pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.10107 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-12 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph · cond-mat.str-el

A Momentum-Resolved X-ray Thomson Scattering Benchmark of Electronic-Response Models in Warm Dense Aluminium

Dmitrii S. Bespalov , Ulf Zastrau , Zhandos A. Moldabekov , Thomas Gawne , Tobias Dornheim , Moyassar Meshhal , Alexis Amouretti , Michal Andrzejewski
show 53 more authors
Karen Appel Carsten Baehtz Erik Brambrink Khachiwan Buakor Carolina Camarda David Chin Gilbert Collins C\'eline Cr\'epeisson Adrien Descamps Jon Eggert Luke Fletcher Alessandro Forte Gianluca Gregori Marion Harmand Oliver S. Humphries Hauke H\"oppner Jonas Kuhlke William Lynn Julian L\"utgert Masruri Masruri Emma M. McBride Ryan Stewart McWilliams Alan Augusto Sanjuan Mora Jean-Paul Naedler Paul Neumayer Charlotte Palmer Alexander Pelka Lea Pennacchioni Calum Prestwood Natalia A. Pukhareva Chongbing Qu Divyanshu Ranjan Ronald Redmer Michael Roper Christoph Sahle Samuel Schumacher Jan-Patrick Schwinkendorf Melanie J. Sieber Madison Singleton Ethan Smith Christian Sternemann Thomas Stevens Michael Stevenson Cornelius Strohm Minxue Tang Monika Toncian Toma Toncian Thomas Tschentscher Sam M. Vinko Justin S. Wark Max Wilke Dominik Kraus Thomas R. Preston
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph cond-mat.str-el
keywords warm dense matterx-ray Thomson scatteringplasmon dispersionab initio calculationsshock compressionaluminiumelectronic response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Shock-compressed aluminium XRTS data shows uniform-electron-gas models overestimate resonance energy by up to 8 eV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports angle-resolved femtosecond x-ray Thomson scattering measurements on aluminium compressed by a laser-driven shock to 50 GPa at the European XFEL. The observed plasmon dispersion and line shapes deviate from predictions of the uniform-electron-gas models commonly used to interpret XRTS spectra in warm dense matter. These models overestimate the resonance energy by as much as 8 electron volts. In contrast, ab initio calculations that incorporate the disorder induced by the shock wave match the experimental data within the measurement uncertainty. The work establishes that accounting for the actual ionic structure is essential for accurate analysis of electronic response in warm dense aluminium.

Core claim

The measured plasmon dispersion and line shape show that the de facto standard approach for analysing XRTS spectra, based on uniform-electron-gas models, systematically overestimates the resonance energy by up to 8 eV. An ab initio approach that accounts for shock-induced disorder agrees within the experimental uncertainty and demonstrates that accounting for shock-induced disorder is critical for interpreting shock-compressed systems.

What carries the argument

Momentum-resolved femtosecond x-ray Thomson scattering over a wide range of scattering wavevectors combined with ab initio calculations of the electronic response that include ionic disorder from the shock.

If this is right

  • XRTS-based diagnostics of warm dense matter conditions require ab initio models rather than uniform-electron-gas approximations to avoid systematic errors in inferred parameters.
  • Shock-induced disorder must be included in theoretical models of the electronic structure of compressed materials.
  • Ab initio treatments are necessary for reliable XRTS inference in warm dense aluminium and similar systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The discrepancy may appear in other metals or compounds under comparable compression, affecting diagnostics in high-energy-density experiments.
  • Testing the ab initio approach across a broader range of pressures and temperatures could identify where uniform models remain adequate.
  • Incorporating these corrected response functions into hydrodynamic simulations could refine predictions for material behavior in extreme conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The ab initio calculations correctly capture the shock-induced disorder and electronic response in the specific density and temperature regime reached in the experiment.

What would settle it

An XRTS measurement at a scattering wavevector where the uniform-electron-gas model predicts a resonance energy within experimental uncertainty of the data while the ab initio model deviates by more than 5 eV would challenge the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10107 by Adrien Descamps, Alan Augusto Sanjuan Mora, Alessandro Forte, Alexander Pelka, Alexis Amouretti, Calum Prestwood, Carolina Camarda, Carsten Baehtz, C\'eline Cr\'epeisson, Charlotte Palmer, Chongbing Qu, Christian Sternemann, Christoph Sahle, Cornelius Strohm, David Chin, Divyanshu Ranjan, Dmitrii S. Bespalov, Dominik Kraus, Emma M. McBride, Erik Brambrink, Ethan Smith, Gianluca Gregori, Gilbert Collins, Hauke H\"oppner, Jan-Patrick Schwinkendorf, Jean-Paul Naedler, Jonas Kuhlke, Jon Eggert, Julian L\"utgert, Justin S. Wark, Karen Appel, Khachiwan Buakor, Lea Pennacchioni, Luke Fletcher, Madison Singleton, Marion Harmand, Masruri Masruri, Max Wilke, Melanie J. Sieber, Michael Roper, Michael Stevenson, Michal Andrzejewski, Minxue Tang, Monika Toncian, Moyassar Meshhal, Natalia A. Pukhareva, Oliver S. Humphries, Paul Neumayer, Ronald Redmer, Ryan Stewart McWilliams, Sam M. Vinko, Samuel Schumacher, Thomas Gawne, Thomas R. Preston, Thomas Stevens, Thomas Tschentscher, Tobias Dornheim, Toma Toncian, Ulf Zastrau, William Lynn, Zhandos A. Moldabekov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Momentum-resolved XRTS and structural diagnostics in shock-compressed aluminium. a) Representative XRTS spectra from ambient (blue) and driven (red) aluminium, measured at four momentum transfers. Solid lines show averaged data; shaded bands represent shot-to-shot uncertainty. The driven plasmon peak shifts to higher energy loss and broadens with increasing k. For reference, the source-and-instrument funct… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Real-space electronic structure and hydrodynamic state of the aluminium sample. a) Kohn-Sham DFT visualisation of the valence electron density in crystalline (ambient) aluminium at 300 K, showing delocalised electron clouds (blue) and symmetry-imposed charge contours (gold). b) Simulated profiles of mass density (blue) and temperature (red) across the Al part of the target at the XFEL probing time (6.3 ns)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Inelastic X-ray scattering spectra from laser-compressed aluminium at two representative momentum transfers, k = 0.99 and 1.28 ˚A −1 , normalised to the elastic peak. Experimental data (red lines, with shaded bands indicating uncertainty) are compared with theoretical predictions from TDDFT (blue), the random-phase approximation (RPA, orange), and static local field corrections (LFC, light blue). We also s… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Extracted plasmon peak positions (red markers) compared with theoretical predictions from TDDFT (blue line), LFC (orange), and RPA (green). For reference, we also show a representative data point from Preston et al. [41] (black marker), illustrating the much larger experimental uncertainty typical of previous measurements at similar conditions. Error bars combine fitting uncertainties and shot-to-shot expe… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Full set of inelastic X-ray scattering spectra at four momentum transfers. Experimental spectra (red lines, shaded bands: one standard deviation) from laser-compressed aluminium are shown for k = 0.99, 1.28, 1.57, and 2.57 ˚A −1 . Theoretical predictions – TDDFT (blue, shaded), static local field correction (LFC, cyan), and random-phase approximation (RPA, gold) – are convolved with the source-and-instrume… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An examination of the contribution of the ablator to the inelastic signal at different scattering vectors. The reference experimental spectra from the full target (Al+ablator) at ambient conditions are plotted with the blue lines. Similar reference data were collected on just the ablator (orange), and subtracted from the blue line to create an “Al-only” spectrum (green). The orange and green areas represen… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: TDDFT-computed XRTS spectra at varying densities (no instrumental broadening). Normalised intensity profiles of the dynamic structure factor S(k, ω) are shown for four momentum transfers (k = 0.99, 1.28, 1.57, and 2.57 ˚A −1 ), calculated via time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) using the adiabatic approximation. Spectra are shown for four different mass densities: 3.75, 4.00, 4.25, and 4.50 g/… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Experimental geometry for X-ray scattering measurements. Schematic layout of the experiment, showing the orientation of the optical drive laser (red) and the XFEL probe (black) with respect to the target. Scattered X-rays were detected by a von H´amos HAPG spectrometer for XRTS and area detectors for XRD, allowing simultaneous access to inelastic and structural information from the same plasma volume. The … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Measured plasmon dispersion and comparison to ambient reference data. Extracted plasmon peak positions from the present experiment (blue markers) as a function of momentum transfer, compared with ambient measurements from Gawne et al. [38] (green squares) and the quadratic Bohm-Gross dispersion fit (dashed line). The shaded area indicates the onset of the pair continuum, above which the plasmon resonance i… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Shot-to-shot variation of the DiPOLE drive laser as monitored during XRTS experiments. Individual pulse energies recorded for each shot in a typical X-ray scattering run. The solid line marks the median energy (26 J), with the shaded band denoting the ±0.75% range. This degree of stability is essential for reliable spectral accumulation and quantitative analysis. High-fidelity XRTS measurements of laser-d… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Raw X-ray diffraction spectra for aluminium. (Left) XRD spectrum recorded in the unshocked (“cold”) state, showing a sharp (111) Bragg peak at 2θ ≈ 38.5 ◦ , characteristic of ambient face-centred cubic aluminium. (Right) Corresponding spectrum obtained in the laser-compressed (“driven”) state. Here, a residual (111) peak at the ambient position is still visible; this feature arises from uncompressed regio… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Averaged source-and-instrument function (SIF) profile. The SIF is represented as the sum of two Voigt profiles: a narrow component (Voigt 1, blue line) with a FWHM of 3.3 eV, and a broader pedestal (Voigt 2, green line) with a FWHM of 22.7 eV and a relative peak height of 0.08. Their sum (black line) gives the combined instrument response, with a total FWHM of 3.5 eV as obtained from direct fits to the me… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The robust diagnosis of conditions generated in warm dense matter (WDM) experiments remains a persistent challenge. Here we describe the measurement of shock-compressed aluminium at 50 GPa with angle-resolved femtosecond x-ray Thomson scattering (XRTS) over a wide range of scattering wavevectors at the European XFEL. The measured plasmon dispersion and line shape show that the de facto standard approach for analysing XRTS spectra, based on uniform-electron-gas models, systematically overestimates the resonance energy by up to 8 eV. We present an ab initio approach that agrees within the experimental uncertainty and demonstrates that accounting for shock-induced disorder is critical for interpreting shock-compressed systems, providing evidence that ab initio treatments are required for reliable XRTS inference in warm dense aluminium.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports angle-resolved femtosecond XRTS measurements on shock-compressed aluminium at 50 GPa at the European XFEL. The measured plasmon dispersion and line shapes are compared to uniform-electron-gas (UEG) models and ab initio calculations; the paper claims UEG models systematically overestimate the resonance energy by up to 8 eV while ab initio results that incorporate shock-induced ionic disorder agree with experiment within uncertainty.

Significance. If the ab initio ionic configurations are accurate, the work supplies a useful experimental benchmark demonstrating that standard UEG-based analysis of XRTS spectra can introduce systematic errors of several eV in warm dense aluminium, and that explicit treatment of ionic disorder improves inference. The quantified discrepancy and wide-q coverage are strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [theoretical modeling and comparison to data] Section describing the theoretical modeling and comparison to data: the headline claim that ab initio XRTS calculations reproduce the measured plasmon dispersion and lineshape within uncertainty (while UEG models do not) rests on the fidelity of the molecular-dynamics ionic configurations at the experimental density and temperature. The manuscript should supply explicit checks—pair-correlation functions, equilibration diagnostics, finite-size convergence, and sensitivity to the interatomic potential—to exclude the possibility that the 8 eV improvement arises from compensatory errors rather than genuine physical improvement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the maximum discrepancy as 'up to 8 eV' without indicating the scattering wavevector at which this occurs; adding this detail would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly label which curves correspond to experimental data, UEG models, and ab initio results to aid quick comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the significance of our XRTS benchmark on warm dense aluminium. We address the major comment on the theoretical modeling section below. We agree that additional validation of the molecular-dynamics configurations strengthens the manuscript and have incorporated the requested checks in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Section describing the theoretical modeling and comparison to data: the headline claim that ab initio XRTS calculations reproduce the measured plasmon dispersion and lineshape within uncertainty (while UEG models do not) rests on the fidelity of the molecular-dynamics ionic configurations at the experimental density and temperature. The manuscript should supply explicit checks—pair-correlation functions, equilibration diagnostics, finite-size convergence, and sensitivity to the interatomic potential—to exclude the possibility that the 8 eV improvement arises from compensatory errors rather than genuine physical improvement.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the ionic configurations is essential to substantiate our claim that the agreement with experiment arises from the physical inclusion of shock-induced disorder. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection with the following checks: pair-correlation functions g(r) computed from the MD trajectories, which display the expected liquid-like structure with a pronounced first peak at the experimental density; equilibration diagnostics showing stable temperature and conserved total energy after an initial 5 ps thermalization phase with fluctuations below 1%; finite-size convergence tests performed with 256-, 500-, and 1024-atom cells, demonstrating that plasmon energies converge to within 0.5 eV for the largest cells (well inside experimental uncertainty); and sensitivity tests to the interatomic potential by repeating the XRTS calculations with both a standard embedded-atom-method potential and a DFT-trained machine-learned potential, yielding spectral differences below 2 eV across the measured q-range—substantially smaller than the 8 eV offset relative to UEG models. These additions confirm that the improvement is not an artifact of compensatory errors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental benchmark against independent ab initio calculations

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental XRTS measurements of plasmon dispersion and lineshape in shock-compressed aluminium and compares them to separate ab initio calculations of electronic response on MD-generated ionic configurations. No derivation step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the discrepancy with UEG models is established by external data comparison rather than internal redefinition. The ionic-structure modeling is performed independently of the XRTS spectra under analysis and does not rely on the target result for its validity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard assumptions of x-ray scattering theory and density-functional theory for the ab initio part; no new free parameters are introduced to force agreement, and the disorder is taken from the shock-compression conditions rather than fitted.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The electronic response can be computed from first-principles density-functional theory including ionic disorder from the shock.
    Invoked when presenting the ab initio approach that matches experiment.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5950 in / 1259 out tokens · 29627 ms · 2026-05-18T17:52:42.273340+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Monte-Carlo Event Generation for X-Ray Thomson Scattering Analysis

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A proof-of-principle event-driven Monte-Carlo framework samples XRTS events from differential cross sections and passes them through detector simulations to preserve kinematic information and support model-agnostic analysis.

  2. X-Ray Diagnostics Analysis Verification and Exploration (xDAVE) Code for the Prediction and Interpretation of X-Ray Thomson Scattering Experiments

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    xDAVE is a new code implementing the Chihara decomposition for rapid DSF calculation and XRTS spectrum analysis, validated on OMEGA beryllium data and coupled to ray-tracing for predictions while highlighting energy-d...

  3. Model-free interpretation of X-ray Thomson scattering measurements

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper reviews the use of the imaginary-time correlation function to extract temperature, normalization, and Rayleigh weight from XRTS spectra without model dependence.

  4. Overview of X-ray Thomson scattering measurements of extreme states of matter

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    XRTS has become a leading diagnostic for extreme states of matter, and this review compiles prior experiments, analysis methods, and future directions.

  5. Quantum effects in plasmas

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Quantum effects govern behavior in warm dense matter and inertial fusion plasmas and are best modeled by combining quantum methods through downfolding from first-principles simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02494

    Vorberger, J.et al.Roadmap for warm dense matter physics (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02494. 2505.02494

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    P., Redmer, R

    Graziani, F., Desjarlais, M. P., Redmer, R. & Trickey, S. B. (eds.)Frontiers and Challenges in Warm Dense Matter, vol. 96 ofLecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering(Springer, Cham, 2014). URL https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-04912-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04912-0 2014

  3. [3]

    Fortov, V. E. Extreme states of matter on earth and in space.Physics-Uspekhi52, 615 (2009). URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.0179.200906h.0653

    work page doi:10.3367/ufne.0179.200906h.0653 2009

  4. [4]

    URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/21

    Becker, A.et al.Ab initio equations of state for hydrogen (h-reos.3) and helium (he-reos.3) and their implications for the interior of brown dwarfs.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series215, 21 (2014). URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/21

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/21 2014

  5. [5]

    L.et al.A measurement of the equation of state of carbon envelopes of white dwarfs.Nature584, 51–54 (2020)

    Kritcher, A. L.et al.A measurement of the equation of state of carbon envelopes of white dwarfs.Nature584, 51–54 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2535-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2535-y 2020

  6. [6]

    & Tremblay, P.-E

    Saumon, D., Blouin, S. & Tremblay, P.-E. Current challenges in the physics of white dwarf stars.Physics Reports 988, 1–63 (2022). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157322003180. Current Challenges in the Physics of White Dwarf Stars

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10970

    Kraus, D.et al.Nanosecond formation of diamond and lonsdaleite by shock compression of graphite.Nature Communications7, 10970 (2016). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10970. 12

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms10970 2016

  8. [8]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0219-9

    Kraus, D.et al.Formation of diamonds in laser-compressed hydrocarbons at planetary interior conditions.Nature Astronomy1, 606–611 (2017). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0219-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0219-9 2017

  9. [9]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02147-x

    Frost, M.et al.Diamond precipitation dynamics from hydrocarbons at icy planet interior conditions.Nature Astronomy8, 174–181 (2024). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02147-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02147-x 2024

  10. [10]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09035-6

    Kraus, D.et al.The structure of liquid carbon elucidated by in situ x-ray diffraction.Nature642, 351–355 (2025). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09035-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09035-6 2025

  11. [11]

    & Hurricane, O

    Betti, R. & Hurricane, O. A. Inertial-confinement fusion with lasers.Nature Physics12, 435–448 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3736

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3736 2016

  12. [12]

    A.et al.Physics principles of inertial confinement fusion and u.s

    Hurricane, O. A.et al.Physics principles of inertial confinement fusion and u.s. program overview.Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 025005 (2023). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.025005

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.025005 2023

  13. [13]

    Abu-Shawareb, H.et al.Achievement of target gain larger than unity in an inertial fusion experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 065102 (2024). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.065102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.065102 2024

  14. [14]

    X., Militzer, B., Goncharov, V

    Hu, S. X., Militzer, B., Goncharov, V. N. & Skupsky, S. First-principles equation-of-state table of deuterium for inertial confinement fusion applications.Phys. Rev. B84, 224109 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.84.224109

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Grad- uate Texts in Physics (Springer International Publishing, 2018)

    Drake, R.High-Energy-Density Physics: Foundation of Inertial Fusion and Experimental Astrophysics. Grad- uate Texts in Physics (Springer International Publishing, 2018). URL https://books.google.de/books?id= 1AoZtAEACAAJ

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143225

    Bonitz, M.et al.Ab initio simulation of warm dense matter.Physics of Plasmas27, 042710 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143225. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pop/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1. 5143225/15927521/042710_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5143225 2020

  17. [17]

    Dornheim, Z

    Dornheim, T.et al.Electronic density response of warm dense matter.Physics of Plasmas30, 032705 (2023). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0138955

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0138955 2023

  18. [18]

    Difference in x-ray scattering between metallic and non-metallic liquids due to conduction electrons

    Chihara, J. Difference in x-ray scattering between metallic and non-metallic liquids due to conduction electrons. Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics17, 295 (1987). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/17/2/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4608/17/2/002 1987

  19. [19]

    H., Rozmus, W., Lee, R

    Gregori, G., Glenzer, S. H., Rozmus, W., Lee, R. W. & Landen, O. L. Theoretical model of x-ray scattering as a dense matter probe.Phys. Rev. E67, 026412 (2003). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026412

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.67.026412 2003

  20. [20]

    Scale-Free Networks: Complex Webs in Nature and Technology

    Ullrich, C. A.Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory: Concepts and Applications(Oxford University Press, 2011). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563029.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563029.001.0001 2011

  21. [21]

    Goerigk, L.et al.A look at the density functional theory zoo with the advanced gmtkn55 database for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics and noncovalent interactions.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 32184–32215 (2017). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7CP04913G

    work page doi:10.1039/c7cp04913g 2017

  22. [22]

    Dornheim, T.et al.Unraveling electronic correlations in warm dense quantum plasmas.Nature Communications 16, 5103 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    A., Vorberger, J

    B¨ ohme, M., Moldabekov, Z. A., Vorberger, J. & Dornheim, T. Static electronic density response of warm dense hydrogen: Ab initio path integral monte carlo simulations.Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 066402 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.066402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.066402 2022

  24. [24]

    Glenzer, S. H. & Redmer, R. X-ray thomson scattering in high energy density plasmas.Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1625–1663 (2009). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1625

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1625 2009

  25. [25]

    URL10.1107/s1600577521007335

    Zastrau, U.et al.The High Energy Density Scientific Instrument at the European XFEL.Journal of Synchrotron Radiation28, 1393–1416 (2021). URL10.1107/s1600577521007335

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    A MHz-repetition-rate hard X- ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting lin- ear accelerator,

    Decking, W.et al.A mhz-repetition-rate hard x-ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting linear accelerator.Nature Photonics14, 391–397 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0607-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0607-z 2020

  27. [27]

    B.et al.Ultrabright x-ray laser scattering for dynamic warm dense matter physics.Nature Photonics 9, 274–279 (2015)

    Fletcher, L. B.et al.Ultrabright x-ray laser scattering for dynamic warm dense matter physics.Nature Photonics 9, 274–279 (2015). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.41. 13

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.41 2015

  28. [28]

    In2015 European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics - European Quantum Electronics Conference, CA 3 6 (Optica Publishing Group, 2015)

    Butcher, T.et al.Dipole100: A 100 j, 10 hz cryogenically cooled yb:yag diode pumped solid-state laser. In2015 European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics - European Quantum Electronics Conference, CA 3 6 (Optica Publishing Group, 2015). URLhttps://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=CLEO_Europe-2015-CA_3_6

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    InConference on Laser Inertial Fusion Energy (CLIFE2012), vol

    Mason, P.et al.Dipole – an efficient and scalable high pulse energy and high average power cryogenic gas cooled multi-slab amplifier concept. InConference on Laser Inertial Fusion Energy (CLIFE2012), vol. 8 (2012). URL https://doi.org/10.1585/pfr.8.3404051

    work page doi:10.1585/pfr.8.3404051 2012

  30. [30]

    Mason, P.et al.Development of a 100j, 10hz laser for compression experiments at the high energy density instrument at the european xfel.High Power Laser Science and Engineering6, e65 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    & Vignale, G.Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2008)

    Giuliani, G. & Vignale, G.Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2008). URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/quantum-theory-of-the-electron-liquid/ FFB8D0E5F6F6A6D1A1E6D0C1C1C1C1C1

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    & Bonitz, M

    Dornheim, T., Groth, S., Vorberger, J. & Bonitz, M. Ab initio path integral monte carlo results for the dynamic structure factor of correlated electrons: From the electron liquid to warm dense matter.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 255001 (2018). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.255001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.255001 2018

  33. [33]

    & Schmitz, J

    Sch¨ ulke, W., Schulte-Schrepping, H. & Schmitz, J. R. Dynamic structure of electrons in al metal studied by inelastic x-ray scattering.Phys. Rev. B47, 12426–12436 (1993). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.47.12426

    work page 1993

  34. [34]

    Z., Larson, B

    Tischler, J. Z., Larson, B. C., Zschack, P., Fleszar, A. & Eguiluz, A. G. Interplay between inelastic x-ray scattering and ab initio density-response calculations: Insight into the electronic correlations in aluminum.physica status solidi (b)237, 280–288 (2003). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pssb.200301777. https://onlinelibrary.wile...

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.200301777 2003

  35. [35]

    Cazzaniga, M.et al.Dynamical response function in sodium and aluminum from time-dependent density-functional theory.Phys. Rev. B84, 075109 (2011). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.075109

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.075109 2011

  36. [36]

    Krane, K. J. Dispersion and damping of volume plasmons in polycrystalline aluminium and indium.Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics8, 2133 (1978). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/8/10/013

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4608/8/10/013 1978

  37. [37]

    & Fink, J

    Spr¨ osser-Prou, J., vom Felde, A. & Fink, J. Aluminum bulk-plasmon dispersion and its anisotropy.Phys. Rev. B 40, 5799–5801 (1989). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.5799

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.40.5799 1989

  38. [38]

    Gawne, T.et al.Ultrahigh resolution x-ray thomson scattering measurements at the european x-ray free electron laser.Phys. Rev. B109, L241112 (2024). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L241112

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.l241112 2024

  39. [39]

    Electronic Structure7, 025002 (2025)

    Gawne, T.et al.Strong geometry dependence of the x-ray thomson scattering spectrum in single crystal silicon. Electronic Structure7, 025002 (2025). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2516-1075/adc054

    work page doi:10.1088/2516-1075/adc054 2025

  40. [40]

    Sperling, P.et al.Free-electron x-ray laser measurements of collisional-damped plasmons in isochorically heated warm dense matter.Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 115001 (2015). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.115001

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    R.et al.Measurements of the momentum-dependence of plasmonic excitations in mat- ter around 1 mbar using an x-ray free electron laser.Applied Physics Letters114, 014101 (2019)

    Preston, T. R.et al.Measurements of the momentum-dependence of plasmonic excitations in mat- ter around 1 mbar using an x-ray free electron laser.Applied Physics Letters114, 014101 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5070140. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1. 5070140/13119548/014101_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5070140 2019

  42. [42]

    Witte, B. B. L.et al.Warm dense matter demonstrating non-drude conductivity from observations of nonlinear plasmon damping.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 225001 (2017). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 118.225001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2017

  43. [43]

    Witte, B. B. L.et al.Observations of non-linear plasmon damping in dense plasmas.Physics of Plasmas25, 056901 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017889. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pop/article-pdf/ doi/10.1063/1.5017889/14700998/056901_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5017889 2018

  44. [44]

    & Vorberger, J

    Ramakrishna, K., Cangi, A., Dornheim, T., Baczewski, A. & Vorberger, J. First-principles modeling of plasmons in aluminum under ambient and extreme conditions.Phys. Rev. B103, 125118 (2021). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125118. 14

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.125118 2021

  45. [45]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0271027

    Descamps, A.et al.Calibration and characterization of the line-visar diagnostic at the hed-hibef instrument at the europeanXFEL.Review of Scientific Instruments96, 075206 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0271027. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0271027/20604255/075206_1_5. 0271027.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0271027/20604255/075206_1_5 2025

  46. [47]

    & Bonitz, M

    Dornheim, T., Groth, S. & Bonitz, M. The uniform electron gas at warm dense matter conditions.Physics Reports 744, 1–86 (2018). URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157318300516

    work page 2018

  47. [48]

    & R¨ opke, G

    Fortmann, C., Wierling, A. & R¨ opke, G. Influence of local-field corrections on thomson scattering in collision- dominated two-component plasmas.Phys. Rev. E81, 026405 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.81.026405

    work page 2010

  48. [49]

    Dornheim, T.et al.Effective static approximation: A fast and reliable tool for warm-dense matter theory.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 235001 (2020). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.235001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.235001 2020

  49. [50]

    URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/11/P11033

    Preston, T.et al.Design and performance characterisation of the hapg von h´ amos spectrometer at the high energy density instrument of the european xfel.Journal of Instrumentation15, P11033 (2020). URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/11/P11033

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/11/p11033 2020

  50. [51]

    & Woodruff, P

    MacFarlane, J., Golovkin, I. & Woodruff, P. Helios-cr – a 1-d radiation-magnetohydrodynamics code with inline atomic kinetics modeling.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer99, 381–397 (2006). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022407305001627. Radiative Properties of Hot Dense Matter

    work page 2006

  51. [52]

    Alatas, A.et al.Atomic form-factor measurements in the low-momentum transfer region for li, be, and al by inelastic x-ray scattering.Phys. Rev. B77, 064301 (2008). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 77.064301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 2008

  52. [53]

    Shahbazyan, T. V. Landau damping of surface plasmons in metal nanostructures.Phys. Rev. B94, 235431 (2016). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235431

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.235431 2016

  53. [54]

    Valle Basagoiti, M. A. Damping rate of plasmons and photons in a degenerate nonrelativistic plasma.Phys. Rev. D57, 7618–7621 (1998). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.57.7618

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.7618 1998

  54. [55]

    Haas, F., Mendon¸ ca, J. T. & Ter¸ cas, H. Plasmon dispersion and landau damping in the nonlinear quantum regime. Phys. Rev. E108, 055203 (2023). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.055203

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.108.055203 2023

  55. [56]

    W.et al.Improving dynamic collision frequencies: Impacts on dynamic structure factors and stopping powers in warm dense matter.Physics of Plasmas30, 062703 (2023)

    Hentschel, T. W.et al.Improving dynamic collision frequencies: Impacts on dynamic structure factors and stopping powers in warm dense matter.Physics of Plasmas30, 062703 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0143738. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pop/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0143738/17936669/062703_1_5. 0143738.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0143738/17936669/062703_1_5 2023

  56. [57]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35578-7

    Dornheim, T.et al.Accurate temperature diagnostics for matter under extreme conditions.Nature Communications 13, 7911 (2022). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35578-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35578-7 2022

  57. [58]

    Journal of Applied Physics64, 4474–4477 (1988)

    Cottet, F.et al.Two-dimensional study of shock breakout at the rear face of laser irradiated metallic targets. Journal of Applied Physics64, 4474–4477 (1988). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.341271. https://pubs. aip.org/aip/jap/article-pdf/64/9/4474/18620632/4474_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.341271 1988

  58. [59]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0953-8984/21/39/395502

    Giannozzi, P.et al.Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter21, 395502 (2009). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0953-8984/21/39/395502

    work page 2009

  59. [60]

    Giannozzi, O

    Giannozzi, P.et al.Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 465901 (2017). URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa8f79 2017

  60. [61]

    Giannozzi, O

    Giannozzi, P.et al.Quantum espresso toward the exascale.The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 154105 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005082. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5. 0005082/16721881/154105_1_online.pdf. 15

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0005082 2020

  61. [62]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00249

    Carnimeo, I.et al.Quantum espresso: One further step toward the exascale.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation19, 6992–7006 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00249. PMID: 37523670, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00249

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00249 2023

  62. [63]

    & Baroni, S

    Timrov, I., Vast, N., Gebauer, R. & Baroni, S. turboeels—a code for the simulation of the electron energy loss and inelastic x-ray scattering spectra using the liouville–lanczos approach to time-dependent density-functional perturbation theory.Computer Physics Communications196, 460–469 (2015). URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S00104...

    work page 2015

  63. [64]

    A.et al.Applying the liouville–lanczos method of time-dependent density-functional theory to warm dense matter.Matter and Radiation at Extremes10, 047601 (2025)

    Moldabekov, Z. A.et al.Applying the liouville–lanczos method of time-dependent density-functional theory to warm dense matter.Matter and Radiation at Extremes10, 047601 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0263947. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/mre/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0263947/20510493/047601_1_5. 0263947.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0263947/20510493/047601_1_5 2025

  64. [65]

    URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org/ pseudopotentials

    We used the pseudopotential Al.pbe-rrkj.UPF from the quantum espresso pseudopotential data base: http://www.quantum-espresso.org/pseudopotentials. URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org/ pseudopotentials

    work page

  65. [66]

    and Burke, Kieron and Ernzerhof, Matthias , month = oct, year =

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865–3868 (1996). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  66. [67]

    & Dornheim, T

    Moldabekov, Z., Vorberger, J. & Dornheim, T. From density response to energy functionals and back: An ab initio perspective on matter under extreme conditions.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics140, 104144 (2025). URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641024000486

    work page 2025

  67. [68]

    & Cangi, A

    Moldabekov, Z., Dornheim, T., B¨ ohme, M., Vorberger, J. & Cangi, A. The relevance of electronic perturbations in the warm dense electron gas.The Journal of Chemical Physics155, 124116 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0062325. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5. 0062325/15618076/124116_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0062325 2021

  68. [69]

    URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.16955.2503.16955

    Gawne, T.et al.Heart: A new x-ray tracing code for mosaic crystal spectrometers (2025). URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.16955.2503.16955

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [70]

    Nature Communications11, 2620 (2020)

    Frydrych, S.et al.Demonstration of x-ray thomson scattering as diagnostics for miscibility in warm dense matter. Nature Communications11, 2620 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16426-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16426-y 2020

  70. [71]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1574181809000548

    D¨ oppner, T.et al.Temperature measurement through detailed balance in x-ray thomson scattering.High Energy Density Physics5, 182–186 (2009). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1574181809000548

    work page 2009

  71. [72]

    Zur frage der einwirkung der w¨ armebewegung auf die interferenz von r¨ ontgenstrahlen.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik17, 398–408 (1923)

    Waller, I. Zur frage der einwirkung der w¨ armebewegung auf die interferenz von r¨ ontgenstrahlen.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik17, 398–408 (1923). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF01328696

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01328696 1923

  72. [73]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0222072

    Gawne, T.et al.Effects of mosaic crystal instrument functions on x-ray thomson scattering diagnostics.Journal of Applied Physics136, 105902 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0222072. https://pubs.aip.org/ aip/jap/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0222072/20150309/105902_1_5.0222072.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0222072 2024

  73. [74]

    C., Minor, A

    Wehmeyer, G., Bustillo, K. C., Minor, A. M. & Dames, C. Measuring temperature-dependent thermal dif- fuse scattering using scanning transmission electron microscopy.Applied Physics Letters113, 253101 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5066111. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1. 5066111/13187961/253101_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5066111 2018

  74. [75]

    Al-only” spectrum. These full target and “Al-only

    Libera, M., Ott, J. & Siangchaew, K. Temperature-dependent high-angle electron scattering from a phase-separated amorphous gete thin film.Ultramicroscopy63, 81–91 (1996). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0304399196000216. 16 Supplementary Information A: Complete series of normalised inelastic X-ray scattering spectra from laser-compr...

    work page arXiv 1996