The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2504.09249 · v1 · pith:GK3A6YJV · submitted 2025-04-12 · cs.CV · cs.IR· cs.LG· cs.MM

NoTeS-Bank: Benchmarking Neural Transcription and Search for Scientific Notes Understanding

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:GK3A6YJVrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV cs.IRcs.LGcs.MM
keywords notes-bankmodelsreasoningbenchmarkdocumentnotesstructuredtranscription
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Understanding and reasoning over academic handwritten notes remains a challenge in document AI, particularly for mathematical equations, diagrams, and scientific notations. Existing visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks focus on printed or structured handwritten text, limiting generalization to real-world note-taking. To address this, we introduce NoTeS-Bank, an evaluation benchmark for Neural Transcription and Search in note-based question answering. NoTeS-Bank comprises complex notes across multiple domains, requiring models to process unstructured and multimodal content. The benchmark defines two tasks: (1) Evidence-Based VQA, where models retrieve localized answers with bounding-box evidence, and (2) Open-Domain VQA, where models classify the domain before retrieving relevant documents and answers. Unlike classical Document VQA datasets relying on optical character recognition (OCR) and structured data, NoTeS-BANK demands vision-language fusion, retrieval, and multimodal reasoning. We benchmark state-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and retrieval frameworks, exposing structured transcription and reasoning limitations. NoTeS-Bank provides a rigorous evaluation with NDCG@5, MRR, Recall@K, IoU, and ANLS, establishing a new standard for visual document understanding and reasoning.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.