Joint photometric cross-calibration and SED modeling in BayeSN yields G26 model with 12% NMAD scatter reduction on DES-SN5YR supernovae at z<0.7.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4representative citing papers
skysurvey provides a Python framework with Target, Survey, and DataSet classes plus modeldag to simulate transient sky observations, demonstrated on Type Ia supernovae populations and ZTF DR2 replication.
No kilonova detected from sub-solar GW candidate S251112cm, but coincident IIb supernova SN 2025adtq yields suggestive evidence for the superkilonova channel, though inconclusive after accounting for chance coincidence.
BayeSN analysis of ZTF Type Ia supernovae confirms a ~0.1 mag intrinsic environmental step in standardized brightness that is not explained by differences in dust extinction properties.
citing papers explorer
-
BayeSN $\times$ Dovekie: Joint Photometric Cross-calibration and SED Modelling of Type Ia Supernovae
Joint photometric cross-calibration and SED modeling in BayeSN yields G26 model with 12% NMAD scatter reduction on DES-SN5YR supernovae at z<0.7.
-
skysurvey: a pure python package to simulate the transient sky
skysurvey provides a Python framework with Target, Survey, and DataSet classes plus modeldag to simulate transient sky observations, demonstrated on Type Ia supernovae populations and ZTF DR2 replication.
-
Electromagnetic Follow-up of the Sub-Solar Mass Gravitational Wave Candidate S251112cm: Kilonova Constraints and a Coincident IIb Supernova
No kilonova detected from sub-solar GW candidate S251112cm, but coincident IIb supernova SN 2025adtq yields suggestive evidence for the superkilonova channel, though inconclusive after accounting for chance coincidence.
-
On the origin of the environmental step: A BayeSN view of the ZTF SN Ia DR2
BayeSN analysis of ZTF Type Ia supernovae confirms a ~0.1 mag intrinsic environmental step in standardized brightness that is not explained by differences in dust extinction properties.