The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2305.10626 · v3 · pith:NPELYL7G · submitted 2023-05-18 · cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

Language Models Meet World Models: Embodied Experiences Enhance Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:NPELYL7Grecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords embodiedmodelsworldlanguageplanningapproachdiverseexperiences
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

While large language models (LMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across numerous tasks, they often struggle with simple reasoning and planning in physical environments, such as understanding object permanence or planning household activities. The limitation arises from the fact that LMs are trained only on written text and miss essential embodied knowledge and skills. In this paper, we propose a new paradigm of enhancing LMs by finetuning them with world models, to gain diverse embodied knowledge while retaining their general language capabilities. Our approach deploys an embodied agent in a world model, particularly a simulator of the physical world (VirtualHome), and acquires a diverse set of embodied experiences through both goal-oriented planning and random exploration. These experiences are then used to finetune LMs to teach diverse abilities of reasoning and acting in the physical world, e.g., planning and completing goals, object permanence and tracking, etc. Moreover, it is desirable to preserve the generality of LMs during finetuning, which facilitates generalizing the embodied knowledge across tasks rather than being tied to specific simulations. We thus further introduce the classical (EWC) for selective weight updates, combined with low-rank adapters (LoRA) for training efficiency. Extensive experiments show our approach substantially improves base LMs on 18 downstream tasks by 64.28% on average. In particular, the small LMs (1.3B, 6B, and 13B) enhanced by our approach match or even outperform much larger LMs (e.g., ChatGPT).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Agent vs. Parametric World Models: Hybrid Planning for Reliable Language Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GILP trains a parameterized backbone for valid actions and state predictions, then uses a consistency gate with LLM drafts to reduce hallucinated-state rate from 0.176 to 0.035 on GPT-4o-mini while raising success fro...

  2. Agent vs. Parametric World Models: Hybrid Planning for Reliable Language Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GILP combines a small parameterized world model with LLM agent reasoning via a consistency gate, reducing hallucinated-state rate from 0.176 to 0.035 and raising success from 0.668 to 0.838 on graph planning benchmarks.

  3. LaGO: Latent Action Guidance for Online Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LaGO improves online RL success rates over vanilla PPO by using pretrained LLMs as latent action priors, raising rates from 15.1% to 27.2% on CLEVR-Robot and 2.7% to 15.2% on Meta-World.