pith. sign in

hub

Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability

11 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

11 Pith papers citing it
abstract

AI agents are increasingly deployed to execute important tasks. While rising accuracy scores on standard benchmarks suggest rapid progress, many agents still continue to fail in practice. This discrepancy highlights a fundamental limitation of current evaluations: compressing agent behavior into a single success metric obscures critical operational flaws. Notably, it ignores whether agents behave consistently across runs, withstand perturbations, fail predictably, or have bounded error severity. Grounded in safety-critical engineering, we provide a holistic performance profile by proposing twelve concrete metrics that decompose agent reliability along four key dimensions: consistency, robustness, predictability, and safety. Evaluating 15 models across two complementary benchmarks, we find that recent capability gains have only yielded small improvements in reliability. By exposing these persistent limitations, our metrics complement traditional evaluations while offering tools for reasoning about how agents perform, degrade, and fail.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 3

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 11

roles

background 3

polarities

background 3

representative citing papers

Agent Meltdowns: The Road to Hell Is Paved with Helpful Agents

cs.CL · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

The paper defines accidental meltdowns as unsafe agent behavior triggered by benign errors and reports that such meltdowns occur in 64.7% of evaluated rollouts across GPT, Grok, and Gemini agents.

Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities

cs.AI · 2026-05-19 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Open-world evaluations using qualitative review of real-world tasks can give earlier warnings of frontier AI capabilities than automated benchmarks, as demonstrated by an AI agent publishing a simple iOS app with one minor human fix.

MarketBench: Evaluating AI Agents as Market Participants

cs.AI · 2026-04-26 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

LLMs show poor calibration in predicting task success and token use on software engineering benchmarks, causing market auctions to underperform compared to perfect information scenarios, with limited improvement from added context.

The Agentic Web Requires New Normative Infrastructure

cs.CY · 2026-06-09 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

The agentic web requires new normative infrastructure of laws, norms, and practices to allow user-delegated AI agents to access online properties without being blocked as malicious bots.

Security, Privacy, and Ethical Risks in OpenClaw

cs.CR · 2026-05-22 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

The paper analyzes security, privacy, and ethical risks in the OpenClaw AI agent system arising from its architecture, storage, tool use, and integrations, arguing these form major barriers to trustworthy adoption.

citing papers explorer

Showing 11 of 11 citing papers.