MASS-DPO derives a Plackett-Luce-specific log-determinant Fisher information objective to select non-redundant negative samples, matching or exceeding multi-negative DPO performance with substantially fewer negatives across four benchmarks and three model families.
Wiley New York
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
method 2
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4representative citing papers
GraphDPO generalizes pairwise DPO to a graph-structured Plackett-Luce objective over DAGs induced by rollout rankings, enforcing transitivity with linear complexity and recovering DPO as a special case.
ModelLens learns a performance-aware latent space from 1.62M leaderboard records to rank unseen models on unseen datasets without forward passes on the target.
HJA ranking separates consensus ranking, judge sensitivity, and residual disagreement as distinct inferential targets with identifiability conditions and an anchored alternating algorithm, yielding better recovery and uncertainty calibration than pooled baselines on synthetic and real data.
citing papers explorer
-
MASS-DPO: Multi-negative Active Sample Selection for Direct Policy Optimization
MASS-DPO derives a Plackett-Luce-specific log-determinant Fisher information objective to select non-redundant negative samples, matching or exceeding multi-negative DPO performance with substantially fewer negatives across four benchmarks and three model families.
-
Beyond Pairs: Your Language Model is Secretly Optimizing a Preference Graph
GraphDPO generalizes pairwise DPO to a graph-structured Plackett-Luce objective over DAGs induced by rollout rankings, enforcing transitivity with linear complexity and recovering DPO as a special case.
-
ModelLens: Finding the Best for Your Task from Myriads of Models
ModelLens learns a performance-aware latent space from 1.62M leaderboard records to rank unseen models on unseen datasets without forward passes on the target.
-
Heterogeneous Judge-Aware Ranking with Sensitivity, Disagreement, and Confidence
HJA ranking separates consensus ranking, judge sensitivity, and residual disagreement as distinct inferential targets with identifiability conditions and an anchored alternating algorithm, yielding better recovery and uncertainty calibration than pooled baselines on synthetic and real data.