pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.31228 · v1 · pith:2Q7GPC27new · submitted 2026-05-29 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

EchoRL: Reinforcement Learning via Rollout Echoing

Jinhe Bi , Aniri , Minglai Yang , Xingcheng Zhou , Wenke Huang , Sikuan Yan , Yujun Wang , Zixuan Cao
show 4 more authors
Michael F\"arber Xun Xiao Volker Tresp Yunpu Ma
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 23:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords reinforcement learninglarge language modelspost-trainingentropy patternsrollout echoingverifiable rewardsadvantage degeneration
0
0 comments X

The pith

EchoRL extracts entropy-matched clips from verified-success rollouts to restore auxiliary supervision signals in RLVR training.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses the point in RLVR post-training where many prompts yield only successful rollouts, driving reward standard deviation and advantages to zero so that policy gradients vanish. It shows that some of these rollouts still hold useful signals that can be recovered by matching step-level entropy patterns to those seen in external expert trajectories. EchoRL does this by selecting an EchoClip segment from the successful rollouts and adding it as extra supervision inside the existing RL objective. The approach requires only a lightweight addition and produces consistent gains across ten benchmarks, five model families, and four RLVR methods with negligible extra cost. If the claim holds, post-training pipelines can keep extracting progress from already-correct outputs instead of stalling or requiring new data generation.

Core claim

EchoRL is a lightweight module that first identifies an EchoClip from verified-success rollouts based on their step-level entropy values, and then feeds this clip back as an auxiliary supervision signal in the RL objective, thereby better exploiting the advantage-degenerated rollouts to further improve the training performance.

What carries the argument

EchoClip: a segment drawn from a verified-success rollout whose step-level entropy pattern is selected to match patterns observed in external expert trajectories, then used as auxiliary supervision.

If this is right

  • Policy gradients remain nonzero even when all rollouts for a prompt receive identical verified rewards.
  • The same lightweight addition works on top of multiple existing RLVR algorithms without altering rollout generation.
  • Gains appear across different model scales and reasoning benchmarks without increasing inference cost during training.
  • External expert entropy serves as a reusable reference for surfacing overlooked signals in self-generated outputs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same entropy-matching idea might transfer to other RL settings where advantages collapse after initial success.
  • It suggests that uncertainty patterns can act as a cheap proxy for identifying reasoning steps worth reinforcing.
  • One could test whether self-generated entropy alone, without an external expert, suffices to select the clips.
  • The method points toward hybrid supervision that blends verified outcomes with internal model uncertainty signals.

Load-bearing premise

Step-level entropy patterns observed in external expert trajectories reliably identify valuable learning signals inside already-verified-success rollouts of the current policy.

What would settle it

If adding EchoClip supervision produces no measurable change in policy updates or downstream benchmark scores on prompts where every rollout is already verified successful, the central claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31228 by Aniri, Jinhe Bi, Michael F\"arber, Minglai Yang, Sikuan Yan, Volker Tresp, Wenke Huang, Xingcheng Zhou, Xun Xiao, Yujun Wang, Yunpu Ma, Zixuan Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Advantage degeneration and usable learning signals in RLVR. Left: As training proceeds, groups of verified-success rollouts increasingly suffer advantage degeneration: identical verifiable rewards make the group standard deviation vanish, driving group-relative advantages and policy-gradient updates toward zero. Right: For a representative quartic-polynomial prompt during Qwen2.5-Math-7B training, verified… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of EchoRL. (a) Paradigm Comparison: Unlike rejection sampling that discards verified-success rollouts (top) or expert supervision that relies on external golden trajectories (middle), EchoRL (bottom) mines usable learning signals directly from the model’s own verified rollouts via step-entropy clipping. (b) EchoRL: For a verified-success rollout, we calculate step-level entropy to identify the har… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Entropy pattern of usable learning signals in RLVR. (a) Comparing per-prompt rollouts, external golden trajectories concentrate at higher entropy than regular rollouts from the current policy, indicating that successful expert reasoning often traverses higher-entropy regions. (b) Entropy distribution varies across different regions of the generated response: R4 exhibits substantially higher entropy than re… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Training Dynamics Analysis. Left: Accuracy curve of Qwen2.5-VL-7B on Geometry3K, confirming EchoRL’s gener￾alization to multimodal tasks. Right: Step-level entropy evolution on Qwen2.5-Math-7B. EchoRL maintains significantly higher entropy levels throughout training, indicating sustained exploration capability compared to the rapid collapse observed in GRPO. lapse and sustains continuous learning. Analyzin… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Universality across Model Scales and Families. To demonstrate the generalizability of EchoRL beyond the primary Qwen2.5-Math-7B benchmark, we evaluate it across three distinct backbones: the smaller specialized Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, and the general-purpose Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct. The consistent improvements across all settings verify that our approach is robust to variations in model siz… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Framework Analysis. Left: Ablation study on auxiliary loss coefficient λ, indicating λ = 0.001 as the optimal balance between exploration and exploitation. Right: Sensitivity analysis on Qwen2.5-Math-7B, confirming EchoRL’s stability across runs and compatibility with RLVR methods. 5.3. Cost Analysis (RQ2) To evaluate the efficiency of EchoRL, we analyze its compu￾tational cost profile (visualized in [PIT… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Detailed Ablation Study (Qwen2.5-Math-7B). Left: Sweep of the auxiliary-loss weight λ (larger values can overpower the RLVR signal; λ = 0.001 yields the best overall performance, while λ = 0.1 degrades). Middle: Entropy/clip-selection ablation (Avg-only, ID/OOD Avg) comparing full verified rollout vs lowest-entropy rollout clip vs EchoRL trained throughout. Right: EchoRL activation window ablation (Avg-onl… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Actor Update Latency. The update time (in seconds) for EchoRL and GRPO across training steps. The intertwined curves demonstrate that EchoRL introduces no significant computational overhead to the update phase. G. Training Details This appendix summarizes the training and evaluation settings used throughout our experiments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards is an effective route for post-training to strengthen the reasoning capability of large language models. However, as training proceeds, the learning signal can collapse thus makes the training gain become marginal and ineffective. Specifically, a growing fraction of prompts' rollouts become advantage-degenerated: all the self-generated rollouts show verified-success, making the standard deviation over their rewards be zero; accordingly each rollout's advantage becomes degenerated (zero) as well. Given such rollouts' advantages, the policy-gradient for model optimization eventually vanishes, capping the training performance. We argue that some of these rollouts still contain valuable learning signals but unfortunately omitted with the existing RLVR methods. In this paper, inspired through analyzing the entropy pattern behind golden trajectories produced by external expert models, we propose EchoRL for better exploiting the advantage-degenerated rollouts to further improve the training performance. EchoRL is a lightweight module that first identifies an EchoClip from verified-success rollouts based on their step-level entropy values, and then feeds this clip back as an auxiliary supervision signal in the RL objective. Extensive experiments across 10 benchmarks, 5 LLM backbones, and 4 popular RLVR post-training methods demonstrate that EchoRL consistently improves RLVR post-training with minimal overhead.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that RLVR post-training of LLMs suffers from advantage-degenerated rollouts (all verified-success trajectories yield zero advantage and vanishing policy gradients). EchoRL addresses this by analyzing step-level entropy patterns in external expert (golden) trajectories, selecting an 'EchoClip' from degenerated rollouts whose entropy sequence matches the expert pattern, and injecting the clip as auxiliary supervision into the RL objective. Experiments across 10 benchmarks, 5 LLM backbones, and 4 RLVR methods are reported to show consistent gains with minimal overhead.

Significance. If the entropy-matching procedure reliably surfaces under-optimized reasoning steps inside verified-success rollouts, the approach would offer a lightweight way to sustain learning signals after standard RLVR has saturated, which is a practical bottleneck in current LLM reasoning pipelines. The claimed breadth of evaluation (multiple methods and backbones) would strengthen the result if the gains survive controls for the matching criterion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (entropy pattern analysis paragraph): the central claim that matching step-level entropy sequences from external experts identifies 'valuable learning signals' inside advantage-degenerated rollouts of the current policy lacks any derivation showing why entropy alignment under the current policy implies gradient utility or improved optimization. The skeptic concern that the match may select tokens whose entropy merely resembles the expert distribution without corresponding to under-optimized steps is therefore unaddressed.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (method description): no ablation is described that isolates the entropy-matching criterion from simpler alternatives such as random clipping, length-based selection, or uniform sampling within degenerated rollouts. Without this, the reported consistent gains cannot be attributed to the proposed auxiliary signal rather than incidental effects of adding any clip.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract (entropy pattern analysis paragraph): the entropy reference pattern is derived from external expert trajectories, yet the text does not state whether this pattern was computed on held-out data or on the same 10 evaluation benchmarks used for final reporting. If the latter, the gains risk circularity or overfitting to the test distribution.
minor comments (2)
  1. The term 'EchoClip' is introduced without a formal definition or pseudocode; a short algorithmic box would clarify the selection and injection steps.
  2. The abstract states 'minimal overhead' but provides no wall-clock or memory numbers; a single sentence or table entry quantifying the added cost relative to baseline RLVR would be useful.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below with point-by-point responses and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (entropy pattern analysis paragraph): the central claim that matching step-level entropy sequences from external experts identifies 'valuable learning signals' inside advantage-degenerated rollouts of the current policy lacks any derivation showing why entropy alignment under the current policy implies gradient utility or improved optimization. The skeptic concern that the match may select tokens whose entropy merely resembles the expert distribution without corresponding to under-optimized steps is therefore unaddressed.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of a formal derivation linking entropy alignment to gradient utility. The manuscript's motivation rests on the empirical observation that expert trajectories exhibit distinctive step-level entropy patterns at critical reasoning points, and matching these within verified-success rollouts of the current policy can surface steps where the policy remains uncertain despite overall success. This is intended to provide auxiliary supervision where standard advantage signals vanish. We agree this intuition could be more rigorously motivated and will add a dedicated paragraph in Section 3 deriving the connection via the relationship between policy entropy, advantage collapse, and potential for continued optimization on high-entropy expert-aligned steps. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (method description): no ablation is described that isolates the entropy-matching criterion from simpler alternatives such as random clipping, length-based selection, or uniform sampling within degenerated rollouts. Without this, the reported consistent gains cannot be attributed to the proposed auxiliary signal rather than incidental effects of adding any clip.

    Authors: This is a valid concern. While the full manuscript reports gains across multiple RLVR methods and backbones, it does not include explicit ablations isolating the entropy-matching selection criterion. We will add a new ablation subsection in the experiments (Section 4) comparing EchoClip selection against random clipping, length-based selection, and uniform sampling from degenerated rollouts. This will quantify whether the entropy-matching procedure contributes beyond simply injecting any auxiliary clip. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (entropy pattern analysis paragraph): the entropy reference pattern is derived from external expert trajectories, yet the text does not state whether this pattern was computed on held-out data or on the same 10 evaluation benchmarks used for final reporting. If the latter, the gains risk circularity or overfitting to the test distribution.

    Authors: The entropy reference patterns are computed from golden trajectories generated by external expert models on prompts drawn from the training distribution, which is disjoint from the 10 held-out evaluation benchmarks used for final reporting. The expert models are separate from those undergoing RLVR training. We will revise the method description and experimental setup sections to explicitly state this separation and confirm the use of held-out data for pattern extraction, eliminating any ambiguity regarding circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: method derives auxiliary signal from independent external expert entropy analysis

full rationale

The paper's core proposal analyzes entropy patterns in golden trajectories from external expert models to select EchoClips in advantage-degenerated rollouts of the current policy, then adds the clip as auxiliary supervision. This chain introduces an external reference distribution and does not reduce any claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation load-bearing premise. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are shown that equate the output to the input by construction. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the untested premise that entropy in expert trajectories marks useful internal structure in successful but advantage-zero rollouts; no free parameters or invented entities are quantified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Step-level entropy in golden trajectories produced by external expert models identifies valuable learning signals inside verified-success rollouts of the current policy.
    Invoked in the sentence describing the inspiration for EchoRL.
invented entities (1)
  • EchoClip no independent evidence
    purpose: Auxiliary supervision signal extracted from verified-success rollouts
    New construct introduced to supply the missing gradient when advantages are zero.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5794 in / 1237 out tokens · 17448 ms · 2026-06-28T23:06:04.973076+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RankVR: Low-Rank Structure Perception and Value Recalibration for Robust Composed Image Retrieval

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    RankVR introduces GSCP and ASVC modules to improve CIR robustness by decoupling clean samples via low-rank structure and dynamically scoring triplet value in noisy datasets.

  2. IMAGINE: Adaptive Schema-Imagery Enhanced Composition for Composed Video Retrieval

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    IMAGINE uses adaptive schema-imagery via dynamic multimodal prototypes to incorporate implicit semantics into composed video retrieval, claiming SOTA results on CVR and CIR benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.0 5457. 9 EchoRL: Reinforcement Learning via Rollout Echoing Cui, G., Yuan, L., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Zhang, Y ., Chen, J., Li, W., He, B., Fan, Y ., Yu, T., Xu, Q., Chen, W., Yuan, J., Chen, H., Zhang, K., Lv, X., Wang, S., Yao, Y ., Han, X., Peng, H., Cheng, Y ., Liu, Z., Sun, M., Zhou, B., and Ding, N. Process reinforcement...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09422-z 2025

  2. [2]

    Schulman, J., Levine, S., Abbeel, P., Jordan, M., and Moritz, P

    URL https://openreview.net/forum ?id=os4QYDf3Ms. Schulman, J., Levine, S., Abbeel, P., Jordan, M., and Moritz, P. Trust region policy optimization. InInternational conference on machine learning, pp. 1889–1897. PMLR, 2015. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., and Klimov, O. Proximal policy optimization algorithms,

    2015

  3. [3]

    DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.0 6347. Shao, Z., Wang, P., Zhu, Q., Xu, R., Song, J., Bi, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, M., Li, Y . K., Wu, Y ., and Guo, D. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathemat- ical reasoning in open language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300. Team, K. Kimi k1.5: Scaling reinforcement learning with llms, 2025. URL https:...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i12.38000 2024

  4. [4]

    Method In-Distribution Performance Out-of-Distribution Performance AIME24 AIME25 AMC MATH-500 Minerva OlympiadAvg

    across 3 independent runs.EchoRLconsistently outperforms baselines while maintaining comparable stability. Method In-Distribution Performance Out-of-Distribution Performance AIME24 AIME25 AMC MATH-500 Minerva OlympiadAvg. ARC-c GPQA∗ MMLU-Pro Avg. GRPO26.1±1.0 16.7±0.4 60.5±0.7 80.3±1.4 40.0±0.4 43.7±1.6 44.6±0.481.8±1.1 39.3±0.6 45.0±0.4 55.4±0.4 ,→+Echo...

  5. [5]

    Actor Update Time

    across runs to average out randomness in individual trials. As shown in Table 3, EchoRL not only improves the mean performance across almost all benchmarks but also maintains stable variance. The confidence intervals indicate that the improvements are consistent and not due to random fluctuations. 14 EchoRL: Reinforcement Learning via Rollout Echoing 0 10...

    2024

  6. [6]

    Then the difference between the largest and smallest roots of $fˆ{\prime}(x)$ is $\qquad$ Q2: What are the four rollouts (R1–R4)? A2:We list the full trajectories (verbatim) below

    Given a quartic polynomial $f(x)$ whose four real roots form an arithmetic sequence with a common difference of 2. Then the difference between the largest and smallest roots of $fˆ{\prime}(x)$ is $\qquad$ Q2: What are the four rollouts (R1–R4)? A2:We list the full trajectories (verbatim) below. Even though all four rollouts reach the correct answer, they ...

  7. [7]

    R4: uses the log-derivative identity for g(x) =Q i(x−r i), where critical points satisfyP i 1 x−ri = 0, yielding the same critical points with less algebra. 19 EchoRL: Reinforcement Learning via Rollout Echoing R1 (Differentiate + factor after centering) Thought <think> To solve the problem, we need to find the difference between the largest and smallest ...

  8. [8]

    We need to find the difference between the largest and smallest roots of the derivative $fˆ{\ prime}(x)$

    \textbf{Understand the Problem}: We are given a quartic polynomial $f(x)$ with four real roots in an arithmetic sequence with a common difference of 2. We need to find the difference between the largest and smallest roots of the derivative $fˆ{\ prime}(x)$

  9. [9]

    We can shift the polynomial to center the roots at the origin

    \textbf{Use Symmetry}: The roots are evenly spaced. We can shift the polynomial to center the roots at the origin. This simplifies calculations because the polynomial becomes an even function, and the spacing between critical points is invariant under translation

  10. [10]

    The polynomial in the shifted variable $y$ is $g (y) = (y-3)(y-1)(y+1)(y+3)$

    \textbf{Define the Shifted Polynomial}: Let the centered roots be $-3, -1, 1, 3$ ( since the common difference is 2). The polynomial in the shifted variable $y$ is $g (y) = (y-3)(y-1)(y+1)(y+3)$

  11. [11]

    \textbf{Differentiate}: Expand $g(y)$ into a polynomial form and compute its derivative $gˆ{\prime}(y)$

  12. [12]

    \textbf{Find the Roots of the Derivative}: Set $gˆ{\prime}(y) = 0$ and solve for $y$ to find the critical points

  13. [13]

    This will be the final answer

    \textbf{Calculate the Difference}: Identify the largest and smallest roots of $gˆ{\ prime}(y)$ and calculate their difference. This will be the final answer. Let’s use these steps to solve the problem. </think> Solution Let the roots be $a,a+2,a+4,a+6$ and set $m=a+3$. Put $y=x-m$, so the roots become $ -3,-1,1,3$. Then \[g(y)=(y-3)(y-1)(y+1)(y+3)=(yˆ2-9)...

  14. [14]

    \textbf{Understand the Goal}: We need to find the range of the roots of the derivative of a quartic polynomial whose roots form an arithmetic progression with difference 2

  15. [15]

    Let’s map the roots to $\pm \frac{1}{2}, \pm \frac{3}{2}$

    \textbf{Apply Transformation}: We can shift and scale the roots to make the numbers smaller and symmetric. Let’s map the roots to $\pm \frac{1}{2}, \pm \frac{3}{2}$. This corresponds to a scaling factor of $1/2$ (since the original difference is 2 and the new difference is 1)

  16. [16]

    \textbf{Form Polynomial in Scaled Variable}: Construct the polynomial $G(z)$ with these simpler roots

  17. [17]

    \textbf{Differentiate and Solve}: Find the roots of the derivative $Gˆ{\prime}(z)$

  18. [18]

    Since we scaled the coordinates by $1/2$, the distances in the $z$- domain are half the distances in the $x$-domain

    \textbf{Rescale and Conclude}: Convert the roots of $Gˆ{\prime}(z)$ back to the original scale. Since we scaled the coordinates by $1/2$, the distances in the $z$- domain are half the distances in the $x$-domain. We must multiply the result by 2 to get the final answer. Let’s apply this transformation and solve. </think> 20 EchoRL: Reinforcement Learning ...

  19. [19]

    Centering them at 0 yields the set $\{-3, -1, 1, 3\}$

    \textbf{Analyze the Roots}: The roots are in an arithmetic progression. Centering them at 0 yields the set $\{-3, -1, 1, 3\}$

  20. [20]

    \textbf{Identify Parity}: The centered polynomial $g(y)$ has roots symmetric around 0, which means $g(y)$ is an even function ($g(y) = g(-y)$)

  21. [21]

    This immediately implies that $gˆ{\prime}(0) = 0$, so $y=0$ is one critical point

    \textbf{Derivative Properties}: The derivative of an even function is an odd function. This immediately implies that $gˆ{\prime}(0) = 0$, so $y=0$ is one critical point

  22. [22]

    \textbf{Find Other Roots}: Differentiate $g(y)$ (using the product rule on grouped factors like $(yˆ2-1)(yˆ2-9)$) to find the remaining non-zero roots

  23. [23]

    The difference between the largest and smallest roots is $c - (-c) = 2c$

    \textbf{Calculate Difference}: The non-zero roots will be symmetric, say $\pm c$. The difference between the largest and smallest roots is $c - (-c) = 2c$. Let’s use this parity argument to find the answer. </think> Solution Center the roots: let $m=a+3$ and $y=x-m$, so the roots are $-3,-1,1,3$. Then \[g(y)=(yˆ2-1)(yˆ2-9).\] Differentiate using the produ...

  24. [24]

    Let the shifted variable be $y$

    \textbf{Center the Roots}: Shift the polynomial so the roots become symmetric around zero: $\{-3, -1, 1, 3\}$. Let the shifted variable be $y$

  25. [25]

    \textbf{Use Logarithmic Derivative}: For a polynomial $g(y) = \prod (y-r_i)$, the critical points satisfy $\frac{gˆ{\prime}(y)}{g(y)} = \sum \frac{1}{y-r_i} = 0$

  26. [26]

    \textbf{Set up the Equation}: Substitute the roots into the sum: $\frac{1}{y-3} + \ frac{1}{y-1} + \frac{1}{y+1} + \frac{1}{y+3} = 0$

  27. [27]

    \textbf{Group Terms}: Pair the terms with opposite roots (e.g., $\frac{1}{y-3} + \ 21 EchoRL: Reinforcement Learning via Rollout Echoing frac{1}{y+3}$) to simplify the algebra using difference of squares

  28. [28]

    \textbf{Solve for y}: Solve the resulting rational equation to find the values of $y$ where the derivative is zero

  29. [29]

    Let’s solve using this method

    \textbf{Compute Difference}: Determine the largest and smallest roots from the solution set and compute their difference. Let’s solve using this method. </think> Solution Let the roots be $a,a+2,a+4,a+6$ and set the midpoint $m=a+3$. Define $y=x-m$. Then the roots become $-3,-1,1,3$, so \[g(y)=(y+3)(y+1)(y-1)(y-3).\] For $g(y)\neq 0$, we have \[\frac{g’(y...

  30. [30]

    Standardization collapses: with (near-)zero standard deviation, the standardized group-relative advantages satisfy A(R1) =· · ·=A(R4)≈0

  31. [31]

    Vanishing gradient: the resulting policy-gradient contribution from this prompt is near zero, so the optimizer cannot prefer the higher-quality reasoning path (Figure 1). Q4: What signal does EchoRL extract here? A4:EchoRL creates a usable learning signal by focusing supervision on the uncertain, high-entropy part of verified-success rollouts: 1.Measure s...

  32. [32]

    <think>\n thoughts </think>\n

    Apply an auxiliary losson this EchoClip so that learning remains active even when group-relative advantages degenerate. In this example, the rollout using the log-derivative identity contains a short, high-leverage reasoning step that is easy to miss under reward-only standardization but can be reinforced via EchoClip-based supervision. I. Prompt Template...