Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 27 cited by

An unambiguous AGN and a Balmer break in an Ultraluminous Little Red Dot at z=4.47 from Ultradeep UNCOVER and All the Little Things Spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a single ultraluminous little red dot at z=4.47 provides unambiguous spectroscopic evidence for a broad-line region around a ~10^9 solar-mass black hole, and that its sharp Balmer break requires an old…

desk verdict A solid, honest AGN detection in a little red dot; the extreme stellar-core claim is real but conditional on the power-law AGN assumption the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04557 v1 pith:Z4R6MGSS submitted 2024-12-05 astro-ph.GA

Ivo Labbe , Jenny E. Greene , Jorryt Matthee , Helena Treiber , Vasily Kokorev , Tim B. Miller , Ivan Kramarenko , David J. Setton
show 32 more authors
Yilun Ma Andy D. Goulding Rachel Bezanson Rohan P. Naidu Christina C. Williams Hakim Atek Gabriel Brammer Sam E. Cutler Iryna Chemerynska Aidan P. Cloonan Pratika Dayal Anna de Graaff Yoshinobu Fudamoto Seiji Fujimoto Lukas J. Furtak Karl Glazebrook Kasper E. Heintz Joel Leja Danilo Marchesini Themiya Nanayakkara Erica J. Nelson Pascal A. Oesch Richard Pan Sedona H. Price Irene Shivaei David Sobral Katherine A. Suess Pieter van Dokkum Bingjie Wang John R. Weaver Katherine E. Whitaker Adi Zitrin
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords LittleRedDotsbroad-lineAGNBalmerbreakhigh-redshiftgalaxiessupermassiveblackholesJWSTspectroscopystellarpopulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the most optically luminous 'little red dot' known at $z=4.47$, source A2744-45924, unambiguously hosts a broad-line region around a supermassive black hole of mass $M_{\rm BH}\sim10^9\,M_\odot$, and that its sharp Balmer break at rest 3650 \AA requires an old, extremely compact stellar population in addition to the AGN. Ultradeep JWST prism and grism spectra reveal broad Fe II emission across the UV, optical, and near-IR, a telltale broad-line-region signature, together with broad H$\alpha$ (FWHM $\sim4500$ km/s) and strong UV nitrogen lines. A joint AGN-plus-stars spectral model is strongly favored over AGN-only or stars-only models, implying a $\sim500$ Myr old, $M_*\sim8\times10^{10}\,M_\odot$ stellar core with effective radius below 70 pc. The authors caution that the Balmer break could in principle arise from dense gas in the broad-line region rather than stars, and call for high-resolution spectroscopy to confirm stellar absorption.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the joint spectral decomposition of the NIRSpec/PRISM and NIRCam/grism data into three competing models: (I) a reddened AGN power-law continuum with broad and narrow emission lines and an Fe II pseudo-continuum, (II) only stellar population synthesis models, and (III) a combination of both. The discriminating evidence is the broad Fe II pseudo-continuum, which marks emission from the broad-line region, paired with the Balmer break at 3650 \AA, which the power-law model cannot reproduce; the fit quality and Bayesian evidence strongly favor model III. The Balmer break strength is measured as $f_{\lambda4100}/f_{\lambda3670}=2.4$, and the stellar component is modeled with population synthesis models, velocity-broadened according to the virial relation for a compact size of 70 pc.

What would settle it

Take a high-resolution ($R\gtrsim3000$) NIRSpec spectrum across the rest-frame 3500--4100 \AA region of A2744-45924. If the break is stellar, deep, narrow stellar absorption lines (Ca II H&K and the higher Balmer series) should appear with velocity widths consistent with the virial motion of an $\sim8\times10^{10}\,M_\odot$ core within 70 pc; if the break is produced by dense broad-line-region gas, no such stellar features will be present and the break should track the broad-line kinematics. An alternative test is to monitor the continuum for variability across the break: a passive stellar continuum should be stable, while a dense-gas or accretion-disk origin would plausibly vary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that A2744-45924, a compact, dust-reddened source at $z=4.47$, shows the clearest spectroscopic evidence yet that little red dots are powered by accretion onto a supermassive black hole: a broad Fe II pseudo-continuum, broad Balmer, Paschen, and O I 8446 \AA lines, with line widths and equivalent widths far exceeding those of typical AGN. The same spectra exhibit a sharp Balmer break at 3650 \AA, and the paper shows that a pure power-law AGN continuum plus emission lines cannot reproduce this break, whereas a two-component model with an evolved stellar population and an AGN produces an excellent fit. The interpretation is that the source contains both a massive black hole ($M_{\rm BH}\sim7\times10^8\,M_\odot$ from the single-epoch H$\alpha$ scaling) and a remarkably dense, evolved stellar core, making it one of the densest stellar systems known. The authors explicitly stress that the stellar interpretation rests on the assumption that the AGN continuum is a power law; if the AGN continuum itself features a Balmer break, no massive stellar component is needed.

Load-bearing premise

The AGN continuum is assumed to be a pure power law plus emission lines; if the AGN's own dense gas produces the Balmer break, the massive stellar component is not needed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the stellar interpretation holds, little red dots at $z>4$ can host evolved, ultra-compact stellar cores with densities rivaling any known stellar system, which would constrain feedback and star-formation at extreme densities.
  • If the AGN interpretation holds, the X-ray non-detection (more than 10 times underluminous relative to broad H$\alpha$) implies either Compton-thick gas with column density above $10^{25}$ cm$^{-2}$ or a significantly higher X-ray bolometric correction than typical quasars.
  • The inferred black-hole-to-stellar-mass ratio of roughly 1 percent, with a black hole near $10^9\,M_\odot$ at $z=4.47$, would test black-hole seeding and early growth models.
  • The strong UV nitrogen lines and narrow Balmer absorption suggest a recent, dense, nitrogen-enriched starburst or intense AGN radiation, plausibly linked to the 40-galaxy overdensity in which the source resides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If dense broad-line-region gas can produce a Balmer break, as in the alternative the paper cites, then many apparent stellar breaks in little red dots could be misattributed, lowering the inferred stellar masses and densities of the whole population.
  • A concrete prediction follows: if the break is stellar, high-resolution spectra should reveal narrow stellar Ca II H&K and Balmer absorption lines with velocity dispersion tied to the compact stellar mass; if the break is from broad-line-region gas, those features should be absent or follow the broad-line kinematics.
  • The Balmer absorption components seen in H$\alpha$ at $-143$ and $+172$ km/s, requiring gas densities above $10^9$ cm$^{-3}$, suggest little red dots may be systematically obscured along the line of sight; accounting for this could change the inferred AGN continuum shapes and Eddington ratios.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents ultradeep JWST spectroscopy and imaging of A2744−45924, an ultraluminous little red dot at z=4.47. The authors report an unambiguous broad-line AGN based on grism-resolved Hα (FWHM ≈ 4500 km/s), broad Fe II pseudo-continuum in the UV/optical/NIR, [Ne V], broad O I, and high-EW nitrogen lines. They also identify a strong Balmer break at rest-frame 3650 Å that their AGN power-law model cannot reproduce, and a joint AGN+stellar fit yields a massive (M* ≈ 8×10^10 M_sun), old (~500 Myr), extremely compact stellar core (ρ ≈ 3×10^6 M_sun/pc^2). The authors explicitly caution in §5.2.3 and §8 that a dense-gas AGN continuum with an intrinsic Balmer break (Inayoshi & Maiolino 2024) could remove the need for a stellar component, and they recommend deep high-resolution spectroscopy to distinguish these interpretations.

Significance. If the stellar interpretation of the Balmer break holds, A2744−45924 would be one of the densest known stellar systems at z > 4, with major implications for early galaxy assembly and black-hole–galaxy co-evolution. The AGN detection itself is robust and significant: the combination of broad Hα, broad Fe II, [Ne V], and broad O I provides one of the cleanest cases for an accreting massive black hole in the little-red-dot population. The paper is also exemplary in its use of ultradeep, multi-instrument JWST data and in explicitly acknowledging the main systematic limitation of its SED modeling. Its main results are presented with appropriate caution in the discussion, though the abstract and title give more weight to the stellar-core interpretation than the model comparison strictly supports.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2.3, abstract] The Bayes factor ln(BI,III) = −81 demonstrates that the data require a component with a Balmer break in addition to a power-law AGN plus emission lines, but it does not identify that component as stellar. The paper itself states in §5.2.3 that if the AGN continuum has a different shape or features a Balmer break (Inayoshi & Maiolino 2024), a massive stellar component would not be needed. Because this dense-gas BLR alternative is neither modeled nor ruled out, the abstract's claim that the stellar-population fit implies a massive, compact stellar core is premature. I recommend either adding a quantitative test of a dense-gas Balmer-break AGN model to the model comparison, or restructuring the abstract and conclusions so the stellar mass, age, and density are presented explicitly as conditional on the power-law AGN assumption.
  2. [Table 1, §5.2.3] The headline stellar parameters are quoted with formal uncertainties that the paper itself warns are underestimates: the Table 1 note says the dust-index and age uncertainties are artificially small because they run into prior limits, and 'all quoted uncertainties should be considered underestimates.' The stellar age (log t = 8.7 ± 0.01) is central to the '~500 Myr old' and 'evolved' characterization, and the stellar mass drives the density claim. The abstract and summary should either propagate a realistic systematic floor into these quantities or state clearly that the stellar parameters are model-dependent and not robust at the quoted precision.
  3. [§3, §9] The effective radius is described both as a measurement (re = 0.010 ± 0.001 arcsec in F200W) and as an upper limit ('re ≲ 70 ± 10 pc' in §3, 're < 70 ± 10 pc' in §9). Since the stellar density scales as M*/R^2, the reported value ρ ≈ 3×10^6 M_sun/pc^2 should be labeled as a lower limit if the size is an upper limit. The current abstract presents the density as a specific number for R_e = 70 ± 10 pc without flagging the direction of the systematic uncertainty. Please clarify the size notation and the corresponding bound on the density.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1] The text says 'Three of the seven MSA configurations included A2744−45924' but then lists configurations MSA 4, 5, 6, and 7, which is four configurations; please resolve this inconsistency.
  2. [§4.2, Table 5] The [Ne V] λ3426 line appears twice in Table 5 with different fluxes (5.2 ± 3.6 and 6.3 ± 1.0, in units of 1e-19 erg/s/cm^2); please check which value corresponds to the fit shown in Figure 4.
  3. [§5.2.3] The phrase 'Bayes Factor (the ratio of the logarithm of the evidence Z)' is imprecise: the Bayes factor is the ratio of evidences, and the natural logarithm is then taken. Please rephrase to avoid confusion.
  4. [§2.1] The point-source LSF scale factor of 1.3 is introduced without a quantitative justification; since line widths and equivalent widths are discussed throughout, a brief test or reference showing the sensitivity of the results to this choice would strengthen the presentation.
  5. [§3, §9] The notation for the effective radius is inconsistent between §3 ('re ≲ 70 ± 10 pc') and §9 ('re < 70 ± 10 pc'); please use a single convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the stellar interpretation is conditional on the power-law AGN assumption, which the paper explicitly flags as a limitation rather than hiding.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. The AGN identification rests on observed broad Fe II, Mg II, He II, and Balmer lines fitted with external empirical templates (Vestergaard & Wilkes 2001; Salviander et al. 2006; Tsuzuki et al. 2006) and on the external Greene & Ho (2005) single-epoch scaling relation; none of these inputs are defined in terms of the paper's conclusions. The Balmer-break analysis is a genuine three-way model comparison: an AGN-only power-law model (Model I), a stellar-only model (Model II), and a joint AGN+stellar model (Model III) are each fit to the same NIRSpec/PRISM and grism data, with Bayes factor ln(BI,III) = -81 favoring Model III. The stellar mass, age, and density are posterior outputs of an FSPS fit with a Chabrier IMF, not inputs. The paper explicitly identifies the load-bearing assumption that the AGN continuum is a pure power law and states in §5.2.3 that if the AGN continuum itself features a Balmer break (Inayoshi & Maiolino 2024), a massive stellar component would not be needed; the abstract and §8 further require high-resolution spectroscopy to rule out dense gas. Self-citations such as Setton et al. (2024) for the ubiquitous 3600 Å inflection provide empirical context rather than mathematical or definitional grounding. No fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported, so there is no circular reduction to flag.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard cosmology and stellar population synthesis plus several modeling assumptions the paper mostly discloses. The free parameters (stellar mass, age, dust, AGN slope, EW) are fitted to the same spectrum that defines the Balmer break. The most fragile input is the power-law AGN continuum assumption, which the authors explicitly flag.

free parameters (7)
  • Stellar mass log M*/Msun = 10.9 ± 0.02 (Model III)
    Fitted to the full spectrum; directly drives the massive stellar core claim.
  • Stellar age log t/yr = 8.7 ± 0.01 (~500 Myr)
    Fitted; Table 1 notes the age runs into the prior limit, so the uncertainty is underestimated.
  • Stellar dust attenuation AV,sps = 1.17 ± 0.04
    Fitted; needed to redden the old stellar population to match the observed break.
  • AGN power-law slope beta = -2.90 ± 0.05
    Fitted; the power-law shape is the key assumption for the AGN continuum.
  • AGN intrinsic H-alpha equivalent width = log EW = 3.75 (EW > 3000 A)
    Fitted relative to the AGN power-law continuum; extreme value helps motivate missing physics.
  • Dust attenuation index delta = -1.79 ± 0.01
    Shared between AGN and stellar components; steep slope is an expression of the break mismatch.
  • Balmer absorption components = two absorbers at -143 and +172 km/s, EW 1.2-4.4 A
    Fitted in the H-alpha profile; their strength and width are degenerate with the narrow line component.
assumptions (9)
  • standard math Flat LambdaCDM cosmology with H0=70 km/s/Mpc, Omega_m=0.3
    Adopted in Section 1 for luminosity distances and sizes.
  • domain assumption Chabrier IMF between 0.1 and 100 Msun
    Used in FSPS stellar population models (Section 5.1).
  • domain assumption FSPS stellar population synthesis models
    Used to generate stellar continua (Section 5.1).
  • domain assumption Case B recombination for Balmer series ratios
    Fixes relative Balmer line strengths in AGN model (Section 5.1).
  • ad hoc to paper AGN continuum is a power law
    Core assumption for the AGN SED; if false, the Balmer break can arise from AGN gas (Section 5.2.3).
  • domain assumption Empirical Fe II templates from I Zwicky 1 represent BLR iron emission
    Used to model the Fe II pseudo-continuum (Section 4.2).
  • domain assumption Greene and Ho (2005) single-epoch scaling relates H-alpha to MBH
    Used to infer MBH ~ 7e8 Msun (Section 8.4).
  • domain assumption Lens magnification mu = 1.7 +/- 0.2 from Furtak et al. 2023c
    Corrects luminosities and sizes (Section 2.1).
  • ad hoc to paper NIRSpec line spread function scale factor 1.3 for point sources
    Applied when forward-modeling PRISM resolution (Section 2.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An unambiguous AGN and a Balmer break in an Ultraluminous Little Red Dot at z=4.47 from Ultradeep UNCOVER and All the Little Things Spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z4R6MGSS

@misc{pith2026241204557,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An unambiguous AGN and a Balmer break in an Ultraluminous Little Red Dot at z=4.47 from Ultradeep UNCOVER and All the Little Things Spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z4R6MGSS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04557}
}
abstract

We present a detailed exploration of the most optically-luminous Little Red Dot ($L_{H\alpha}=10^{44}$erg/s, $L_V=10^{45}$erg/s, F444W=22AB) found to date. Located in the Abell 2744 field, source A744-45924 was observed by NIRSpec/PRISM with ultradeep spectroscopy reaching SNR$\sim$100pix$^{-1}$, high-resolution 3-4 micron NIRCam/Grism spectroscopy, and NIRCam Medium Band imaging. The NIRCam spectra reveal high rest-frame EW $W_{H\alpha,0,broad}>800$\r{A}, broad H$\alpha$ emission (FWHM$\sim$4500 km/s), on top of narrow, complex absorption. NIRSpec data show exceptionally strong rest-frame UV to NIR Fe II emission ($W_{FeII-UV,0}\sim$340\r{A}), N IV]$\lambda\lambda$1483,1486 and N III]$\lambda$1750, and broad NIR O I $\lambda$8446 emission. The spectra unambiguously demonstrate a broad-line region associated with an inferred $M_{BH}\sim10^9M_\odot$ supermassive black hole embedded in dense gas, which might explain a non-detection in ultradeep Chandra X-ray data (>$10\times$ underluminous relative to broad $L_{H\alpha}$). Strong UV Nitrogen lines suggest supersolar N/O ratios due to rapid star formation or intense radiation near the AGN. The continuum shows a clear Balmer break at rest-frame 3650\r{A}, which cannot be accounted for by an AGN power-law alone. A stellar population model produces an excellent fit with a reddened Balmer break and implying a massive ($M_*\sim8\times10^{10}M_\odot$), old $\sim$500 Myr, compact stellar core, among the densest stellar systems known ($\rho\sim3\times10^6M_\odot$/pc$^2$ for $R_{e,opt}=70\pm10$ pc), and AGN emission with extreme intrinsic EW $W_{H\alpha,0}\gg$1000\r{A}. However, although high $M_*$ and $M_{BH}$ are supported by evidence of an overdensity containing 40 galaxies at $z=4.41-4.51$, deep high-resolution spectroscopy is required to confirm stellar absorption and rule out that dense gas around the AGN causes the Balmer break instead.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04557 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: broadband NIRCam images of A2744−45924 in the short wavelength channel filters F070W, F090W, F115W, F150W, F200W at 20 mas pixel size and long wavelength channel filters F277W, F356W, F444W at 40 mas pixel size. The images are 3′′ on a side. North is up, East is left. Also shown are color composite images and an overlay of the micro-shutter array locations of the NIRSpec PRISM observations. Middle: the 2D NIRSp… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Results of fitting two-component models to the F070W, F200W, and F300M images of A2744−45924 using pysersic, orientation has North up as above in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Rest-frame far-UV fit to A2744−45924. We see prominent N IV]λ1483+N IV]λ1487 ˚A, CIV λλ1548,1551, HeII λ1640, OIII] λ1661,1666, N III] λ1750, and [CIII]λ1907+CIII]λ1909. Note that SiIII] and CIII] are blended, as are HeII and OIII]. Also needed to explain the spectrum is the blend of Al IIIλ1860, [Ne III]+Si IIλ1815 and Fe IIλ1786, which are lines also found in the Shen et al. (2019) z≳5.7 quasar composite. This bro… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The total Hα+[N II] emission line profile as seen by the JWST/F356W GrismR with best-fit line emission and absorption complex. The profile is centered on the central velocity of the broad Hα component. Green dashed lines mark the location of the [N II] doublet. The top…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Model fitting results using only AGN components (model I, top panels), only stellar components (model II, middle), and a mix of AGN and stars (model III, bottom). NIRSpec/PRISM observations (black), uncertainties (dotted), model fits (gray), and normalized residuals ar…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The overdensity around A2744−45924 as revealed by ALT spectroscopy. A2744−45924 is the red hexagon, and those of 40 galaxies with 4.45 < z < 4.49 as blue circles whose size correlates with their stellar mass. These were all identified via Hα emission in ALT. For ref￾er…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: The neighboring galaxies to A2744−45924 in the NIRCam F090W image. We highlight the masses and redshifts of other galaxies for which ALT detected Hα emission. Right: The average number of neighbours within ∆z/(1 + z) < 0.01 as a function of increasing projected r…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: We compare the projected stellar density of A2744−45924 with JWST-detected objects at similar red￾shift from de Graaff et al. (2024c) and (Carnall et al. 2023), with higher-redshift little red dots from Baggen et al. (2023, see also Wang et al. 2024b), and z ∼ 2.3 comp…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The position of A2744−45924 in a black hole mass-galaxy mass scaling relation plot. Since the inferred M∗ is similar across Model II and III (and unconstrained in Model I), we simply show one value. In terms of MBH, we note that the formal errors on all MBH values are…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Model fits to the optical and near-IR lines. Top panels: optical emission lines: Hβ, [O III] doublet, and He IIλ4686 (a) and Hα, N II doublet, S II doublet (b). Narrow and broad lines are indicated. A background was removed by subtracting a powerlaw fit to the continu…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Model fits to the optical and near-IR lines, using the joint model III (AGN+Stars, see §5.2.3), but reducing the contribution of the evolved stellar population (green) in steps of 0.3 dex (log(M/M⊙) = 10.9, 10.6, 10.3) and refitting. The fit residuals become significa…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 27 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BlackTHUNDER: Evidence of three massive black holes in a z~5 galaxy

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Observations of the z=5.0167 galaxy J0148-4214 reveal three spatially distinct broad H-alpha regions, interpreted as three massive accreting black holes, including a close 190 pc pair.

  2. Unveiling and Characterising Ubiquitous Nitrogen Enhancement in $6 \leq z \leq 10$ Galaxies with JWST Spectroscopy

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stacked JWST/NIRSpec spectra of 135 z=6-10 galaxies show supersolar N/O that is highest after a star-formation lull, consistent with delayed AGB enrichment and pristine gas inflows.

  3. Implications of Broad [O III] 4364 and UV Line Emission in Two Little Red Dots at z ~ 7 - 8

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Broad [O III] 4364 lines in two Little Red Dots imply extremely dense gas, about 10^6.3 to 10^7.9 cm^-3, within roughly 1-10 pc of the central engine, and require ionizing radiation from an accretion disk to escape th...

  4. Misaligned or chaotic? A strong break of axial symmetry in the local LRD J1025 revealed with VLT/FORS2 spectropolarimetry

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    The local Little Red Dot J1025 shows a 48° polarisation-angle offset between continuum and broad H-alpha, requiring broken axial symmetry.

  5. (Re)solving the Complex Multiscale Morphology and V-shaped Spectral Energy Distribution of a Newly Discovered Strongly Lensed Little Red Dot in A383

    astro-ph.GA 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Lensed LRD A383-LRD1 resolves into blue and red components ~300 pc apart whose combined light produces the canonical V-shaped SED.

  6. What you see is what you get: empirically measured bolometric luminosities of Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Directly integrating the observed spectra of two Little Red Dots shows the bolometric luminosity is dominated by rest-frame optical light, lowering implied black hole masses to about 10^5 to 10^7 solar masses.

  7. JWST/NIRSpec Observations of High Ionization Emission Lines in Galaxies at High Redshift

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Two distant galaxies at redshift 6.98 and 8.72 show narrow N V emission with no C IV or He II, and very high ionization lines appear in only about 2% of z>4 galaxies.

  8. BlackTHUNDER Reveals a Massive Filament around a Compact AGN at $z\simeq5.23$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    GN-77652, a compact broad-line AGN at z=5.229, lies beside a 12 kpc multi-source filament at the same redshift whose coalescence will erase the compact AGN appearance within ~150–440 Myr.

  9. Where did all the Little Red Dots go? The abundance of LRD analogues among objects with broad lines at $z < 0.35$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Only 0.08% of low-redshift broad-line objects have SEDs resembling high-redshift Little Red Dots, yielding nine candidates, one of which is the known analogue 'The Egg'.

  10. NEXUS: Spectral Variability of Little Red Dots and Blue Active Galactic Nuclei at $2 \lesssim z \lesssim 6$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Little Red Dots at z=2-6 show less than 4% intrinsic H-alpha variability on 1-3 month rest-frame timescales, a flat white-noise pattern unlike normal AGNs, implying different broad-line production.

  11. ATLAS. II. Extremely High Incidence of Balmer Line Absorption with Predominant Blueshifts in LRDs: Statistical Insights through Comparison with Type 1 AGNs

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Balmer-line absorption occurs in ~35% (14/40) of JWST little-red-dot AGNs, roughly 850x the rate in SDSS type-1 AGNs, with mostly slow blueshifted absorber velocities.

  12. The Distinctive Evolution and Spectral Energy Distribution of Binary Massive Black Hole Accretion

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Combining three accretion disk states for binary massive black holes, the paper predicts a spectrum 'notch' and a mass-ratio evolution attractor at q~1e-3 for extreme-mass-ratio binaries.

  13. Optically Thick Outflow Driven by Supercritical Accretion May Explain Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Super-Eddington outflows from 10^5–10^7 M_sun black holes, with 3000–6000 K photospheres, can account for Little Red Dots' red continua, broad-line widths, and Balmer breaks.

  14. Discovery of Multiply Ionized Iron Emission Powered by an Active Galactic Nucleus in a z~7 Little Red Dot

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The z=6.68 Little Red Dot THRILS 46403 shows a 4.5 sigma [FeVII] line, the first robust coronal-line detection among z>5 LRDs, plus narrow Balmer absorption, supporting an AGN with direct sightlines to gas at or beyon...

  15. Do Little Red Dots Vary?

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Super-Eddington accretion models can explain why little red dots show almost no variability, whereas standard sub-Eddington AGN variability models predict changes that should already have been seen.

  16. No Luminous Little Red Dots: A Sharp Cutoff in Their Luminosity Function

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Little red dots have a sharp cutoff in their optical luminosity function at about lambda L5100 = 2.5e44 erg/s, roughly 20 times fainter than the quasar turnover, so they are not hidden quasars.

  17. Subaru High-z Exploration of Low-Luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs). XXIV. 54 New Quasars and Candidate Obscured Quasars at $5.71 \le z \le 7.02$

    astro-ph.GA 2025-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spectroscopic follow-up of the completed HSC-SSP survey yields 43 new quasars, 11 candidate obscured quasars, and 29 galaxies at z 5.71 to 7.02.

  18. BASS. XLIX. Characterization of highly luminous and obscured AGNs: local X-ray and [NeV]$\lambda$3426 emission in comparison with the high-redshift Universe

    astro-ph.GA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A local sample of 21 luminous obscured AGNs shows a high [NeV] detection rate, and a stacked spectrum reveals strong [NeV] that is missing in JWST-selected high-redshift AGNs matched in [OIII].

  19. Lonely Little Red Dots: Challenges to the AGN-nature of little red dots through their clustering and spectral energy distributions

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Little red dots sit in lower-density environments than typical galaxies, and Bayesian model comparison favors non-AGN interpretations for most of them.

  20. NEXUS: A Spectroscopic Census of Broad-line AGNs and Little Red Dots at $3\lesssim z\lesssim 6$

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A JWST grism survey finds 23 broad-line AGNs at z~3-6, including 15 little red dots, with host-galaxy UV emission and a tentative small-scale clustering excess.

  21. CAPERS-LRD-z9: A Gas Enshrouded Little Red Dot Hosting a Broad-line AGN at z=9.288

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CAPERS-LRD-z9 is a spectroscopically confirmed broad-line AGN at z=9.288 with a black hole of about 10^7.6 solar masses, making it the highest-redshift little red dot and broad-line AGN known.

  22. The Physical Nature of the Off-centered Extended Emission Associated with the Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The off-centered extended emission near three little red dots is physically associated with the dots, and for two sources it is best explained as low-density, metal-poor nebular gas photoionized by the dot's ultraviol...

  23. Investigating photometric and spectroscopic variability in the multiply-imaged Little Red Dot A2744-QSO1

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Broad H-alpha and H-beta line strengths in the lensed z=7 Little Red Dot A2744-QSO1 vary by 18 to 22 percent over about 875 rest-frame days, favoring an AGN explanation.

  24. Little Red Dots are Tidal Disruption Events in Runaway-Collapsing Clusters

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Little Red Dots may be tidal disruption events in runaway-collapsing clusters that form intermediate-mass black hole seeds.

  25. Tracing the Evolution of the Balmer Break from Cosmic Dawn to Cosmic Noon with JWST

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using JWST photometry of ~17,000 galaxies, the median Balmer break strength decreases from 1.5 to 1.1 (flux ratio) from z~3.5 to z~10, driven by stellar population age, with rare extremely strong breaks at both epochs...

  26. Little Red Dots as Obscured Little Blue Dots: A Super-Eddington Unification Model

    astro-ph.GA 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Little Red Dots are proposed to be dust-reddened, edge-on views of the same super-Eddington accreting blue AGNs seen face-on as Little Blue Dots.

  27. Evolution of Size, Mass, and Density of Galaxies Since Cosmic Dawn

    physics.gen-ph 2025-10 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Under the author's CCC+TL cosmology, galaxy effective radii are larger by roughly (1+z)^0.93, reducing the inferred density and mass of early galaxies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 27 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    adobe:ns:meta/

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    P., & Satyapal , S

    Abel , N. P., & Satyapal , S. 2008, , 678, 686, 10.1086/529013

    doi:10.1086/529013 2008

  5. [5]

    B., Casey , C

    Akins , H. B., Casey , C. M., Allen , N., et al. 2023, , 956, 61, 10.3847/1538-4357/acef21

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acef21 2023

  6. [6]

    B., Casey , C

    Akins , H. B., Casey , C. M., Lambrides , E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.10341, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.10341

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10341 2024

  7. [7]

    M., Zakamska , N

    Alexandroff , R. M., Zakamska , N. L., Barth , A. J., et al. 2018, , 479, 4936, 10.1093/mnras/sty1685

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1685 2018

  8. [8]

    J., et al

    Atek , H., Labb \'e , I., Furtak , L. J., et al. 2024, , 626, 975, 10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6 2024

Show all 160 references
  1. [9]

    Baggen , J. F. W., van Dokkum , P., Labb \'e , I., et al. 2023, , 955, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf5ef

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Baggen , J. F. W., van Dokkum , P., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.07745, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.07745

    2024 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    A., Ferland , G

    Baldwin , J. A., Ferland , G. J., Korista , K. T., Hamann , F., & LaCluyz \'e , A. 2004, , 615, 610, 10.1086/424683

    2004 doi

  4. [12]

    C., & McMahon , R

    Banerji , M., Alaghband-Zadeh , S., Hewett , P. C., & McMahon , R. G. 2015, , 447, 3368, 10.1093/mnras/stu2649

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    2023, , 675, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244838

    Barchiesi , L., Dessauges-Zavadsky , M., Vignali , C., et al. 2023, , 675, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244838

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    G., Kocevski , D

    Barro , G., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., Kocevski , D. D., et al. 2024, , 963, 128, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    D., & Baldwin , J

    Batra , N. D., & Baldwin , J. A. 2014, , 439, 771, 10.1093/mnras/stu007

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    H., Hearin , A

    Behroozi , P., Wechsler , R. H., Hearin , A. P., & Conroy , C. 2019, , 488, 3143, 10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    C., Hall , P

    Bentz , M. C., Hall , P. B., & Osmer , P. S. 2004, , 128, 561, 10.1086/422346

    2004 doi

  10. [18]

    A., James , B

    Berg , D. A., James , B. L., King , T., et al. 2022, , 261, 31, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6c03

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    G., Tal , T., et al

    Bezanson , R., van Dokkum , P. G., Tal , T., et al. 2009, , 697, 1290, 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1290

    2009 doi

  12. [20]

    E., et al

    Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., Whitaker , K. E., et al. 2024, , 974, 92, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    D., Natarajan , P., et al

    Bogd \'a n , \'A ., Goulding , A. D., Natarajan , P., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 126, 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    A., & Green , R

    Boroson , T. A., & Green , R. F. 1992, , 80, 109, 10.1086/191661

    1992 doi

  15. [23]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.10900, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.10900

    Boylan-Kolchin , M. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.10900, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.10900

    2024 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    2022, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools , 0.3.4, Zenodo, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7299500

    Brammer , G. 2022, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools , 0.3.4, Zenodo, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7299500

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    E., Sartori , L

    Buchner , J., Treister , E., Bauer , F. E., Sartori , L. F., & Schawinski , K. 2019, , 874, 117, 10.3847/1538-4357/aafd32

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A

    Bunker , A. J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A. J., et al. 2023, , 677, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    J., Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., et al

    Burgasser , A. J., Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., et al. 2024, , 962, 177, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad206f

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Katz , H., Rey , M

    Cameron , A. J., Katz , H., Rey , M. P., & Saxena , A. 2023, , 523, 3516, 10.1093/mnras/stad1579

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    C., McLure , R

    Carnall , A. C., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2023, , 619, 716, 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier , G. 2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.17110, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.17110

    Chemerynska , I., Atek , H., Dayal , P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.17110, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.17110

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    C., Li , R., & Zhuang , M.-Y

    Chen , C.-H., Ho , L. C., Li , R., & Zhuang , M.-Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.04446, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.04446

    2024 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    A., Endsley , R., et al

    Chisholm , J., Berg , D. A., Endsley , R., et al. 2024, , 534, 2633, 10.1093/mnras/stae2199

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Conroy , C., & Gunn , J. E. 2010, , 712, 833, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    2024, , 690, A182, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451481

    Dayal , P. 2024, , 690, A182, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451481

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    2000, , 362, 519, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008264

    De Breuck , C., R \"o ttgering , H., Miley , G., van Breugel , W., & Best , P. 2000, , 362, 519, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008264

    2000 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05948

    de Graaff , A., Brammer , G., Weibel , A., et al. 2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05948

    2024 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    2024 b , , 684, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347755

    de Graaff , A., Rix , H.-W., Carniani , S., et al. 2024 b , , 684, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347755

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    J., Brammer , G., et al

    de Graaff , A., Setton , D. J., Brammer , G., et al. 2024 c , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.05683, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.05683

    2024 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    J., Scholtz , J., et al

    D'Eugenio , F., Cameron , A. J., Scholtz , J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.06531, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.06531

    2024 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    C., et al

    Dong , X.-B., Wang , J.-G., Ho , L. C., et al. 2011, , 736, 86, 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/86

    2011 doi

  34. [42]

    2020, , 636, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    Duras , F., Bongiorno , A., Ricci , F., et al. 2020, , 636, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    2024, , 974, 275, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad778b

    Eilers , A.-C., Mackenzie , R., Pizzati , E., et al. 2024, , 974, 275, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad778b

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    Fan , X., Ba \ n ados , E., & Simcoe , R. A. 2023, , 61, 373, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    P., & Trotta , R

    Feroz , F., Hobson , M. P., & Trotta , R. 2010, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1001.0719, 10.48550/arXiv.1001.0719

    2010 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    2022, , 661, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142673

    Ferruit , P., Jakobsen , P., Giardino , G., et al. 2022, , 661, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142673

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    Filippenko , A. V. 1997, , 35, 309, 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309

    1997 doi

  40. [48]

    Fosbury , R. A. E., Villar-Mart \' n , M., Humphrey , A., et al. 2003, , 596, 797, 10.1086/378228

    2003 doi

  41. [49]

    B., Watson , D., et al

    Fujimoto , S., Brammer , G. B., Watson , D., et al. 2022, , 604, 261, 10.1038/s41586-022-04454-1

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    2023 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.11609, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.11609

    Fujimoto , S., Wang , B., Weaver , J., et al. 2023 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.11609, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.11609

    2023 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    2023 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.01658, 10.48550/arXiv.2303.01658

    Fujimoto , S., Kohno , K., Ouchi , M., et al. 2023 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.01658, 10.48550/arXiv.2303.01658

    2023 doi arXiv

  44. [53]

    2023 b , , 952, 142, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc9d

    ---. 2023 b , , 952, 142, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc9d

    2023 doi

  45. [54]

    J., Zitrin , A., Weaver , J

    Furtak , L. J., Zitrin , A., Weaver , J. R., et al. 2023 c , , 523, 4568, 10.1093/mnras/stad1627

    2023 doi

  46. [55]

    J., Labb \'e , I., Zitrin , A., et al

    Furtak , L. J., Labb \'e , I., Zitrin , A., et al. 2024, , 628, 57, 10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8

    2024 doi

  47. [56]

    G., Stern , D., Bogosavljevi \'c , M., & Mahabal , A

    Glikman , E., Djorgovski , S. G., Stern , D., Bogosavljevi \'c , M., & Mahabal , A. 2007, , 663, L73, 10.1086/520085

    2007 doi

  48. [57]

    2012, , 757, 51, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/51

    Glikman , E., Urrutia , T., Lacy , M., et al. 2012, , 757, 51, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/51

    2012 doi

  49. [58]

    E., Chen , G

    Glikman , E., Rusu , C. E., Chen , G. C. F., et al. 2023, , 943, 25, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca093

    2023 doi

  50. [59]

    D., Greene , J

    Goulding , A. D., Greene , J. E., Setton , D. J., et al. 2023, , 955, L24, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c5

    2023 doi

  51. [60]

    E., & Ho , L

    Greene , J. E., & Ho , L. C. 2005, , 630, 122, 10.1086/431897

    2005 doi

  52. [61]

    E., Strader , J., & Ho , L

    Greene , J. E., Strader , J., & Ho , L. C. 2020, , 58, 257, 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835

    2020 doi

  53. [62]

    E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A

    Greene , J. E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A. D., et al. 2024, , 964, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    2024 doi

  54. [63]

    A., Heckman , T

    Groves , B. A., Heckman , T. M., & Kauffmann , G. 2006, , 371, 1559, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10812.x

    2006

  55. [64]

    Y., Hopkins , P

    Grudi \'c , M. Y., Hopkins , P. F., Quataert , E., & Murray , N. 2019, , 483, 5548, 10.1093/mnras/sty3386

    2019 doi

  56. [65]

    2022, , 511, 3751, 10.1093/mnras/stac225

    Habouzit , M., Onoue , M., Ba \ n ados , E., et al. 2022, , 511, 3751, 10.1093/mnras/stac225

    2022 doi

  57. [66]

    N., Shapley , A

    Hainline , K. N., Shapley , A. E., Greene , J. E., & Steidel , C. C. 2011, , 733, 31, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/31

    2011 doi

  58. [67]

    2022, , 259, 20, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc

    Harikane , Y., Ono , Y., Ouchi , M., et al. 2022, , 259, 20, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc

    2022 doi

  59. [68]

    V., et al

    Hoffman, M., Sountsov, P., Dillon, J. V., et al. 2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03704

    2019 arXiv

  60. [69]

    D., Gelman, A., et al

    Hoffman, M. D., Gelman, A., et al. 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1593

    2014

  61. [70]

    F., Murray , N., Quataert , E., & Thompson , T

    Hopkins , P. F., Murray , N., Quataert , E., & Thompson , T. A. 2010, , 401, L19, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00777.x

    2010

  62. [71]

    1986, , 98, 609, 10.1086/131801

    Horne , K. 1986, , 98, 609, 10.1086/131801

    1986 doi

  63. [72]

    2008, , 383, 11, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12506.x

    Humphrey , A., Villar-Mart \' n , M., Vernet , J., et al. 2008, , 383, 11, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12506.x

    2008

  64. [73]

    B., Crenshaw , D

    Hutchings , J. B., Crenshaw , D. M., Kraemer , S. B., et al. 2002, , 124, 2543, 10.1086/344080

    2002 doi

  65. [74]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.07805, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.07805

    Inayoshi , K., & Maiolino , R. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.07805, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.07805

    2024 doi arXiv

  66. [75]

    2023, , 959, 100, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    Isobe , Y., Ouchi , M., Tominaga , N., et al. 2023, , 959, 100, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    2023 doi

  67. [76]

    2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen , P., Ferruit , P., Alves de Oliveira , C., et al. 2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  68. [77]

    2008, , 679, 962, 10.1086/587868

    Jiang , L., Fan , X., & Vestergaard , M. 2008, , 679, 962, 10.1086/587868

    2008 doi

  69. [78]

    L., & Khochfar , S

    Johnson , J. L., & Khochfar , S. 2011, , 743, 126, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/126

    2011 doi

  70. [79]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.08643, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.08643

    Juod z balis , I., Ji , X., Maiolino , R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.08643, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.08643

    2024 doi arXiv

  71. [80]

    J., Matthee , J., et al

    Kashino , D., Lilly , S. J., Matthee , J., et al. 2023, , 950, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc588

    2023 doi

  72. [81]

    C., & Evans , N

    Kennicutt , R. C., & Evans , N. J. 2012, , 50, 531, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610

    2012 doi

  73. [82]

    2024, , 691, A52, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348857

    Killi , M., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, , 691, A52, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348857

    2024 doi

  74. [83]

    D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al

    Kocevski , D. D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al. 2023, , 954, L4, 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    2023 doi

  75. [84]

    D., Finkelstein , S

    Kocevski , D. D., Finkelstein , S. L., Barro , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03576, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576

    2024 doi arXiv

  76. [85]

    Kochanek , C. S. 2016, , 458, 127, 10.1093/mnras/stw267

    2016 doi

  77. [86]

    2023, , 957, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    Kokorev , V., Fujimoto , S., Labbe , I., et al. 2023, , 957, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    2023 doi

  78. [87]

    I., Greene , J

    Kokorev , V., Caputi , K. I., Greene , J. E., et al. 2024, , 968, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    2024 doi

  79. [88]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    Kokubo , M., & Harikane , Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    2024 doi

  80. [89]

    C ., & Dimitrijevi \'c , M

    Kova c evi \'c , J., Popovi \'c , L. C ., & Dimitrijevi \'c , M. S. 2010, , 189, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/15

    2010 doi

  81. [90]

    B., & Crenshaw , D

    Kraemer , S. B., & Crenshaw , D. M. 2000, , 532, 256, 10.1086/308572

    2000 doi

  82. [91]

    G., Franx , M., et al

    Kriek , M., van Dokkum , P. G., Franx , M., et al. 2008, , 677, 219, 10.1086/528945

    2008 doi

  83. [92]

    Krolik , J. H. 2001, , 551, 72, 10.1086/320091

    2001 doi

  84. [93]

    E., Bezanson , R., et al

    Labb \'e , I., Greene , J. E., Bezanson , R., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.07320, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.07320

    2023 doi arXiv

  85. [94]

    2023, , 957, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfeec

    Langeroodi , D., & Hjorth , J. 2023, , 957, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfeec

    2023 doi

  86. [95]

    Laor , A., & Davis , S. W. 2011, , 417, 681, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19310.x

    2011

  87. [96]

    L., Finkelstein , S

    Larson , R. L., Finkelstein , S. L., Kocevski , D. D., et al. 2023, , 953, L29, 10.3847/2041-8213/ace619

    2023 doi

  88. [97]

    C., Nakajima , K., et al

    Le F \`e vre , O., Lemaux , B. C., Nakajima , K., et al. 2019, , 625, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732197

    2019 doi

  89. [98]

    C., Johnson , B

    Leja , J., Carnall , A. C., Johnson , B. D., Conroy , C., & Speagle , J. S. 2019, , 876, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c

    2019 doi

  90. [99]

    M., Koekemoer , A., Coe , D., et al

    Lotz , J. M., Koekemoer , A., Coe , D., et al. 2017, , 837, 97, 10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97

    2017 doi

  91. [100]

    E., Setton , D

    Ma , Y., Greene , J. E., Setton , D. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.06257, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.06257

    2024 doi arXiv

  92. [101]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01230, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.01230

    Maiolino , R., Scholtz , J., Curtis-Lake , E., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01230, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.01230

    2023 doi arXiv

  93. [102]

    2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00504, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.00504

    Maiolino , R., Risaliti , G., Signorini , M., et al. 2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00504, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.00504

    2024 doi arXiv

  94. [103]

    2024 b , , 627, 59, 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    Maiolino , R., Scholtz , J., Witstok , J., et al. 2024 b , , 627, 59, 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    2024 doi

  95. [104]

    2024, , 681, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411

    Marques-Chaves , R., Schaerer , D., Kuruvanthodi , A., et al. 2024, , 681, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411

    2024 doi

  96. [105]

    2017, , 608, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731314

    Martocchia , S., Piconcelli , E., Zappacosta , L., et al. 2017, , 608, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731314

    2017 doi

  97. [106]

    P., Brammer , G., et al

    Matthee , J., Naidu , R. P., Brammer , G., et al. 2024 a , , 963, 129, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  98. [107]

    2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.02846, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.02846

    Matthee , J., Brammer , G., Weibel , A., et al. 2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.02846, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.02846

    2024 doi arXiv

  99. [108]

    J., & Ma , C.-P

    McConnell , N. J., & Ma , C.-P. 2013, , 764, 184, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/184

    2013 doi

  100. [109]

    Murray , N., Quataert , E., & Thompson , T. A. 2005, , 618, 569, 10.1086/426067

    2005 doi

  101. [110]

    P., Matthee , J., Kramarenko , I., et al

    Naidu , R. P., Matthee , J., Kramarenko , I., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.01874, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.01874

    2024 doi arXiv

  102. [111]

    A., Kannappan , S

    Norris , M. A., Kannappan , S. J., Forbes , D. A., et al. 2014, , 443, 1151, 10.1093/mnras/stu1186

    2014 doi

  103. [112]

    B., & Gunn , J

    Oke , J. B., & Gunn , J. E. 1983, , 266, 713, 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  104. [113]

    Osterbrock , D. E. 1977, , 215, 733, 10.1086/155407

    1977 doi

  105. [114]

    2023, , 957, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158

    Pacucci , F., Nguyen , B., Carniani , S., Maiolino , R., & Fan , X. 2023, , 957, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158

    2023 doi

  106. [115]

    Pasha , I., & Miller , T. B. 2023, The Journal of Open Source Software, 8, 5703, 10.21105/joss.05703

    2023 doi

  107. [116]

    G., Barro , G., Rieke , G

    P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., Barro , G., Rieke , G. H., et al. 2024, , 968, 4, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb

    2024 doi

  108. [117]

    2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.11554

    Phan, D., Pradhan, N., & Jankowiak, M. 2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.11554

    2019 arXiv

  109. [118]

    F., Schaye , J., et al

    Pizzati , E., Hennawi , J. F., Schaye , J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.18208, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.18208

    2024 doi arXiv

  110. [119]

    2020, , 641, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    Planck Collaboration , Aghanim , N., Akrami , Y., et al. 2020, , 641, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    2020 doi

  111. [120]

    H., Suess , K

    Price , S. H., Suess , K. A., Williams , C. C., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.02500, 10.48550/arXiv.2310.02500

    2023 doi arXiv

  112. [121]

    H., Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., et al

    Price , S. H., Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.03920, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.03920

    2024 doi arXiv

  113. [122]

    Raiter , A., Fosbury , R. A. E., & Teimoorinia , H. 2010, , 510, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912429

    2010 doi

  114. [123]

    A., Shapley , A

    Reddy , N. A., Shapley , A. E., Sanders , R. L., et al. 2018, , 869, 92, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaed1e

    2018 doi

  115. [124]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282, 10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4

    Ricci , C., & Trakhtenbrot , B. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282, 10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4

    2023 doi

  116. [125]

    2002, , 387, 487, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000524

    Rodriguez , J., Varni \`e re , P., Tagger , M., & Durouchoux , P. 2002, , 387, 487, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000524

    2002 doi

  117. [126]

    A., Gebhardt , K., & Bonning , E

    Salviander , S., Shields , G. A., Gebhardt , K., & Bonning , E. W. 2006, , 50, 803, 10.1016/j.newar.2006.06.018

    2006 doi

  118. [127]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.18731, 10.48550/arXiv.2311.18731

    Scholtz , J., Maiolino , R., D'Eugenio , F., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.18731, 10.48550/arXiv.2311.18731

    2023 doi arXiv

  119. [128]

    2018, , 853, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7f0

    Schulze , A., Misawa , T., Zuo , W., & Wu , X.-B. 2018, , 853, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7f0

    2018 doi

  120. [129]

    P., et al

    Senchyna , P., Plat , A., Stark , D. P., et al. 2024, , 966, 92, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad235e

    2024 doi

  121. [130]

    J., Greene , J

    Setton , D. J., Greene , J. E., de Graaff , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.03424. 2411.03424

    2024 arXiv

  122. [131]

    2013, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 41, 61, 10.48550/arXiv.1302.2643

    Shen , Y. 2013, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 41, 61, 10.48550/arXiv.1302.2643

    2013 doi arXiv

  123. [132]

    2019, , 873, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab03d9

    Shen , Y., Wu , J., Jiang , L., et al. 2019, , 873, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab03d9

    2019 doi

  124. [133]

    Shi , Y., Kremer , K., & Hopkins , P. F. 2024, , 691, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450964

    2024 doi

  125. [134]

    2018, , 477, 2817, 10.1093/mnras/sty782

    Sobral , D., Matthee , J., Darvish , B., et al. 2018, , 477, 2817, 10.1093/mnras/sty782

    2018 doi

  126. [135]

    2012, , 423, 600, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x

    Stern , J., & Laor , A. 2012, , 423, 600, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x

    2012

  127. [136]

    A., Weaver , J

    Suess , K. A., Weaver , J. R., Price , S. H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.13132, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.13132

    2024 doi arXiv

  128. [137]

    1985, , 213, 841, 10.1093/mnras/213.4.841

    Terlevich , R., & Melnick , J. 1985, , 213, 841, 10.1093/mnras/213.4.841

    1985 doi

  129. [138]

    A., Quataert , E., & Murray , N

    Thompson , T. A., Quataert , E., & Murray , N. 2005, , 630, 167, 10.1086/431923

    2005 doi

  130. [139]

    W., Stark , D

    Topping , M. W., Stark , D. P., Endsley , R., et al. 2024, , 529, 4087, 10.1093/mnras/stae800

    2024 doi

  131. [140]

    P., et al

    Torralba-Torregrosa , A., Matthee , J., Naidu , R. P., et al. 2024, , 689, A44, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450318

    2024 doi

  132. [141]

    R., et al

    Treiber , H., Greene , J., Weaver , J. R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.12232, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.12232

    2024 doi arXiv

  133. [142]

    2006, , 650, 57, 10.1086/506376

    Tsuzuki , Y., Kawara , K., Yoshii , Y., et al. 2006, , 650, 57, 10.1086/506376

    2006 doi

  134. [143]

    2023, , 677, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346137

    \"U bler , H., Maiolino , R., Curtis-Lake , E., et al. 2023, , 677, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346137

    2023 doi

  135. [144]

    G., Franx , M., Kriek , M., et al

    van Dokkum , P. G., Franx , M., Kriek , M., et al. 2008, , 677, L5, 10.1086/587874

    2008 doi

  136. [145]

    G., Nelson , E

    van Dokkum , P. G., Nelson , E. J., Franx , M., et al. 2015, , 813, 23, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/23

    2015 doi

  137. [146]

    E., Richards , G

    Vanden Berk , D. E., Richards , G. T., Bauer , A., et al. 2001, , 122, 549, 10.1086/321167

    2001 doi

  138. [147]

    2021, Bayesian analysis, 16, 667

    Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & B \"u rkner, P.-C. 2021, Bayesian analysis, 16, 667

    2021

  139. [148]

    P., Joly , M., & V \'e ron , P

    V \'e ron-Cetty , M. P., Joly , M., & V \'e ron , P. 2004, , 417, 515, 10.1051/0004-6361:20035714

    2004 doi

  140. [149]

    Vestergaard , M., & Wilkes , B. J. 2001, , 134, 1, 10.1086/320357

    2001 doi

  141. [150]

    2023, , 957, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfe07

    Wang , B., Fujimoto , S., Labb \'e , I., et al. 2023, , 957, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfe07

    2023 doi

  142. [151]

    L., et al

    Wang , B., de Graaff , A., Davies , R. L., et al. 2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02304, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02304

    2024 doi arXiv

  143. [152]

    2024 b , , 969, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

    Wang , B., Leja , J., de Graaff , A., et al. 2024 b , , 969, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

    2024 doi

  144. [153]

    2024 c , , 270, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad0846

    Wang , B., Leja , J., Labb \'e , I., et al. 2024 c , , 270, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad0846

    2024 doi

  145. [154]

    R., Cutler , S

    Weaver , J. R., Cutler , S. E., Pan , R., et al. 2024, , 270, 7, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad07e0

    2024 doi

  146. [155]

    J., et al

    Weibel , A., de Graaff , A., Setton , D. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.03829, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.03829

    2024 doi arXiv

  147. [156]

    M., Lovell , C

    Wilkins , S. M., Lovell , C. C., & Stanway , E. R. 2019, , 490, 5359, 10.1093/mnras/stz2894

    2019 doi

  148. [157]

    C., Alberts , S., Ji , Z., et al

    Williams , C. C., Alberts , S., Ji , Z., et al. 2024, , 968, 34, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3f17

    2024 doi

  149. [158]

    J., Netzer , H., & Wills , D

    Wills , B. J., Netzer , H., & Wills , D. 1985, , 288, 94, 10.1086/162767

    1985 doi

  150. [159]

    T., et al

    Yue , M., Eilers , A.-C., Ananna , T. T., et al. 2024, , 974, L26, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba

    2024 doi

  151. [160]

    L., Strauss , M

    Zakamska , N. L., Strauss , M. A., Krolik , J. H., et al. 2006, , 132, 1496, 10.1086/506986

    2006 doi

  152. [161]

    Zhang , Z., Jiang , L., Liu , W., & Ho , L. C. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.02729, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.02729

    2024 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.