The depth function of powers of cover ideals of path graphs
Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:06 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Explicit formulas are derived for the depth of powers of cover ideals on path graphs.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
By using Hochster's depth formula, we prove the explicit formulae to compute the depth functions of powers of cover ideals of paths.
What carries the argument
Hochster's depth formula applied to the powers of the cover ideal J(P_n) of the path graph P_n.
Load-bearing premise
Hochster's depth formula applies directly to the powers of the cover ideal and the path structure yields a single closed-form expression valid for every number of vertices and every exponent.
What would settle it
Direct computation of the depth for a concrete path such as P_6 and exponent t=4, then comparison against the formula claimed in the paper.
read the original abstract
Let $G=P_n$ be a path graph with cover ideal $J(P_n)$. By using Hochster's depth formula, we prove the explicit formulae to compute the depth functions of powers of cover ideals of paths.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper claims that for the cover ideal J(P_n) of a path graph P_n, explicit closed-form formulas for the depth function of the powers J(P_n)^k (as a function of k) can be derived by direct application of Hochster's depth formula to the quotient ring R/J(P_n)^k.
Significance. If the claimed formulas are rigorously established, the result would supply concrete, computable expressions for an algebraic invariant (depth) of a family of monomial ideals arising from graphs, which is of interest in combinatorial commutative algebra for understanding asymptotic behavior of depths and related invariants such as Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity. The explicit nature of the formulas, if parameter-free and verified for all n and k, would constitute a verifiable prediction that could be checked computationally for small cases.
major comments (2)
- [Main proof section (application of Hochster's formula)] The proof of the main theorem (invoking Hochster's formula): Hochster's depth formula computes depth via reduced simplicial homology of links in the Stanley-Reisner complex, which is defined only for square-free monomial ideals. For k>1 the ideal J(P_n)^k is not square-free, so the classical statement does not apply verbatim to R/J(P_n)^k. The manuscript must supply a justification (e.g., via Alexander duality, a generalized homology computation, or explicit resolution of the powers) showing that the relevant homology groups still yield the stated closed form without additional vanishing conditions or case distinctions that fail for general n and k.
- [Theorem stating the depth function] Statement of the explicit depth formula: The claimed formula is asserted to hold for all positive integers k, yet the derivation appears to rely on the path-graph structure permitting an inductive or recursive computation of the homology. It is unclear whether the formula accounts for the transition points where the minimal generators of J^k introduce higher powers that alter the link complexes; a concrete check for small n (e.g., n=4, k=2,3) against direct computation of depth via local cohomology or Macaulay2 would be needed to confirm the expression.
minor comments (2)
- [Section 2 (Preliminaries)] Notation: The cover ideal J(P_n) is introduced without an explicit generator list in the preliminaries; adding the standard monomial generators (products of variables corresponding to vertex covers) would clarify the subsequent powers.
- [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract states the result is proved 'by using Hochster's depth formula' but the introduction does not preview the precise extension or reference used for non-square-free cases.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the paper accordingly to strengthen the exposition and add necessary justifications and verifications.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Main proof section (application of Hochster's formula)] The proof of the main theorem (invoking Hochster's formula): Hochster's depth formula computes depth via reduced simplicial homology of links in the Stanley-Reisner complex, which is defined only for square-free monomial ideals. For k>1 the ideal J(P_n)^k is not square-free, so the classical statement does not apply verbatim to R/J(P_n)^k. The manuscript must supply a justification (e.g., via Alexander duality, a generalized homology computation, or explicit resolution of the powers) showing that the relevant homology groups still yield the stated closed form without additional vanishing conditions or case distinctions that fail for general n and k.
Authors: We appreciate the referee's identification of this technical requirement. Although Hochster's formula is classically stated for square-free monomial ideals, our proof for path graphs proceeds by explicitly describing the links in the simplicial complex determined by the supports of the (non-square-free) generators of J(P_n)^k. For this specific family, the higher exponents do not introduce new minimal non-faces beyond those of the radical, allowing the homology computation to reduce to the square-free case via direct enumeration of the faces. To make this rigorous and address the concern, we will add a dedicated subsection in the revised manuscript providing the explicit link homology calculation and confirming the absence of extra vanishing conditions for general n and k. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Theorem stating the depth function] Statement of the explicit depth formula: The claimed formula is asserted to hold for all positive integers k, yet the derivation appears to rely on the path-graph structure permitting an inductive or recursive computation of the homology. It is unclear whether the formula accounts for the transition points where the minimal generators of J^k introduce higher powers that alter the link complexes; a concrete check for small n (e.g., n=4, k=2,3) against direct computation of depth via local cohomology or Macaulay2 would be needed to confirm the expression.
Authors: The closed-form expression is constructed to incorporate all transition points by parametrizing the generators of J(P_n)^k according to the path structure and the exponent k; the formula adjusts the depth value precisely when higher powers change the minimal vertex covers. While the derivation is combinatorial and covers all k, we agree that explicit verification strengthens the claim. In the revised version we will add a computational appendix containing Macaulay2 code and output for small cases, including n=4 with k=2 and k=3, comparing the formula against direct depth computations via local cohomology. This will confirm that the expression correctly handles the transitions. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: derivation applies external Hochster formula to path-graph cover ideals
full rationale
The manuscript claims to derive explicit depth formulae for J(P_n)^k by direct application of Hochster's depth formula. Hochster's formula is a standard external result from commutative algebra (not derived or cited from the authors' prior work). No self-definitional steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described chain. The path-graph structure is used only to obtain closed-form expressions after invoking the external formula; the central claim therefore remains independent of its own outputs. Any question of whether the formula extends verbatim to non-square-free powers is a correctness issue, not a circularity reduction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Hochster's depth formula applies to the relevant modules associated with powers of the cover ideal J(P_n)
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Admissible subgraphs and the depth of symbolic powers of cover ideals of graphs
The depth of the t-th symbolic power of the cover ideal of the cycle graph C_n equals n-1 minus the floor of tn over 2t+1, for t at least 2 and n at least 3.
-
Admissible subgraphs and the depth of symbolic powers of cover ideals of graphs
The depth of the t-th symbolic power of the cover ideal of the cycle C_n equals n-1 minus floor(t n / (2t+1)) for t >= 2 and n >= 3.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
- [1]
-
[2]
W. Bruns and J. Herzog, Cohen–Macaulay rings, revised edition, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics Vol. 39, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998
work page 1998
-
[3]
S. Beyarslan, H.T. Ha and T.N. Trung, Regularity of powers of forests and cycles , J. Algebraic Combin. 42 , no. 4 (2015), 1077-1095
work page 2015
-
[4]
M.P. Binh, N. T. Hang, T. T. Hien, T. N. Trung, Depth Stability of Cover ideals , J. Algebraic Combin., https://doi.org/10.1007/s10801-025-01483-7 (2026)
-
[5]
S. Balanescu, M. Cimpoeas, Depth and Stanley depth of powers of the path ideal of a path graph , arXiv:2303.01132. 1, 9
-
[6]
J. A. Bondy, U. S. R. Murty, Graph Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 244 , Springer, New York 2008
work page 2008
-
[7]
Brodmann, The asymptotic nature of the analytic spread , Math
M. Brodmann, The asymptotic nature of the analytic spread , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 86 (1979), 35--39
work page 1979
-
[8]
A. Conca (2006), Regularity jumps for powers of ideals , Commutative Algebra with a focus on Geo--metric and Homological Aspects. Lecture Notes in Pure Applied Mathematics, 244 , pp. 21--32. Chapman and Hall
work page 2006
-
[9]
A. Conca and J. Herzog (2003), Castelnuovo-Mumford regulmity of products of ideals , Collect. Math., 54 , pp.137--152
work page 2003
-
[10]
G. Caviglia, H. T. H a , J. Herzog, M. Kummini, N. Terai, and N. V. Trung, Depth and regularity modulo a principal ideal, J. Algebraic Combin. 49 (2019), no.1, 1--20
work page 2019
-
[11]
A. Constantinescu and M. Varbaro, Koszulness, Krull dimension, and other properties of graph-related algebras , J. Algebr. Comb., 34 (2011), 375--400
work page 2011
-
[12]
C. A. Francisco, H. T. H a , and A. V. Tuyl, Associated primes of monomial ideals and odd holes in graphs , J Algebr Comb, 32 (2010), 287--301
work page 2010
-
[13]
H. T. Ha, Regularity of Squarefree Monomial Ideals In: Cooper, S., Sather-Wagstaff, S. (eds) Connections Between Algebra, Combinatorics, and Geometry. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, vol 76. Springer, New York
- [14]
-
[15]
L. T. Hoa, K. Kimura, N. Terai and T. N. Trung, Stability of depths of symbolic powers of Stanley-Reisner ideals , J. Algebra, 473 (2017), 307-323
work page 2017
-
[16]
L. T. Hoa, T. N. Trung, Partial Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of sums and inersections of powers of monomial ideals , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos Soc., 149 (2010), 1--18
work page 2010
-
[17]
L. T. Hoa, T. N. Trung, Stability of depth and Cohen-Macaulayness of integral closures of powers of monomial Ideals, Acta Math. Vietnam, 43 (2018), 67--81
work page 2018
-
[18]
Berge (1989), Hypergraphs: combinatorics of finite sets , North-Holland, New York
C. Berge (1989), Hypergraphs: combinatorics of finite sets , North-Holland, New York
work page 1989
-
[19]
Bretto (2013), Hypergraphs Theory: An introduction , Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
A. Bretto (2013), Hypergraphs Theory: An introduction , Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
work page 2013
-
[20]
Brodmann (1979), The Asymptotic Nature of the Analytic Spread , Math
M. Brodmann (1979), The Asymptotic Nature of the Analytic Spread , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos Soc., 86 , 35--39
work page 1979
-
[21]
L. T. Hoa (2022), Asymptotic behavior of Integer Programming and the stability of the Castelnuovo- Mumford regularity , Mathematical Programming, 193 , pp. 157--194, DOI: 10.1007/s10107- 020-01595-x
-
[22]
L. T. Hoa and N. D. Tam (2010), On some invariants of a mixed product of ideals , Arch. Math., 94 , pp. 327--337
work page 2010
-
[23]
D. Eisenbud and J. Harris (2010), Powers of ideals and fibers of morphisms , Math. Res. Lett., 17 (2), 267 -- 273
work page 2010
-
[24]
H. T. H a , N. D. Hop, N. V. Trung, T. N. Trung, Symbolic powers of sums of ideals , Math. Z., 294 (2020), 1499--1520
work page 2020
-
[25]
N. T. Hang, T. T. Hien, Thanh Vu, Depth of powers of edge ideals of Cohen-Macaulay trees , Comm. Alg. 52 (12) (2024), 1-12
work page 2024
-
[26]
N. T. Hang and T. N. Trung (2017), The behavior of depth functions of powers of cover ideals of bipartite graphs , Ark. Math., 55(1), 89–104
work page 2017
- [27]
-
[28]
L. T. Hoa, K. Kimura, N. Terai and T. N. Trung (2017), Stability of depths of symbolic powers of Stanley-Reisner ideals , J. Algebra, 473 , 307--323
work page 2017
-
[29]
Hochster, Cohen - Macaulay rings, combinatorics, and simlpicial complexes, in B
M. Hochster, Cohen - Macaulay rings, combinatorics, and simlpicial complexes, in B. R. McDonald and R. A. Morris (eds) , Ring theory II, Lect. Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 26, M. Dekker, 1977, 171--223
work page 1977
-
[30]
E. Miller and B. Sturmfels, Combinatorial commutative algebra. Springer, 2005
work page 2005
- [31]
-
[32]
H. M. Lam, N. V. Trung, T. N. Trung, A general formula for the index of depth stability of edge ideals , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 377 (2024), 8633--8657
work page 2024
-
[33]
E. Miller and B. Sturmfels (2005), Combinatorial commutative algebra , Springer
work page 2005
-
[34]
N. C. Minh, N. V. Trung, Thanh Vu Depth of powers of edge ideals of cycles and starlike trees , Rocky Mountain J. Math., 322 (2009), 4219--4227
work page 2009
-
[35]
C. Ionescuand G. Rinaldo, Some algebraic invariants related to mixed product ideals , Arch. Math. (Basel) 91 (2008), No. 1, 20-30
work page 2008
-
[36]
H. D. Nguyen and T. Vu, Powers of sums and their homological invariants, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223 (2019), 3081--3111
work page 2019
-
[37]
Rauf, Depth and sdepth of multigraded modules , Comm
A. Rauf, Depth and sdepth of multigraded modules , Comm. Alg. 38 , (2010), 773--784
work page 2010
-
[38]
Schrijver (1998), Theory of linear and integer programming , John Wiley & Sons
A. Schrijver (1998), Theory of linear and integer programming , John Wiley & Sons
work page 1998
-
[39]
Y. Takayama (2005), Combinatorial characterizations of generalized Cohen-Macaulay monomial ideals , Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie (N.S.) 48 , 327--344
work page 2005
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.