pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25014 · v1 · pith:A6T4FR5Anew · submitted 2026-05-24 · 💻 cs.CV

Stop Denoising Your Blurs

Sasidhar Parvathireddy , Vamsidhar Saraswathula , Rama Krishna Gorthi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 12:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords image deblurringdiffusion modelsconvolutionfrequency domainGaussian blurimage restorationdegradation trajectory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Diffusion models for deblurring should replace additive noise with convolution to follow the actual blur process.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard diffusion models for image restoration assume degradation happens through additive noise, but real blur occurs through convolution. ConvDiff builds a forward diffusion trajectory that directly applies convolution in the frequency domain to move from a sharp image to its blurred version. This produces intermediate states that are physically valid rather than artificial noise additions. The approach is demonstrated for Gaussian blur, where closed-form solutions exist, but the core idea is meant to generalize to other blur types. If correct, it aligns the iterative steps of diffusion restoration more closely with the mathematics of the degradation.

Core claim

ConvDiff substitutes the additive noise operation with convolution in the diffusion forward process. It constructs a trajectory from clean image to blurred image by exploiting frequency-domain properties of convolution, yielding closed-form and physically valid intermediate states for Gaussian blur. This replaces the conventional noise-addition path that does not match the blur degradation model.

What carries the argument

ConvDiff framework, which replaces additive noise with convolution-based degradation trajectory constructed via frequency-domain decomposition.

If this is right

  • Deblurring can proceed by reversing a convolution-based trajectory instead of a noise-based one.
  • The method yields intermediate images that correspond to partially blurred versions rather than noisy versions.
  • The same principle of building degradation trajectories from the blur operator can be applied to other blur families beyond Gaussian.
  • Restoration models become more consistent with the mathematical definition of the blur degradation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same convolution-trajectory idea might be tested on non-Gaussian blurs where closed-form intermediates are unavailable, perhaps using numerical approximations.
  • If the frequency-domain path proves stable, it could be combined with existing diffusion samplers to reduce the number of steps needed for deblurring.
  • This formulation suggests diffusion models could be redesigned for other convolutional degradations such as certain motion or defocus effects.

Load-bearing premise

Frequency-domain decomposition of the blur operator produces closed-form intermediate states that are physically valid and suitable as a diffusion trajectory.

What would settle it

Generate the intermediate states using the frequency-domain convolution schedule and check whether they match the result of applying the actual Gaussian blur kernel at the corresponding effective strength; mismatch would falsify the claim of valid physical intermediates.

read the original abstract

In recent times, diffusion models have achieved remarkable performance in image restoration tasks. Their core mechanism relies on the restricted presumption of degradation prior to the additive noise operation. However, the blur model, one of the most widely studied degradation formulations, violates this assumption, as it is inherently based on convolution rather than addition. In this paper, we introduce ConvDiff, a novel diffusion based framework that substitutes the additive operation with convolution for the task of image deblurring. In the forward process, we construct a meaningful trajectory from the clean image to its blurred counterpart by exploiting the frequency domain characteristics of convolution, rather than progressively corrupting the image with additive noise. While the current work instantiates this framework for Gaussian blur, where frequency-domain decomposition yields closed-form and physically valid intermediate states, the underlying principle of constructing degradation trajectories from the blur operator extends naturally to other blur families. This formulation bridges the gap between the mathematical principles of blurring and the iterative design of diffusion-based restoration algorithms, enabling more physically grounded and effective image restoration models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces ConvDiff, a diffusion-based framework for image deblurring that replaces the standard additive noise operation with convolution in the forward process. It constructs a trajectory from clean image to blurred counterpart by exploiting frequency-domain characteristics of convolution, claiming closed-form and physically valid intermediate states for Gaussian blur (with the principle asserted to extend to other blur families), thereby bridging blur mathematics with diffusion-based restoration.

Significance. If the claimed closed-form trajectories prove valid and the reverse process can be shown to converge to high-quality restorations, the work could enable more physically grounded diffusion models for deblurring tasks that better respect the convolutional nature of blur, potentially improving upon additive-noise assumptions common in current diffusion restoration methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that frequency-domain decomposition of the blur operator 'yields closed-form and physically valid intermediate states' is stated without any supporting derivation, equation, or explicit construction, making it impossible to verify whether the intermediates are non-circular or actually usable as a diffusion trajectory.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no experiments, convergence analysis, or error bounds are provided to support the assertion that the framework enables 'more physically grounded and effective image restoration models,' which is load-bearing for the claimed practical advantage over existing diffusion approaches.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions to the manuscript are planned.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that frequency-domain decomposition of the blur operator 'yields closed-form and physically valid intermediate states' is stated without any supporting derivation, equation, or explicit construction, making it impossible to verify whether the intermediates are non-circular or actually usable as a diffusion trajectory.

    Authors: The abstract is a high-level summary. The frequency-domain decomposition for Gaussian blur, the resulting closed-form expressions for the intermediate states, and the explicit trajectory construction (including handling to ensure physical validity) are derived with equations in the methods section of the manuscript. We will revise the abstract to add a brief qualifier or pointer to this construction so the claim is more directly supported at the abstract level. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no experiments, convergence analysis, or error bounds are provided to support the assertion that the framework enables 'more physically grounded and effective image restoration models,' which is load-bearing for the claimed practical advantage over existing diffusion approaches.

    Authors: Abstracts are constrained in length and conventionally omit detailed experiments, analyses, or bounds; these appear in the experimental and theoretical sections of the manuscript. The assertion summarizes the intended benefit of the blur-operator trajectory. We will revise the abstract to qualify the language (e.g., 'has the potential to enable') to better align with the scope of evidence presented in the body. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper proposes a methodological substitution of additive noise with convolution in the diffusion forward process for deblurring, instantiated via frequency-domain decomposition for Gaussian blur to produce closed-form intermediates. No equations, predictions, or first-principles results in the abstract or described claims reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central construction is presented as a direct exploitation of blur operator properties rather than a renaming or forced outcome of prior inputs. The derivation chain is self-contained with independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the frequency-domain closed-form claim is presented without derivation or stated assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5714 in / 963 out tokens · 23889 ms · 2026-06-30T12:22:41.411557+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION Diffusion models [1] have made a remarkable impact in the field of computer vision, achieving unprecedented ©2026IEEE.Personaluseofthismaterialispermitted. Permis- sionfromIEEEmustbeobtainedforallotheruses, inanycurrentor future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for ad- vertisingorpromotionalpurposes,creatingnewcollective...

  2. [2]

    Stop Denoising Your Blurs

    integrate blur physics into diffusion models by us- ing simulated exposure time to control the strength of blur in each forward step. While this successfully cre- ates meaningful intermediate states, its reliance on an exposure-time restricts its applicability to motion blur. This motivates a more general formulation - one that derives the degradation tra...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Problem formulation for progressive blurring Assume𝑘 blur denotes the degradation blur kernel that relates the sharp (𝑥) and blurred (𝑦) images

    PROPOSED METHODOLOGY 2.1. Problem formulation for progressive blurring Assume𝑘 blur denotes the degradation blur kernel that relates the sharp (𝑥) and blurred (𝑦) images. The rela- tionship of𝑥,𝑦, and𝑘 blur in the spatial domain is given in Eq. 1. 𝑦=𝑥∗𝑘 blur (1) Taking Fourier transform of Eq.1 gives, 𝑌=𝑋·𝐻 blur (2) LetF {𝑥}=𝑋,F {𝑦}=𝑌 ,F {𝑘 blur}=𝐻 blur w...

  4. [4]

    In noise-free or synthetic datasets,𝑆can be set to a small positive constant to ensure stable inver- sionwithoutsignificantlydistortingtheestimatedkernel

    The Wiener-based estimation approach stabilizes frequency-domain division by introducing a regulariza- tion term𝑆. In noise-free or synthetic datasets,𝑆can be set to a small positive constant to ensure stable inver- sionwithoutsignificantlydistortingtheestimatedkernel. For our dataset, we empirically determined the optimal valueof𝑆byevaluatingreconstructi...

  5. [5]

    Training The objective is to design a deep learning model that approximates the inverse of the degradation function𝐷

    EXPERIMENTAL SETUP 3.1. Training The objective is to design a deep learning model that approximates the inverse of the degradation function𝐷. Wedenotethisinverseapproximationas𝐼 𝜃 (𝑥 𝛽, 𝛽) ≈ˆ𝑥0, where the model predicts the sharp image𝑥0 given a degraded image𝑥 𝛽 and its corresponding degradation strength𝛽. Similartodiffusionmodels,duringtraining,a random...

  6. [6]

    RESULTS Our primary comparison focuses on two traditional iterative restoration baselines: the noise-driven diffu- sion model SR3 [2] and the interpolation-based model INDI [11]. All three models,ConvDiff, SR3, and INDI, were trained using the same U-Net architecture aug- mented with ConvNeXt blocks, ensuring consistency in network configuration and depth...

    2000

  7. [7]

    This physically interpretable formulation bridges diffusion and convolution based restoration

    CONCLUSION Toconclude,ConvDiffintroducesaniterativefrequency- domain deblurring framework that progressively recon- structs sharp images by factorizing the blur kernel. This physically interpretable formulation bridges diffusion and convolution based restoration. However, the current formulation has certain limitations. This formulation assumes spatially ...

  8. [8]

    De- noising diffusion probabilistic models,

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel, “De- noising diffusion probabilistic models,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  9. [9]

    Image super-resolution via iterative refinement,

    ChitwanSaharia,JonathanHo,WilliamChan,Tim Salimans, DavidJFleet, andMohammadNorouzi, “Image super-resolution via iterative refinement,” IEEEtransactionsonpatternanalysisandmachine intelligence, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 4713–4726, 2022

    2022

  10. [10]

    Cold diffu- sion: Inverting arbitrary image transforms without noise,

    ArpitBansal,EitanBorgnia,Hong-MinChu,JieLi, Hamid Kazemi, Furong Huang, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, and Tom Goldstein, “Cold diffu- sion: Inverting arbitrary image transforms without noise,”AdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 41259–41282, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Generative modelling with inverse heat dissipation,

    Severi Rissanen, Markus Heinonen, and Arno Solin, “Generative modelling with inverse heat dissipation,” inTheEleventhInternationalConfer- ence on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  12. [12]

    Progressivedeblurringofdiffusion models for coarse-to-fine image synthesis,

    SangyunLee,HyungjinChung,JaehyeonKim,and JongChulYe, “Progressivedeblurringofdiffusion models for coarse-to-fine image synthesis,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.11192, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Fidediff: Efficient diffusion model for high- fidelity image motion deblurring,

    Xiaoyang Liu, Zhengyan Zhou, Zihang Xu, Jiezhang Cao, Zheng Chen, and Yulun Zhang, “Fidediff: Efficient diffusion model for high- fidelity image motion deblurring,” 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    Blurdm: A blur diffusion model for image de- blurring,

    Jin-Ting He, Fu-Jen Tsai, Yan-Tsung Peng, Min- Hung Chen, Chia-Wen Lin, and Yen-Yu Lin, “Blurdm: A blur diffusion model for image de- blurring,” inThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Separable kernel for image deblur- ring,

    LuFang,HaifengLiu,FengWu,XiaoyanSun,and Houqiang Li, “Separable kernel for image deblur- ring,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2014, pp. 2885–2892

    2014

  16. [16]

    Norbert Wiener,Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series, MIT Press, 1949

    1949

  17. [17]

    The wiener filter and regularization methods for image restoration problems,

    Almerico Murli, Luisa D’Amore, and Valentina De Simone, “The wiener filter and regularization methods for image restoration problems,” inPro- ceedings 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, 1999, pp. 394–399

    1999

  18. [18]

    Inver- sionbydirectiteration: Analternativetodenoising diffusion for image restoration,

    Mauricio Delbracio and Peyman Milanfar, “Inver- sionbydirectiteration: Analternativetodenoising diffusion for image restoration,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11435, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    A convnet for the 2020s,

    ZhuangLiu,HanziMao,Chao-YuanWu,Christoph Feichtenhofer,TrevorDarrell,andSainingXie, “A convnet for the 2020s,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVFconferenceoncomputervisionandpat- tern recognition, 2022, pp. 11976–11986

    2022

  20. [20]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study,

    Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte, “Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study,” inThe IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, July 2017

    2017

  21. [21]

    Efficient frequency domain-based transformers for high- quality image deblurring,

    Lingshun Kong, Jiangxin Dong, Jianjun Ge, Mingqiang Li, and Jinshan Pan, “Efficient frequency domain-based transformers for high- quality image deblurring,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 5886–5895

    2023

  22. [22]

    Restormer: Efficienttransformerfor high-resolutionimagerestoration,

    Syed Waqas Zamir, Aditya Arora, Salman Khan, Munawar Hayat, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, and Ming- HsuanYang, “Restormer: Efficienttransformerfor high-resolutionimagerestoration,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 5728–5739

    2022

  23. [23]

    Diffir: Efficient diffusion model for image restoration,

    BinXia,YulunZhang,ShiyinWang,YitongWang, Xinglong Wu, Yapeng Tian, Wenming Yang, and Luc Van Gool, “Diffir: Efficient diffusion model for image restoration,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 13095–13105

    2023

  24. [24]

    Hierarchical inte- gration diffusion model for realistic image deblur- ring,

    Zheng Chen, Yulun Zhang, Ding Liu, Jinjin Gu, Linghe Kong, Xin Yuan, et al., “Hierarchical inte- gration diffusion model for realistic image deblur- ring,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 36, pp. 29114–29125, 2023

    2023