An interdisciplinary survey of network similarity methods
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:ICYQRCTPrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Comparative graph and network analysis play an important role in both systems biology and pattern recognition, but existing surveys on the topic have historically ignored or underserved one or the other of these fields. We present an integrative introduction to the key objectives and methods of graph and network comparison in each field, with the intent of remaining accessible to relative novices in order to mitigate the barrier to interdisciplinary idea crossover. To guide our investigation, and to quantitatively justify our assertions about what the key objectives and methods of each field are, we have constructed a citation network containing 5,793 vertices from the full reference lists of over two hundred relevant papers, which we collected by searching Google Scholar for ten different network comparison-related search terms. We investigate its basic statistics and community structure, and frame our presentation around the papers found to have high importance according to five different standard centrality measures.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.