pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.16672 · v1 · pith:UG7I4OOPnew · submitted 2025-01-28 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.CL· cs.IR· cs.LO

VeriFact: Verifying Facts in LLM-Generated Clinical Text with Electronic Health Records

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.CLcs.IRcs.LO
keywords verifacttextclinicalpatientagreementaverageclinicianelectronic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Methods to ensure factual accuracy of text generated by large language models (LLM) in clinical medicine are lacking. VeriFact is an artificial intelligence system that combines retrieval-augmented generation and LLM-as-a-Judge to verify whether LLM-generated text is factually supported by a patient's medical history based on their electronic health record (EHR). To evaluate this system, we introduce VeriFact-BHC, a new dataset that decomposes Brief Hospital Course narratives from discharge summaries into a set of simple statements with clinician annotations for whether each statement is supported by the patient's EHR clinical notes. Whereas highest agreement between clinicians was 88.5%, VeriFact achieves up to 92.7% agreement when compared to a denoised and adjudicated average human clinican ground truth, suggesting that VeriFact exceeds the average clinician's ability to fact-check text against a patient's medical record. VeriFact may accelerate the development of LLM-based EHR applications by removing current evaluation bottlenecks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM-as-a-Judge in Healthcare: A Scoping Analysis of Applications, Methods, and Human Alignment

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Scoping review of 134 studies on LLM-as-a-Judge in healthcare finds concentration in clinical decision support and NLP, frequent use of OpenAI models with prompt engineering, and moderate-to-strong human alignment whe...

  2. Verification Mirage: Mapping the Reliability Boundary of Self-Verification in Medical VQA

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Self-verification in medical VQA creates a verification mirage where verifiers exhibit high error and agreement bias on wrong answers, with reliability strongly conditioned on task type.

  3. Deployment-Centered Evaluation: Predicting Query-Level Rejection Risk in a Clinical LLM System

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A pre-response classifier predicts user rejection risk for clinical LLM outputs with AUROC 0.719 over 4.5 months of deployment data by incorporating deployment-specific context.