pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards

Canonical reference. 79% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

86 Pith papers citing it
Background 79% of classified citations
abstract

Dense process rewards have proven a more effective alternative to the sparse outcome-level rewards in the inference-time scaling of large language models (LLMs), particularly in tasks requiring complex multi-step reasoning. While dense rewards also offer an appealing choice for the reinforcement learning (RL) of LLMs since their fine-grained rewards have the potential to address some inherent issues of outcome rewards, such as training efficiency and credit assignment, this potential remains largely unrealized. This can be primarily attributed to the challenges of training process reward models (PRMs) online, where collecting high-quality process labels is prohibitively expensive, making them particularly vulnerable to reward hacking. To address these challenges, we propose PRIME (Process Reinforcement through IMplicit rEwards), which enables online PRM updates using only policy rollouts and outcome labels through implict process rewards. PRIME combines well with various advantage functions and forgoes the dedicated reward model training phrase that existing approaches require, substantially reducing the development overhead. We demonstrate PRIME's effectiveness on competitional math and coding. Starting from Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Base, PRIME achieves a 15.1% average improvement across several key reasoning benchmarks over the SFT model. Notably, our resulting model, Eurus-2-7B-PRIME, surpasses Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct on seven reasoning benchmarks with 10% of its training data.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 19 method 5

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Dense process rewards have proven a more effective alternative to the sparse outcome-level rewards in the inference-time scaling of large language models (LLMs), particularly in tasks requiring complex multi-step reasoning. While dense rewards also offer an appealing choice for the reinforcement learning (RL) of LLMs since their fine-grained rewards have the potential to address some inherent issues of outcome rewards, such as training efficiency and credit assignment, this potential remains largely unrealized. This can be primarily attributed to the challenges of training process reward model

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Unsupervised Process Reward Models

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Unsupervised PRMs derived from LLM probabilities achieve up to 15% better error detection than LLM judges and match supervised PRMs in verification and RL tasks.

Self-Distilled RLVR

cs.LG · 2026-04-03 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

RLSD mixes self-distillation for token-level policy difference magnitudes with RLVR for reliable update directions from response correctness to reach higher convergence and better training stability.

Unified Data Selection for LLM Reasoning

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

High-Entropy Sum (HES) selects high-quality reasoning data for LLMs by summing entropy of the top highest-entropy tokens, matching full-dataset performance with top 20% in SFT and outperforming baselines in RFT and RL.

STRIDE: Learnable Stepwise Language Feedback for LLM Reasoning

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

STRIDE co-trains generator and verifier on outcome rewards alone to deliver learnable stepwise language feedback that redirects LLM reasoning trajectories and outperforms scalar-reward baselines.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 86 citing papers.