pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04308 · v1 · pith:EN2M3HG7new · submitted 2026-06-03 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.IR· cs.SI

Creative Reading: Scaffolding Reading for Transformation

Sophia Liu , Sarah Abowitz , Yijun Liu , Sarah Sterman , Shm Garanganao Almeda , Max Kreminski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.IRcs.SI
keywords creative readingreading augmentationliterary theoryscholarly sensemakingcreativity supporthuman-computer interactionnarrative theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reading augmentation should support readers in creating their own interpretations and transforming themselves instead of treating reading as information transmission.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Current augmentation tools often delegate interpretation to machines under an implicit model of reading as quick extraction or discard. This paper proposes creative reading as the alternative goal for augmentation systems. The approach draws literary and narrative theories into conversation with scholarly sensemaking and creativity support to create a provocation-oriented design space. The design space values the process of reading in order to preserve a plurality of possible readings and allow readers to change over time through that process.

Core claim

Creative reading is reading augmentation that supports readers in creating both readings and themselves as readers. By putting literary and narrative theories into conversation with scholarly sensemaking and creativity support, the work presents a provocation-oriented design space for valuing the process of reading as a way of preserving a plurality of readings and transforming readers over time.

What carries the argument

Creative reading, the goal of augmentation that supports readers in creating readings and themselves as readers, carried by a provocation-oriented design space drawn from literary and narrative theories.

If this is right

  • Scholarly readers would retain responsibility for deciding what a text implies and why it matters rather than delegating that step.
  • Augmentation interfaces would prioritize prompts and structures that surface multiple readings instead of converging on a single summary.
  • Readers would experience measurable change in their own interpretive practices and identity as readers across repeated engagements.
  • Designers would treat the process of reading itself as the valued output rather than speed or volume of information processed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same design space could be tested in non-scholarly contexts such as long-form journalism or personal narrative reading to check whether plurality and transformation appear outside academic settings.
  • If adopted, the approach would require new evaluation metrics focused on interpretive diversity and reader self-change rather than recall accuracy or time saved.
  • Interfaces built this way might reduce the appeal of fully automated reading agents in favor of hybrid systems that keep human interpretive labor visible.

Load-bearing premise

Current reading augmentation systems implicitly frame reading as information transmission in ways that change reading outcomes undesirably, and a design space drawn from literary theories can address this by preserving plurality of readings.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the diversity of interpretations and self-reported reader transformation produced by standard summarization or extraction tools versus tools built from the proposed creative reading design space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04308 by Max Kreminski, Sarah Abowitz, Sarah Sterman, Shm Garanganao Almeda, Sophia Liu, Yijun Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A provocation-oriented design space for creative reading, mapping systems along two axes: reading for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reading augmentation systems increasingly help readers process text at scale. While these tools address real constraints of time and cognitive load, they often implicitly frame reading as information transmission, or "reading to discard," delegating interpretation and effort to the machine. Yet this delegation changes the outcome of reading. For example, in scholarly reading, deciding what a research text implies and why it matters is central to the work of scholarly production. We propose creative reading as an alternative goal: reading augmentation that supports readers in creating both readings and themselves as readers. By putting literary and narrative theories into conversation with scholarly sensemaking and creativity support, we present a provocation-oriented design space for valuing the process of reading as a way of preserving a plurality of readings and transforming readers over time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes creative reading as an alternative goal for reading augmentation systems. It critiques current systems for implicitly framing reading as information transmission ('reading to discard'), which alters the outcomes of reading. By drawing on literary and narrative theories alongside scholarly sensemaking and creativity support, the paper presents a provocation-oriented design space aimed at supporting readers in creating readings and transforming themselves while preserving a plurality of interpretations.

Significance. If this conceptual proposal holds, it has the potential to influence the field of human-computer interaction by encouraging the design of reading tools that prioritize interpretive depth and reader transformation over mere efficiency and information extraction. This could foster interdisciplinary connections between HCI, literary studies, and creativity research, leading to augmentation systems that support long-term scholarly development.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract introduces several key terms (e.g., 'creative reading', 'reading to discard') without immediate definitions; adding brief parenthetical explanations or a glossary would improve accessibility for readers outside literary theory.
  2. The paper could benefit from a more explicit statement of how the design space differs from or builds upon existing creativity support tools in HCI.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, recognition of the paper's potential significance, and recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a conceptual provocation in HCI that defines 'creative reading' as an alternative goal for augmentation systems and sketches a design space drawn from literary and narrative theories. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or formal derivation chain. The central move is a definitional reframing presented as independent of any prior fitted quantities or self-citation load-bearing premises. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper contributes a new conceptual framework and terminology rather than empirical results or mathematical models; the main addition is the proposed design space synthesized from existing domains.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Reading augmentation systems often implicitly frame reading as information transmission or 'reading to discard'
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the current implicit framing of existing tools.
  • ad hoc to paper Synthesizing literary and narrative theories with scholarly sensemaking and creativity support produces a valuable provocation-oriented design space
    The paper's core contribution relies on this synthesis being productive for preserving plurality of readings.
invented entities (1)
  • creative reading no independent evidence
    purpose: Alternative goal for reading augmentation that supports readers in creating readings and transforming themselves
    New term and framing introduced by the authors as the central proposal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5670 in / 1369 out tokens · 46733 ms · 2026-06-28T05:01:22.000244+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Espen J. Aarseth. 1997.Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md

    1997

  2. [2]

    Sarah Abowitz and Gregory Crane. 2026. Tompkinsia: A Data-Driven Com- mentary Augmentation. InProceedings of the CHI 2026 Workshop on Science and Technology for Augmenting Reading (STAR)

    2026

  3. [3]

    Mark W. R. Anderson. 2025. W(h)ither Spatial Hypertext?. InProceedings of the 36th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 100–112. doi:10.1145/3720553. 3746683

    work page doi:10.1145/3720553 2025

  4. [4]

    Mark W. R. Anderson and David E. Millard. 2023. Seven Hypertexts. InProceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media(Rome, Italy)(HT ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 42, 15 pages. doi:10.1145/3603163.3609048

    work page doi:10.1145/3603163.3609048 2023

  5. [5]

    Nürnberg

    Claus Atzenbeck and Peter J. Nürnberg. 2019. Hypertext as Method. InProceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media(Hof, Germany)(HT ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–38. doi:10. 1145/3342220.3343669

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Tal August, Andrew Head, Alexa Siu, Elena L Glassman, Jonathan K Kummerfeld, Joseph Chee Chang, Lucy Lu Wang, and Marti A Hearst. 2026. Science and Technology for Augmenting Reading (STAR). InProceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    2026

  7. [7]

    1974.S/Z: An Essay

    Roland Barthes. 1974.S/Z: An Essay. Macmillan, New York

    1974

  8. [8]

    Roland Barthes. 1977. The Death of the Author. InImage-Music-Text, Stephen Heath (Ed.). Fontana Press, 142–148. Originally published 1967/1968

    1977

  9. [9]

    Daniel Bennett and Elisa D. Mekler. 2024. Beyond Intrinsic Motivation: The Role of Autonomous Motivation in User Experience.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.31, 5, Article 60 (Nov. 2024), 41 pages. doi:10.1145/3689044

    work page doi:10.1145/3689044 2024

  10. [10]

    Mark Bernstein. 2009. On hypertext narrative. InProceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia(Torino, Italy)(HT ’09). Association for Creative Reading: Scaffolding Reading for Transformation Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5–14. doi:10.1145/1557914.1557920

    work page doi:10.1145/1557914.1557920 2009

  11. [11]

    Mark Bernstein, Silas Hooper, and Mark W. R. Anderson. 2025. Back To The Information City. InProceedings of the 36th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 118–126. doi:10.1145/3720553.3746664

    work page doi:10.1145/3720553.3746664 2025

  12. [12]

    Vannevar Bush. 1945. As We May Think.Atlantic Monthly176, 1 (March 1945), 641–649. doi:10.1145/227181.227186

    work page doi:10.1145/227181.227186 1945

  13. [13]

    May Kristine Jonson Carlon, Donn Emmanuel Gonda, Eden Mariquit Andrews, John Maurice Gayed, Robert Anthony Olexa, and Jeffrey Scott Cross. 2022. Educa- tional Nonlinear Stories with Twine. InProceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale(New York City, NY, USA)(L@S ’22). Association for Com- puting Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 248–251. doi:1...

    work page doi:10.1145/3491140.3528287 2022

  14. [14]

    Myra Cheng, Cinoo Lee, Pranav Khadpe, Sunny Yu, Dyllan Han, and Dan Jurafsky. 2026. Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial in- tentions and promotes dependence.Science391, 6792 (2026), eaec8352. arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aec8352 doi:10.1126/science.aec8352

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aec8352 2026

  15. [15]

    2019.Casual Creators: Defining a Genre of Autotelic Creativity Support Systems

    Katherine Compton. 2019.Casual Creators: Defining a Genre of Autotelic Creativity Support Systems. Ph. D. Dissertation. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations- theses/casual-creators-defining-genre-autotelic/docview/2300563742/se-2 Copy- right - Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works; Last upd...

    arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Omar El Malki, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Manoel Horta Ribeiro. 2026. Bonsai: Intentional and Personalized Social Media Feeds. InProceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’26). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1395, 24 pages. doi:10.1145/3772318.3791855

    work page doi:10.1145/3772318.3791855 2026

  17. [17]

    Engelbart

    Douglas C. Engelbart. 1962.Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Frame- work. SRI Summary Report AFOSR-3233. Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California. https://www.dougengelbart.org/pubs/augment-3906.html

    1962

  18. [18]

    1980.Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities

    Stanley Fish. 1980.Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    1980

  19. [19]

    Raymond Fok, Hita Kambhamettu, Luca Soldaini, Jonathan Bragg, Kyle Lo, Marti Hearst, Andrew Head, and Daniel S Weld. 2023. Scim: Intelligent Skimming Sup- port for Scientific Papers. InProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(Sydney, NSW, Australia)(IUI ’23). Association for Com- puting Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3581641.3584034 2023

  20. [20]

    Glăveanu and Ronald A

    Vlad P. Glăveanu and Ronald A. Beghetto. 2021. Creative Experience: A Non- Standard Definition of Creativity.Creativity Research Journal33, 2 (2021), 75–80. doi:10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606

    work page doi:10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606 2021

  21. [21]

    Ziwei Gu, Joyce Zhou, Ning-Er Lei, Jonathan K Kummerfeld, Mahmood Jasim, Narges Mahyar, and Elena L Glassman. 2025. AbstractExplorer: Leveraging Structure-Mapping Theory to Enhance Comparative Close Reading at Scale. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

    2025

  22. [22]

    Weld, and Marti A

    Andrew Head, Kyle Lo, Dongyeop Kang, Raymond Fok, Sam Skjonsberg, Daniel S. Weld, and Marti A. Hearst. 2021. Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and Symbols. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Yokohama, Japan)(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3411764.3445648 2021

  23. [23]

    Hill, James D

    William C. Hill, James D. Hollan, Dave Wroblewski, and Tim McCandless. 1992. Edit wear and read wear. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Monterey, California, USA)(CHI ’92). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–9. doi:10.1145/142750.142751

    work page doi:10.1145/142750.142751 1992

  24. [24]

    Qihang Hou, Guowei Liu, and Pinpin Zhu. 2026. HMA: A Hierarchical Multi- Agent System for Document Question Answering. InProceedings of the 2025 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 871–876. doi:10. 1145/3797552.3797691

    arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Yuxuan Huang, Yihang Chen, Haozheng Zhang, Kang Li, Huichi Zhou, Meng Fang, Linyi Yang, Xiaoguang Li, Lifeng Shang, Songcen Xu, Jianye Hao, Kun Shao, and Jun Wang. 2025. Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap. arXiv:2506.18096 [cs.AI] https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18096

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Interactive Fiction Technology Foundation. 2022. Twine: An open-source tool for telling interactive, nonlinear stories. https://twinery.org/

    2022

  27. [27]

    1974.The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett

    Wolfgang Iser. 1974.The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    1974

  28. [28]

    Bernstein

    Joy Kim, Maneesh Agrawala, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2017. Mosaic: Designing Online Creative Communities for Sharing Works-in-Progress. InProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Portland, Oregon, USA)(CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 246–258. doi:10.1145/2998181.2998195

    work page doi:10.1145/2998181.2998195 2017

  29. [29]

    2015.Interactive Digital Narrative: History, Theory and Practice

    Hartmut Koenitz, Gabriele Ferri, Mads Haahr, Digdem Sezen, and Tongu Ibrahim Sezen. 2015.Interactive Digital Narrative: History, Theory and Practice. Routledge, USA

    2015

  30. [30]

    Max Kreminski and Michael Mateas. 2021. Reflective Creators. InICCC. https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:237181869

    2021

  31. [31]

    Anukriti Kumar. 2026. Beyond Frictionless: Designing Productive Friction into Augmented Reading Interfaces. InProceedings of the CHI 2026 Workshop on Science and Technology for Automated Reading (STAR)

    2026

  32. [32]

    Alghamdi, Tal August, Avinash Bhat, Madiha Zahrah Choksi, Senjuti Dutta, Jin L.C

    Mina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum, Vipul Raheja, Hua Shen, Subhashini Venugopalan, Thiemo Wambsganss, David Zhou, Emad A. Alghamdi, Tal August, Avinash Bhat, Madiha Zahrah Choksi, Senjuti Dutta, Jin L.C. Guo, Md Naimul Hoque, Yewon Kim, Simon Knight, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Antonette Shibani, Disha Shrivastava, Lila Shr...

    work page doi:10.1145/3613904.3642697 2024

  33. [33]

    Sophia Liu and Shm Garanganao Almeda. 2025. Agency Among Agents: De- signing with Hypertextual Friction in the Algorithmic Web. InAdjunct Pro- ceedings of the 36th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT Ad- junct ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 30–34. doi:10.1145/3720533.3750065

    work page doi:10.1145/3720533.3750065 2025

  34. [34]

    Kyle Lo, Joseph Chee Chang, Andrew Head, Jonathan Bragg, Amy X Zhang, Cassidy Trier, Chloe Anastasiades, Tal August, Russell Authur, Danielle Bragg, et al. 2024. The semantic reader project.Commun. ACM67, 10 (2024), 50–61

    2024

  35. [35]

    Janet H. Murray. 1997.Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cy- berspace. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    1997

  36. [36]

    Kumiyo Nakakoji. 2006. Meanings of tools, support, and uses for creative design processes. InInternational Design Research Symposium, Vol. 6. 156–165

    2006

  37. [37]

    Jeanne Nakamura and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2002. The Concept of Flow. In Handbook of Positive Psychology, C. R. Snyder and Shane J. Lopez (Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York, 89–105

    2002

  38. [38]

    1987.Literary Machines

    Ted Nelson. 1987.Literary Machines. Published by the author, S.l. Includes technical details related to the Xanadu hypertext system

    1987

  39. [39]

    O’Day and Robin Jeffries

    Vicki L. O’Day and Robin Jeffries. 1993. Orienteering in an information landscape: how information seekers get from here to there. InProceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Amsterdam, The Netherlands)(CHI ’93). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 438–445. doi:10.1145/169059.169365

    work page doi:10.1145/169059.169365 1993

  40. [40]

    Zhang, Jonathan Bragg, and Joseph Chee Chang

    Srishti Palani, Aakanksha Naik, Doug Downey, Amy X. Zhang, Jonathan Bragg, and Joseph Chee Chang. 2023. Relatedly: Scaffolding Literature Reviews with Existing Related Work Sections. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany)(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 742...

    arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Angela S. Raines. 2005. Louise Rosenblatt: An Advocate for Nurturing Democratic Participation through Literary Transactions.Talking Points17, 1 (Oct. 2005), 28–31. doi:10.58680/tp20054532

    work page doi:10.58680/tp20054532 2005

  42. [42]

    Rosenblatt

    Louise M. Rosenblatt. 1938.Literature as Exploration. D. Appleton-Century Com- pany, New York, London. Published for the Progressive Education Association

    1938

  43. [43]

    Santos, Yphtach Lelkes, and Simon A

    Fernando P. Santos, Yphtach Lelkes, and Simon A. Levin. 2021. Link recom- mendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, 50 (2021), e2102141118. arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2102141118 doi:10.1073/pnas. 2102141118

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2102141118 2021

  44. [44]

    Jianna So, Connie Cheng, and Sonia Krishna Murthy. 2026. Beyond Anthropo- morphism: a Spectrum of Interface Metaphors for LLMs. InProceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’26). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 120, 7 pages. doi:10.1145/3772363.3798591

    work page doi:10.1145/3772363.3798591 2026

  45. [45]

    Susan Stephens. 2002. Commenting on Fragments. InThe Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory, Roy K. Gibson and Christina Shuttleworth Kraus (Eds.). Brill, 67–88. doi:10.1163/9789047400943_005

    work page doi:10.1163/9789047400943_005 2002

  46. [46]

    Tashman and W

    Craig S. Tashman and W. Keith Edwards. 2011. LiquidText: a flexible, multitouch environment to support active reading. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Vancouver, BC, Canada)(CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3285–3294. doi:10. 1145/1978942.1979430

    arXiv 2011

  47. [47]

    Ackerman, and David R

    Jaime Teevan, Christine Alvarado, Mark S. Ackerman, and David R. Karger

  48. [48]

    InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Vienna, Austria)(CHI ’04)

    The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Vienna, Austria)(CHI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 415–422. doi:10.1145/985692.985745

    work page doi:10.1145/985692.985745

  49. [49]

    Alice Vitali. 2026. What Are We Really Trying to Do, When We Augment Reading?. InProceedings of the CHI 2026 Workshop on Science and Technology for Automated Reading (STAR)

    2026

  50. [50]

    Yiwei Xu, Saloni Dash, Sungha Kang, Wang Liao, and Emma S. Spiro. 2025. AI summaries in online search influence users’ attitudes. arXiv:2511.22809 [cs.HC] https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22809 Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA Sophia Liu, Sarah Abowitz, Yijun Liu, Sarah Sterman, Shm Garanganao Almeda, and Max Kreminski

    arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Haoqi Zhang. 2024. Searching for the Non-Consequential: Dialectical Activities in HCI and the Limits of Computers. InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA)(CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 297, 13 pages. doi:10. 1145/3613904.3641945

    arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    David Zhou and Sarah Sterman. 2023. Creative struggle: Arguing for the value of difficulty in supporting ownership and self-expression in creative writing. InThe Second Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants (In2Writing)

    2023

  53. [53]

    Siyi Zhu and Joel Chan. 2023. Exploring Distributed Synthesis: In-Progress Findings from Guided Tours of Scholarly Knowledge Synthesis Work Practices with A Distributed Lens. InCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Minneapolis, MN, USA)(CSCW ’23 Companion). Association for Computing Machin...

    work page doi:10.1145/3584931.3606985 2023

  54. [54]

    Siyi Zhu, Robert Haisfield, Brendan Langen, and Joel Chan. 2024. Patterns of Hypertext-Augmented Sensemaking. InProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(Pittsburgh, PA, USA)(UIST ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 143, 17 pages. doi:10.1145/3654777.3676338

    work page doi:10.1145/3654777.3676338 2024