pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.01349 · v2 · pith:XZJUQOTEnew · submitted 2024-03-31 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords llmsfairnessbiasexistingalgorithmsdiscussedevaluatingfair
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Debiasing Without Protected Attributes: Latent Concept Erasure from Textual Profiles

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    H-SAL erases latent concepts from text profiles using self-descriptions as implicit debiasing signals and shows competitive performance on a new multi-domain Stack Exchange helpfulness benchmark.

  2. Explanation Fairness in Large Language Models: An Empirical Analysis of Disparities in How LLMs Justify Decisions Across Demographic Groups

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    LLMs produce explanations with significant disparities in verbosity, sentiment, hedging, faithfulness, and lexical complexity across demographic groups, varying by model and only partially mitigated by prompting.