The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2305.18703 · v7 · pith:LWCBQGVZ · submitted 2023-05-30 · cs.CL · cs.AI

Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Survey

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:LWCBQGVZrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords domainlanguagelargellmsapplicationsmodelscomprehensivetechniques
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the field of natural language processing (NLP), providing a highly useful, task-agnostic foundation for a wide range of applications. However, directly applying LLMs to solve sophisticated problems in specific domains meets many hurdles, caused by the heterogeneity of domain data, the sophistication of domain knowledge, the uniqueness of domain objectives, and the diversity of the constraints (e.g., various social norms, cultural conformity, religious beliefs, and ethical standards in the domain applications). Domain specification techniques are key to make large language models disruptive in many applications. Specifically, to solve these hurdles, there has been a notable increase in research and practices conducted in recent years on the domain specialization of LLMs. This emerging field of study, with its substantial potential for impact, necessitates a comprehensive and systematic review to better summarize and guide ongoing work in this area. In this article, we present a comprehensive survey on domain specification techniques for large language models, an emerging direction critical for large language model applications. First, we propose a systematic taxonomy that categorizes the LLM domain-specialization techniques based on the accessibility to LLMs and summarizes the framework for all the subcategories as well as their relations and differences to each other. Second, we present an extensive taxonomy of critical application domains that can benefit dramatically from specialized LLMs, discussing their practical significance and open challenges. Last, we offer our insights into the current research status and future trends in this area.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TS-Reasoner: Domain-Oriented Time Series Inference Agents for Reasoning and Automated Analysis

    cs.LG 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TS-Reasoner is a domain-oriented agent using LLMs, computational tools, and error feedback for multi-step time series inference, showing better performance than general LLMs on understanding and reasoning benchmarks.

  2. When AI Reviews Its Own Code: Recursive Self-Training Collapse in Code LLMs

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Experiments across code LLMs show no-review collapses fastest, human-gated filters slow collapse, and AI self-gates lose effect over time, degenerating to ungated self-training under self-confirming acceptance as prov...

  3. ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs

    cs.LG 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    A principled reward design for tool selection and application in RL-trained LLMs delivers 17% gains over base models and 15% over SFT across benchmarks.

  4. Predicate Importance Estimation and Decoupled Rationale-Score Distillation for Entity Alignment

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PIE creates predicate-aware embeddings by weighting subjectless triples and DRSD distills LLM reasoning into an SLM while decoupling confidence from rationales to improve entity alignment and enable human-in-the-loop ...

  5. Knowledge-Driven Hallucination in Large Language Models: An Empirical Study on Process Modeling

    cs.AI 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLMs override explicit source evidence with internal knowledge when modeling business processes, creating a measurable reliability risk in analytical tasks.

  6. Assessment of RAG and Fine-Tuning for Industrial Question-Answering-Applications

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    RAG is more effective and cost-efficient than fine-tuning for industrial QA adaptation on automotive datasets.

  7. Towards EnergyGPT: A Large Language Model Specialized for the Energy Sector

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Fine-tuned LLaMA 3.1-8B variants for the energy sector outperform the base model on domain QA benchmarks, with LoRA delivering similar gains at lower training cost.