The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2409.18032 · v1 · pith:5VOAUTIR · submitted 2024-09-26 · physics.flu-dyn · cs.LG· cs.NE

FlowBench: A Large Scale Benchmark for Flow Simulation over Complex Geometries

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5VOAUTIRrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification physics.flu-dyn cs.LGcs.NE
keywords flowcomplexflowbenchgeometriesdataperformancesolversacross
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Simulating fluid flow around arbitrary shapes is key to solving various engineering problems. However, simulating flow physics across complex geometries remains numerically challenging and computationally resource-intensive, particularly when using conventional PDE solvers. Machine learning methods offer attractive opportunities to create fast and adaptable PDE solvers. However, benchmark datasets to measure the performance of such methods are scarce, especially for flow physics across complex geometries. We introduce FlowBench, a dataset for neural simulators with over 10K samples, which is currently larger than any publicly available flow physics dataset. FlowBench contains flow simulation data across complex geometries (\textit{parametric vs. non-parametric}), spanning a range of flow conditions (\textit{Reynolds number and Grashoff number}), capturing a diverse array of flow phenomena (\textit{steady vs. transient; forced vs. free convection}), and for both 2D and 3D. FlowBench contains over 10K data samples, with each sample the outcome of a fully resolved, direct numerical simulation using a well-validated simulator framework designed for modeling transport phenomena in complex geometries. For each sample, we include velocity, pressure, and temperature field data at 3 different resolutions and several summary statistics features of engineering relevance (such as coefficients of lift and drag, and Nusselt numbers). %Additionally, we include masks and signed distance fields for each shape. We envision that FlowBench will enable evaluating the interplay between complex geometry, coupled flow phenomena, and data sufficiency on the performance of current, and future, neural PDE solvers. We enumerate several evaluation metrics to help rank order the performance of neural PDE solvers. We benchmark the performance of several baseline methods including FNO, CNO, WNO, and DeepONet.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GenMed: A Pairwise Generative Reformulation of Medical Diagnostic Tasks

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GenMed uses diffusion models to capture P(X,Y) for medical tasks and performs inference via gradient-based test-time optimization, supporting arbitrary observation combinations without retraining.

  2. Do Neural Operators Forget Geometry? The Forgetting Hypothesis in Deep Operator Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural operators progressively forget domain geometry with depth due to Markovian layers and global mixing; a geometry memory injection mechanism mitigates this forgetting.

  3. Harnessing AI for Inverse Partial Differential Equation Problems: Past, Present, and Prospects

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey organizing AI methods for inverse PDE problems into inverse problems, inverse design, and control categories, covering applications and future challenges like physics-informed models and uncertainty quantification.