pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.20932 · v3 · submitted 2024-12-30 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Weak nuclear decays deep-underground as a probe of axion dark matter

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 06:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th
keywords axion dark matterweak nuclear decaystheta dependencetime modulationelectron capturebeta decayunderground experiments
0
0 comments X

The pith

Axion dark matter induces time-dependent shifts in weak nuclear decay rates via the θ parameter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theoretical framework to calculate the dependence of weak nuclear decays on the QCD θ parameter. This framework predicts that an oscillating axion dark matter background will cause periodic variations in decay rates such as electron capture and beta decay. Using this, the authors analyze past measurements of potassium-40 and cesium-137 decays at the Gran Sasso Laboratory to place limits on the axion decay constant for masses from a few 10^{-23} eV to 10^{-19} eV. They also outline a new experiment with potassium-40 electron capture to extend sensitivity to axion masses up to 10^{-9} eV.

Core claim

By computing the θ-dependence of weak nuclear decays including electron capture and β decay, the authors show that an oscillating axion dark matter field produces time-varying radioactivity, which they use to recast Gran Sasso data on 40K and 137Cs decays into constraints on the axion decay constant in the 10^{-23} to 10^{-19} eV range and propose a new measurement to reach up to 10^{-9} eV.

What carries the argument

The θ-dependence of weak nuclear decay rates, which translates axion-induced θ oscillations into measurable time modulations of decay probabilities.

If this is right

  • Old data from 40K and 137Cs decays constrain axion parameters in the 10^{-23} to 10^{-19} eV mass range.
  • A new 40K electron capture measurement can probe axion masses up to 10^{-9} eV.
  • The framework applies to both electron capture and beta decay processes.
  • Underground setups enable detection of the predicted time modulations by reducing external backgrounds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could complement other axion searches in the ultra-light mass regime where direct detection is challenging.
  • Similar θ-dependent analyses might extend to additional weak processes or different isotopes for broader coverage.
  • Confirmation would link nuclear decay timing directly to dark matter properties in a new observable channel.

Load-bearing premise

An oscillating axion dark matter background produces a time-dependent effective θ that modulates weak decay rates without significant interference from underground conditions or detector effects.

What would settle it

Absence of the predicted periodic variation in decay rates at the frequency corresponding to the axion mass in high-precision measurements of 40K electron capture would contradict the expected modulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20932 by Carlo Broggini, Claudio Toni, Denise Piatti, Giuseppe Di Carlo, Jorge Alda, Luca Di Luzio, Stefano Rigolin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The measured rate of the 40K source averaged over 1 day as function of time. The yellow shaded area corresponds to a 10−4 uncertainty, the two red lines are at ±10−3 from the average. The intrinsic background, i.e. shielded setup without the KHCO3 salt, has been measured during a period of 12 days. Thanks to the underground environment and to the detector shielding, it was rather low, down to about 6.4 Hz … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The measured rate of the 137Cs source averaged over 1 day as a function of time. The yellow shaded area corresponds to a 2 × 10−4 uncertainty, the two red lines are at ±10−3 from the average. The first points correspond to the first week of data taking, when the setup was stabilizing, and they are not considered in the analysis. with a 6 µs shaping time, and then to a Multi Channel Analyser (Easy-MCA 8k Or… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Constraints on the axion dark matter coupling to gluons. The limits from past [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the time modulation of weak nuclear decays as a method to probe axion dark matter. To this end, we develop a theoretical framework to compute the $\theta$-dependence of weak nuclear decays, including electron capture and $\beta$ decay, which enables us to predict the time variation of weak radioactivity in response to an oscillating axion dark matter background. As an application, we recast old data sets, from the weak nuclear decays of ${^{40}\text{K}}$ and ${^{137}\text{Cs}}$ taken at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory, in order to set constraints on the axion decay constant, specifically in the axion mass range from few $10^{-23}\;$eV up to $10^{-19}\;$eV. We finally propose a new measurement at the Gran Sasso Laboratory, based on the weak nuclear decay of ${^{40}\text{K}}$ via electron capture, in order to explore even shorter timescales, thus reaching sensitivities to axion masses up to $10^{-9}\;$eV.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework to compute the θ-dependence of weak nuclear decay rates (electron capture and β decay) in order to predict time modulations induced by an oscillating axion dark matter background. It recasts historical Gran Sasso data on 40K electron capture and 137Cs β decay to derive constraints on the axion decay constant f_a for axion masses in the range few × 10^{-23} eV to 10^{-19} eV, and proposes a new 40K measurement to extend sensitivity to masses up to 10^{-9} eV.

Significance. If the θ-dependence derivation is valid at leading order and the recast data can be shown to be free of dominating systematics at the relevant frequencies, the approach would provide a novel, low-cost probe of ultralight axion dark matter complementary to astrophysical and other laboratory searches. The explicit proposal for a new underground measurement strengthens the paper by outlining a path to improved sensitivity.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theoretical framework] Theoretical framework section: the manuscript states that a calculable, non-zero δΓ/Γ proportional to a0/f_a is obtained for 40K EC and 137Cs β decay, but provides no explicit leading-order chiral expressions, nuclear matrix element evaluation, or cross-check against known θ-dependent observables (e.g., neutron EDM bounds). Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the effect is not suppressed by higher-order terms in the chiral expansion, which is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Data recast] Data recast section (Gran Sasso 40K and 137Cs analyses): no quantitative error budget or stability analysis is presented for time-dependent underground systematics (temperature, radon, detector gain drifts) at frequencies set by m_a ~ 10^{-23}–10^{-19} eV. The skeptic concern therefore remains unaddressed; if these systematics exceed the predicted modulation amplitude, the derived f_a bounds lose their sensitivity.
  3. [Proposed measurement] Proposed new measurement section: the sensitivity projection to m_a ~ 10^{-9} eV assumes a counting precision and long-term stability that are not quantified (e.g., required fractional rate precision per coherence time or total observation duration). This renders the reach claim non-falsifiable within the manuscript.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the mass range phrasing “few 10^{-23} eV up to 10^{-19} eV” should be written with consistent scientific notation and an explicit lower bound.
  2. Notation: the definition of the effective θ(t) induced by the axion field should be stated once with its normalization (a0/f_a factor) to avoid ambiguity in later sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Theoretical framework] Theoretical framework section: the manuscript states that a calculable, non-zero δΓ/Γ proportional to a0/f_a is obtained for 40K EC and 137Cs β decay, but provides no explicit leading-order chiral expressions, nuclear matrix element evaluation, or cross-check against known θ-dependent observables (e.g., neutron EDM bounds). Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the effect is not suppressed by higher-order terms in the chiral expansion, which is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit leading-order expressions and supporting checks are necessary to substantiate the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added the leading-order chiral expressions for the θ-dependence of both the electron-capture and β-decay rates, together with the relevant nuclear matrix-element evaluations. We have also included a cross-check against the neutron EDM bound to confirm that the effect is not suppressed by higher-order terms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Data recast] Data recast section (Gran Sasso 40K and 137Cs analyses): no quantitative error budget or stability analysis is presented for time-dependent underground systematics (temperature, radon, detector gain drifts) at frequencies set by m_a ~ 10^{-23}–10^{-19} eV. The skeptic concern therefore remains unaddressed; if these systematics exceed the predicted modulation amplitude, the derived f_a bounds lose their sensitivity.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of a quantitative error budget for the recast constraints. The revised manuscript now contains an explicit error budget and stability analysis for the relevant underground systematics (temperature, radon, and detector gain) evaluated at the frequencies corresponding to the axion-mass range under consideration. This analysis demonstrates that the systematics remain sub-dominant to the expected modulation amplitude. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Proposed measurement] Proposed new measurement section: the sensitivity projection to m_a ~ 10^{-9} eV assumes a counting precision and long-term stability that are not quantified (e.g., required fractional rate precision per coherence time or total observation duration). This renders the reach claim non-falsifiable within the manuscript.

    Authors: We agree that the projected sensitivity must be supported by concrete numbers. In the revised section we have quantified the required fractional rate precision per coherence time, the necessary long-term stability, and the total observation duration needed to reach axion masses up to 10^{-9} eV, rendering the claim falsifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper develops a new theoretical framework for the θ-dependence of weak nuclear decays (electron capture and β decay) and applies it to recast independent external datasets from Gran Sasso to constrain axion parameters. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its inputs: the framework is presented as derived from standard chiral and nuclear physics considerations rather than fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the central result. The time-variation predictions are not statistically forced from the same data used to define the model. This is the most common honest finding for papers that introduce a new calculational method and test it on separate observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the θ-dependence framework for weak decays under axion influence, which is not detailed here. It assumes standard axion phenomenology in which the axion field couples to the QCD theta term and that nuclear decay rates respond linearly to this coupling. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the axion properties being constrained.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Axion dark matter can be modeled as a classical oscillating background field that shifts the effective QCD theta parameter and thereby affects weak interaction rates.
    This is the core modeling step invoked to connect axion DM to decay rate modulation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1430 out tokens · 45000 ms · 2026-05-23T06:48:21.913331+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RadioAxion results on the search for axion dark matter under Gran Sasso

    hep-ex 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The RadioAxion experiment at Gran Sasso found no evidence for axion dark matter induced periodic modulations in 241Am decays and derived constraints on the axion decay constant for masses from 10^{-21} to 10^{-9} eV.

  2. Crossing into the $m_a > f_a$ Region for Leptophilic ALPs

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Leptophilic ALPs with m_a > f_a can explain the electron anomalous magnetic moment tension over a large parameter space and are testable via μ→e conversion.

  3. Time-dependent signals of new physics at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Incorporating timing information from time-dependent new physics signals can improve LHC search sensitivity by up to a factor of two compared to standard time-invariant analyses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    PhD Thesis,

    M. Curie, “PhD Thesis,” Doctoral Dissertation, Sorbonne University, Paris (1903)

  2. [2]

    Anomalies in Radioactive Decay Rates: A Bibliography of Measurements and Theory,

    M. H. McDuffie, P. Graham, J. L. Eppele, J. T. Gruenwald, D. Javorsek, D. E. Krause, and E. Fischbach, “Anomalies in Radioactive Decay Rates: A Bibliography of Measurements and Theory,” arXiv:2012.00153 [nucl-ex]

  3. [3]

    On decay constants and orbital distance to the sun - part i: alpha decay,

    S. Pomm´ eet al., “On decay constants and orbital distance to the sun - part i: alpha decay,” Metrologia 54 no. 1, (Nov, 2016) 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/54/1/1

  4. [4]

    On decay constants and orbital distance to the sun - part ii: beta minus decay,

    S. Pomm´ eet al., “On decay constants and orbital distance to the sun - part ii: beta minus decay,” Metrologia 54 no. 1, (Nov, 2016) 19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/54/1/19

  5. [5]

    On decay constants and orbital distance to the sun - part iii: beta plus and electron capture decay,

    S. Pomm´ eet al., “On decay constants and orbital distance to the sun - part iii: beta plus and electron capture decay,” Metrologia 54 no. 1, (Nov, 2016) 36. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/54/1/36

  6. [6]

    Search for the time dependence of the 137Cs decay constant

    E. Bellotti, C. Broggini, G. Di Carlo, M. Laubenstein, and R. Menegazzo, “Search for the time dependence of the 137Cs decay constant,” Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 114–117, arXiv:1202.3662 [nucl-ex]

  7. [7]

    Precise measurement of the 222Rn half-life: a probe to monitor the stability of radioactivity

    E. Bellotti, C. Broggini, G. Di Carlo, M. Laubenstein, and R. Menegazzo, “Precise measurement of the 222Rn half-life: A probe to monitor the stability of radioactivity,” Phys. Lett. B 743 (2015) 526–530, arXiv:1501.07757 [nucl-ex]

  8. [8]

    Search for time modulations in the decay rate of 40K and 232Th

    E. Bellotti, C. Broggini, G. Di Carlo, M. Laubenstein, R. Menegazzo, and M. Pietroni, “Search for time modulations in the decay rate of 40K and 232Th,” Astropart. Phys. 61 (2015) 82–87, arXiv:1311.7043 [astro-ph.SR]

  9. [9]

    Search for time modulations in the decay constant of 40K and 226Ra at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory

    E. Bellotti, C. Broggini, G. Di Carlo, M. Laubenstein, and R. Menegazzo, “Search for time modulations in the decay constant of 40K and 226Ra at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory,” Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 61–65, arXiv:1802.09373 [nucl-ex]

  10. [10]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443

  11. [11]

    Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797

  12. [12]

    A New Light Boson?,

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226

  13. [13]

    Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282

  14. [14]

    The Not So Harmless Axion,

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137–141

  15. [15]

    A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133–136

  16. [16]

    Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127–132

  17. [17]

    New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, “New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102 (2018) 89–159, arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

  18. [18]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, “The landscape of QCD axion models,” Phys. Rept. 870 (2020) 1–117, arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph] . 19

  19. [19]

    Invisible Axion Search Methods,

    P. Sikivie, “Invisible Axion Search Methods,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 no. 1, (2021) 015004, arXiv:2003.02206 [hep-ph]

  20. [20]

    New Observables for Direct Detection of Axion Dark Matter

    P. W. Graham and S. Rajendran, “New Observables for Direct Detection of Axion Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035023, arXiv:1306.6088 [hep-ph]

  21. [21]

    Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr)

    D. Budker, P. W. Graham, M. Ledbetter, S. Rajendran, and A. Sushkov, “Proposal for a Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr),” Phys. Rev. X 4 no. 2, (2014) 021030, arXiv:1306.6089 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    Axion-induced effects in atoms, molecules and nuclei: Parity nonconservation, anapole moments, electric dipole moments, and spin-gravity and spin-axion momentum couplings

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum, “Axion-induced effects in atoms, molecules, and nuclei: Parity nonconservation, anapole moments, electric dipole moments, and spin-gravity and spin-axion momentum couplings,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 4, (2014) 043522, arXiv:1312.6667 [hep-ph]

  23. [23]

    Search for axion-like dark matter through nuclear spin precession in electric and magnetic fields

    C. Abel et al., “Search for Axionlike Dark Matter through Nuclear Spin Precession in Electric and Magnetic Fields,” Phys. Rev. X 7 no. 4, (2017) 041034, arXiv:1708.06367 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Experimental Constraint on Axionlike Particles over Seven Orders of Magnitude in Mass,

    T. S. Roussy et al., “Experimental Constraint on Axionlike Particles over Seven Orders of Magnitude in Mass,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 17, (2021) 171301, arXiv:2006.15787 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    New Limit on Axionlike Dark Matter Using Cold Neutrons,

    I. Schulthess et al., “New Limit on Axionlike Dark Matter Using Cold Neutrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 19, (2022) 191801, arXiv:2204.01454 [hep-ex]

  26. [26]

    First Search for Axionlike Particles in a Storage Ring Using a Polarized Deuteron Beam,

    JEDI Collaboration, S. Karanth et al., “First Search for Axionlike Particles in a Storage Ring Using a Polarized Deuteron Beam,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 3, (2023) 031004, arXiv:2208.07293 [hep-ex]

  27. [27]

    Search for Ultralight Dark Matter with Spectroscopy of Radio-Frequency Atomic Transitions,

    X. Zhang, A. Banerjee, M. Leyser, G. Perez, S. Schiller, D. Budker, and D. Antypas, “Search for Ultralight Dark Matter with Spectroscopy of Radio-Frequency Atomic Transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 25, (2023) 251002, arXiv:2212.04413 [physics.atom-ph]

  28. [28]

    Prospects of nuclear-coupled-dark-matter detection via correlation spectroscopy of I2+ and Ca+,

    E. Madge, G. Perez, and Z. Meir, “Prospects of nuclear-coupled-dark-matter detection via correlation spectroscopy of I2+ and Ca+,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 1, (2024) 015008, arXiv:2404.00616 [physics.atom-ph]

  29. [29]

    First results from a search for axionlike dark matter using octupole-deformed nuclei in a crystal,

    M. Fan, B. Nima, A. Radak, G. Alonso- ´Alvarez, and A. Vutha, “First results from a search for axionlike dark matter using octupole-deformed nuclei in a crystal,” arXiv:2410.02218 [physics.atom-ph]

  30. [30]

    Nuclear decay anomalies as a signature of axion dark matter,

    X. Zhang, N. Houston, and T. Li, “Nuclear decay anomalies as a signature of axion dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 7, (2023) L071101, arXiv:2303.09865 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    θ-dependence of light nuclei and nucleosynthesis,

    D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, K. A. Olive, M. Shifman, and T. Vonk, “ θ -dependence of light nuclei and nucleosynthesis,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2 no. 3, (2020) 033392, arXiv:2006.12321 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    Alpha radioactivity deep-underground as a probe of axion dark matter,

    C. Broggini, G. Di Carlo, L. Di Luzio, and C. Toni, “Alpha radioactivity deep-underground as a probe of axion dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138836, arXiv:2404.18993 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron,

    C. Abel et al., “Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 no. 8, (2020) 081803, arXiv:2001.11966 [hep-ex]

  34. [34]

    Effects of theta on the deuteron binding energy and the triple-alpha process

    L. Ubaldi, “Effects of theta on the deuteron binding energy and the triple-alpha process,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 025011, arXiv:0811.1599 [hep-ph]

  35. [35]

    Spectrum of Dirac operator and role of winding number in QCD,

    H. Leutwyler and A. V. Smilga, “Spectrum of Dirac operator and role of winding number in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 5607–5632

  36. [36]

    QCD at Fixed Topology

    R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, J. W. Negele, and U. J. Wiese, “QCD at fixed topology,” Phys. Lett. B 560 (2003) 64–74, arXiv:hep-lat/0302005

  37. [37]

    $\theta$-dependence of the lightest meson resonances in QCD

    N. R. Acharya, F.-K. Guo, M. Mai, and U.-G. Meißner, “ θ-dependence of the lightest meson resonances in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 054023, arXiv:1507.08570 [hep-ph] . 20

  38. [38]

    Parameter Counting in Relativistic Mean-Field Models

    R. J. Furnstahl and B. D. Serot, “Parameter counting in relativistic mean field models,” Nucl. Phys. A 671 (2000) 447–460, arXiv:nucl-th/9911019

  39. [39]

    Sigma exchange in the nuclear force and effective field theory

    J. F. Donoghue, “Sigma exchange in the nuclear force and effective field theory,” Phys. Lett. B 643 (2006) 165–170, arXiv:nucl-th/0602074

  40. [40]

    Constraints on the variability of quark masses from nuclear binding

    T. Damour and J. F. Donoghue, “Constraints on the variability of quark masses from nuclear binding,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 014014, arXiv:0712.2968 [hep-ph]

  41. [41]

    The Nuclear Central Force in the Chiral Limit

    J. F. Donoghue, “The Nuclear central force in the chiral limit,” Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 024002, arXiv:nucl-th/0603016

  42. [42]

    Zur Theorie der Kernmassen,

    C. F. V. Weizsacker, “Zur Theorie der Kernmassen,” Z. Phys. 96 (1935) 431–458

  43. [43]

    J. D. Walecka, Theoretical Nuclear And Subnuclear Physics. World Scientific Publishing Company, 2 ed., 2004

  44. [44]

    Revision of the semi-empirical mass formula coefficients by using the ame2020 database,

    S. Gjorgievska, H. Kochankovski, K. Stankovic, and L. Barandovski, “Revision of the semi-empirical mass formula coefficients by using the ame2020 database,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 426 (2024) 113403. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002954932400503X

  45. [45]

    Energy spectra of small bosonic clusters having a large two-body scattering length

    M. Gattobigio, A. Kievsky, and M. Viviani, “Energy spectra of small bosonic clusters having a large two-body scattering length,” Phys. Rev. A 86 (2012) 042513, arXiv:1206.0854 [physics.atm-clus]

  46. [46]

    An updated view on the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies,

    D. Barducci and C. Toni, “An updated view on the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies,” JHEP 02 (2023) 154, arXiv:2212.06453 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: JHEP 07, 168 (2023)]

  47. [47]

    A. R. Edmonds, Angular momentum in quantum mechanics . Princeton University Press

  48. [48]

    The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references,

    M. Wang, W. J. Huang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, “The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references,” Chin. Phys. C 45 no. 3, (2021) 030003

  49. [49]

    Rare K40 Decay with Implications for Fundamental Physics and Geochronology,

    KDK Collaboration, M. Stukel et al., “Rare K40 Decay with Implications for Fundamental Physics and Geochronology,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 5, (2023) 052503, arXiv:2211.10319 [nucl-ex]

  50. [50]

    Tableau du Laboratoire National Henry Becquerell

    “Tableau du Laboratoire National Henry Becquerell.” http://www.lnhb.fr/accueil/donnees-nucleaires/donnees-nucleaires-tableau/

  51. [51]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits.” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July, 2020

  52. [52]

    Universal bound on QCD axions from supernovae,

    K. Springmann, M. Stadlbauer, S. Stelzl, and A. Weiler, “A Universal Bound on QCD Axions from Supernovae,” arXiv:2410.19902 [hep-ph]

  53. [53]

    Axion signatures from supernova explosions through the nucleon electric-dipole portal,

    G. Lucente, L. Mastrototaro, P. Carenza, L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, and A. Mirizzi, “Axion signatures from supernova explosions through the nucleon electric-dipole portal,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 12, (2022) 123020, arXiv:2203.15812 [hep-ph]

  54. [54]

    Probing axions with neutron star inspirals and other stellar processes

    A. Hook and J. Huang, “Probing axions with neutron star inspirals and other stellar processes,” JHEP 06 (2018) 036, arXiv:1708.08464 [hep-ph]

  55. [55]

    White dwarfs as a probe of exceptionally light QCD axions,

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl, and A. Weiler, “White dwarfs as a probe of light QCD axions,” arXiv:2211.02661 [hep-ph]

  56. [56]

    Constraining Light QCD Axions with Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,

    A. G´ omez-Ba˜ n´ on, K. Bartnick, K. Springmann, and J. A. Pons, “Constraining Light QCD Axions with Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 25, (2024) 251002, arXiv:2408.07740 [hep-ph]

  57. [57]

    Neutron stars with exceptionally light QCD axions,

    M. Kumamoto, J. Huang, C. Drischler, M. Baryakhtar, and S. Reddy, “Pi in the Sky: Neutron Stars with Exceptionally Light QCD Axions,” arXiv:2410.21590 [hep-ph] . 21

  58. [58]

    First Constraints on Nuclear Coupling of Axionlike Particles from the Binary Neutron Star Gravitational Wave Event GW170817,

    J. Zhang, Z. Lyu, J. Huang, M. C. Johnson, L. Sagunski, M. Sakellariadou, and H. Yang, “First Constraints on Nuclear Coupling of Axionlike Particles from the Binary Neutron Star Gravitational Wave Event GW170817,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 16, (2021) 161101, arXiv:2105.13963 [hep-ph]

  59. [59]

    Constraining the mass of dark photons and axion-like particles through black-hole superradiance

    V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, M. Middleton, P. Pani, and J. E. Santos, “Constraining the mass of dark photons and axion-like particles through black-hole superradiance,” JCAP 03 (2018) 043, arXiv:1801.01420 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Superradiance Exclusions in the Landscape of Type IIB String Theory,

    V. M. Mehta, M. Demirtas, C. Long, D. J. E. Marsh, L. Mcallister, and M. J. Stott, “Superradiance Exclusions in the Landscape of Type IIB String Theory,” arXiv:2011.08693 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    Black hole superradiance of self-interacting scalar fields,

    M. Baryakhtar, M. Galanis, R. Lasenby, and O. Simon, “Black hole superradiance of self-interacting scalar fields,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 9, (2021) 095019, arXiv:2011.11646 [hep-ph]

  62. [62]

    Properties of ultralight bosons from heavy quasar spins via superradiance,

    C. ¨Unal, F. Pacucci, and A. Loeb, “Properties of ultralight bosons from heavy quasar spins via superradiance,” JCAP 05 (2021) 007, arXiv:2012.12790 [hep-ph]

  63. [63]

    Getting more out of 8 black hole superradiance: a statistically rigorous approach to ultralight boson constraints from black hole spin measurements,

    S. Hoof, D. J. E. Marsh, J. Sisk-Reyn´ es, J. H. Matthews, and C. Reynolds, “Getting More Out of Black Hole Superradiance: a Statistically Rigorous Approach to Ultralight Boson Constraints,” arXiv:2406.10337 [hep-ph]

  64. [64]

    Stepping up superradiance constraints on axions,

    S. J. Witte and A. Mummery, “Stepping Up Superradiance Constraints on Axions,” arXiv:2412.03655 [hep-ph]

  65. [65]

    Constraining Axion Dark Matter with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    K. Blum, R. T. D’Agnolo, M. Lisanti, and B. R. Safdi, “Constraining Axion Dark Matter with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,” Phys. Lett. B 737 (2014) 30–33, arXiv:1401.6460 [hep-ph]

  66. [66]

    Recurrent axion stars collapse with dark radiation emission and their cosmological constraints,

    P. J. Fox, N. Weiner, and H. Xiao, “Recurrent axion stars collapse with dark radiation emission and their cosmological constraints,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 9, (2023) 095043, arXiv:2302.00685 [hep-ph]

  67. [67]

    Solving the Hierarchy Problem Discretely

    A. Hook, “Solving the Hierarchy Problem Discretely,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 26, (2018) 261802, arXiv:1802.10093 [hep-ph]

  68. [68]

    An even lighter QCD axion,

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez, and A. Ringwald, “An even lighter QCD axion,” JHEP 05 (2021) 184, arXiv:2102.00012 [hep-ph]

  69. [69]

    Dark matter from an even lighter QCD axion: trapped misalignment,

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez, and A. Ringwald, “Dark matter from an even lighter QCD axion: trapped misalignment,” JCAP 10 (2021) 001, arXiv:2102.01082 [hep-ph]

  70. [70]

    From axion quality and naturalness problems to a high-quality ZN QCD relaxion,

    A. Banerjee, J. Eby, and G. Perez, “From axion quality and naturalness problems to a high-quality ZN QCD relaxion,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 11, (2023) 115011, arXiv:2210.05690 [hep-ph]

  71. [71]

    Observation of Non-Exponential Orbital Electron Capture Decays of Hydrogen-Like $^{140}$Pr and $^{142}$Pm Ions

    Y. A. Litvinov et al., “Observation of Non-Exponential Orbital Electron Capture Decays of Hydrogen-Like 140Pr and 142Pm Ions,” Phys. Lett. B 664 (2008) 162–168, arXiv:0801.2079 [nucl-ex]

  72. [72]

    New test of modulated electron capture decay of hydrogen-like 142Pm ions: precision measurement of purely exponential decay,

    FRS-ESR, ILIMA, SP ARC, TBWD Collaboration, F. C. Ozturk et al., “New test of modulated electron capture decay of hydrogen-like 142Pm ions: precision measurement of purely exponential decay,” Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134800, arXiv:1907.06920 [nucl-ex]

  73. [73]

    Direct Q-Value Determination of the β- Decay of Re187,

    P. Filianin et al., “Direct Q-Value Determination of the β- Decay of Re187,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 7, (2021) 072502, arXiv:2108.07039 [nucl-ex]

  74. [74]

    Direct Measurement of the Mass Difference of Ho163 and Dy163 Solves the Q-Value Puzzle for the Neutrino Mass Determination

    ECHo Collaboration, S. Eliseev et al., “Direct Measurement of the Mass Difference of 163Ho and 163Dy Solves the Q-Value Puzzle for the Neutrino Mass Determination,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 no. 6, (2015) 062501, arXiv:1604.04210 [physics.ins-det]

  75. [75]

    A NEW WAY TO MEASURE NEUTRINO MASSES,

    A. De Rujula, “A NEW WAY TO MEASURE NEUTRINO MASSES,” Nucl. Phys. B 188 (1981) 414–458. 22

  76. [76]

    Calorimetric Measurements of 163Ho Decay as Tools to Determine the Electron Neutrino Mass,

    A. De Rujula and M. Lusignoli, “Calorimetric Measurements of 163Ho Decay as Tools to Determine the Electron Neutrino Mass,” Phys. Lett. B 118 (1982) 429

  77. [77]

    New limits from the Milano neutrino mass experiment with thermal microcalorimeters,

    M. Sisti et al., “New limits from the Milano neutrino mass experiment with thermal microcalorimeters,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 520 (2004) 125–131

  78. [78]

    An updated overview of the HOLMES status,

    M. Borghesi et al., “An updated overview of the HOLMES status,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1051 (2023) 168205

  79. [79]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum mechanics: non-relativistic theory . 23