies to arithmetic surfaces, high-probability random hyperbolic surfaces, and thermodynamic limits of many-body systems, thereby linking spectral theory, hyperbolic dynamics, and statistical mechanics. The reliance on established exponential mixing (from the uniform spectral gap) and BS convergence rather than new dynamical estimates makes the argument reusable across models.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction should explicitly define the induced potential V_n on X_n (e.g., via the covering map or pull-back) and state the precise regularity it inherits from V, since this is used to control error terms in the Duhamel expansion.
  2. Clarify the dependence of the 'sufficiently large' spectral window I on the uniform spectral gap, the L^p norm of V, and the BS convergence rate; a quantitative statement would strengthen the applications to random surfaces.
  3. In the statement of the main theorem, specify whether the quantum mixing is in the sense of matrix coefficients against continuous test functions or in a weaker averaged sense, and indicate the topology on the space of measures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation uses external standard tools on stated assumptions

full rationale

The paper states its assumptions explicitly (uniform spectral gap, BS convergence to H, exponential mixing of the geodesic flow on T^1 X_n, and V in L^p ∩ L^∞ inducing V_n) and invokes the Duhamel formula for the hyperbolic wave equation as a standard analytic tool rather than deriving it internally. The central step transfers the assumed mixing to the Schrödinger eigenfunctions via BS convergence and error control uniform in n; no step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The argument is therefore self-contained against its listed external inputs and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the uniform spectral gap assumption for the sequence, the Benjamini-Schramm convergence to H, and the exponential mixing property of the geodesic flow, all treated as given inputs from prior work.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The sequence of surfaces has a uniform spectral gap
    Stated as a hypothesis on (X_n) to control the spectrum in the limit.
  • domain assumption The geodesic flow on T^1 X_n has exponential mixing
    Invoked directly in the proof via the Duhamel formula.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Mixing for Schr\"odinger eigenfunctions in Benjamini-Schramm limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.21582

@misc{pith2026260421582,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Mixing for Schr\"odinger eigenfunctions in Benjamini-Schramm limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.21582}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.21582}
}
abstract

Let $-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}+V$ be the Schr\"odinger operator on $\mathbb{H}$ where $V \in L^p(\mathbb{H}) \cap L^\infty(\mathbb{H})$ for some $p > 0$. If $(X_n)$ is a uniformly discrete sequence of compact hyperbolic surfaces with a uniform spectral gap that Benjamini-Schramm converges to $\mathbb{H}$, we prove quantum mixing for the eigenfunctions of $-\Delta_{X_n}+V_n$ in any sufficiently large spectral window $I$, where $V_n$ is the potential on $X_n$ induced by $V$. These apply to large degree lifts of a potential on a base surface such as congruence covers of arithmetic surfaces, with high probability to random hyperbolic surfaces in the Weil-Petersson model of large genus, and to Hartree one-particle operators arising in thermodynamic limit of many-body Bose gas on hyperbolic surfaces. The proof uses the Duhamel formula for the hyperbolic wave equation together with exponential mixing of the geodesic flow on $T^1 X_n$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Local Weyl law and length-minimising loops on hyperbolic surfaces

    math-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For large random hyperbolic surfaces, the pointwise variance of a smoothed local Weyl law equals the Berry random-wave value, up to explicit O(1/(L²g)+1/g²) errors.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abert, N

    M. Abert, N. Bergeron, and E. Le Masson. Eigenfunctions and random waves in the Benjamini-Schramm limit,

    work page

  2. [2]

    Aizenman and S

    M. Aizenman and S. Warzel. Extended states in a lifshitz tail regime for random schrödinger operators on trees. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:136804, Mar 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Anantharaman

    N. Anantharaman. Entropy and the localization of eigenfunctions.Ann. of Math. (2), 168(2):435–475, 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Anantharaman.Quantum ergodicity and delocalization of Schrödinger eigenfunctions

    N. Anantharaman.Quantum ergodicity and delocalization of Schrödinger eigenfunctions. Zurich Lectures in Ad- vanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, [2022]©2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Anantharaman and E

    N. Anantharaman and E. Le Masson. Quantum ergodicity on large regular graphs.Duke Math. J., 164(4):723–765, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Friedman-Ramanujan functions in random hyperbolic geometry and application to spectral gaps II

    N. Anantharaman and L. Monk. Friedman–Ramanujan functions in random hyperbolic geometry and application to spectral gaps, 2023. arXiv:2304.02678

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    A Moebius inversion formula to discard tangled hyperbolic surfaces

    N. Anantharaman and L. Monk. A Möbius inversion formula to discard tangled hyperbolic surfaces, 2024. arXiv:2401.01601

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Spectral gap of random hyperbolic surfaces

    N. Anantharaman and L. Monk. Spectral gap of random hyperbolic surfaces, 2024. arXiv:2403.12576

    work page arXiv 2024

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    Anantharaman and L

    N. Anantharaman and L. Monk. Friedman–Ramanujan functions in random hyperbolic geometry and application to spectral gaps II, 2025. arXiv:2502.12268

    2025

  2. [10]

    Anantharaman and S

    N. Anantharaman and S. Nonnenmacher. Half-delocalization of eigenfunctions for the Laplacian on an Anosov manifold.Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 57(7):2465–2523, 2007. Festival Yves Colin de Verdière

    2007

  3. [11]

    Anantharaman and M

    N. Anantharaman and M. Sabri. Quantum ergodicity for the Anderson model on regular graphs.J. Math. Phys., 58(9):091901, 10, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Anantharaman and M

    N. Anantharaman and M. Sabri. Quantum ergodicity on graphs: from spectral to spatial delocalization.Ann. of Math. (2), 189(3):753–835, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Anantharaman and M

    N. Anantharaman and M. Sabri. Recent results of quantum ergodicity on graphs and further investigation.Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6), 28(3):559–592, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    P. W. Anderson. Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices.Phys. Rev., 109:1492–1505, Mar 1958

    1958

  7. [15]

    Anker and V

    J.-P. Anker and V. Pierfelice. Nonlinear Schrödinger equation on real hyperbolic spaces.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire, 26(5):1853–1869, 2009

    2009

  8. [16]

    Anker and V

    J.-P. Anker and V. Pierfelice. Wave and Klein-Gordon equations on hyperbolic spaces.Anal. PDE, 7(4):953–995, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Anker, V

    J.-P. Anker, V. Pierfelice, and M. Vallarino. The wave equation on hyperbolic spaces.J. Differential Equations, 252(10):5613–5661, 2012

    2012

  10. [18]

    Anker, V

    J.-P. Anker, V. Pierfelice, and M. Vallarino. The wave equation on Damek-Ricci spaces.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 194(3):731–758, 2015

    2015

  11. [19]

    Bauerschmidt, J

    R. Bauerschmidt, J. Huang, and H.-T. Yau. Local Kesten-McKay law for random regular graphs.Comm. Math. Phys., 369(2):523–636, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Bauerschmidt, A

    R. Bauerschmidt, A. Knowles, and H.-T. Yau. Local semicircle law for random regular graphs.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 70(10):1898–1960, 2017

    1960

  13. [21]

    M. Beceanu. Dispersive estimates for Schrödinger’s and wave equations on Riemannian manifolds, 2025. arXiv:2501.06957

    2025

  14. [22]

    Bordenave and B

    C. Bordenave and B. Collins. Eigenvalues of random lifts and polynomials of random permutation matrices.Ann. of Math. (2), 190(3):811–875, 2019. 34 KAI HIPPI, FÉLIX LEQUEN, SØREN MIKKELSEN, TUOMAS SAHLSTEN, AND HENRIK UEBERSCHÄR

    2019

  15. [23]

    Bordenave, C

    C. Bordenave, C. Letrouit, and M. Sabri. Quantum mixing on large Schreier graphs, 2026. arXiv:2601.14182

    2026

  16. [24]

    Bourgain and C

    J. Bourgain and C. E. Kenig. On localization in the continuous Anderson-Bernoulli model in higher dimension. Invent. Math., 161(2):389–426, 2005

    2005

  17. [25]

    Breteaux

    S. Breteaux. A geometric derivation of the linear Boltzmann equation for a particle interacting with a Gaussian random field, using a Fock space approach.Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 64(3):1031–1076, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    Brooks, E

    S. Brooks, E. Le Masson, and E. Lindenstrauss. Quantum ergodicity and averaging operators on the sphere, 2016

    2016

  19. [27]

    Brooks and E

    S. Brooks and E. Lindenstrauss. Non-localization of eigenfunctions on large regular graphs.Israel J. Math., 193(1):1–14, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Brumley, S

    F. Brumley, S. Marshall, J. Matz, and C. Peterson. Quantum ergodicity in the Benjamini–Schramm limit for locally symmetric spaces, 2026. arXiv:2604.01075

    2026

  21. [29]

    Brumley and J

    F. Brumley and J. Matz. Quantum ergodicity for compact quotients ofSLd(R)/SO(d)in the Benjamini-Schramm limit.J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 22(5):2075–2115, 2023

  22. [30]

    C.-F. Chen, J. Garza-Vargas, J. A. Tropp, and R. van Handel. A new approach to strong convergence.Ann. of Math. (2), 203(2):555–602, 2026

    2026

  23. [31]

    X. Chen. Resolvent and spectral measure on non-trapping asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds III: Global-in-time Strichartz estimates without loss.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire, 35(3):803–829, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    Cipolloni, L

    G. Cipolloni, L. Erdős, and D. Schröder. Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis for Wigner matrices.Comm. Math. Phys., 388(2):1005–1048, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    Colin de Verdière

    Y. Colin de Verdière. Pseudo-laplaciens. I.Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 32(3):xiii, 275–286, 1982

    1982

  26. [34]

    Colin de Verdière

    Y. Colin de Verdière. Ergodicité et fonctions propres du laplacien.Comm. Math. Phys., 102(3):497–502, 1985

    1985

  27. [35]

    J. M. Deutsch. Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis.Rep. Prog. Phys., 81(8):082001, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    S. Dyatlov. Around quantum ergodicity.Ann. Math. Qué., 46(1):11–26, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Dyatlov and L

    S. Dyatlov and L. Jin. Semiclassical measures on hyperbolic surfaces have full support.Acta Math., 220(2):297–339, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Dyatlov and J

    S. Dyatlov and J. Zahl. Spectral gaps, additive energy, and a fractal uncertainty principle.Geom. Funct. Anal., 26(4):1011–1094, 2016

    2016

  31. [39]

    Eng and L

    D. Eng and L. Erdős. The linear Boltzmann equation as the low density limit of a random Schrödinger equation. Rev. Math. Phys., 17(6):669–743, 2005

    2005

  32. [40]

    Erdős, A

    L. Erdős, A. Knowles, H.-T. Yau, and J. Yin. Spectral statistics of Erdős-Rényi graphs I: Local semicircle law. Ann. Probab., 41(3B):2279–2375, 2013

    2013

  33. [41]

    Erdős, B

    L. Erdős, B. Schlein, and H.-T. Yau. Local semicircle law and complete delocalization for Wigner random matrices. Comm. Math. Phys., 287(2):641–655, 2009

    2009

  34. [42]

    M. B. Erdoğan, M. Goldberg, and W. Schlag. Strichartz and smoothing estimates for Schrödinger operators with large magnetic potentials inR3.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 10(2):507–531, 2008

    2008

  35. [43]

    Erdős, M

    L. Erdős, M. Salmhofer, and H.-T. Yau. Quantum diffusion for the Anderson model in the scaling limit.Ann. Henri Poincaré, 8(4):621–685, 2007

    2007

  36. [44]

    Erdős and H.-T

    L. Erdős and H.-T. Yau. Linear Boltzmann equation as the weak coupling limit of a random Schrödinger equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 53(6):667–735, 2000

    2000

  37. [45]

    Rep., 103(1-4):9–25, 1984.Common trends in particle and condensed matter physics (Les Houches, 1983)

    J.FröhlichandT.Spencer.ArigorousapproachtoAndersonlocalization.Phys. Rep., 103(1-4):9–25, 1984.Common trends in particle and condensed matter physics (Les Houches, 1983)

    1984

  38. [46]

    Gérard and É

    P. Gérard and É. Leichtnam. Ergodic properties of eigenfunctions for the Dirichlet problem.Duke Math. J., 71(2):559–607, 1993

    1993

  39. [47]

    Germinet, P

    F. Germinet, P. Hislop, and A Klein. On localization for the Schrödinger operator with a Poisson random potential. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 341(8):525–528, 2005

    2005

  40. [48]

    Gilmore, E

    C. Gilmore, E. Le Masson, T. Sahlsten, and J. Thomas. Short geodesic loops andLp norms of eigenfunctions on large genus random surfaces.Geom. Funct. Anal., 31(1):62–110, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Goldberg

    M. Goldberg. Strichartz estimates for the Schrödinger equation with time-periodicLn/2 potentials.J. Funct. Anal., 256(3):718–746, 2009

    2009

  42. [50]

    I. Ja. Gol’dše˘id, S. A. Molčanov, and L. A. Pastur. A random homogeneous Schrödinger operator has a pure point spectrum.Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen., 11(1):1–10, 96, 1977

    1977

  43. [51]

    A. Hassani. Wave equation on Riemannian symmetric spaces.J. Math. Phys., 52(4):043514, 15, 2011

    2011

  44. [52]

    Hezari and G

    H. Hezari and G. Rivière. Quantitative equidistribution properties of toral eigenfunctions.J. Spectr. Theory, 7(2):471–485, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    W. Hide, D. Macera, and J. Thomas. Spectral gap with polynomial rate for random covering surfaces, 2025. arXiv:2505.08479. QUANTUM MIXING FOR SCHRÖDINGER EIGENFUNCTIONS IN BENJAMINI-SCHRAMM LIMIT 35

    2025

  46. [54]

    W. Hide, D. Macera, and J. Thomas. Spectral gap with polynomial rate for Weil-Petersson random surfaces, 2025. arXiv:2508.14874

    2025

  47. [55]

    Hide and M

    W. Hide and M. Magee. Near optimal spectral gaps for hyperbolic surfaces.Ann. of Math. (2), 198(2):791–824, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    K. Hippi. Quantum mixing and benjamini-schramm convergence of hyperbolic surfaces, 2025. arXiv:2512.15504

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    A. D. Ionescu. Fourier integral operators on noncompact symmetric spaces of real rank one.J. Funct. Anal., 174(2):274–300, 2000

    2000

  50. [58]

    Journé, A

    J.-L. Journé, A. Soffer, and C. D. Sogge. Decay estimates for Schrödinger operators.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 44(5):573–604, 1991

    1991

  51. [59]

    M. G. Katz, M. Schaps, and U. Vishne. Logarithmic growth of systole of arithmetic Riemann surfaces along congruence subgroups.J. Differential Geom., 76(3):399–422, 2007

    2007

  52. [60]

    J. P. Keating, N. Linden, and H. J. Wells. Spectra and eigenstates of spin chain Hamiltonians.Comm. Math. Phys., 338(1):81–102, 2015

    2015

  53. [61]

    J. P. Keating and H. Ueberschär. Multifractal eigenfunctions for a singular quantum billiard.Comm. Math. Phys., 389(1):543–569, 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    Kim and Z

    E. Kim and Z. Tao. Eigenvalue rigidity of hyperbolic surfaces in the random cover model, 2026. arXiv:2603.01127

    2026

  55. [63]

    A. Klein. Extended states in the Anderson model on the Bethe lattice.Adv. Math., 133(1):163–184, 1998

    1998

  56. [64]

    Kurlberg and H

    P. Kurlberg and H. Ueberschär. Quantum ergodicity for point scatterers on arithmetic tori.Geom. Funct. Anal., 24(5):1565–1590, 2014

    2014

  57. [65]

    Kurlberg and H

    P. Kurlberg and H. Ueberschär. Superscars in the šeba billiard.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 19(10):2947–2964, 2017

    2017

  58. [66]

    V. F. Lazutkin.KAM theory and semiclassical approximations to eigenfunctions, volume 24 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,

  59. [67]

    With an addendum by A. I. Shnirelman

  60. [68]

    Le Masson and T

    E. Le Masson and T. Sahlsten. Quantum ergodicity and Benjamini-Schramm convergence of hyperbolic surfaces. Duke Math. J., 166(18):3425–3460, 2017

    2017

  61. [69]

    Le Masson and T

    E. Le Masson and T. Sahlsten. Quantum ergodicity for Eisenstein series on hyperbolic surfaces of large genus. Math. Ann., 389(1):845–898, 2024

    2024

  62. [70]

    Lemm and O

    M. Lemm and O. Siebert. Bose-Einstein condensation on hyperbolic spaces.J. Math. Phys., 63(8):Paper No. 081903, 18, 2022

    2022

  63. [71]

    E.Lindenstrauss.Invariantmeasuresandarithmeticquantumuniqueergodicity.Ann. of Math. (2), 163(1):165–219, 2006

    2006

  64. [72]

    Magee, F

    M. Magee, F. Naud, and D. Puder. A random cover of a compact hyperbolic surface has relative spectral gap 3 16 −ε.Geom. Funct. Anal., 32(3):595–661, 2022

    2022

  65. [73]

    Magee, D

    M. Magee, D. Puder, and R. van Handel. Strong convergence of uniformly random permutation representations of surface groups, 2025. arXiv:2504.08988

    2025

  66. [74]

    Magee, J

    M. Magee, J. Thomas, and Y. Zhao. Quantum unique ergodicity for Cayley graphs of quasirandom groups.Comm. Math. Phys., 402(3):3021–3044, 2023

    2023

  67. [75]

    J. Marklof. Selberg’s trace formula: an introduction. InHyperbolic geometry and applications in quantum chaos and cosmology, volume 397 ofLondon Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 83–119. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012

    2012

  68. [76]

    C. Matheus. Some quantitative versions of Ratner’s mixing estimates.Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 44(3):469–488, 2013

    2013

  69. [77]

    McKenzie

    T. McKenzie. The necessity of conditions for graph quantum ergodicity and Cartesian products with an infinite graph.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 360:399–408, 2022

    2022

  70. [78]

    Mikkelsen

    S. Mikkelsen. Schrödinger evolution in a low-density random potential: annealed convergence to the linear boltz- mann equation for general semiclassical wigner measures, 2023. arXiv:2303.05176

    2023

  71. [79]

    Mirzakhani

    M. Mirzakhani. Growth of Weil-Petersson volumes and random hyperbolic surfaces of large genus.J. Differential Geom., 94(2):267–300, 2013

    2013

  72. [80]

    Monk.Geometry and Spectrum of Typical Hyperbolic Surfaces

    L. Monk.Geometry and Spectrum of Typical Hyperbolic Surfaces. PhD thesis, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, 2021. Available athttps://lauramonk.github.io/thesis.pdf

    2021

  73. [81]

    L. Monk. Benjamini–Schramm convergence and spectra of random hyperbolic surfaces of high genus.Analysis & PDE, 15(3):727–752, June 2022

    2022

  74. [82]

    P. D. Nelson. Equidistribution of cusp forms in the level aspect.Duke Math. J., 160(3):467–501, 2011. 36 KAI HIPPI, FÉLIX LEQUEN, SØREN MIKKELSEN, TUOMAS SAHLSTEN, AND HENRIK UEBERSCHÄR

    2011

  75. [83]

    P. D. Nelson, A. Pitale, and A. Saha. Bounds for Rankin-Selberg integrals and quantum unique ergodicity for powerful levels.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 27(1):147–191, 2014

    2014

  76. [84]

    A. Nevo. Spectral transfer and pointwise ergodic theorems for semi-simple Kazhdan groups.Math. Res. Lett., 5(3):305–325, 1998

    1998

  77. [85]

    Peterson

    C. Peterson. Quantum ergodicity on the Bruhat-Tits building for PGL(3, f)in the Benjamini-Schramm limit, 2023. arXiv:2304.08641

    2023

  78. [86]

    M. Ratner. The rate of mixing for geodesic and horocycle flows.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 7(2):267–288, 1987

    1987

  79. [87]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon.Methods of modern mathematical physics. I. Functional analysis. Academic Press, New York-London, 1972

    1972

  80. [88]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon.Methods of modern mathematical physics. II. Fourier analysis, self-adjointness. Academic Press, New York-London, 1975

    1975

  81. [89]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon.Methods of modern mathematical physics. IV. Analysis of operators. Academic Press, New York-London, 1978

    1978

  82. [90]

    Rodnianski and W

    I. Rodnianski and W. Schlag. Time decay for solutions of Schrödinger equations with rough and time-dependent potentials.Invent. Math., 155(3):451–513, 2004

    2004

  83. [91]

    Rudnick and H

    Z. Rudnick and H. Ueberschär. Statistics of wave functions for a point scatterer on the torus.Comm. Math. Phys., 316(3):763–782, 2012

    2012

  84. [92]

    A. Selberg. On the estimation of Fourier coefficients of modular forms. InProc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. VIII, pages 1–15. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1965

    1965

  85. [93]

    A. I. Shnirelman. Ergodic properties of eigenfunctions.Uspehi Mat. Nauk, 29(6(180)):181–182, 1974

    1974

  86. [94]

    Soundararajan

    K. Soundararajan. Quantum unique ergodicity forSL2(Z)\H.Ann. of Math. (2), 172(2):1529–1538, 2010

    2010

  87. [95]

    T. Sunada. Quantum ergodicity. InProgress in inverse spectral geometry, Trends Math., pages 175–196. Birkhäuser, Basel, 1997

    1997

  88. [96]

    Ueberschär

    H. Ueberschär. Quantitative equidistribution of eigenfunctions for toral Schrödinger operators.Rev. Math. Phys., 35(10):Paper No. 2350030, 18, 2023

    2023

  89. [97]

    Ueberschär

    H. Ueberschär. Multifractality for intermediate quantum systems.Acta Phys. Pol. A., 144(6):500–504, 2024

    2024

  90. [98]

    Ueberschär

    H. Ueberschär. Multifractal scaling and the Euler equations onR3/Z3.Nonlinearity, 38(11):Paper No. 115010, 14, 2025

    2025

  91. [99]

    A. Wright. A tour through Mirzakhani’s work on moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 57(3):359–408, 2020

    2020

  92. [100]

    Wu and Y

    Y. Wu and Y. Xue. Random hyperbolic surfaces of large genus have first eigenvalues greater than3 16 −ε.Geom. Funct. Anal., 32(2):340–410, 2022

    2022

  93. [101]

    Zelditch

    S. Zelditch. Uniform distribution of eigenfunctions on compact hyperbolic surfaces.Duke Math. J., 55(4):919–941, 1987

    1987

  94. [102]

    Zelditch

    S. Zelditch. Quantum transition amplitudes for ergodic and for completely integrable systems.J. Funct. Anal., 94(2):415–436, 1990

    1990

  95. [103]

    Zelditch

    S. Zelditch. Quantum ergodicity ofC∗ dynamical systems.Comm. Math. Phys., 177(2):507–528, 1996

    1996

  96. [104]

    Zelditch

    S. Zelditch. Quantum mixing.J. Funct. Anal., 140(1):68–86, 1996

    1996

  97. [105]

    Zelditch and M

    S. Zelditch and M. Zworski. Ergodicity of eigenfunctions for ergodic billiards.Comm. Math. Phys., 175(3):673–682, 1996. Aalto University, Espoo, Finland Email address:kai.hippi@aalto.fi Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France Email address:lequen@math.univ-paris13...

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.