pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05069 · v2 · pith:M5U7SOBUnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · 💻 cs.SI · cs.CY

Federating Governance: How Community Rules Scale with Mastodon Instances

Rasika Muralidharan , Yong-Yeol Ahn , Bao Tran Truong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 02:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SI cs.CY
keywords Mastodondecentralized governancecommunity moderationrule scalingfederationsocial media instancesself-governance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Community size strongly predicts the extent and form of rules on Mastodon instances, outweighing the role of federation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how moderation rules on Mastodon servers change as communities grow in size. It finds that rule priorities stay consistent, focusing on issues like harassment and illegal content, but larger instances develop more detailed and varied rules. These rules also become harder to read and use less diverse language. Federation with other instances has only a small effect, mainly on the breadth of topics covered. The patterns mirror those on centralized platforms, pointing to size as a fundamental factor in self-governance.

Core claim

Analysis of community rules across Mastodon instances of varying sizes shows that community size is a strong predictor of rule development: larger instances have more extensive and topically diverse rules, but with reduced readability and linguistic diversity. External federation interactions are associated mainly with broader rule scope but do not substantially affect diversity or form. Priorities remain consistent across sizes, with problematic content rules dominating.

What carries the argument

Categorization of rules into topics and quantitative measures of rule extent, topical diversity, readability, and linguistic diversity, compared across instance sizes and federation levels.

If this is right

  • Internal community growth drives governance changes more than external network connections.
  • Volunteer moderators in growing communities face increasing demands for complex rule sets.
  • Decentralized platforms may need mechanisms to support rule evolution independent of federation.
  • Similar scaling laws apply across different social media architectures due to community size constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers of new decentralized platforms could build in rule templates that account for expected growth in topic coverage.
  • Studying actual moderation outcomes rather than posted rules could test if the observed patterns reflect real practices.
  • These findings might extend to other volunteer-governed online communities beyond social media.
  • The consistency of rule topics suggests potential for shared governance resources across instances.

Load-bearing premise

The posted rules accurately reflect the actual moderation priorities and that the categorization of rules by topic is done consistently without bias related to instance size.

What would settle it

Observing large instances with concise, readable rules covering few topics or small instances with lengthy, complex rule sets would contradict the predicted scaling with community size.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05069 by Bao Tran Truong, Rasika Muralidharan, Yong-Yeol Ahn.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Descriptive statistics of all Mastodon instances (a) Complementary cumulative distribution (CCDF) of instance size. Scatter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of topic count, measured by number of unique rule topics per instance (top) and topic diversity, measured by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Heat map of topic prevalence per instance, across instance size bins. Topics are grouped into one of the four categories: Action, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of lexical features across instance sizes: (a) word count, (b) rule count, (c) readability of rule, measured by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of lexical features across engagement levels. (a) Rule count. (b) Word count. (c) Readability of rule, measured by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Heat map of topic prevalence per instance, across instance size bins. Topics are deduplicated using a global Jaccard similarity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Few-shot prompt used for GPT-4o-mini rule categorization. The top section lists the 20 possible categories; the middle section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) CCDF and (b) heatmap of similarities between topics based on their rule categories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The rise of decentralized social media platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky highlights the challenge of scaling self-governance and moderation. As communities grow, they face new issues that demand increasingly complex governance structures. However, as moderation is mainly volunteer-driven, there is limited formal guidance on how community rules and moderation practices should evolve with growth. This study investigates how moderation scale with Mastodon instances by analyzing community rules across servers of varying sizes. We categorize these rules to identify key governance priorities and find that these priorities are remarkably consistent across instance sizes: rules addressing problematic content, such as harassment, hate speech, and illegal content, dominate regardless of scale. While smaller communities focus on narrower sets of topics, larger servers maintain a more balanced coverage of a broad range of topics. Our analysis of rule formalization reveals that community size strongly predicts rule development. As instances grow, their rules become more extensive and topically diverse, but also exhibit lower readability and linguistic diversity. In contrast, external federation interactions have a limited role, mainly associated with a broader scope of rules without substantially affecting their diversity or form. These findings highlight the relative influence of internal versus external factors, suggesting that local scaling pressures outweigh network-level dynamics in decentralized social media governance. The scaling pattern observed on Mastodon resemble those previously identified on centralized platforms such as Reddit, suggesting that community size imposes fundamental constraints on self-governance that transcend platform architectures

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes posted community rules from Mastodon instances of varying sizes to examine how self-governance scales in decentralized social media. It reports that topical priorities (e.g., harassment, hate speech, illegal content) remain consistent across scales, while larger instances exhibit more extensive and topically diverse rules, lower readability, and reduced linguistic diversity. Federation interactions are associated mainly with broader rule scope but have limited effects on diversity or form. The study concludes that internal community-size pressures dominate external network effects and that the observed scaling patterns resemble those on centralized platforms such as Reddit.

Significance. If the empirical patterns hold after methodological clarification, the work supplies quantitative evidence on governance scaling in federated platforms, isolating the relative influence of size versus federation. The consistency of core rule topics and the parallel to Reddit findings would strengthen claims about fundamental constraints on volunteer moderation that transcend platform architecture.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods: The manuscript provides no information on instance sampling frame, total number of instances or rules analyzed, selection criteria, or inter-coder reliability for topic categorization. These details are required to evaluate whether the reported correlations between instance size and rule extent/diversity are robust to selection bias or measurement error.
  2. [Results] Results: The claim that 'community size strongly predicts rule development' rests on observational regressions whose model specifications, controls, and effect sizes are not described; without these, it is impossible to assess whether size effects remain after accounting for instance age, topic, or other confounders.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Sample sizes, statistical methods, and categorization protocol are omitted, making it difficult for readers to gauge the strength of the central claims from the opening summary.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion: The interpretation that posted rules accurately reflect actual moderation priorities is stated without qualification or robustness checks; a brief limitations paragraph addressing this assumption would improve transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which identify key areas where methodological and analytical details require clarification to strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper to incorporate the requested information.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods: The manuscript provides no information on instance sampling frame, total number of instances or rules analyzed, selection criteria, or inter-coder reliability for topic categorization. These details are required to evaluate whether the reported correlations between instance size and rule extent/diversity are robust to selection bias or measurement error.

    Authors: We agree that these methodological details are essential for assessing robustness. The original manuscript omitted a dedicated methods subsection describing the sampling process. In revision, we will add explicit information on: the sampling frame (instances drawn from the Mastodon API and directory listings), the total number of instances and rules analyzed, inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g., active instances with publicly posted rules), and inter-coder reliability statistics for the topic categorization (including how categories were developed and any agreement metrics used). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results: The claim that 'community size strongly predicts rule development' rests on observational regressions whose model specifications, controls, and effect sizes are not described; without these, it is impossible to assess whether size effects remain after accounting for instance age, topic, or other confounders.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the manuscript does not report the regression specifications. We will revise the results section to include full details of the models: variable definitions, inclusion of controls such as instance age and primary topic, coefficient estimates with standard errors, R-squared values, and standardized effect sizes. We will also report robustness checks that add potential confounders to confirm whether the size coefficients remain significant. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper reports observational correlations and regression results linking instance size to rule extent, topical diversity, readability, and linguistic diversity, using posted rules as direct input data and size as an independent predictor while controlling for federation. No equations, parameter fits, self-citations, or ansatzes are described that would reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction; the scaling patterns are presented as empirical findings from external data sources and are therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that posted rules are faithful indicators of governance and that rule categorization reliably measures topical coverage and readability. No free parameters or invented entities are described.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Posted community rules accurately reflect governance priorities and moderation practices.
    The study uses rule texts to categorize priorities and measure formalization, treating them as direct evidence of governance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5788 in / 1177 out tokens · 32470 ms · 2026-06-28T02:58:01.079701+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the Effects of Decentralized Moderation on Network Robustness and Information Diffusion in Mastodon

    physics.soc-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Decentralized moderation on Mastodon produces stable signed network structure that allows information from moderating instances to spread more efficiently while constraining flow from banned domains.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Ishaku Hassan Anaobi, Aravindh Raman, Ignacio Castro, Haris Bin Zia, Damilola Ibosiola, and Gareth Tyson. 2023. Will Admins Cope? Decentralized Moderation in the Fediverse. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. ACM, Austin TX USA, 3109–3120. doi:10.1145/3543507.3583487

    work page doi:10.1145/3543507.3583487 2023

  2. [2]

    Ashforth and Fred Mael

    Blake E. Ashforth and Fred Mael. 1989. Social Identity Theory and the Organization.Academy of Management Review14, 1 (1989), 20–39. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999

    work page doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999 1989

  3. [3]

    Shambhobi Bhattacharya, Jisung Yoon, and Hyejin Youn. 2024. Unveiling Scaling Laws in the Regulatory Functions of Reddit. arXiv:2407.12063 [physics.soc-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Carlo Alberto Bono, Lucio La Cava, Luca Luceri, and Francesco Pierri. 2024. An Exploration of Decentralized Moderation on Mastodon. InACM Web Science Conference. ACM, Stuttgart Germany, 53–58. doi:10.1145/3614419.3644016

    work page doi:10.1145/3614419.3644016 2024

  5. [5]

    Bilge Bulat, Haotian Wang, Shun Fujimoto, and Seth Frey. 2024. The psychology of volunteer moderators: Tradeoffs between participation, belonging, and norms in online community governance.New Media & Society0, 0 (2024), xx–yy. doi:10.1177/14614448241246512

    work page doi:10.1177/14614448241246512 2024

  6. [6]

    Jie Cai and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. What are Effective Strategies of Handling Harassment on Twitch? Users’ Perspectives. InCompanion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Austin, TX, USA)(CSCW ’19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 166–170. doi:10.1145/3311957.3359478

    work page doi:10.1145/3311957.3359478 2019

  7. [7]

    Jie Cai, Donghee Yvette Wohn, and Mashael Almoqbel. 2021. Moderation Visibility: Mapping the Strategies of Volunteer Moderators in Live Streaming Micro Communities. InProceedings of the 2021 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences(Virtual Event, USA)(IMX ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–72. doi:10.1145...

    work page doi:10.1145/3452918.3458796 2021

  8. [8]

    2023.Platform Policies Versus Human Rights Standards

    Edoardo Celeste, Nicola Palladino, Dennis Redeker, and Kinfe Yilma. 2023.Platform Policies Versus Human Rights Standards. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 93–129. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32924-1_5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32924-1_5 2023

  9. [9]

    Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Chaitrali Gandhi, Matthew Wortley Mustelier, and Eric Gilbert. 2019. Crossmod: A cross-community learning-based system to assist reddit moderators.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction3, CSCW (2019), 1–30

    2019

  10. [10]

    2021.Double Standards in Social Media Content Moderation

    Ángel Díaz and Laura Hecht-Felella. 2021.Double Standards in Social Media Content Moderation. Technical Report. Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/double-standards-social-media-content-moderation Accessed: 24 Dec 2025

    2021

  11. [11]

    Bryan Dosono and Bryan Semaan. 2019. Moderation Practices as Emotional Labor in Sustaining Online Communities: The Case of AAPI Identity Work on Reddit. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300372

    work page doi:10.1145/3290605.3300372 2019

  12. [12]

    R. I. M. Dunbar. 2012. Social cognition on the Internet: testing constraints on social network size.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences367, 1599 (Aug. 2012), 2192–2201. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0121 Publisher: Royal Society

    work page doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0121 2012

  13. [13]

    R. I. M. Dunbar. 2016. Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks?Royal Society Open Science3, 1 (Jan. 2016), 150292. doi:10.1098/rsos.150292 Publisher: Royal Society

    work page doi:10.1098/rsos.150292 2016

  14. [14]

    Anna Fang, Wenjie Yang, and Haiyi Zhu. 2023. Shaping Online Dialogue: Examining How Community Rules Affect Discussion Structures on Reddit. arXiv:2308.01257 [cs.SI] https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01257

    arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Casey Fiesler, Jialun Jiang, Joshua McCann, Kyle Frye, and Jed Brubaker. 2018. Reddit Rules! Characterizing an Ecosystem of Governance.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media12, 1 (Jun. 2018), 72–81. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15033

    work page doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15033 2018

  16. [16]

    Rudolf Franz Flesch. 1948. A new readability yardstick.The Journal of applied psychology32 3 (1948), 221–33. https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:39344661

    1948

  17. [17]

    Andrea Forte, Vanessa Larco, and Amy Bruckman. 2009. Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance.Journal of Management Information Systems26, 1 (2009), 49–72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40398966

    arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    Seth Frey and Robert W. Sumner. 2019. Emergence of integrated institutions in a large population of self-governing communities.PLOS ONE14, 7 (July 2019), e0216335. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216335

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216335 2019

  19. [19]

    Weisman, Caitlyn Liu, Stephen Fujimoto, Hannah Wang, and Charles M

    Seth Frey, Qiankun Zhong, Beril Bulat, William D. Weisman, Caitlyn Liu, Stephen Fujimoto, Hannah Wang, and Charles M. Schweik. 2022. Governing Online Goods: Maturity and Formalization in Minecraft, Reddit, and World of Warcraft Communities.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–23. doi:10.1145/3555191

    work page doi:10.1145/3555191 2022

  20. [20]

    Edoardo Gallo and Chang Yan. 2015. The effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 12 (2015), 3647–3652. arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1415883112 doi:10.1073/pnas.1415883112

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1415883112 2015

  21. [21]

    2018.Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media

    Tarleton Gillespie. 2018.Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. doi:10.12987/9780300235029 Journal Abbreviation: Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media Pages: 288 Publication Title...

    work page doi:10.12987/9780300235029 2018

  22. [22]

    2020-07-01

    Tarleton Gillespie. 2020-07-01. Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale.Big Data & Society7, 2 (2020-07-01), 2053951720943234. doi:10.1177/2053951720943234 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    work page doi:10.1177/2053951720943234 2020

  23. [23]

    Google. 2025. YouTube Community Guidelines enforcement. https://transparencyreport.google.com/youtube-policy/removals

    2025

  24. [24]

    Rachel Griffin. 2024. The heteronormative male gaze: Experiences of sexual content moderation among queer instagram users in berlin.International journal of communications, network and system sciences18 (2024), 1266–1288

    2024

  25. [25]

    Jiahui He, Haris Bin Zia, Ignacio Castro, Aravindh Raman, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2023. Flocking to Mastodon: Tracking the Great Twitter Migration. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference(Montreal QC, Canada)(IMC ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–123. doi:10.1145/3618257.3624819

    work page doi:10.1145/3618257.3624819 2023

  26. [26]

    Susan C. Herring. 2004. Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior. InDesigning for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, New York, 338–376. Preprint

    2004

  27. [27]

    Benjamin Mako Hill. 2019. How Discord moderators build innovative solutions to problems of scale with the past as a guide. https://mako.cc/ copyrighteous/how-discord-moderators-build-innovative-solutions-to-problems-of-scale-with-the-past-as-a-guide

    2019

  28. [28]

    Geoffrey M. Hodgson. 2025. Formal and informal institutions: some problems of meaning, impact, and interaction.Journal of Institutional Economics 21 (2025), e1. doi:10.1017/S1744137424000249

    work page doi:10.1017/s1744137424000249 2025

  29. [29]

    Tao Huang. 2024. Decentralized social networks and the future of free speech online.Computer Law & Security Review55 (2024), 106059. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106059

    work page doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106059 2024

  30. [30]

    Russell Bernard, and Huan Liu

    Ujun Jeong, Paras Sheth, Anique Tahir, Faisal Alatawi, H. Russell Bernard, and Huan Liu. 2024. Exploring Platform Migration Patterns between Twitter and Mastodon: A User Behavior Study. arXiv:2305.09196 [cs.SI] https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09196

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Shagun Jhaver, Iris Birman, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Human-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation: The Case of Reddit Automoderator.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.26, 5, Article 31 (July 2019), 35 pages. doi:10.1145/3338243

    work page doi:10.1145/3338243 2019

  32. [32]

    Shagun Jhaver, Christian Boylston, Diyi Yang, and Amy Bruckman. 2021. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deplatforming as a Moderation Strategy on Twitter.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.5, CSCW2, Article 381 (Oct. 2021), 30 pages. doi:10.1145/3479525

    work page doi:10.1145/3479525 2021

  33. [33]

    Shagun Jhaver, Seth Frey, and Amy X. Zhang. 2023. Decentralizing Platform Power: A Design Space of Multi-Level Governance in Online Social Platforms.Social Media + Society9, 4 (2023), 20563051231207857. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231207857 doi:10.1177/20563051231207857

    work page doi:10.1177/20563051231207857 2023

  34. [34]

    Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler

    Jialun ’Aaron’ Jiang, Skyler Middler, Jed R. Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler. 2020. Characterizing Community Guidelines on Social Media Platforms. InCompanion Publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Virtual Event, USA)(CSCW ’20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 287–291. d...

    work page doi:10.1145/3406865.3418312 2020

  35. [35]

    Wendell Johnson. 1944. Studies in language behavior: A program of research.Psychological Monographs56, 2 (1944), 1–15

    1944

  36. [36]

    Kate Klonick. 2017. The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech.Harv. L. Rev.131 (2017), 1598

    2017

  37. [37]

    Peter Kollock and Marc A. Smith. 1996. Managing the virtual commons : Cooperation and conflict in computer communities.Pragmatics and beyond. New series39 (1996), 109–128. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150982575

    1996

  38. [38]

    Vinay Koshy, Tanvi Bajpai, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Hari Sundaram, and Karrie Karahalios. 2023. Measuring User-Moderator Alignment on r/ChangeMyView.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.7, CSCW2, Article 286 (Oct. 2023), 36 pages. doi:10.1145/3610077

    work page doi:10.1145/3610077 2023

  39. [39]

    Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Moira Burke, Yan Chen, Niki Kittur, Joseph Konstan, Yuqing Ren, and John Riedl

    Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Moira Burke, Yan Chen, Niki Kittur, Joseph Konstan, Yuqing Ren, and John Riedl. 2012.Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. The MIT Press, Massachusetts. doi:10.7551/mitpress/8472.001.0001

    work page doi:10.7551/mitpress/8472.001.0001 2012

  40. [40]

    2004.Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology(2 ed.)

    Klaus Krippendorff. 2004.Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology(2 ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Especially Chapter 11, pp. 211–256

    2004

  41. [41]

    Tina Kuo, Alicia Hernani, and Jens Grossklags. 2023. The unsung heroes of facebook groups moderation: A case study of moderation practices and tools.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction7, CSCW1 (2023), 1–38

    2023

  42. [42]

    Lucio La Cava, Sergio Greco, and Andrea Tagarelli. 2021. Understanding the growth of the Fediverse through the lens of Mastodon.Applied Network Science6, 1 (Dec. 2021), 64. doi:10.1007/s41109-021-00392-5 arXiv:2106.15473 [physics]

    work page doi:10.1007/s41109-021-00392-5 2021

  43. [43]

    S Lai, Yoel Roth, R DiResta, K Klonick, M Knodel, E Prodromou, and A Rodericks. 2025. New Paradigms in Trust and Safety: Navigating Defederation on Decentralized Social Media Platforms. Carnegie Endownment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/03/fediverse- social-media-internet-defederation Accessed: 2025-05-13

    2025

  44. [44]

    Cliff Lampe and Paul Resnick. 2004. Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Vienna, Austria)(CHI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 543–550. doi:10.1145/985692.985761

    work page doi:10.1145/985692.985761 2004

  45. [45]

    Cliff Lampe, Rick Wash, Alcides Velasquez, and Elif Ozkaya. 2010. Motivations to participate in online communities. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1927–1936. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753616

    work page doi:10.1145/1753326.1753616 2010

  46. [46]

    Cliff Lampe, Paul Zube, Jusil Lee, Chul Hyun Park, and Erik Johnston. 2014. Crowdsourcing civility: A natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums.Government Information Quarterly31, 2 (April 2014), 317–326. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.005 2014

  47. [47]

    Zhang, and Tim Althoff

    Leon Leibmann, Galen Weld, Amy X. Zhang, and Tim Althoff. 2025. Reddit Rules and Rulers: Quantifying the Link Between Rules and Perceptions of Governance Across Thousands of Communities.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media19, 1 (Jun. 2025), 1098–1121. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35863 Manuscript submitted to ACM Federating ...

    work page doi:10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35863 2025

  48. [48]

    Zhiyuan Lin, Niloufar Salehi, Bowen Yao, Yiqi Chen, and Michael Bernstein. 2017. Better When It Was Smaller? Community Content and Behavior After Massive Growth.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media11, 1 (May 2017), 132–141. doi:10.1609/icwsm. v11i1.14884 Number: 1

    work page doi:10.1609/icwsm 2017

  49. [49]

    Jessa Lingel and Adam Golub. 2015. In face on Facebook: Brooklyn’s drag community and sociotechnical practices of online communication.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20, 5 (2015), 536–553

    2015

  50. [50]

    Travis Lloyd, Joseph Reagle, and Mor Naaman. 2025. ’There Has To Be a Lot That We’re Missing’: Moderating AI-Generated Content on Reddit. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.9, 7 (Oct. 2025), CSCW264:1–CSCW264:24. doi:10.1145/3757445

    work page doi:10.1145/3757445 2025

  51. [51]

    March, Martin Schulz, and Xueguang Zhou

    James G. March, Martin Schulz, and Xueguang Zhou. 2000.The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes(30 ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    2000

  52. [52]

    Nathan Matias

    J. Nathan Matias. 2019. The Civic Labor of Volunteer Moderators Online.Social Media + Society5, 2 (2019), 2056305119836778. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119836778 doi:10.1177/2056305119836778

    work page doi:10.1177/2056305119836778 2019

  53. [53]

    Meta. 2024. How enforcement technology works. https://transparency.meta.com/enforcement/detecting-violations/how-enforcement-technology- works/

    2024

  54. [54]

    Supun Nakandala, Giovanni Ciampaglia, Norman Su, and Yong-Yeol Ahn. 2017. Gendered Conversation in a Social Game-Streaming Platform. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media11, 1 (May 2017), 162–171. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14885

    work page doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14885 2017

  55. [55]

    Azadeh Nematzadeh, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Alessandro Flammini. 2019. Information overload in group communication: from conversation to cacophony in the Twitch chat.Royal Society open science6, 10 (2019), 191412

    2019

  56. [56]

    Nicholson, Brian C Keegan, and Casey Fiesler

    Matthew N. Nicholson, Brian C Keegan, and Casey Fiesler. 2023. Mastodon Rules: Characterizing Formal Rules on Popular Mastodon Instances. In Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ’23 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 86–90. doi:10.1145/3584931.3606970

    work page doi:10.1145/3584931.3606970 2023

  57. [57]

    Siobhán O’Mahony and Fabrizio Ferraro. 2007. The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community.Academy of Management Journal50, 5 (2007), 1079–1106. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27169153

    work page doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27169153 2007

  58. [58]

    2021.Batemane, Jon abd Thompson, Natalie and Smith, Victoria

    How Social Media Platforms’ Community Standards Address Influence Operations. 2021.Batemane, Jon abd Thompson, Natalie and Smith, Victoria. Technical Report. Carnegie Endowment For International Peace

    2021

  59. [59]

    Elinor Ostrom. 1992. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.Natural Resources Journal32, 2 (1992), 415–491. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol32/iss2/6

    1992

  60. [60]

    Elinor Ostrom. 2000. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms.Journal of Economic Perspectives14, 3 (2000), 137–158

    2000

  61. [61]

    Powers, Carel P

    Simon T. Powers, Carel P. van Schaik, and Laurent Lehmann. 2016. How institutions shaped the last major evolutionary transition to large-scale human societies.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences371, 1687 (2016), 20150098. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0098

    work page doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0098 2016

  62. [62]

    Jenny Preece and Diane Maloney-Krichmar. 2005. Online Communities: Design, Theory, and Practice.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10, 4 (July 2005), JCMC10410. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00264.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00264.x 2005

  63. [63]

    Limor Raviv, Antje Meyer, and Shiri Lev-Ari. 2019. Larger communities create more systematic languages.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences286, 1907 (July 2019), 20191262. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.1262

    work page doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.1262 2019

  64. [64]

    Harita Reddy and Eshwar Chandrasekharan. 2023. Evolution of Rules in Reddit Communities. InComputer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Minneapolis MN USA, 278–282. doi:10.1145/3584931.3606973

    work page doi:10.1145/3584931.3606973 2023

  65. [65]

    Maxwell Harper, Sara Drenner, Loren Terveen, Sara Kiesler, John Riedl, and Robert E

    Yuqing Ren, F. Maxwell Harper, Sara Drenner, Loren Terveen, Sara Kiesler, John Riedl, and Robert E. Kraut. 2012. Building Member Attachment in Online Communities: Applying Theories of Group Identity and Interpersonal Bonds.MIS Quarterly36, 3 (2012), 841–864. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/41703483

    arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Yuqing Ren, Robert Kraut, and Sara Kiesler. 2007. Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities.Organization Studies28, 3 (2007), 377–408. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076007 doi:10.1177/0170840607076007

    work page doi:10.1177/0170840607076007 2007

  67. [67]

    Eduard Sabo, Mirela Riveni, and Dimka Karastoyanova. 2024. Decentralized Networks Growth Analysis: Instance Dynamics on Mastodon. In Complex Networks & Their Applications XII, Hocine Cherifi, Luis M. Rocha, Chantal Cherifi, and Murat Donduran (Eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 366–377. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53503-1_30

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53503-1_30 2024

  68. [68]

    Community Guidelines Make this the Best Party on the Internet

    Brennan Schaffner, Arjun Nitin Bhagoji, Siyuan Cheng, Jacqueline Mei, Jay L Shen, Grace Wang, Marshini Chetty, Nick Feamster, Genevieve Lakier, and Chenhao Tan. 2024. "Community Guidelines Make this the Best Party on the Internet": An In-Depth Study of Online Platforms’ Content Moderation Policies. InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors...

    work page doi:10.1145/3613904.3642333 2024

  69. [69]

    Nathan Schneider. 2022. Governable Spaces: A Feminist Agenda for Platform Policy. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/governable-spaces- feminist-agenda-platform-policy. doi:10.14763/2022.1.1628 Internet Policy Review, 11(1)

    work page doi:10.14763/2022.1.1628 2022

  70. [70]

    Richard Scott

    W. Richard Scott. 2013.Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities(4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    2013

  71. [71]

    Joseph Seering. 2020. Reconsidering Self-Moderation: the Role of Research in Supporting Community-Based Models for Online Content Moderation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4, CSCW2 (Oct. 2020), 1–28. doi:10.1145/3415178

    work page doi:10.1145/3415178 2020

  72. [72]

    Joseph Seering, Tony Wang, Jina Yoon, and Geoff Kaufman. 2019. Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New Media & Society21, 7 (July 2019), 1417–1443. doi:10.1177/1461444818821316 Publisher: SAGE Publications

    work page doi:10.1177/1461444818821316 2019

  73. [73]

    Joseph Seering, Tony Wang, Jina Yoon, and Geoff Kaufman. 2019. Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New media & society21, 7 (2019), 1417–1443. Manuscript submitted to ACM 20 Muralidharan et al

    2019

  74. [74]

    Anna DuVal Smith. 2002. Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. InCommunities in cyberspace. Routledge, UK, 145–174

    2002

  75. [75]

    Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1994. Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. InProceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA) (CSCW ’94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 253–264. do...

    work page doi:10.1145/192844.193021 1994

  76. [76]

    Thanakorn Thaminkaew, Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, and Peerapon Vateekul. 2024. Prompt-Based Label-Aware Framework for Few-Shot Multi-Label Text Classification.IEEE Access12 (2024), 28310–28322. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3367994

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3367994 2024

  77. [77]

    Emma Tosch, Luis Garcia, Cynthia Li, and Chris Martens. 2024. Privacy Policies on the Fediverse: A Case Study of Mastodon Instances.Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies2024, 4 (Oct. 2024), 700–733. doi:10.56553/popets-2024-0138

    work page doi:10.56553/popets-2024-0138 2024

  78. [78]

    X Transparency. 2025. Global Transparency Report. https://transparency.x.com/en/reports/global-reports/2025-transparency-report

    2025

  79. [79]

    Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson. 2021. Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms.Nature600, 7888 (Dec. 2021), 264–268. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04167-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04167-x 2021

  80. [80]

    Emily Webber and Robin Dunbar. 2020. The fractal structure of communities of practice: Implications for business organization.PLOS ONE15, 4 (April 2020), e0232204. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232204 Publisher: Public Library of Science

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232204 2020

Showing first 80 references.