The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2406.19237 · v2 · pith:5IIVDVA3 · submitted 2024-06-27 · cs.CL · cs.CV· cs.IR· cs.LG

FlowVQA: Mapping Multimodal Logic in Visual Question Answering with Flowcharts

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5IIVDVA3record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.CVcs.IRcs.LG
keywords visualmultimodalreasoningflowvqaansweringbenchmarkflowchartslanguage
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Existing benchmarks for visual question answering lack in visual grounding and complexity, particularly in evaluating spatial reasoning skills. We introduce FlowVQA, a novel benchmark aimed at assessing the capabilities of visual question-answering multimodal language models in reasoning with flowcharts as visual contexts. FlowVQA comprises 2,272 carefully generated and human-verified flowchart images from three distinct content sources, along with 22,413 diverse question-answer pairs, to test a spectrum of reasoning tasks, including information localization, decision-making, and logical progression. We conduct a thorough baseline evaluation on a suite of both open-source and proprietary multimodal language models using various strategies, followed by an analysis of directional bias. The results underscore the benchmark's potential as a vital tool for advancing the field of multimodal modeling, providing a focused and challenging environment for enhancing model performance in visual and logical reasoning tasks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond NL2Code: A Structured Survey of Multimodal Code Intelligence

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A structured survey of multimodal code intelligence that formulates the field by code roles and organizes work into four domains while proposing verification-centered research directions.