Empirical evidence shows that a drift term (rμτ) added to GBM implementation risk improves the fit of put-call parity carry gaps in SPX and RUT options, pointing to drift-sensitive margin burden.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
fields
q-fin.GN 3years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Carry gap in U.S. equity option put-call parity correlates with low-frequency global asset returns, indicating reduced-form alignment between risk-neutral and physical measures.
Enforcing put-call parity creates an annualized carry gap that is systematic in carry space and linked to a volatility times sqrt(tau) path-risk term using minute-level options data.
citing papers explorer
-
The P behind Q: Empirical Evidence from Physical Drift in Put-Call Parity
Empirical evidence shows that a drift term (rμτ) added to GBM implementation risk improves the fit of put-call parity carry gaps in SPX and RUT options, pointing to drift-sensitive margin burden.
-
Tuning in to Frequencies: How Global Assets Align with U.S. Put-Call Parity Residuals
Carry gap in U.S. equity option put-call parity correlates with low-frequency global asset returns, indicating reduced-form alignment between risk-neutral and physical measures.
-
The Cost of a Free Lunch: Evidence from U.S. Derivatives Markets
Enforcing put-call parity creates an annualized carry gap that is systematic in carry space and linked to a volatility times sqrt(tau) path-risk term using minute-level options data.