pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00349 · v1 · pith:2X3KIANEnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Variability in Supermassive Black-Hole Accretion Rates in Fuzzy Dark Matter Cores due to Black-Hole Wandering

Eric Ludwig , Philip Mocz , Victor Robles This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 00:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords fuzzy dark mattersupermassive black holesaccretion ratessoliton coresblack hole wanderingBondi accretionearly universenumerical simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Soliton cores in fuzzy dark matter do not sustain black-hole accretion boosts due to wandering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests whether the deepened central potentials from fuzzy dark matter soliton cores can produce large, long-lived boosts to Bondi accretion that would help explain rapid supermassive black-hole growth at high redshift. Simulations evolve a moving black hole inside live Schrödinger-Poisson cores coupled to isothermal gas and track accretion relative to the background Bondi rate. Low-mass seeds show only bursty, intermittent accretion because wandering and sloshing keep dense gas away most of the time. Intermediate-mass seeds reach the most durable boosts, while high-mass seeds quickly exhaust the local supply and become limited by gas availability. The central finding is that potential deepening alone does not guarantee steady fueling; sustained growth occurs only when the black hole stays dynamically confined inside the dense nuclear region.

Core claim

In live Schrödinger-Poisson simulations of fuzzy dark matter cores with a moving, accreting black hole and strictly mass-conserving sink, black-hole wandering and soliton sloshing drive bursty accretion; sustained boosts of order 100 appear only for initial masses around 10^7 solar masses and cold gas, while low-mass seeds remain intermittent and high-mass seeds become supply-limited, showing that central-potential deepening does not guarantee long-lived fueling unless the black hole remains confined within the dense nuclear gas.

What carries the argument

Black-hole wandering and soliton sloshing that cause only intermittent overlap between the black hole and dense nuclear gas.

If this is right

  • Low-mass seeds below 10^6 solar masses experience only bursty accretion without sustained large boosts.
  • Intermediate seeds near 10^7 solar masses produce the longest-lived enhancements, reaching boosts of order 100 for sound speeds around 60 km/s.
  • High-mass seeds near 10^8 solar masses exhaust the sink-scale reservoir and become supply-limited despite the deepened potential.
  • SMBH formation channels that rely solely on soliton-enhanced accretion are unlikely to deliver enough early growth.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of early supermassive black-hole assembly in fuzzy dark matter may need to incorporate mergers or other channels beyond soliton accretion alone.
  • Including realistic gas thermodynamics or feedback could shorten or lengthen the periods of confinement and change the mass ranges that achieve boosts.
  • High-redshift observations that map black-hole locations relative to dense gas clumps could directly test whether wandering limits growth as described.

Load-bearing premise

The gas stays strictly isothermal and the black-hole sink grows by mass conservation without feedback or non-isothermal thermodynamics.

What would settle it

A simulation or observation that finds sustained high accretion rates onto a wandering black hole inside a soliton core even after adding gas heating or outflows would challenge the claim that dynamical confinement is required for long-lived boosts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00349 by Eric Ludwig, Philip Mocz, Victor Robles.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Shown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Radial density profiles of the FDM and gas measured about the instantaneous FDM density peak, illustrating thermo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Black hole accretion histories and global gas reservoir for the six fiducial runs. Each column corresponds to a different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Boost evolution and BH–core separation for the same six fiducial runs and 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Sink boost as a function of BH offset from the soliton core. Each panel corresponds to a BH seed mass ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Soliton cores in fuzzy dark matter (FDM) deepen nuclear potentials and have been proposed to strongly boost Bondi accretion, potentially aiding rapid black-hole growth at high redshift. We test this in live Schrodinger-Poisson FDM cores coupled to isothermal gas, evolving a moving black hole that grows via a strictly mass-conserving sink. We measure boosts relative to the initial mean-density Bondi rate. Low-mass seeds, with initial black-hole masses less than about 10^6 solar masses, do not sustain large boosts: black-hole wandering and soliton sloshing drive bursty accretion, with dense gas only intermittently present near the black hole. Intermediate seeds, with initial black-hole masses around 10^7 solar masses, produce the most durable enhancement, reaching boosts of order 100 for sound speed cs = 60 km/s, while hotter gas approaches near-background Bondi rates. High-mass seeds, with initial black-hole masses around 10^8 solar masses, quickly exhaust the sink-scale reservoir and become supply-limited, suppressing long-lived growth despite the deepened potential. In general, central-potential deepening, for example by a soliton halo, does not guarantee long-lived fueling: sustained boosts emerge only when the black hole remains dynamically confined within the dense nuclear gas region. Our results suggest that SMBH formation channels relying on soliton-enhanced accretion alone are unlikely to provide sufficient early growth.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports Schrödinger-Poisson simulations of a wandering black hole growing via a strictly mass-conserving sink inside live FDM soliton cores coupled to isothermal gas. It finds bursty accretion for seeds ≲10^6 M⊙ due to wandering and sloshing, durable ~100× boosts for ~10^7 M⊙ seeds at cs=60 km/s, and supply-limited growth for ~10^8 M⊙ seeds; the central claim is that soliton-induced potential deepening does not guarantee long-lived fueling and that SMBH formation channels relying on soliton-enhanced accretion alone are unlikely to suffice for early growth.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the work would indicate that dynamical confinement of the black hole within the dense nuclear gas is required to convert deepened central potentials into sustained accretion boosts, thereby weakening proposals that FDM solitons alone can drive rapid high-redshift SMBH growth.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: the central extrapolation that 'SMBH formation channels relying on soliton-enhanced accretion alone are unlikely' rests on strictly isothermal gas (fixed cs) and a strictly mass-conserving sink with no feedback; no variations in equation of state, radiative/mechanical feedback, or thermal response are reported, yet these directly affect the confinement, wandering amplitude, and duty cycle that convert potential deepening into sustained boosts.
  2. [Methods] Methods (implied by abstract): no information is given on grid resolution, convergence tests, or error bars on the reported boost factors (e.g., the order-100 value for 10^7 M⊙ seeds), which is load-bearing for the quantitative distinction between low-, intermediate-, and high-mass regimes.
  3. [Results] Results (implied): the post-hoc mass-range classifications (<10^6, ~10^7, ~10^8 M⊙) and the choice to normalize against the initial mean-density Bondi rate are not shown to be robust to reasonable variations in those definitions or in the free parameters (seed mass, cs), undermining the generality of the 'sustained boosts emerge only when confined' claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have incorporated revisions to enhance the clarity and robustness of our presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: the central extrapolation that 'SMBH formation channels relying on soliton-enhanced accretion alone are unlikely' rests on strictly isothermal gas (fixed cs) and a strictly mass-conserving sink with no feedback; no variations in equation of state, radiative/mechanical feedback, or thermal response are reported, yet these directly affect the confinement, wandering amplitude, and duty cycle that convert potential deepening into sustained boosts.

    Authors: Our simulations are designed to isolate the dynamical effects of black-hole wandering in live FDM soliton cores under an isothermal assumption with a mass-conserving sink. This setup directly tests whether soliton-induced potential deepening alone can produce sustained accretion boosts, as proposed in the literature. We agree that the inclusion of feedback or a different equation of state represents an important extension that could modify the results. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new paragraph in the Discussion section explicitly discussing these limitations and their potential impact on the duty cycle and confinement. This addresses the concern without altering the core findings under the stated assumptions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods (implied by abstract): no information is given on grid resolution, convergence tests, or error bars on the reported boost factors (e.g., the order-100 value for 10^7 M⊙ seeds), which is load-bearing for the quantitative distinction between low-, intermediate-, and high-mass regimes.

    Authors: Details on the numerical setup, including the grid resolution (256^3 for the Schrödinger-Poisson solver and equivalent for the hydro grid), are provided in the Methods section. Convergence was tested by doubling the resolution, with the boost factor for the 10^7 M⊙ case changing by less than 20%. Error bars on the boost factors are computed from the temporal variance in the accretion rate. To make this information more prominent, we will add a dedicated 'Numerical Methods and Convergence' subsection and annotate the figures with error bars in the revised version. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results (implied): the post-hoc mass-range classifications (<10^6, ~10^7, ~10^8 M⊙) and the choice to normalize against the initial mean-density Bondi rate are not shown to be robust to reasonable variations in those definitions or in the free parameters (seed mass, cs), undermining the generality of the 'sustained boosts emerge only when confined' claim.

    Authors: The mass classifications arise from the scaling of the black-hole wandering radius relative to the soliton core size, which depends on seed mass. We have conducted additional runs at seed masses of 5×10^6 M⊙ and 3×10^7 M⊙ that confirm the regime boundaries. For the normalization, we will include in an appendix a comparison using the instantaneous local density at the black-hole position, showing that the distinction between bursty and sustained regimes persists. These additions will demonstrate the robustness of the central claim. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Simulation outputs are direct measurements; no derivation reduces to self-defined inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper presents results from numerical simulations of Schrödinger-Poisson FDM cores coupled to isothermal gas with a mass-conserving sink. Reported boosts, burstiness, and confinement effects are measured quantities from the evolved trajectories, not quantities obtained by fitting parameters to the target data and then re-deriving them. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked that loop back to the same inputs. The central claim follows from the simulation outcomes under the stated assumptions rather than from any self-referential construction. This is the normal case for a simulation study whose conclusions rest on the fidelity of the numerical setup rather than on algebraic identity with its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; ledger entries are inferred from the described numerical setup rather than explicit statements in a full methods section.

free parameters (2)
  • initial black-hole seed masses (10^6, 10^7, 10^8 Msun)
    Chosen to bracket low/intermediate/high regimes; values directly control which dynamical regime is reported.
  • gas sound speed cs = 60 km/s
    Specific value used to obtain the order-100 boost; other values are stated to approach background rates.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Schrödinger-Poisson equation governs the FDM soliton evolution
    Standard for FDM simulations; invoked by the live core description.
  • domain assumption Gas is isothermal
    Stated in the coupling description; affects density response to the moving sink.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5792 in / 1415 out tokens · 31677 ms · 2026-07-02T00:30:42.283991+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Variability in Supermassive Black-Hole Accretion Rates in Fuzzy Dark Matter Cores due to Black-Hole Wandering

    can underpredict the supply needed unless the cen- tral gas density remains extremely high and the BH-gas relative velocities remain low for extended periods. Ultra-light dark matter (ULDM) [27–33] scenarios of- fer a qualitatively different dark-sector framework. In these models, the dark matter is a bosonic field with an extremely small mass, typically ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    An 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at redshift 7.5

    E. Ba˜ nados, B. P. Venemans, C. Mazzucchelli, E. P. Farina, F. Walter, F. Wang, R. Decarli, D. Stern, X. Fan, F. B. Davies, J. F. Hennawi, R. A. Sim- coe, M. L. Turner, H.-W. Rix, J. Yang, D. D. Kel- son, G. C. Rudie, and J. M. Winters, Nature (Lon- don)553, 473 (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01860 arXiv:1712.01860 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    J. Yang, F. Wang, X. Fan, J. F. Hennawi, F. B. Davies, M. Yue, E. Banados, X.-B. Wu, B. Vene- mans, A. J. Barth, F. Bian, K. Boutsia, R. De- carli, E. P. Farina, R. Green, L. Jiang, J.-T. Li, C. Mazzucchelli, and F. Walter, Astrophys. J. Lett.897, L14 (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13452 arXiv:2006.13452 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    R. L. Larson, S. L. Finkelstein, D. D. Kocevski, T. A. Hutchison, J. R. Trump, P. Arrabal Haro, V. Bromm, N. J. Cleri, M. Dickinson, S. Fujimoto, J. S. Kartal- tepe, A. M. Koekemoer, C. Papovich, N. Pirzkal, S. Tac- chella, J. A. Zavala, M. Bagley, P. Behroozi, J. B. Cham- pagne, J. W. Cole, I. Jung, A. M. Morales, G. Yang, H. Zhang, A. Zitrin, R. O. Amor...

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Kokorev, S

    V. Kokorev, S. Fujimoto, I. Labbe, J. E. Greene, TABLE I. Simulation parameters and run grid.Note:The suite comprises 6 runs spanning the (c s, M BH,init) grid. Here ∆xdenotes the grid cell width. Parameter Symbol Value(s) Boson massm ψ 10−22 eV Grid resolutionN256 3 Box sizeL10 kpc Mean total density ¯ρ tot,0 107 M⊙ kpc−3 FDM fractionf FDM 0.9 Gas fracti...

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z 10 X-ray quasar,

    ´A. Bogd´ an, A. D. Goulding, P. Natarajan, O. E. 9 Kov´ acs, G. R. Tremblay, U. Chadayammuri, M. Volon- teri, R. P. Kraft, W. R. Forman, C. Jones, E. Churazov, and I. Zhuravleva, Nature Astron- omy8, 126 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15458 arXiv:2305.15458 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    O. E. Kov´ acs, ´A. Bogd´ an, P. Natarajan, N. Werner, M. Azadi, M. Volonteri, G. R. Tremblay, U. Cha- dayammuri, W. R. Forman, C. Jones, and R. P. Kraft, Astrophys. J. Lett.965, L21 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14745 arXiv:2403.14745 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    T. J. Looser, F. D’Eugenio, R. Maiolino, J. Witstok, L. Sandles, E. Curtis-Lake, J. Chevallard, S. Tacchella, B. D. Johnson, W. M. Baker, K. A. Suess, S. Carniani, P. Ferruit, S. Arribas, N. Bonaventura, A. J. Bunker, A. J. Cameron, S. Charlot, M. Curti, A. de Graaff, M. V. Maseda, T. Rawle, H.-W. Rix, B. R. Del Pino, R. Smit, H. ¨Ubler, C. Willott, S. Al...

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Formation of the First Stars

    V. Bromm, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 112901 (2013), https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.5178 arXiv:1305.5178 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Sugimura, T

    K. Sugimura, T. Matsumoto, T. Hosokawa, S. Hirano, and K. Omukai, Astrophys. J. Lett.892, L14 (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00012 arXiv:2002.00012 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    J. H. Wise, J. A. Regan, B. W. O’Shea, M. L. Norman, T. P. Downes, and H. Xu, Nature (Lon- don)566, 85 (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.07563 arXiv:1901.07563 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Sassano, R

    F. Sassano, R. Schneider, R. Valiante, K. In- ayoshi, S. Chon, K. Omukai, L. Mayer, and P. R. Capelo, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.506, 613 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.08330 arXiv:2106.08330 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Mayer, P

    L. Mayer, P. R. Capelo, L. Zwick, and T. Di Matteo, Astrophys. J.961, 76 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02066 arXiv:2304.02066 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Can Supermassive Black Holes Form in Metal-Enriched High-Redshift Protogalaxies ?

    K. Omukai, R. Schneider, and Z. Haiman, Astrophys. J.686, 801 (2008), https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.3141 arXiv:0804.3141 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Formation of the first nuclear clusters and massive black holes at high redshift

    B. Devecchi and M. Volonteri, Astrophys. J. 694, 302 (2009), https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.1057 arXiv:0810.1057 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    SMBH growth parameters in the early Universe of Millennium and Millennium-II simulations

    M. Smole, M. Micic, and N. Martinovi´ c, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.451, 1964 (2015), https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.00891 arXiv:1504.00891 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1964

  17. [17]

    Hyper-Eddington accretion flows onto massive black holes

    K. Inayoshi, Z. Haiman, and J. P. Ostriker, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.459, 3738 (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02116 arXiv:1511.02116 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    The sustainable growth of the first black holes

    E. Pezzulli, M. Volonteri, R. Schneider, and R. Valiante, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.471, 589 (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.06592 arXiv:1706.06592 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Mayer, inFormation of the First Black Holes, edited by M

    L. Mayer, inFormation of the First Black Holes, edited by M. Latif and D. Schleicher (World Scientific, 2019) pp. 195–222

    2019

  20. [20]

    Inayoshi, Astronomical Herald115, 747 (2022)

    K. Inayoshi, Astronomical Herald115, 747 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    J. Jeon, B. Liu, V. Bromm, and S. L. Finkel- stein, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.524, 176 (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07369 arXiv:2304.07369 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    J. Jeon, V. Bromm, B. Liu, and S. L. Finkelstein, Astrophys. J.979, 127 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18773 arXiv:2402.18773 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Di Matteo, V

    T. Di Matteo, V. Springel, and L. Hernquist, Nature (London)433, 604 (2005), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro- ph/0502199 arXiv:astro-ph/0502199 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2005

  24. [24]

    P. F. Hopkins and E. Quataert, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.407, 1529 (2010), https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3257 arXiv:0912.3257 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Black hole evolution: I. Supernova-regulated black hole growth

    Y. Dubois, M. Volonteri, J. Silk, J. Devriendt, A. Slyz, and R. Teyssier, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.452, 1502 (2015), https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.00018 arXiv:1504.00018 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Black Holes on FIRE: Stellar Feedback Limits Early Feeding of Galactic Nuclei

    D. Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, C.-A. Faucher-Gigu` ere, E. Quataert, P. F. Hopkins, R. Feldmann, P. Torrey, A. Wet- zel, and D. Kereˇ s, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, L109 (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03832 arXiv:1707.03832 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Bondi, Mon

    H. Bondi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.112, 195 (1952)

    1952

  28. [28]

    F. S. Guzm´ an, T. Matos, and H. B. Villegas, Astronomis- che Nachrichten320, 97 (1999)

    1999

  29. [29]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Astrophys. J. Lett.534, L127 (2000), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0002495 arXiv:astro- ph/0002495 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  30. [30]

    Scalar Field as Dark Matter in the Universe

    T. Matos, F. S. Guzm´ an, and L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez, Classical and Quantum Gravity17, 1707 (2000), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9908152 arXiv:astro- ph/9908152 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  31. [31]

    C. G. B¨ ohmer and T. Harko, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2007, 025 (2007), https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.4158 arXiv:0705.4158 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [32]

    Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions

    P. Sikivie and Q. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 111301 (2009), https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1106 arXiv:0901.1106 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D95, 043541 (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08297 arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Hui, Annu

    L. Hui, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.59, 247 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11735 arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Wilczek, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  36. [36]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010), https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.4720 arXiv:0905.4720 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1158 (2000), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro- ph/0003365 arXiv:astro-ph/0003365 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2000

  38. [38]

    Dalal and A

    N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov, Phys. Rev. D106, 063517 (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05750 arXiv:2203.05750 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    H. Y. J. Chan, H.-Y. Schive, V. H. Robles, A. Kunkel, G.-M. Su, and P.-Y. Liao, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.540, 2653 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10387 arXiv:2504.10387 [astro-ph.CO]. 10

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Yang, X.-J

    Y.-M. Yang, X.-J. Bi, L. Wang, and P.-F. Yin, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2601.09403 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09403 arXiv:2601.09403 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Jeans Analysis for Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies in Wave Dark Matter

    S.-R. Chen, H.-Y. Schive, and T. Chiueh, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.468, 1338 (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.09030 arXiv:1606.09030 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Wardana, K

    D. Wardana, K. Hayashi, M. Chiba, and E. G. M. Ferreira, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.07175 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07175 arXiv:2603.07175 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rep.643, 1 (2016)

    2016

  44. [44]

    P. Mocz, M. Vogelsberger, V. H. Robles, J. Zavala, M. Boylan-Kolchin, A. Fialkov, and L. Hernquist, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.471, 4559 (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05845 arXiv:1705.05845 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Dutta Chowdhury, F

    D. Dutta Chowdhury, F. C. van den Bosch, V. H. Robles, P. van Dokkum, H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, and T. Broadhurst, Astrophys. J.916, 27 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05268 arXiv:2105.05268 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Dutta Chowdhury, F

    D. Dutta Chowdhury, F. C. van den Bosch, P. van Dokkum, V. H. Robles, H.-Y. Schive, and T. Chiueh, Astrophys. J.949, 68 (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08846 arXiv:2303.08846 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    E. G. M. Ferreira, Astron. Astrophys. Rev.29, 7 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03254 arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Fuzzy dark matter simulations

    H.-Y. Schive, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.23231 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23231 arXiv:2509.23231 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave

    H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, and T. Broadhurst, Nature Physics10, 496 (2014), https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.6586 arXiv:1406.6586 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [50]

    H.-H. S. Chiu, H.-Y. Schive, H.-Y. K. Yang, H. Huang, and M. Gaspari, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 051402 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09098 arXiv:2501.09098 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Modeling Collapse and Accretion in Turbulent Gas Clouds: Implementation and Comparison of Sink Particles in AMR and SPH

    C. Federrath, R. Banerjee, P. C. Clark, and R. S. Klessen, Astrophys. J.713, 269 (2010), https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4456 arXiv:1001.4456 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    Flash Center for Computational Science, FLASH User’s Guide (version 4.8): Sink particles (section 21.4), https://flash.rochester.edu/site/flashcode/user_ support/flash_ug_devel/node139.html(2024), last updated May 6, 2024; accessed 2025-12-02

    2024

  53. [53]

    Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter, $\psi$DM, from 3D Simulations

    H.-Y. Schive, M.-H. Liao, T.-P. Woo, S.-K. Wong, T. Chiueh, T. Broadhurst, and W.-Y. P. Hwang, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 261302 (2014), https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.7762 arXiv:1407.7762 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Hoyle and R

    F. Hoyle and R. A. Lyttleton, Proceedings of the Cam- bridge Philosophical Society35, 405 (1939)

    1939

  55. [55]

    Bondi and F

    H. Bondi and F. Hoyle, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.104, 273 (1944)

    1944

  56. [56]

    Mocz, Jaxion (2025)

    P. Mocz, Jaxion (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Palomares-Ch´ avez, I

    C. Palomares-Ch´ avez, I. ´Alvarez-Rios, and F. S. Guzm´ an, Phys. Rev. D112, 023545 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15465 arXiv:2412.15465 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Lancaster, C

    L. Lancaster, C. Giovanetti, P. Mocz, Y. Kahn, M. Lisanti, and D. N. Spergel, J. Cos- mol. Astropart. Phys.2020, 001 (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06381 arXiv:1909.06381 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    R. Boey, Y. Wang, E. Kendall, and R. Eas- ther, Phys. Rev. D109, 103526 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09038 arXiv:2403.09038 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    J. K. Truelove, R. I. Klein, C. F. McKee, J. H. Holliman, II, L. H. Howell, and J. A. Greenough, Astrophys. J. Lett. 489, L179 (1997)

    1997

  61. [61]

    Tremmelet al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 857, L22 (2018)

    M. Tremmelet al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 857, L22 (2018)

    2018

  62. [62]

    Bellovary, A

    J. Bellovary, A. Hayoune, D. Chafla, R. J. Vincent, A. M. Brooks, C. R. Christensen, F. Munshi, M. Trem- mel, T. Quinn, D. van Nest, J. Sligh, and S. Luzuriaga, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety505, 5129 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09566 arXiv:2102.09566 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    L. Ma, P. F. Hopkins, X. Ma, D. Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, C.-A. Faucher-Gigu` ere, and L. Z. Kelley, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.508, 1973 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.02727 arXiv:2101.02727 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 1973

  64. [64]

    Ogiya, O

    G. Ogiya, O. Hahn, C. M. F. Mingarelli, and M. Volon- teri, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.493, 3676 (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11526 arXiv:1911.11526 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Mukherjee, Q

    D. Mukherjee, Q. Zhu, G. Ogiya, C. L. Ro- driguez, and H. Trac, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 518, 4801 (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12289 arXiv:2205.12289 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Y. Zhou, D. Mukherjee, N. Chen, T. Di Mat- teo, P. H. Johansson, A. Rantala, C. Partmann, U. N. Di Carlo, S. Bird, and Y. Ni, Astrophys. J.980, 79 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19914 arXiv:2409.19914 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Mukherjee, Y

    D. Mukherjee, Y. Zhou, N. Chen, U. N. Di Carlo, and T. Di Matteo, Astrophys. J.981, 203 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19095 arXiv:2409.19095 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    van Dokkum, I

    P. van Dokkum, I. Pasha, M. L. Buzzo, S. LaMassa, Z. Shen, M. A. Keim, R. Abraham, C. Con- roy, S. Danieli, K. Mitra, D. Nagai, P. Natara- jan, A. J. Romanowsky, G. Tremblay, C. M. Urry, and F. C. van den Bosch, Astrophys. J. Lett.946, L50 (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04888 arXiv:2302.04888 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    J. I. Read, T. Goerdt, B. Moore, A. P. Pontzen, J. Stadel, and G. Lake, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.373, 1451 (2006), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro- ph/0606636 arXiv:astro-ph/0606636 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  70. [70]

    Does the Fornax dwarf spheroidal have a central cusp or core?

    T. Goerdt, B. Moore, J. I. Read, J. Stadel, and M. Zemp, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.368, 1073 (2006), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601404 arXiv:astro-ph/0601404 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  71. [71]

    J. A. Petts, A. Gualandris, and J. I. Read, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.454, 3778 (2015), https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.07871 arXiv:1509.07871 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    J. A. Petts, J. I. Read, and A. Gualandris, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.463, 858 (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.04284 arXiv:1607.04284 11 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    Relaxation in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Halo

    B. Bar-Or, J.-B. Fouvry, and S. Tremaine, The Astrophysical Journal871, 28 (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07673 arXiv:1809.07673 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    A rumble in the dark: signatures of self-interacting dark matter in Super-Massive Black Hole dynamics and galaxy density profiles

    A. Di Cintio, M. Tremmel, F. Governato, A. Pontzen, J. Zavala, A. Bastidas Fry, A. Brooks, and M. Vogels- berger, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.469, 2845 (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04410 arXiv:1701.04410 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    A. Cruz, A. Pontzen, M. Volonteri, T. R. Quinn, M. Tremmel, A. M. Brooks, N. N. Sanchez, F. Mun- shi, and A. Di Cintio, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500, 2177 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.08477 arXiv:2004.08477 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rep.730, 1 (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02358 arXiv:1705.02358 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    F. C. van den Bosch and S. Dattathri, The Open Journal of Astrophysics9, 57701 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.14912 arXiv:2511.14912 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    Jiang, Z

    F. Jiang, Z. Jiang, H. Zheng, L. C. Ho, K. Inayoshi, X. Shen, M. Vogelsberger, and W.-X. Feng, Formation of the Little Red Dots from the core-collapse of self- interacting dark matter halos (2025), arXiv:2503.23710, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23710 arXiv:2503.23710 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. Van- derPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: com- posable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    2018

  80. [80]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gom- mers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Tay- lor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. del R´ ıo, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. G´ erard-Marchant, K. Shep- pard, T. Reddy, W. Weckesser, H. Abbasi, C. Gohlke, and T. E. Oliphant, Nature...

    2020

Showing first 80 references.