pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.15690 · v1 · pith:GAQGHFBEnew · submitted 2024-12-20 · 💻 cs.IR · cs.AI· cs.CL

Level-Navi Agent: A Framework and benchmark for Chinese Web Search Agents

classification 💻 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CL
keywords searchagentagentsevaluationlevel-navibeenchinesecomplex
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs), adopted to understand human language, drive the development of artificial intelligence (AI) web search agents. Compared to traditional search engines, LLM-powered AI search agents are capable of understanding and responding to complex queries with greater depth, enabling more accurate operations and better context recognition. However, little attention and effort has been paid to the Chinese web search, which results in that the capabilities of open-source models have not been uniformly and fairly evaluated. The difficulty lies in lacking three aspects: an unified agent framework, an accurately labeled dataset, and a suitable evaluation metric. To address these issues, we propose a general-purpose and training-free web search agent by level-aware navigation, Level-Navi Agent, accompanied by a well-annotated dataset (Web24) and a suitable evaluation metric. Level-Navi Agent can think through complex user questions and conduct searches across various levels on the internet to gather information for questions. Meanwhile, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs under fair settings. To further facilitate future research, source code is available at Github.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BrowseComp-ZH: Benchmarking Web Browsing Ability of Large Language Models in Chinese

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    BrowseComp-ZH is a new benchmark of 289 Chinese web questions where even the strongest LLM agents reach only 42.9% accuracy.