Recognition: unknown
Narrow scope for resolution-limit-free community detection
read the original abstract
Detecting communities in large networks has drawn much attention over the years. While modularity remains one of the more popular methods of community detection, the so-called resolution limit remains a significant drawback. To overcome this issue, it was recently suggested that instead of comparing the network to a random null model, as is done in modularity, it should be compared to a constant factor. However, it is unclear what is meant exactly by "resolution-limit-free", that is, not suffering from the resolution limit. Furthermore, the question remains what other methods could be classified as resolution-limit-free. In this paper we suggest a rigorous definition and derive some basic properties of resolution-limit-free methods. More importantly, we are able to prove exactly which class of community detection methods are resolution-limit-free. Furthermore, we analyze which methods are not resolution-limit-free, suggesting there is only a limited scope for resolution-limit-free community detection methods. Finally, we provide such a natural formulation, and show it performs superbly.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Dynamics of the Transformer Residual Stream: Coupling Spectral Geometry to Network Topology
Training installs a depth-dependent spectral gradient and low-rank bottleneck in LLM residual streams whose amplification or suppression of graph communities is predicted by local operator type.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.