Exploring Interaction Patterns for Debugging: Enhancing Conversational Capabilities of AI-assistants
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BAOAIEF4record.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The widespread availability of Large Language Models (LLMs) within Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) has led to their speedy adoption. Conversational interactions with LLMs enable programmers to obtain natural language explanations for various software development tasks. However, LLMs often leap to action without sufficient context, giving rise to implicit assumptions and inaccurate responses. Conversations between developers and LLMs are primarily structured as question-answer pairs, where the developer is responsible for asking the the right questions and sustaining conversations across multiple turns. In this paper, we draw inspiration from interaction patterns and conversation analysis -- to design Robin, an enhanced conversational AI-assistant for debugging. Through a within-subjects user study with 12 industry professionals, we find that equipping the LLM to -- (1) leverage the insert expansion interaction pattern, (2) facilitate turn-taking, and (3) utilize debugging workflows -- leads to lowered conversation barriers, effective fault localization, and 5x improvement in bug resolution rates.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Understanding the Human-LLM Dynamic: A Literature Survey of LLM Use in Programming Tasks
A survey of user studies on LLM use in programming that identifies interaction behaviors, mixed benefits and weaknesses, and factors influencing human and task performance.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.