pith. sign in

arxiv: 1806.11493 · v1 · pith:PTJS5TF4new · submitted 2018-06-29 · 🧮 math.AT · math.GR· math.GT· math.KT

A counterexample to a strong version of the Andrews-Curtis conjecture

classification 🧮 math.AT math.GRmath.GTmath.KT
keywords langlerangleandrews-curtiscomplexesconjecturecounterexampleequivalenteven
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We prove that the presentations $\langle x,y | [x,y],1 \rangle$ and $\langle x,y | [x,[x,y^{-1}]]^2y[y^{-1},x]y^{-1},[x,[[y^{-1},x],x]] \rangle$ are not $Q^*$-equivalent even though their standard complexes have the same simple homotopy type.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.