pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11427 · v1 · pith:VZ6MJTHWnew · submitted 2019-06-27 · 💻 cs.NI · cs.CR· cs.SI

Security of 5G-Mobile Backhaul Networks: A Survey

Gaurav Choudhary , Jiyoon Kim , Vishal Sharma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI cs.CRcs.SI
keywords 5G networksmobile backhaulnetwork securitysoftware defined networkingmillimeter wavequality of servicehandover managementrouting
0
0 comments X

The pith

Security in 5G mobile backhaul networks has received limited attention despite its importance for handling growing data traffic.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that security for 5G mobile backhaul is crucial but has not been widely studied. It examines design issues and key challenges in building secure architectures for these networks. Comparisons of current solutions are provided, along with discussions on problems like quality of service, routing, resource management, latency, and handovers. The work highlights how technologies such as software defined networking and millimeter wave can address some of these issues and suggests future research paths.

Core claim

The central claim is that security of mobile backhaul is of utmost importance; however, there are a limited number of articles which have explored such a requirement. The paper discusses the potential design issues and key challenges of the secure 5G mobile backhaul architecture along with comparisons of existing state-of-the-art solutions.

What carries the argument

Comparisons of state-of-the-art solutions for secure mobile backhaul, focusing on issues in quality of service, routing, scheduling, resource management, capacity, latency, security management, and handovers using software defined networking and millimeter wave technologies.

If this is right

  • Identifying key challenges allows targeted improvements in network design.
  • Comparisons of solutions reveal effective approaches for security.
  • Integration of SDN and mmWave can mitigate latency and capacity issues.
  • Future directions point to ongoing research needs in security management.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The survey could serve as a baseline for tracking progress in the field as more studies emerge.
  • Challenges in backhaul security may influence the development of related wireless technologies.
  • Practical implementations might benefit from prioritizing the listed issues in network planning.

Load-bearing premise

The surveyed literature and selected state-of-the-art solutions are representative of the major contributions in secure 5G mobile backhaul.

What would settle it

Discovery of numerous additional papers on 5G backhaul security that were not considered would undermine the assertion of limited exploration in the area.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.11427 by Gaurav Choudhary, Jiyoon Kim, Vishal Sharma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The communication applications and backhaul solutions (wired and wireless) along with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A taxonomy of existing frameworks and solutions for 5G mobile backhaul. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The security requirements of 5G mobile backhaul. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The security solutions for mobile backhaul, attacks and affected services. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The generalized 5G mobile backhaul network architecture and applicable security solutions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The research challenges and future direction for 5G mobile backhaul networks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The rapid involution of the mobile generation with incipient data networking capabilities and utilization has exponentially increased the data traffic volumes. Such traffic drains various key issues in 5G mobile backhaul networks. Security of mobile backhaul is of utmost importance; however, there are a limited number of articles, which have explored such a requirement. This paper discusses the potential design issues and key challenges of the secure 5G mobile backhaul architecture. The comparisons of the existing state-of-the-art solutions for secure mobile backhaul, together with their major contributions have been explored. Furthermore, the paper discussed various key issues related to Quality of Service (QoS), routing and scheduling, resource management, capacity enhancement, latency, security-management, and handovers using mechanisms like Software Defined Networking and millimeter Wave technologies. Moreover, the trails of research challenges and future directions are additionally presented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a survey on the security of 5G mobile backhaul networks. It notes the limited number of articles exploring this requirement and discusses potential design issues and key challenges of the secure 5G mobile backhaul architecture. It compares existing state-of-the-art solutions along with their major contributions. The paper examines various key issues related to QoS, routing and scheduling, resource management, capacity enhancement, latency, security-management, and handovers using mechanisms like Software Defined Networking and millimeter Wave technologies. It also presents research challenges and future directions.

Significance. If the survey provides a representative coverage of the literature and accurately identifies the major challenges, the work could be significant for the 5G networking community. The topic is important given the growth in data traffic and the acknowledged scarcity of focused articles on backhaul security; a clear comparison of solutions and outline of open issues could help guide subsequent research.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'rapid involution' is likely a typo or misuse for 'rapid evolution'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The sentence 'Such traffic drains various key issues in 5G mobile backhaul networks' is unclear; 'drains' does not fit the intended meaning and should be replaced (e.g., 'raises' or 'introduces').
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: 'the trails of research challenges' is awkward phrasing; consider rewording to 'research trails' or 'avenues of research challenges' for clarity.
  4. [Abstract] Abstract: The comma after 'articles' in 'there are a limited number of articles, which have explored' is unnecessary and should be removed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our survey and the recommendation of minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the scope and contributions of the manuscript. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: pure survey with no derivations

full rationale

This is a literature survey paper with no equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or original derivations. The central claims are descriptive summaries of external work on 5G backhaul security challenges (QoS, routing, handovers, etc.) and comparisons of state-of-the-art solutions. No load-bearing step reduces to self-definition, fitted input, or self-citation chain. The representativeness of selected literature is an acknowledged premise of any survey rather than an internal circularity. Score 0 is the appropriate finding for self-contained descriptive reviews.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey paper the central claim rests on the authors' selection and interpretation of prior literature rather than new parameters, axioms, or entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5681 in / 988 out tokens · 24305 ms · 2026-05-25T14:23:25.519346+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Agiwal, A

    M. Agiwal, A. Roy, and N. Saxena. Next generation 5g wireless networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3):1617–1655, February 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Ahmad, T

    I. Ahmad, T. Kumar, M. Liyanage, J. Okwuibe, M. Ylianttila, and A. Gurtov. Overview of 5g security challenges and solutions. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 2(1):36–43, March 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    M. H. Alsharif and R. Nordin. Evolution towards fifth generation (5g) wireless networks: Current trends and challenges in the deployment of millimetre wave, massive mimo, and small cells. Telecommunication Systems, 64(4):617–637, July 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Alzenad, M

    M. Alzenad, M. Z. Shakir, H. Yanikomeroglu, and M.-S. Alouini. Fso-based vertical backhaul/fronthaul framework for 5g+ wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(1):218–224, January 2018. 23 Security of 5G-Mobile Backhaul Networks: A Survey Choudhary et al

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    S. Asif. 5g mobile communications: Concepts and technologies. July 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Atakora and H

    M. Atakora and H. Chenji. A multicast technique for fixed and mobile optical wireless backhaul in 5g networks. IEEE Access, 6, 2018, DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2832980

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2018.2832980 2018

  7. [7]

    Y . Balmas. Mobile network security.Availability Risks in Mobile Networks-Radware ERT Research Report, November 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Basin, J

    D. Basin, J. Dreier, L. Hirschi, S. Radomirovic, R. Sasse, and V . Stettler. A formal analysis of 5g authen- tication. In Proceedings of the SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Toronto, Canada, pages 1383–1396. ACM, October 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Bercovich, L

    D. Bercovich, L. M. Contreras, Y . Haddad, A. Adam, and C. J. Bernardos. Software-defined wireless trans- port networks for flexible mobile backhaul in 5g systems. Mobile Networks and Applications, 20(6):793– 801, August 2015

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Beyranvand, M

    H. Beyranvand, M. L ´evesque, M. Maier, J. A. Salehi, C. Verikoukis, and D. Tipper. Toward 5g: Fiwi enhanced lte-a hetnets with reliable low-latency fiber backhaul sharing and wifi offloading. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(2):690–707, April 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Bordel and R

    B. Bordel and R. Alcarria. Physical unclonable functions based on silicon micro-ring resonators for secure signature delegation in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security (JISIS), 8(3):40–53, August 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Borgaonkar, K

    R. Borgaonkar, K. Redon, and J.-P. Seifert. Security analysis of a femtocell device. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks, Sydney, Australia , pages 95–102. ACM, November 2011

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Chang and N

    C.-Y . Chang and N. Nikaein. Closing in on 5g control apps: Enabling multiservice programmability in a disaggregated radio access network. ieee vehicular technology magazine, 13(4):80 – 93, December 2018

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    J. T. Chapman, J. Andreoli-Fang, M. Chauvin, E. C. Reyes, Z. Lu, D. Liu, J. Padden, and A. Bernstein. Low latency techniques for mobile backhaul over docsis. In Proc. of the Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Barcelona, Spain, pages 1–6. IEEE, April 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Checko, H

    A. Checko, H. L. Christiansen, Y . Yan, L. Scolari, G. Kardaras, M. S. Berger, and L. Dittmann. Cloud ran for mobile networks—a technology overview. IEEE Communications surveys & tutorials, 17(1):405–426, September 2015

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    M. Chen, Y . Qian, S. Mao, W. Tang, and X. Yang. Software-defined mobile networks security. Mobile Networks and Applications, 21(5):729–743, October 2016

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    S. Chia, M. Gasparroni, and P. Brick. The next challenge for cellular networks: Backhaul. IEEE Microwave Magazine, 10(5):54 – 66, August 2009

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Costa-Perez, A

    X. Costa-Perez, A. Garcia-Saavedra, X. Li, T. Deiss, O. Delgado, A. Di Giglio, A. Mourad, et al. 5g- crosshaul: an sdn/nfv integrated fronthaul/backhaul transport network architecture. 24(1):38–45, February 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Costa-Requena, V

    J. Costa-Requena, V . F. Guasch, and J. L. Santos. Software defined networks based 5g backhaul architecture. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, Bali, Indonesia, page 35. ACM, January 2015

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Costa-Requena, R

    J. Costa-Requena, R. Kantola, J. Llorente, V . Ferrer, J. Manner, A. Y . Ding, Y . Liu, and S. Tarkoma. Software defined 5g mobile backhaul. InProc. of the1st International Conference on 5G for Ubiquitous Connectivity (5GU), Akaslompolo, Finland, pages 258–263. IEEE, November 2014

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Costa-Requena, A

    J. Costa-Requena, A. Poutanen, S. Vural, G. Kamel, C. Clark, and S. K. Roy. Sdn-based upf for mobile backhaul network slicing. In Proc. of the European Conference on Networks and Communications (Eu- CNC), Ljubljana, Slovenia, Slovenia, pages 48–53. IEEE, June 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Cvetkovski, T

    D. Cvetkovski, T. H ¨alsig, B. Lankl, and E. Grass. Next generation mm-wave wireless backhaul based on los mimo links. In Proc. of the German Microwave Conference (GeMiC), Bochum, Germany, pages 69–72. IEEE, March 2016

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Dalla Cia, F

    M. Dalla Cia, F. Mason, D. Peron, F. Chiariotti, M. Polese, T. Mahmoodi, M. Zorzi, and A. Zanella. Using smart city data in 5g self-organizing networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(2):645–654, April 2018

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Destino, O

    G. Destino, O. Kursu, S. Tammelin, J. Haukipuro, M. Sonkki, T. Rahkonen, A. P ¨arssinen, M. Latva-aho, A. Korvala, and M. Pettissalo. System analysis and design of mmw mobile backhaul transceiver at 28 ghz. 24 Security of 5G-Mobile Backhaul Networks: A Survey Choudhary et al. In Proc. of the European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), Oulu...

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Dighriri, G

    M. Dighriri, G. M. Lee, and T. Baker. Big data environment for smart healthcare applications over 5g mobile network. In Applications of Big Data Analytics, pages 1–29. Springer, July 2018

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Dighriri, G

    M. Dighriri, G. M. Lee, and T. Baker. Measurement and classification of smart systems data traffic over 5g mobile networks. In Technology for Smart Futures, pages 195–217. Springer, September 2018

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    P. Donegan. New backhaul requirements for lte, lte advanced and beyond. Juniper Solution, pages 1–14, http://executiveindustryevents.com/FileStore/Juniperlast access: Nov,2018

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    A. T. Eiriksson, A. Gupta, and S. K. M. Venkata. Method for in-line tls/ssl cleartext encryption and authen- tication, Mar. 29 2018. US Patent App. 15/279,894

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    M. H. Eiza, Q. Shi, A. Marnerides, T. Owens, and Q. Ni. Efficient, secure and privacy-preserving pmipv6 protocol for v2g networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, November 2018, DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2880834

    work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2880834 2018

  30. [30]

    D. Fang, Y . Qian, and R. Q. Hu. Security requirements and standards for 4g and 5g wireless systems. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications, 21(1):15–20, March 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    W. Feng, Y . Li, D. Jin, L. Su, and S. Chen. Millimetre-wave backhaul for 5g networks: Challenges and solutions. Sensors, 16(6):892–909, June 2016

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    M. J. Fisher, D. C. Long, M. T. Peets, and T. Weiss. Enclosure with inner tamper-respondent sensor (s) and physical security element (s), Apr. 19 2018. US Patent App. 15/835,585

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Z. Gao, L. Dai, D. Mi, Z. Wang, M. A. Imran, and M. Z. Shakir. Mmwave massive-mimo-based wireless backhaul for the 5g ultra-dense network. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(5):13–21, October 2015

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    X. Ge, H. Cheng, M. Guizani, and T. Han. 5g wireless backhaul networks: challenges and research ad- vances. IEEE Network, 28(6):6–11, November 2014

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Getschmann, K

    R. Getschmann, K. Supanekar, and D. Ruffen. Multi-stage secure network element certificate provisioning in a distributed mobile access network, July 19 2018. US Patent App. 15/872,889

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    J. F. Gomes, M. Iivari, P. Ahokangas, L. Isotalo, B. Sahlin, and J. Mel ´en. Cyber security business models in 5g. A Comprehensive Guide to 5G Security , pages 99–116, January 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119293071.ch5

    work page doi:10.1002/9781119293071.ch5 2018

  37. [37]

    Gupta, R

    A. Gupta, R. K. Jha, and R. Devi. Security architecture of 5g wireless communication network.International Journal of Sensors Wireless Communications and Control, 8(2):92–99, August 2018

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Haddaji, A

    N. Haddaji, A. Bayati, K.-K. Nguyen, and M. Cheriet. Backhauling-as-a-service (bhaas) for 5g optical sliced networks: an optimized tco approach. Journal of Lightwave Technology , 36(18):4006–4017, September 2018

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Hamidouche, W

    K. Hamidouche, W. Saad, M. Debbah, J. B. Song, and C. S. Hong. The 5g cellular backhaul management dilemma: To cache or to serve. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(8):4866–4879, August 2017

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    S. Han, J. Jung, H. Kim, S. Kim, S. Baek, and S. Choi. Achievable rate evaluation by system level simulation for mm wave based backhaul network adopting in-band full-duplex. In Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Prague, Czech Republic, pages 607–609. IEEE, July 2018

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Hu and D

    Q. Hu and D. M. Blough. Relay selection and scheduling for millimeter wave backhaul in urban envi- ronments. In Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Orlando, FL, USA, pages 206–214. IEEE, November 2017

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    S. Hu, X. Wang, and M. Z. Shakir. A mih and sdn-based framework for network selection in 5g hetnet: Backhaul requirement perspectives. In Proc. of the International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW), London, UK, pages 37–43. IEEE, June 2015

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Huskov, T

    P. Huskov, T. Maksymyuk, I. Kahalo, and M. Klymash. Smart backhauling subsystem for 5g heterogeneous network. In Proc. of the 13th International Conference The Experience of Designing and Application of CAD Systems in Microelectronics (CADSM), Lviv, Ukraine, pages 481–483. IEEE, February 2015

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Jaber, M

    M. Jaber, M. A. Imran, R. Tafazolli, and A. Tukmanov. 5g backhaul challenges and emerging research 25 Security of 5G-Mobile Backhaul Networks: A Survey Choudhary et al. directions: A survey. IEEE access, 4:1743–1766, April 2016

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Jaber, F

    M. Jaber, F. J. Lopez-Martinez, M. A. Imran, A. Sutton, A. Tukmanov, and R. Tafazolli. Wireless backhaul: Performance modeling and impact on user association for 5g. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communica- tions, 17(5):3095–3110, May 2018

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Jung and I.-H

    H. Jung and I.-H. Lee. Outage analysis of millimeter-wave wireless backhaul in the presence of blockage. IEEE Communications Letters, 20(11):2268–2271, November 2016

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Jungnickel, K

    V . Jungnickel, K. Habel, M. Parker, S. Walker, C. Bock, J. F. Riera, V . Marques, and D. Levi. Software- defined open architecture for front-and backhaul in 5g mobile networks. In Proc. of the16th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Graz, Austria, pages 1–4. IEEE, August 2014

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Kornaros, O

    G. Kornaros, O. Tomoutzoglou, and M. Coppola. Hardware-assisted security in electronic control units: Secure automotive communications by utilizing one-time-programmable network on chip and firewalls. IEEE Micro, 38(5):63–74, September 2018

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Koslowski, W

    K. Koslowski, W. Keusgen, and T. Haustein. Meshed 5g millimeter-wave backhaul networks with central- ized sdn orchestration. ITRI ICL Journal 2018, 2018

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Krasko, H

    O. Krasko, H. Al-Zayadi, A. Masyuk, and M. Klymash. Enhanced mac design for convergence of 5g back- haul network. In Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), Lviv, Ukraine, pages 213–216. IEEE, July 2017

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    Kumar, S

    V . Kumar, S. Yadav, D. Sandeep, S. Dhok, R. K. Barik, and H. Dubey. 5g cellular: Concept, research work and enabling technologies. In Advances in Data and Information Sciences, pages 327–338. Springer, 2019

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    L. M. Larsen, A. Checko, and H. L. Christiansen. A survey of the functional splits pro- posed for 5g mobile crosshaul networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2018, DOI:10.1109/COMST.2018.2868805

    work page doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2868805 2018

  53. [53]

    H. C. Leligou, T. Zahariadis, L. Sarakis, E. Tsampasis, A. V oulkidis, and T. E. Velivassaki. Smart grid: a demanding use case for 5g technologies. In Proc. of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), Athens, Greece, pages 215–220. IEEE, March 2018

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    S. Li, L. Da Xu, and S. Zhao. 5g internet of things: A survey. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 10:1–9, June 2018

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Y . Li, E. Pateromichelakis, N. Vucic, J. Luo, W. Xu, and G. Caire. Radio resource management considera- tions for 5g millimeter wave backhaul and access networks.IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(6):86–92, June 2017

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Liyanage, I

    M. Liyanage, I. Ahmad, A. B. Abro, A. Gurtov, and M. Ylianttila. A comprehensive guide to 5g security, 2018

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Liyanage, I

    M. Liyanage, I. Ahmed, M. Ylianttila, J. L. Santos, R. Kantola, O. L. Perez, M. U. Itzazelaia, E. M. de Oca, A. Valtierra, and C. Jimenez. Security for future software defined mobile networks. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, Cambridge, UK, pages 256–264. IEEE, September 2015

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Liyanage and A

    M. Liyanage and A. Gurtov. Secured vpn models for lte backhaul networks. In Proc. of the Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), Quebec City, QC, Canada, pages 1–5. IEEE, September 2012

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    Liyanage, P

    M. Liyanage, P. Kumar, M. Ylianttila, and A. Gurtov. Novel secure vpn architectures for lte backhaul networks. Security and Communication Networks, 9(10):1198–1215, January 2016

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Liyanage, J

    M. Liyanage, J. Okwuibe, I. Ahmed, M. Ylianttila, O. L. P´erez, M. U. Itzazelaia, and E. M. de Oca. Software defined monitoring (sdm) for 5g mobile backhaul networks. In Proc. of the International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN), Osaka, Japan, pages 1–6. IEEE, June 2017

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Liyanage, M

    M. Liyanage, M. Ylianttila, and A. Gurtov. A case study on security issues in lte backhaul and core networks. Case Studies in Secure Computing: Achievements and Trends, 1:167–188, August 2014

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    L. Ma, S. Yi, N. Carter, and Q. Li. Efficient live migration of edge services leveraging container layered storage. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, September 2018, DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2018.2871842

    work page doi:10.1109/tmc.2018.2871842 2018

  63. [63]

    Magne, A

    F. Magne, A. Ramirez, and C. Paoloni. Millimeter wave point to multipoint for affordable high capacity backhaul of dense cell networks. In Proc. of the Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Barcelona, Spain, pages 1–6. IEEE, April 2018. 26 Security of 5G-Mobile Backhaul Networks: A Survey Choudhary et al

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Maksymyuk, O

    T. Maksymyuk, O. KRASKO, M. KYRYK, V . ROMANCHUK, and R. KOLODIY . Designing the new backhaul for 5g heterogeneous network based on converged optical infrastructure. Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 17(4):9–13, January 2017

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    Mesodiakaki, E

    A. Mesodiakaki, E. Zola, R. Santos, and A. Kassler. Optimal user association, backhaul routing and switch- ing off in 5g heterogeneous networks with mesh millimeter wave backhaul links. Ad hoc networks, 78:99– 114, 2018

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    C. M. Moreira, G. Kaddoum, and E. Bou-Harb. Cross-layer authentication protocol design for ultra-dense 5g hetnets. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kansas City, MO, USA, pages 1–7. IEEE, May 2018

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    M. M. Mowla, I. Ahmad, D. Habibi, and V . Phung. Energy efficient backhauling for 5g small cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 2018, DOI:10.1109/TSUSC.2018.2838116

    work page doi:10.1109/tsusc.2018.2838116 2018

  68. [68]

    Mu ˜noz, J

    R. Mu ˜noz, J. F`abrega, R. Vilalta, M. S. Moreolo, R. Mart´ınez, R. Casellas, N. Yoshikane, T. Tsuritani, and I. Morita. Sdn control and monitoring of sdm/wdm and packet transport networks for 5g fronthaul/backhaul. In Proc. of the IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting Series (SUM), Waikoloa, HI, USA , pages 151–152. IEEE, July 2018

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Namal, A

    S. Namal, A. Gurtov, and M. Bennis. Securing the backhaul for mobile and multi-homed femtocells. In Proc. of the Future Network & Mobile Summit (FutureNetw), Warsaw, Poland , pages 1–15. IEEE, June 2011

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    S. A. R. Naqvi, S. A. Hassan, H. Pervaiz, and Q. Ni. Drone-aided communication as a key enabler for 5g and resilient public safety networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(1):36–42, January 2018

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    A. I. Nasr and Y . Fahmy. Millimeter-wave wireless backhauling for 5g small cells: Scalability of mesh over star topologies. In Proc. of the 18th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Macau, China, pages 1–6. IEEE, June 2017

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Navarro-Ortiz, S

    J. Navarro-Ortiz, S. Sendra, P. Ameigeiras, and J. M. Lopez-Soler. Integration of lorawan and 4g/5g for the industrial internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(2):60–67, February 2018

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Niephaus, O

    C. Niephaus, O. G. Aliu, M. Kretschmer, S. Hadzic, and G. Ghinea. Wireless back-haul: a software defined network enabled wireless back-haul network architecture for future 5g networks. IET Networks, 4(6):287– 295, November 2015

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Oracle’s secure hetnet backhaul solution

    Oracle. Oracle’s secure hetnet backhaul solution. Oracle Solution , pages 1–4, http://www.oracle.com/us/industries/communications/secure–het–net–backhaul–br–1985058.pdf, last access: Nov,2018

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Parvez, A

    I. Parvez, A. Rahmati, I. Guvenc, A. I. Sarwat, and H. Dai. A survey on low latency towards 5g: Ran, core network and caching solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4):3098–3130, May 2018

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Pateromichelakis, K

    E. Pateromichelakis, K. Samdanis, Q. Wei, and P. Spapis. Slice-tailored joint path selection & scheduling in mm-wave small cell dense networks. In Proc. of the IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBE- COM), Singapore, pages 1–6. IEEE, December 2017

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    A. T. Pham, P. V . Trinh, V . V . Mai, N. T. Dang, and C.-T. Truong. Hybrid free-space optics/millimeter- wave architecture for 5g cellular backhaul networks. In Proc. of the Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC), Shanghai, China, pages 1–3. IEEE, June 2015

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    Phan-Huy, P

    D.-T. Phan-Huy, P. Ratajczak, R. D’Errico, J. J ¨arvel¨ainen, D. Kong, K. Haneda, B. Bulut, A. Karttunen, M. Beach, E. Mellios, et al. Massive multiple input massive multiple output for 5g wireless backhauling. In Proc. of the 2017 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Singapore, pages 1–6. IEEE, December 2017

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    A. R. Prasad, S. Arumugam, B. Sheeba, and A. Zugenmaier. 3gpp 5g security. Journal of ICT Standardiza- tion, 6(1):137–158, May 2018

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    H. Raza. A brief survey of radio access network backhaul evolution: part i. IEEE Communications Maga- zine, 49(6):164 – 171, June 2011

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.