A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FYGWRUDPrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The software engineering community recently has witnessed widespread deployment of AI programming assistants, such as GitHub Copilot. However, in practice, developers do not accept AI programming assistants' initial suggestions at a high frequency. This leaves a number of open questions related to the usability of these tools. To understand developers' practices while using these tools and the important usability challenges they face, we administered a survey to a large population of developers and received responses from a diverse set of 410 developers. Through a mix of qualitative and quantitative analyses, we found that developers are most motivated to use AI programming assistants because they help developers reduce key-strokes, finish programming tasks quickly, and recall syntax, but resonate less with using them to help brainstorm potential solutions. We also found the most important reasons why developers do not use these tools are because these tools do not output code that addresses certain functional or non-functional requirements and because developers have trouble controlling the tool to generate the desired output. Our findings have implications for both creators and users of AI programming assistants, such as designing minimal cognitive effort interactions with these tools to reduce distractions for users while they are programming.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Robo-Blocks: Generative Scaffolding in End-User Design and Programming of Social Robots
Robo-Blocks is an LLM-augmented block-based tool that supplies generative scaffolding via structured narratives; a deployment study with novices surfaced user personas, usage patterns, and design insights for integrat...
-
Agentic AI in Industry: Adoption Level and Deployment Barriers
Qualitative interview study of 16 practitioners finds most companies at Levels 1-2 of agentic AI maturity and identifies a capability-deployment verification gap as the core barrier to production use.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.