pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20092 · v2 · pith:RSNYAYAWnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 💻 cs.CV

EventVLA: Event-Driven Visual Evidence Memory for Long-Horizon Vision-Language-Action Policies

Ganlin Yang , Zhangzheng Tu , Yuqiang Yang , Sitong Mao , Junyi Dong , Tianxing Chen , Jiaqi Peng , Jing Xiong
show 5 more authors
Jiafei Cao Jifeng Dai Wengang Zhou Yao Mu Tai Wang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 10:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords Vision-Language-ActionKeyframe Evidence MemoryLong-horizon manipulationVisual evidence memoryNon-Markovian tasksRobotic policiesSparse memory
0
0 comments X

The pith

EventVLA stores sparse task-critical visual events by predicting future keyframes from VLA latent embeddings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard vision-language-action policies lose performance on long-horizon manipulation once task-relevant visual cues become occluded or unobservable. EventVLA counters this with an end-to-end sparse visual evidence memory built from foundational visual anchors that keep initial and short-term context plus a Keyframe Evidence Memory module. The module reads the policy's own latent embeddings to forecast which future observations will carry causal utility and stores only those frames. Across seventeen memory-dependent simulation tasks and four real-world bimanual tasks this yields a forty percent average rise in success rate relative to prior memory-augmented VLAs. A new diagnostic benchmark, RoboTwin-MeM, isolates non-Markovian manipulation problems that require exactly this kind of selective retention.

Core claim

EventVLA is an end-to-end framework that maintains sparse visual evidence memory through foundational visual anchors and a Keyframe Evidence Memory module. The module predicts future keyframe probabilities directly from the VLA's latent embeddings, allowing the policy to capture and retain transient, task-critical visual events before they become unobservable. This foresight-driven selection replaces both dense history buffers and decoupled dual systems, producing an average success-rate gain of forty percent on seventeen simulation tasks and four real bimanual tasks while introducing the RoboTwin-MeM benchmark for evaluating non-Markovian manipulation.

What carries the argument

Keyframe Evidence Memory (KEM) module that predicts future keyframe probabilities from the VLA's latent embeddings to autonomously capture and store sparse task-critical visual events.

If this is right

  • Policies avoid both information bottlenecks from compressed history and latency from separate memory systems.
  • Selective storage eliminates the accumulation of visual redundancies that plague unselective buffers.
  • The same architecture supports both simulated and real-world bimanual manipulation without task-specific redesign.
  • The RoboTwin-MeM benchmark provides a standardized way to measure progress on non-Markovian manipulation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same predictive selection principle could be tested on long-horizon navigation or household activity sequences where visual state changes are irreversible.
  • If KEM predictions remain reliable under distribution shift, the method might reduce the need for explicit object tracking in robotic stacks.
  • The benchmark tasks could serve as a test bed for any memory mechanism that claims to handle temporary observability loss.

Load-bearing premise

The Keyframe Evidence Memory module can accurately predict future keyframe probabilities directly from the VLA's latent embeddings in a way that captures task-critical visual events before they become unobservable.

What would settle it

Running EventVLA on a set of occlusion-heavy tasks where the KEM module is replaced by random keyframe selection and measuring whether the forty-percent success-rate gain disappears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20092 by Ganlin Yang, Jiafei Cao, Jiaqi Peng, Jifeng Dai, Jing Xiong, Junyi Dong, Sitong Mao, Tai Wang, Tianxing Chen, Wengang Zhou, Yao Mu, Yuqiang Yang, Zhangzheng Tu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of EventVLA. EventVLA tackles long-horizon, memory-requiring manipulation tasks by storing sparse, task-critical visual evidence. The figure illustrates the (a) non-Markovian challenge, (b) our proposed and evaluated benchmarks, (c) event-driven memory design, and (d) strong gains across simulation and real-world tasks. To avoid the massive redundancy of standard memory buffers [12, 14], we identi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: EventVLA framework. EventVLA maintains a sparse visual evidence memory composed of foundational visual anchors and interaction-driven event keyframes, and uses the KEM module to proactively commit task-critical future key observations into memory. To actively capture transient, interaction-driven events that foun￾dational visual anchors inherently miss, such as the brief exposure of an occluded object, we … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of the 8 evaluation tasks in the RoboTwin-MeM benchmark. To rigorously evaluate the capacity for intermediate visual evidence retention, each task is explicitly parameterized by n (ranges from 1 to 5), denoting the exact number of transient, interaction-driven keyframes that must be memorized to succeed. These task-critical intermediate events are highlighted with blue borders. visual anchors At a… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Real-world experimental setups and results on the ARX ACONE bimanual robot. We [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Expanded real-world execution sequences of EventVLA across the four manipulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative rollouts of EventVLA on four RoboTwin-MeM simulation tasks: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative rollouts of EventVLA on the remaining four RoboTwin-MeM simulation tasks: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative real-world robot execution sequences of EventVLA on four tasks: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Memory remains a critical bottleneck for long-horizon robotic manipulation, as standard Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies often fail when task-relevant cues become occluded or unobservable over time. While existing memory-augmented methods utilize historical context, they either suffer from severe information bottlenecks, incur high latency via decoupled dual systems, or rely on unselective buffers that accumulate massive visual redundancies. To address these limitations, we introduce EventVLA, an end-to-end framework founded on the concept of sparse visual evidence memory that comprises two core components: foundational visual anchors to retain initial and short-term contexts, and a dynamic Keyframe Evidence Memory (KEM) module. Specifically, KEM directly predicts future keyframe probabilities from the VLA's latent embeddings to autonomously capture and store sparse, task-critical visual events. This foresight-driven mechanism empowers the policy to dynamically evaluate the future causal utility of current observations, preserving transient visual evidence before it becomes unobservable. Furthermore, we propose RoboTwin-MeM, a diagnostic benchmark specifically designed to evaluate non-Markovian manipulation tasks with interactive visual evidence. Extensive evaluations show that across 17 memory-requiring simulation tasks and 4 real-world bimanual tasks, EventVLA achieves an average success rate improvement of +40% over state-of-the-art memory-augmented VLAs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces EventVLA, an end-to-end framework for long-horizon vision-language-action (VLA) policies. It proposes sparse visual evidence memory with foundational visual anchors and a Keyframe Evidence Memory (KEM) module that predicts future keyframe probabilities from the VLA's latent embeddings to capture task-critical visual events before they become unobservable. The paper also presents the RoboTwin-MeM benchmark for non-Markovian manipulation tasks and reports an average +40% success rate improvement over state-of-the-art memory-augmented VLAs on 17 simulation tasks and 4 real-world bimanual tasks.

Significance. If the reported performance improvements are substantiated, the work could have significant impact on developing more robust VLA policies for complex, long-horizon robotic tasks by addressing memory bottlenecks in a computationally efficient manner. The diagnostic benchmark for memory-requiring tasks is a useful contribution to the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of a +40% average success rate improvement is presented without any reference to the experimental protocol, specific baselines used, number of evaluation runs, statistical tests, or ablation studies. This information is load-bearing for evaluating whether the gains are attributable to the KEM module.
  2. [§3 (Method), KEM module] §3 (Method), KEM module: The Keyframe Evidence Memory module is described as directly predicting future keyframe probabilities from latent embeddings, but no details are provided on the prediction head architecture, training objective, supervision signal, or any validation metric for the prediction accuracy. This is critical for assessing if the foresight mechanism functions as claimed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The term 'foundational visual anchors' is introduced without a clear definition or distinction from standard initial state retention.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the two major comments below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity on experimental claims and methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of a +40% average success rate improvement is presented without any reference to the experimental protocol, specific baselines used, number of evaluation runs, statistical tests, or ablation studies. This information is load-bearing for evaluating whether the gains are attributable to the KEM module.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional context. In the revised version, we will add a sentence summarizing the evaluation protocol: results are reported as averages over 17 simulation tasks from the RoboTwin-MeM benchmark and 4 real-world bimanual tasks, compared against state-of-the-art memory-augmented VLAs, with full details on baselines, run counts, ablations, and statistical analysis provided in Section 4. This keeps the abstract concise while directing readers to the supporting evidence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3 (Method), KEM module] §3 (Method), KEM module: The Keyframe Evidence Memory module is described as directly predicting future keyframe probabilities from latent embeddings, but no details are provided on the prediction head architecture, training objective, supervision signal, or any validation metric for the prediction accuracy. This is critical for assessing if the foresight mechanism functions as claimed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that Section 3 would be strengthened by explicit details on the KEM implementation. We will expand the section in the revised manuscript to describe the prediction head architecture, training objective, supervision signal, and any validation metrics used for keyframe probability prediction. This will allow readers to fully assess the foresight mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical claims rest on external task evaluations

full rationale

The paper introduces EventVLA as an engineering framework with KEM for predicting keyframe probabilities from latent embeddings, but reports performance solely via success rates on 17 simulation tasks and 4 real-world tasks. No equations, derivations, or self-citations appear in the provided text that reduce any result to a fitted input or self-defined quantity. The +40% improvement is presented as an observed outcome on held-out benchmarks rather than a constructed prediction, rendering the chain self-contained without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no equations, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be enumerated beyond the high-level modules named in the text.

invented entities (2)
  • Keyframe Evidence Memory (KEM) no independent evidence
    purpose: Autonomously capture and store sparse task-critical visual events by predicting future keyframe probabilities
    Core new component introduced to address memory bottlenecks
  • foundational visual anchors no independent evidence
    purpose: Retain initial and short-term contexts
    Second core component named in the framework

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5810 in / 1139 out tokens · 41332 ms · 2026-06-30T10:46:22.588334+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DIM-WAM: World-Action Modeling with Diverse Historical Event Memory

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DiM-WAM is a memory-augmented world-action model that integrates multi-scale historical events and global task progress to improve long-horizon robot manipulation performance.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    $\pi_{0.5}$: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization

    P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, et al. π0.5: a vision-language-action model with open-world generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    $\pi^{*}_{0.6}$: a VLA That Learns From Experience

    P. Intelligence, A. Amin, R. Aniceto, A. Balakrishna, K. Black, K. Conley, G. Connors, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, J. DiCarlo, et al. π∗ 0.6: a vla that learns from experience.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14759, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44(10-11):1684–1704, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Y . Ze, G. Zhang, K. Zhang, C. Hu, M. Wang, and H. Xu. 3d diffusion policy: Generalizable visuomotor policy learning via simple 3d representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03954, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    T. Z. Zhao, V . Kumar, S. Levine, and C. Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Y . Dai, H. Fu, J. Lee, Y . Liu, H. Zhang, J. Yang, C. Finn, N. Fazeli, and J. Chai. Robomme: Benchmarking and understanding memory for robotic generalist policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04639, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Sridhar, J

    A. Sridhar, J. Pan, S. Sharma, and C. Finn. Memer: Scaling up memory for robot control via experience retrieval.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20328, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    T. Chen, Y . Wang, M. Li, Y . Qin, H. Shi, Z. Li, Y . Hu, Y . Zhang, K. Wang, Y . Chen, et al. Rmbench: Memory-dependent robotic manipulation benchmark with insights into policy design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01229, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Torne, K

    M. Torne, K. Pertsch, H. Walke, K. Vedder, S. Nair, B. Ichter, A. Z. Ren, H. Wang, J. Tang, K. Stachowicz, et al. Mem: Multi-scale embodied memory for vision language action models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.03596, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    L. Xiao, J. Li, J. Gao, F. Ye, Y . Jin, J. Qian, J. Zhang, Y . Wu, and X. Yu. Ava-vla: Improving vision-language-action models with active visual attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18960, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Bulatov, Y

    A. Bulatov, Y . Kuratov, and M. Burtsev. Recurrent memory transformer.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:11079–11091, 2022. 9

    2022

  12. [12]

    H. Shi, B. Xie, Y . Liu, L. Sun, F. Liu, T. Wang, E. Zhou, H. Fan, X. Zhang, and G. Huang. Mem- oryvla: Perceptual-cognitive memory in vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19236, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    H. Li, S. Yang, Y . Chen, Y . Tian, X. Yang, X. Chen, H. Wang, T. Wang, F. Zhao, D. Lin, et al. Cronusvla: Transferring latent motion across time for multi-frame prediction in manipulation. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2506, 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    X. Wang, X. Gao, J. Fu, Z. Li, D. Fortier, G. Mullins, A. Kolobov, and B. Guo. Lola: Long horizon latent action learning for general robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20166, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    S. Bai, Y . Cai, R. Chen, K. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Cheng, L. Deng, W. Ding, C. Gao, C. Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    S. Liu, B. Li, K. Ma, L. Wu, H. Tan, X. Ouyang, H. Su, and J. Zhu. Rdt2: Exploring the scaling limit of umi data towards zero-shot cross-embodiment generalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03310, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    X-VLA: Soft-Prompted Transformer as Scalable Cross-Embodiment Vision-Language-Action Model

    J. Zheng, J. Li, Z. Wang, D. Liu, X. Kang, Y . Feng, Y . Zheng, J. Zou, Y . Chen, J. Zeng, et al. X-vla: Soft-prompted transformer as scalable cross-embodiment vision-language-action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10274, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    T. Chen, Y . Mu, Z. Liang, Z. Chen, S. Peng, Q. Chen, M. Xu, R. Hu, H. Zhang, X. Li, et al. G3flow: Generative 3d semantic flow for pose-aware and generalizable object manipulation. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 1735–1744, 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    J. Wen, Y . Zhu, J. Li, Z. Tang, C. Shen, and F. Feng. Dexvla: Vision-language model with plug-in diffusion expert for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05855, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    M. Lin, P. Ding, S. Wang, Z. Zhuang, Y . Liu, X. Tong, W. Song, S. Lyu, S. Huang, and D. Wang. Hif-vla: Hindsight, insight and foresight through motion representation for vision-language- action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09928, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Discrete Diffusion VLA: Bringing Discrete Diffusion to Action Decoding in Vision-Language-Action Policies

    Z. Liang, Y . Li, T. Yang, C. Wu, S. Mao, T. Nian, L. Pei, S. Zhou, X. Yang, J. Pang, et al. Discrete diffusion vla: Bringing discrete diffusion to action decoding in vision-language-action policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20072, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    G. Yang, T. Zhang, H. Hao, W. Wang, Y . Liu, D. Wang, G. Chen, Z. Cai, J. Chen, W. Su, et al. Vlaser: Vision-language-action model with synergistic embodied reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11027, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    W. Shen, Y . Liu, Y . Wu, Z. Liang, S. Gu, D. Wang, T. Nian, L. Xu, Y . Qin, J. Pang, et al. Expertise need not monopolize: Action-specialized mixture of experts for vision-language-action learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14300, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    J. Wen, Y . Zhu, M. Zhu, Z. Tang, J. Li, Z. Zhou, X. Liu, C. Shen, Y . Peng, and F. Feng. Diffusionvla: Scaling robot foundation models via unified diffusion and autoregression. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    J. Wen, Y . Zhu, J. Li, M. Zhu, Z. Tang, K. Wu, Z. Xu, N. Liu, R. Cheng, C. Shen, et al. Tinyvla: Towards fast, data-efficient vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    Zheng, Y

    R. Zheng, Y . Liang, S. Huang, J. Gao, H. Daum ´e III, A. Kolobov, F. Huang, and J. Yang. Tracevla: Visual trace prompting enhances spatial-temporal awareness for generalist robotic policies. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2025, pages 54277– 54296, 2025. 10

    2025

  27. [27]

    H. Tan, P. Co, Y . Xu, S. Rong, Y . Ji, C. Chi, X. Chen, Q. Zhang, Z. Zhao, P. Wang, et al. Action- sketcher: From reasoning to action via visual sketches for long-horizon robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01618, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    H. Wang, Z. Jing, J. Ao, S. Song, X. Li, G. Huang, and C. Bai. Beyond short-horizon: Vq- memory for robust long-horizon manipulation in non-markovian simulation benchmarks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.09513, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Torne, A

    M. Torne, A. Tang, Y . Liu, and C. Finn. Learning long-context diffusion policies via past-token prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09561, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Y .-L. Wei, H. Liao, Y . Lin, P. Wang, Z. Liang, G. Liu, and W.-S. Zheng. Cyclemanip: Enabling cyclic task manipulation via effective historical perception and understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.01022, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    H. Jang, S. Yu, H. Kwon, H. Jeon, Y . Seo, and J. Shin. Contextvla: Vision-language-action model with amortized multi-frame context.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04246, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    M. Lin, X. Liang, B. Lin, L. Jingzhi, Z. Jiao, K. Li, Y . Ma, Y . Liu, S. Zhao, Y . Zhuang, et al. Echovla: Robotic vision-language-action model with synergistic declarative memory for mobile manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18112, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Y . Lei, Z. Liang, H. Zhang, and P. Luo. Vpwem: Non-markovian visuomotor policy with working and episodic memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04910, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    L. Tan, J. Li, and G. Jing. Memoact: Atkinson-shiffrin-inspired memory-augmented visuomotor policy for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18494, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    T. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chen, Z. Cai, Y . Liu, Z. Li, Q. Liang, X. Lin, Y . Ge, Z. Gu, et al. Robotwin 2.0: A scalable data generator and benchmark with strong domain randomization for robust bimanual robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18088, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    RoboCasa: Large-Scale Simulation of Everyday Tasks for Generalist Robots

    S. Nasiriany, A. Maddukuri, L. Zhang, A. Parikh, A. Lo, A. Joshi, A. Mandlekar, and Y . Zhu. Robocasa: Large-scale simulation of everyday tasks for generalist robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02523, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    S. Tao, F. Xiang, A. Shukla, Y . Qin, X. Hinrichsen, X. Yuan, C. Bao, X. Lin, Y . Liu, T.-k. Chan, et al. Maniskill3: Gpu parallelized robotics simulation and rendering for generalizable embodied ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00425, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    C. Li, R. Zhang, J. Wong, C. Gokmen, S. Srivastava, R. Mart´ın-Mart´ın, C. Wang, G. Levine, M. Lingelbach, J. Sun, et al. Behavior-1k: A benchmark for embodied ai with 1,000 everyday activities and realistic simulation. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 80–93. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  39. [39]

    X. Li, K. Hsu, J. Gu, K. Pertsch, O. Mees, H. R. Walke, C. Fu, I. Lunawat, I. Sieh, S. Kir- mani, et al. Evaluating real-world robot manipulation policies in simulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05941, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    H. Fang, M. Grotz, W. Pumacay, Y . R. Wang, D. Fox, R. Krishna, and J. Duan. Sam2act: Integrating visual foundation model with a memory architecture for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18564, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Cherepanov, N

    E. Cherepanov, N. Kachaev, A. K. Kovalev, and A. I. Panov. Memory, benchmark & robots: A benchmark for solving complex tasks with reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10550, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    B. Liu, Y . Zhu, C. Gao, Y . Feng, Q. Liu, Y . Zhu, and P. Stone. Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 44776–44791, 2023. 11

    2023

  43. [43]

    S. Han, B. Qiu, Y . Liao, S. Huang, C. Gao, S. Yan, and S. Liu. Robocerebra: A large-scale benchmark for long-horizon robotic manipulation evaluation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38, 2026

    2026

  44. [44]

    H. Lei, W. Song, H. Zhang, J. Pei, J. Chen, H. Yan, H. Zhao, P. Ding, Z. Zhang, L. Huang, et al. Robomemarena: A comprehensive and challenging robotic memory benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10921, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Xiang, Y

    F. Xiang, Y . Qin, K. Mo, Y . Xia, H. Zhu, F. Liu, M. Liu, H. Jiang, Y . Yuan, H. Wang, et al. Sapien: A simulated part-based interactive environment. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11097–11107, 2020

    2020

  46. [46]

    StarVLA: A Lego-like Codebase for Vision-Language-Action Model Developing

    S. Community. Starvla: A lego-like codebase for vision-language-action model developing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.05014, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    M. J. Kim, C. Finn, and P. Liang. Fine-tuning vision-language-action models: Optimizing speed and success.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19645, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    W. Kwon, Z. Li, S. Zhuang, Y . Sheng, L. Zheng, C. H. Yu, J. E. Gonzalez, H. Zhang, and I. Stoica. Efficient memory management for large language model serving with pagedattention. InProceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 2023. 12 Appendix A Implementation Details of EventVLA A.1 Training Formulations and Curriculum ...

    2023

  49. [49]

    Find key state transitions for this task (e.g., stable grasp acquired, object placed, cycle transition)

  50. [50]

    Keep keyframes representative and temporally ordered across the full task progress

  51. [51]

    Output format constraints:

    For repeated pick/place cycles, pick the most stable and recognizable moments per cycle. Output format constraints:

  52. [52]

    No markdown, no explanations

    Return JSON only. No markdown, no explanations

  53. [53]

    Format:{”keyframe steps”: [int, int, ...]} 3.keyframe stepsmust: - have length exactly<num keyframes> - be strictly increasing - be in [0,<total frames - 1>] - contain no duplicates Annotation Reliability and Error Analysis.To rigorously validate the reliability of this automated pipeline, we conducted a comprehensive cross-validation study. In the simula...

    2000